Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, March 27, 2024

Joe Lieberman, a longtime senator from Connecticut who became the first Jewish American to be nominated on a major party's ticket, died Wednesday. He was 82. Lieberman's family stated that he died "due to complications from a fall. He was 82 years old. His beloved wife, Hadassah, and members of his family were with him as he passed."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Joe, we hardly new ye ...

#1 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-03-27 06:41 PM | Reply

"Joltin' Joe has gone away"

#2 | Posted by shoeless at 2024-03-27 07:13 PM | Reply

ask.funtrivia.com

#3 | Posted by shoeless at 2024-03-27 07:14 PM | Reply

Who Cares?

People will cry over this one about as much as they will over Joe Manchin.

Self Obsessed obstructionists looking to profit from public service.

The Dude single handedly neutered the ACA to placate insurance companies in Connecticut.

He's gone now...

Boo Hoo.

#4 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-27 07:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Former Vice President and sitting Connecticut Senator Joel Lieberman has passed away at age 100. He was the longest serving senator in American history and enjoyed the highest approval rating of any elected Democratic official ever

RIP Joel Loverman

#5 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2024-03-27 07:30 PM | Reply

sitting Connecticut Senator Joel Lieberman has passed away at age 100

Congratulations on retirement.

We really need age limits on government positions.

It should be 70.

Both Biden and Trump should be ineligible.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-27 07:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Too bad but they dont make Democrats like Lieberman anymore. Like most American patriots Joe L. wouldnt put up with the leftist hateful traitorous Dems of today as in like the Biden regime.

#7 | Posted by Robson at 2024-03-27 07:45 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

RIP Joe L.

#8 | Posted by Robson at 2024-03-27 07:46 PM | Reply

Too bad but they dont make Democrats like Lieberman anymore. Like most American patriots Joe L. wouldnt put up with the leftist hateful traitorous Dems of today as in like the Biden regime.

#7 | Posted by Robson

Look at you praising the democrat who stood up against his party's effort to improve health insurance while you demonize every republican who stood up to your party's coup attempt.

#9 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-27 08:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Robotson is a laughable kook.

#10 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-03-27 08:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Joe Lieberman Dies

No more Joementum?

#11 | Posted by censored at 2024-03-27 09:08 PM | Reply

-The Dude single handedly neutered the ACA to placate insurance companies in Connecticut.

You mean represent his constituents?

He didn't single handedly do anything.

#12 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-27 09:47 PM | Reply

His only constituents?

What about his non Donor constituents?

I know.. the free speech of Cash overwhelmed him.

He was deaf to all else but the sound of Iraqis being killed.

I hated that MF for many reasons. He was tiresome.

Now he's dead...

.........

#13 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-27 10:20 PM | Reply

-What about his non Donor constituents?

The entire state of Connecticut who relies on the insurance industry located there?

Yes, he represented his voters.

#14 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-27 10:41 PM | Reply

#4 He would have been a preferable VP to Dick Cheney, who was installed by SCOTUS.

#15 | Posted by JOE at 2024-03-27 10:48 PM | Reply

"Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman said he'd likely join with them in backing a measure that dropped a government-sponsored insurance program."

One less shill.

#16 | Posted by Brennnn at 2024-03-28 12:29 AM | Reply

5. He was 82 and hadn't been in the Senate since 2013.

#17 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2024-03-28 03:49 AM | Reply

5a. Just setting things straight for those who might think you are serious, or miss the names.

#18 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2024-03-28 03:51 AM | Reply

JL was a decent, thoughtful, moderate politician.

It's sad how moderates nowadays receive so much derision. From both parties.

I'm just getting old I suppose.

#19 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-28 04:07 AM | Reply

Joe Lieberman was a self-absorbed, whiney, weak jackass, who never seemed to find the bottom for debasing himself. This Dem carrier of Susan Collins Syndrome will not be missed beyond a small circle. Nor should he be. DC and public life in general is loaded with similarly ineffective, weak characters.

#20 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-03-28 05:40 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It's sad how moderates nowadays receive so much derision. From both parties. I'm just getting old I suppose. #19 | Posted by madbomber

After being their VP candidate in 2000, in 2008 Lieberman turned on the Dem presidential nominee (Obama) to support the Republican nominee (McCain). Lieberman did so out of vindictiveness because the Dems didn't support Lieberman when he ran for president in 2004. He also did so out of hope for personal gain that McCain would make him his Secretary of State. And that's not even getting into Lieberman personally sinking the public option for Obama Care.

I'd micturate on Lieberman's selfish, turn-coat grave from where I stand if I could summon a stream strong enough.

#21 | Posted by censored at 2024-03-28 07:33 AM | Reply

Joe got derision because of his ridiculous attempt to ban video games and threats to vote with Republicans.

#22 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-03-28 08:34 AM | Reply

I guess he won't be speaking at either of the conventions this year.

Unless it's AI generated.

#23 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-28 08:49 AM | Reply

No comment yet from ALF on the passing of his costar.

#24 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-28 09:00 AM | Reply

"This Dem carrier of Susan Collins Syndrome"

That's good.

Notice how the only people praising him are the insurance salesman and the guy who plays video games where you blow up Muslims in real life.

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 10:29 AM | Reply

He's not the only pol to turn against his party. Remember it was his own party that primaried him out and if memory serves he won as an independent. This stuff cuts both ways. But Dems and lefties seem to think they are owed blind loyalty and deference. Must be where Trump learned it.

Anyhow, sometimes when pols turn against their own party they are crap bags about it. Kinzinger comes to mind. Sometimes they are not crap bags about it - Arlen Specter, Justin Amash, Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Lieberman ... .

RIP Joe.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-03-28 10:43 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Joe proved there are enclaves in this country where it's cool to be a Democrat....but not cool to be an actual liberal.

"praising him"

where did I praise him? Unlike morons who shout "he's a traitor...glad he's dead" I understand that regardless of what letter was after his name, a senator from Connecticut has to represent people who live in.......Connecticut. And that includes people who work for insurance companies.

This place is chock full of absolutely childish morons who truly believe everyone with a "D" after their name has a personal resposibility to feed you, clothe you, get you a job, provide healthcare, education, etc. No matter where they are from.

#27 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 10:51 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This place is chock full of absolutely childish morons who truly believe everyone with a "D" after their name has a personal resposibility to feed you, clothe you, get you a job, provide healthcare, education, etc. No matter where they are from.

#27 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I don't care if you choose D or R or if you wear clothes (depending on where you live) but Food, Healthcare (and even jobs) should be basic human rights and available to any citizen in America.

If we were a true Super Power (and supposedly the most powerful civilized nation of human beings on earth) then we would insure that all our citizens were Super Citizens and had the right and access to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and herself and of his/her family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, etc.

We have the resources to be able to do that right here in America but obviously not the desire or will.

#28 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-28 11:13 AM | Reply

"food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, etc."

Are you aware of programs like welfare, social security, medicare, medicaid, unemployment, work comp, ACA, etc?

#29 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 11:23 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"where did I praise him?"

It was when you said he faithfully represented the interests of his constituents.

It's like saying the Uvalde cops who actively prevented the parents from entering the school were effective at securing the perimeter.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 11:24 AM | Reply

But let's assume Joe deprived you of some of those items. Maybe you can make an argument that Joe took food out of your mouth, or denied you healthcare....I'm not going to defend Joe.

Just pointing out that his primary responsibility was to his constituents.....

But this is a fun to watch people who claim conservatives have a victim complex (many do, BTW) but can't look in the mirror to themselves.

You're all a victim of Joe. Joe hurt you. Joe took something from you that you were owed.

#31 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 11:28 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

30

try again, troll.

#32 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 11:29 AM | Reply

Are you aware of programs like welfare, social security, medicare, medicaid, unemployment, work comp, ACA, etc?
#29 | POSTED BY EBERLY

The programs republicans call Socialism?

The programs that Republicans keep trying to underfund undermine denigrate and destroy?

Perfectly aware. And they are weak watered down half ass solutions that don't even apply to every citizen obviously. By design apparently.

#33 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-28 11:29 AM | Reply

"I understand that regardless of what letter was after his name, a senator from Connecticut has to represent people who live in.......Connecticut. And that includes people who work for insurance companies."

Yeah. That's the problem. He's supporting parasites on the economy who produce nothing.

That's not a thing to praise.

That's like saying the Uvalde cops were effective at securing the perimeter around the school.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 11:33 AM | Reply

Just pointing out that his primary responsibility was to his constituents.....

Two things.

His primary responsibility is to the Constitution.

His "responsibility to his constituents" was limited to the financial well being of the insurance industry. He served the rich and you're saying that's laudable.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 11:37 AM | Reply

I guess the Joe-mentum has come to a dead stop.

#36 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2024-03-28 11:38 AM | Reply

This place is chock full of absolutely childish morons who truly believe everyone with a "D" after their name has a personal resposibility to feed you, clothe you, get you a job, provide healthcare, education, etc. No matter where they are from.
#27 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Who?

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 11:38 AM | Reply

33

Good...just making sure you knew about them. You had posted as though you were completely unaware.

#38 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 11:58 AM | Reply

You had posted as though you were completely unaware.
#38 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Naw you knew I knew. You we're just being you.

Republicans are very aware of them. As they try to destroy and undermine and underfund every one of them.

Because God Hates Socialism!

#39 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-28 12:05 PM | Reply

39

I understand what you're saying. I'm not arguing otherwise.

Where maybe we disagree is this....."and supposedly the most powerful civilized nation of human beings on earth"

You believe that, I suppose. I wish it were true but the evidence says otherwise.

We are NOT the most civilized nation of human beings on earth.

The republican party is part of this country. Not a 3rd party trying to undermine this country.

Your definition of "powerful civilized" has to include the republicans and when you include the republicans.....sort of makes it untrue.

#40 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 12:11 PM | Reply

"The republican party is part of this country. Not a 3rd party trying to undermine this country."

The Republican Party is part of this country.

The Republican party is trying to undermine this country.

Exhibit A: Maria Butina.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 12:18 PM | Reply

"We are NOT the most civilized nation of human beings on earth."

Name any current Republican policy proposal which makes us a more civilized nation. Just one.

#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-28 12:22 PM | Reply

Where maybe we disagree is this....."and supposedly the most powerful civilized nation of human beings on earth"

You believe that, I suppose. I wish it were true but the evidence says otherwise.

No actually we don't disagree. That was tongue in cheek.

We COULD be the most powerful and most civilized nation on earth ever. We could be a real Super Power.

If we just took our collective heads out of our collective asses and stopped fighting amongst ourselves about stupid stuff.

We have the power resources and ability but not the will or desire.

Apparently.

#43 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-28 12:30 PM | Reply

let's see... a state run healthcare that has the bare minimums to compete with profit hungry industry is bad. Having a military that cannot audit itself and sells weapons to the world is good. Do I have it right? I say spend it on people here not bombs there.

#44 | Posted by Brennnn at 2024-03-28 12:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The republican party is part of this country. Not a 3rd party trying to undermine this country.

#40 | Posted by eberly

They are part of this country, AND they are trying to undermine this country.

#45 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-28 12:52 PM | Reply

-No actually we don't disagree. That was tongue in cheek.

Despite our banter, I do believe you are a rational adult who can accept reality for what it is.

Maybe it's just that you have more optimism than me. That we are really close to being that great.


#46 | Posted by eberly at 2024-03-28 01:10 PM | Reply

"Springtime for Hitler and Germany".

War is our primary motivation, and we suck at it.

We make great War Toyz.

Then lose wars to motivated people we can't intimidate with our great toys.

The Houthis are the current iteration of this.

Motivated and unafraid. They have ample supplies of good missiles too.

Telling Israel NO to Genocide is apparently tougher than bombing the poorest nation in the ME.

They're used to it,they've been bombed and blockaded for years with American arms.

They know more about our weapons than most, being targets of them.

#47 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-28 02:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

[...]Anyhow, sometimes when pols turn against their own party they are crap bags about it. Kinzinger comes to mind.
What?

Sometimes they are not crap bags about it - [...] Tulsi Gabbard [...]#26 | Posted by BellRinger
Ahahahahahaha
...
Wait, you're serious?
...
hahahahahahha [pant, pant, pant] hahahahahhahaha!

#48 | Posted by censored at 2024-03-28 06:59 PM | Reply

"I don't care if you choose D or R or if you wear clothes (depending on where you live) but Food, Healthcare (and even jobs) should be basic human rights and available to any citizen in America."

Should those "basic human rights" require anything in return?

Should I be able to day drink and play video games while still being able to demand that someone else feed me, house me, clothe me, and pay for my wants and needs...

The US was fail because of the unraveling or rights and responsibilities. Progressives demand that virtually everything is a right, while at the same time stating that those rights are not (and should not be) tied to any form or responsibility or obligation to society for providing those rights.

#49 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-29 12:32 PM | Reply

"Should I be able to day drink and play video games while still being able to demand that someone else feed me, house me, clothe me, and pay for my wants and needs..."

There will always be people who do this. Especially at first. We have a huge mental health and drug problem in America that needs to be addressed before those kind of people can become productive citizens again.

There will always be a percentage of those unable to or unwilling to compete or participate in society. That's where access to healthcare (especially mental health) and education are invaluable. To help those with mental problems participate in society and become better citizens (and taxpayers). I am also a firm believer in serving your country (2 year min) and there are many ways besides the military to do this.

Btw video games are part of a billion dollar industry and with the right education gamers (who are very competitive) could make a lot of money making video games playing video games streaming video games etc.

We have the resources and the ability to solve all our problems. But obviously not the desire.

I am confident that America will eventually do the right thing - after we have tried everything else first.

#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-29 01:02 PM | Reply

"Should those "basic human rights" require anything in return?"

Same question, except it's the Second Amendment.

#51 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-29 01:19 PM | Reply

" Wait, you're serious?"

Yes i am serious.

#52 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-03-29 01:28 PM | Reply

"We have the resources and the ability to solve all our problems. But obviously not the desire."

I'll ask again in a manner that is more succinct and truthful. Should the government be obligated to provide food, housing, clothing, and healthcare for those people who choose to utilize their time in pursuiit of activities that do not generate the income required for them to provide those things for themselves. And this is important, because for every person who chooses a government-funded leisure lifestyle, someone else must work more than they otherwise would have to provide these benefits.

And where it gets really tricky...As more and more people choose a leisure lifestyle, those who elect to utilize their time for income are increasingly obligated to either work more, give up more of their money, or both. Which further incentivizies them to join the ranks of the leisure class. And what happens when there are simply not enough income earners to support the leisure class?

#53 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-29 01:37 PM | Reply

"Same question, except it's the Second Amendment."

Why the second amendment?

Why not any of the other amendments?

#54 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-29 01:38 PM | Reply

Why not just answer the question.

#55 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-29 01:40 PM | Reply

In fact, if you were a bit smarter, you would have brought up the sixth amendment and right to an impartial jury.

There may be others, but this is the only amendment I'm aware of that provides and obligation in support of a "right," as it's impossible to guarantee that someone has access to an impartial jury. Which means it's not really a right...as it is dependent on circumstances that may not always exist.

#56 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-29 01:42 PM | Reply

"this is the only amendment I'm aware of that provides and obligation in support of a "right,"

Okay. So it's okay to encumber rights with obligations.

Glad we agree.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-29 01:45 PM | Reply

"Okay. So it's okay to encumber rights with obligations. Glad we agree."

You agree with that?

YGBFSM.

That's super non-progressive of you.

#58 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-29 01:57 PM | Reply

I agree with that.

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-29 02:08 PM | Reply

"Should the government be obligated to provide food, housing, clothing, and healthcare for those people who choose to utilize their time in pursuiit of activities that do not generate the income required for them to provide those things for themselves."

Yes there is even a place for people like that.

I think you just described career politicians.

There are many many books on this very subject and I could not possibly do it Justice here.

But I am certain that if you free people from the trap of tedious and monotonous wage slave labor you will free their minds.

So obviously we have to do it for FREEDOM (and democracy!).

#60 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-29 02:13 PM | Reply

"Should the government be obligated to provide food, housing, clothing, and healthcare for those people who choose to utilize their time in pursuiit of activities that do not generate the income required for them to provide those things for themselves."

Soldiers don't produce any income. The government providea for them regardless.

#61 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-29 03:08 PM | Reply

Bye.

#62 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-03-29 03:38 PM | Reply

Yes i am serious. #52 | Posted by BellRinger

Well, I guess I'll just agree to disagree with you on your evaluations of Kinzinger and Hare Krishna Cult Member Tulsi "Russian Asset" Gabbard. "Tulsi Gabbard Labeled a 'Russian Asset' for Pushing U.S. Biolabs in Ukraine Claim" www.newsweek.com

#63 | Posted by censored at 2024-03-30 05:06 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort