Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, April 01, 2024

The United States sold more liquefied natural gas on the global market than any other country in 2023, surpassing yet another milestone in the nation's transformation into a fossil fuel superpower. U.S. exports saw massive growth last year, surging 12% compared to 2022.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Installations of wind turbines, solar panels and batteries hit a record high last year. But so, too, did oil production. The U.S. now "produces more crude than any country, ever," the EIA announced last month. U.S. exports of crude are soaring.

LNG drillers across the U.S. broke records for production last year. By December, wells across the lower 48 states were generating nearly 106 billion cubic feet of gas per day.

The U.S. used to import much of its fuel from abroad, leaving the country sensitive to supply cuts from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Now, attempts by OPEC+ - the expanded club that now includes Russia - to cut supplies do little to drive up oil prices, in part because the U.S. currently accounts for such a large share of global production.

Combined with cheap loans from Wall Street, the fracking revolution unleashed an oil- and gas-drilling boom so big, U.S. politicians are still struggling to find the right ways to talk about it. Republicans accused Democrats of squelching the American drilling industry with climate regulations, with GOP lawmakers blaming President Joe Biden's pursuit of more zero-carbon energy for any spike in fuel prices.

So, if Republicans are correct, then how can the U.S. - under Biden - be the top producer of both crude oil and liquified natural gas? Dark Brandon has them not only lying to the American people, they insist on lying to themselves, refusing to acknowledge the US' record setting fossil fuel production. And those who are unable to discern truth from lies have no business in overseeing this nation's energy production, already getting the job done on most current fronts.

#1 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-01 06:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

When you take out the competition literally why wouldn't the US be?

TonyRoma must have been out of the country when Biden banned LNG exportation.

This thread should be hilarious.

#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-04-01 06:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

TonyRoma must have been out of the country when Biden banned LNG exportation.

He didn't ban LNG exports at all numbnuts. Get off the rightwing lie sites and learn some truth. Just like braindead MAGots, you can't tell the truth if your life depended on it.

The long-simmering issue became a top news story in January when President Joe Biden announced he was hitting the pause button on permitting new liquid natural gas, or LNG, export terminals, controversial megaprojects costing billions of dollars along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

It's hard to see how delaying permits on the construction of new plants would affect allies because the pause doesn't halt current shipments or stop work on terminals already under construction.

And such fears "ignore basic trends in global gas markets," according to the Ohio-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, which supports a rapid transition to sustainable energy. "The largest buyers from new U.S. LNG facilities are not European and Asian consumers at all," the institute reported. "Instead, they are large oil and gas traders speculating on their ability to resell LNG at a profit."

yaleclimateconnections.org

You'd rather climb up a tree and tell a lie than stand on your own two feet and present the truth. Be gone you foolish ignoramous.

#3 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-01 07:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 7

OneTiredNumbskull is a complete ----.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-04-01 08:05 PM | Reply

Further:

The Biden administration is pausing approvals of pending applications for liquefied natural gas exports to countries with which the United States does not have free trade agreements [ie., countries that we're not allied with].

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said the pause "will not affect already authorized exports, nor will it impact our ability to supply our allies in Europe, Asia, or other recipients of already authorized exports."

"We remain committed to ensuring our partners' medium-term energy needs are met," she added. "And if needed, the department can determine if exceptions should be made for national security needs."

www.nbcnews.com

OMG... prudence, foresight, and the ability to work towards multiple goals at the same time. No wonder the right wing doesn't know what to honestly say about the US' current fossil fuel industry's record crude/LNG production and exportations.

#5 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-01 08:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"A fossil fuel superpower"

Oh, well good then ... .I guess.

#6 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-01 08:16 PM | Reply

-US' current fossil fuel industry's record crude/LNG production

Producing crude.

Okay ... ...

#7 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-01 08:17 PM | Reply

So producing a record amount climate damaging fossil fuels is fine so long as we export it?

#8 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-01 08:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I have no problem with this, but it is hilarious to watch the hearts of the left change on the "environmental disasters" caused by petroleum...

Progressives can't be taken serious in the least.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-04-01 10:34 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

It's a strange take. I'm shocked Tony would draw attention to the fact the US is contributing to the destruction of the planet by producing record amounts of fossil fuels and selling it.

You can scratch out the destruction of the planet part if it makes you feel better but I thought that's exactly what fossil fuels do ... ..

#10 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-01 10:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I'm shocked Tony would draw attention to the fact the US is contributing to the destruction of the planet by producing record amounts of fossil fuels and selling it.

I'm shocked (not) that both Lefty and Ebs completely missed the context in which this thread was posted, but understanding the dualality of the information actually takes comprehension and more than simplistic linear thinking.

Installations of wind turbines, solar panels and batteries hit a record high last year. But so, too, did oil production.
Under whose governance did the US set records in both renewable green energy production and in-ground fossil fuel extraction? Would everyone rather see this income go to foreign competitors or those employing US workers and facilities?
OMG... prudence, foresight, and the ability to work towards multiple goals at the same time.
What goals would those be? How about creating a more stable energy price environment in the present - at a time where global wars and conflicts are constant threats to the world's supply chains - while at the same time accelerating the eventual switchover to cleaner/renewable energy sources with less upward price volitility in current energy costs?

One cannot simply flip a switch and eliminate the need for fossil fuels immediately in 2024 or any time soon. It will take decades to make this transition and no prognosticator (nor any living Republican) saw it possible for the Biden Administration to serve two masters while it was going on.

It cannot be said that Biden's quest towards renewable green energy itself is stiffling domestic production of fossil fuels when records in both types of energy production are being realized. So Dark Brandon is the right's unacknowledged wet dream hero for fostering conditions leading to all-time record domestic fossil fuel production and he's taking steps - with the pause on new domestic export permits and facilities - to limit even more future environmental damage while assessing how to best move forward with all interests in mind.

#11 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 02:03 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

"destruction of the planet"

The news part of this story isn't the environmental impact.

I'm not sure when that stopped being a novel development. It was common knowledge, albeit vehemently denied by Deplorables, long before Al Gore's movie.

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 02:07 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Would everyone rather see this income go to foreign competitors or those employing US workers and facilities?"
#11 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 02:03 AM

Wow, what a choice.

I've heard Chinese electric cars are quite advanced.

Which competitors?

#13 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2024-04-02 02:59 AM | Reply

To defeat global warming would have taken sacrifice by our economy, by our population, so of course we are setting course for a near future of hellish temperatures. We are led by idiots, and here I mean the American people. I am a nobody from nowhere so I can say it, we had a chance to keep our world from the nightmare of what is coming, but those politicians who fought against an increase in the use of fossil fuels are fighting for their political lives.

#14 | Posted by Hughmass at 2024-04-02 06:40 AM | Reply

...those politicians who fought against an increase in the use of fossil fuels are fighting for their political lives.

As they have been in state/national elections since Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the White House roof because of two main factions: Big Oil and its most numerous political supporters, the GOP.

Acting as though the effort to move from fossil fuels to renewables is simply a choice of simple will isn't based in political reality. One has to be elected to influence energy policy from inside the federal government. And even there, those who do are faced with massive coordinated opposition, ridicule, anti-green propaganda along with personal and partisan demonization.

#15 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 08:29 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

I have no problem with this, but it is hilarious to watch the hearts of the left change on the "environmental disasters" caused by petroleum...
Progressives can't be taken serious in the least.

#9 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You had a problem with it on another thread.

Troll.

#16 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-04-02 10:17 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"I have no problem with this, but it is hilarious to watch the hearts of the left change on the "environmental disasters" caused by petroleum..."

Except that they don't but if an election could be swung to the insane right based on Energy self-sufficiency then I applaud Biden beating GQP lunatics at their own game. The more gas and diwsel vehicles that can be replaced by LPG vehicles the cleaner our environment will be.

#17 | Posted by danni at 2024-04-02 10:22 AM | Reply

You can scratch out the destruction of the planet part if it makes you feel better but I thought that's exactly what fossil fuels do ... ..

#10 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Now you are sounding like Goatman who claimed it was hypocritical to denigrate big oil while we were all still trapped into using big oils gas and oil.

I guess you didn't know that natural gas is the cleanest of the fossil fuels.

We are in a transition phase and if we are to transition to cleaner energy sources natural gas will necessarily play a big part.

A natural gas power generator is much cleaner and cheaper than oil or coal and if we cannot go nuclear then natural gas is next best bet until we perfect cleaner energy sources.

#18 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-04-02 12:30 PM | Reply

"but those politicians who fought against an increase in the use of fossil fuels are fighting for their political lives."

so politicians are worrying about their re-election more than the environment.

and people are okay with that......all of the sudden?

Good to know.

"One has to be elected to influence energy policy from inside the federal government"

okay....

#19 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 12:46 PM | Reply

-I'm shocked (not) that both Lefty and Ebs completely missed the context in which this thread was posted,

Actually, I'm shocked you missed the context I presented before posting this.

Patting Biden on the back for breaking a record in crude production?

#20 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 12:54 PM | Reply

#14

regardless of his politics here is why no matter what we do to gut our economies we will not put a dent in C02 rates.

www.youtube.com

His summary is exactly as I've been saying since this topic came up while I was still in my Meteorology undergrad... We need to be investing in carbon sequestration technologies.

#21 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2024-04-02 01:12 PM | Reply

Patting Biden on the back for breaking a record in crude production?

#20 | Posted by eberly

More like throwing evidence and data in the face of republicans to prove that their narratives about biden are fictional

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-04-02 01:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

so politicians are worrying about their re-election more than the environment.
and people are okay with that......all of the sudden?
#19 | POSTED BY EBERLY

What do you mean, all of a sudden?

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 01:31 PM | Reply

-More like throwing evidence and data in the face of republicans to prove that their narratives about biden are fictional

yeah, that too.

not sure it's worth it to prove that point to republicans. You go backwards with environmentalists with this reality.

Who should Biden care more about? people sensitive to climate change or oil companies and republicans?

Despite all the rhetoric, Biden is pro-oil. pro fossil-fuels. Pro oil company profits. www.washingtonexaminer.com

Exxon Mobil reported $36 billion in profit for the year, supported by further oil and gas production. Chevron outlined profits of $21.4 billion " the second-largest profits in a decade for both. Shell, on Thursday, reported adjusted earnings of $28.25 billion for the year, down significantly from 2022 but also the second-largest in a decade.

"Take that Republicans!!"

LOL

#24 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 02:25 PM | Reply

Despite all the rhetoric, Biden is pro-oil. pro fossil-fuels. Pro oil company profits. www.washingtonexaminer.com

Exxon Mobil reported $36 billion in profit for the year, supported by further oil and gas production. Chevron outlined profits of $21.4 billion " the second-largest profits in a decade for both. Shell, on Thursday, reported adjusted earnings of $28.25 billion for the year, down significantly from 2022 but also the second-largest in a decade.

"Take that Republicans!!"

LOL

#24 | Posted by eberly

And passed the biggest climate change bill in american history.

#25 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-04-02 02:58 PM | Reply

I forgot to add....and get cheerleaders to actually cheer on oil company profits.

Biden is a stud......

#26 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 03:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

so politicians are worrying about their re-election more than the environment.

Tell me just how effective one unelected citizen is in getting Congress to do anything. You cannot affect change from the outside when you don't have a vote. The need to be elected/re-elected is obvious, and when your opposition continuously lies about, smears, and denigrates green energy at every turn, how your electorate feels about the subject may very well dictate whether one wins or loses.

Biden is pro-oil. pro fossil-fuels. Pro oil company profits.

That's precisely why he mandated a pause in allowing more permits for more exportation and construction of LNG infrastructure to allow even more LNG to enter the market. He's not trying to intentionally add immediate higher energy costs to the spike of inflation, burdening American businesses and consumers.

Republicans are still saying that Biden regulations are strangling domestic oil and gas production and this mantra is repeated ad nauseum by elected GOP politicians and right wing media. As Speaks noted, Biden championed the biggest climate change bill in US history while simultaneously navigating global energy supply issues caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Honestly, Biden is trying to move towards green energy as quickly and effectively as public opinion and engagement will allow, the difference being that any Republican chosen to replace him will take a 180 degree different track. Biden is the current best hope for continuing the transition to renewable energy even if the fossil fuel industry is raking in record profits at present. One does not negate the other.

#27 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 03:26 PM | Reply

"The difference being that any Republican chosen to replace him will take a 180 degree different track"

how so?

lower production?

lower profits?

#28 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 03:31 PM | Reply

In this thread, we saw how Dummy's Advocate is not exactly the same thing as Devil's Advocate.

Well, some of us did.

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 03:39 PM | Reply

Progressives can't be taken serious in the least.

#9 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

This from the idiot who thinks Biden's WaR oN EnErGyZ!!! is Biden "RuInInG ThE CouNtrYz!!!

#30 | Posted by jpw at 2024-04-02 03:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

how so?

Federally defunding green energy projects and increasing subsidies for even more domestic fossil fuel production and exportation.

#31 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 03:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

It's all right there in the Republican Party Platform, Eberly! ;)

#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 03:48 PM | Reply

It's interesting to watch as climate deniers complain that fossil fuel production is setting records under Biden.

#33 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-04-02 04:38 PM | Reply

Eberly's climate denial shtick is Obama is one because he owns oceanfront property which will someday be underwater, both literally and figuratively, but since it's still worth millions the entire real estate industry is also a climate denier too.

He abandoned that ruse after big insurance companies started pulling out of climate affected markets. Or maybe it's just on pause. We'll find out soon enough.

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 04:42 PM | Reply

-It's interesting to watch as climate deniers complain that fossil fuel production is setting records under Biden.

don't know if they are complaining...but not denying it's possible they are.

But right here I'm wondering if we don't have a new crop of deniers who are cheering record production and record oil company profits.

it's not that they are deniers.....but that they really don't give a crap.

#35 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 04:50 PM | Reply

This is in spite of biden&Co's, war on fossil fuels, not because of him.

#36 | Posted by MSgt at 2024-04-02 05:00 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

#36 You're raining on Eberly's parade! Stop that.

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-04-02 05:03 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#36 | POSTED BY MSG

You should link the meme you're quoting.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-04-02 05:04 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

This is in spite of biden&Co's, war on fossil fuels, not because of him.

#36 | Posted by MSgt

Even when evidence and data prove you wrong, you cling onto your lies and fantasies, because to do otherwise would be admitting you're a sucker who got duped.

#39 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-04-02 05:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Even when evidence and data prove you wrong, you cling onto your lies and fantasies, because to do otherwise would be admitting you're a sucker who got duped.

#39 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2024-04-02 05:19 PM | REPLY | FLAG;

REALLY?? Then how about you then cite what actions/rules/regulations this anti-Oil&Gas administration has taken to increase the flow and sale of LNG. I'll wait...

#40 | Posted by MSgt at 2024-04-02 05:40 PM | Reply

"Federally defunding green energy projects and increasing subsidies for even more domestic fossil fuel production and exportation."

Fair enough.

#41 | Posted by eberly at 2024-04-02 05:44 PM | Reply

REALLY?? Then how about you then cite what actions/rules/regulations this anti-Oil&Gas administration has taken to increase the flow and sale of LNG. I'll wait...

#40 | Posted by MSgt

Since when do we need to increase the flow of LNG? We're exporting record levels.

#42 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-04-02 06:18 PM | Reply

REALLY?? Then how about you then cite what actions/rules/regulations this anti-Oil&Gas administration has taken to increase the flow and sale of LNG. I'll wait...

Yes, really. You have the question backwards - which is precisely how your mind works anyway. No one here has made any case that Biden is bending over backwards or championing domestic fossil fuel production. With that being said, your destroyed-by-reality assersion that Biden is working against domestic fossil fuel production right now looks as stupid as you do considering this nation is setting all time records for the amounts of fuels extracted and exported.

If it were Biden's immediate goal to cut this production or stymie it, as all the right wing claims, then how is the industry breaking records for production? The point is that the industry has been met with a combination of positive conditions that have allowed it to thrive while Joe Biden has been President, while the former guy with his minions ignore this reality and say that his governance is hurting the industry while it sets both profit and production records.

Either Biden is the worst impediment to domestic oil/gas production in history - actually causing just the opposite to be true - or the right wing narrative of him harming average Americans by his policies is a bald-faced lie. You choose.

#43 | Posted by tonyroma at 2024-04-02 07:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

This from the idiot who thinks Biden's WaR oN EnErGyZ!!! is Biden "RuInInG ThE CouNtrYz!!!

#30 | Posted by jpw at 2024-04-02 03:41 PM | Reply | Flag

From the idiot who refuses to concede to that being exactly what Biden did. You idiots are climate warriors one minute and ---------- oilmen the the next. You can't even make this stuff up.

It must be nice to sit here in your exclusive alternate reality where all 12 of you regular posters trade hand jobs with each other surfing from one side of the spectrum to the other - making sure you bend your reality so that this dementia addled thing you call a president lives up to your (super low) standards.

You dishonest little skid mark.

#44 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-04-02 09:52 PM | Reply

"so that this dementia addled thing you call a president lives up to your (super low) standards"

So has the guy you support admitted he lost the last time around, or is his dementia the type you support?

#45 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-04-02 10:39 PM | Reply

This is in spite of biden&Co's, war on fossil fuels, not because of him.

#36 | Posted by MSgt

When your narrative and reality clash, you will always choose your narrative no matter how much evidence is present of just how f*&^ing awful and wrong it is.

#46 | Posted by jpw at 2024-04-02 11:50 PM | Reply

From the idiot who refuses to concede to that being exactly what Biden did.

LOL there's no arguing with this level of stupidity.

You idiots are climate warriors one minute and ---------- oilmen the the next. You can't even make this stuff up.

Except you literally just did.

Pointing out that your repeating the WaArZ oN EnErGieS!!! nonsense while none of it came true doesn't mean I'm a "---------- oilmen."

It must be nice to sit here in your exclusive alternate reality where all 12 of you regular posters trade hand jobs with each other surfing from one side of the spectrum to the other - making sure you bend your reality so that this dementia addled thing you call a president lives up to your (super low) standards.

You dishonest little skid mark.

#44 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And you close it out with some stupid homoerotic strawmen.

While putting the irony cherry of calling everyone else a dishonest skidmark on top.

You're an idiot. Seriously, there's no simpler way to state it other than you are, objectively, an idiot.

#47 | Posted by jpw at 2024-04-03 12:06 AM | Reply

When your narrative and reality clash, you will always choose your narrative no matter how much evidence is present of just how f*&^ing awful and wrong it is.

#46 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2024-04-02 11:50 PM | FLAG: Still waiting for one of you to cite anything the biden admin has to do with the rise of export LNG....

#48 | Posted by MSgt at 2024-04-03 02:02 PM | Reply

After being proved a liar YET AGAIN, where is oneIQirony now??

#49 | Posted by e1g1 at 2024-04-03 02:20 PM | Reply

#46 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2024-04-02 11:50 PM | FLAG: Still waiting for one of you to cite anything the biden admin has to do with the rise of export LNG....

#48 | Posted by MSgt

Confronting russia and hammering them with severe sanctions.

Unlike your russian puppet cult leader.

#50 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-04-03 02:26 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort