I will say having participated a study a while ago that informed consent even then was somewhat of a joke. Yes they spelled out potential side effects but included parts about some unexpected side effects. Also unless you are a medical expert you can get pretty lost in all the information on the roughly 60 pages I had to sign/initial.

I still don't agree with the ruling as informed consent should be trying to push towards making the informed part more not less accessible to patients but I also don't see where for most people in studies this will make a significant difference.