Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, March 25, 2024

Chick-fil-A is ditching its "no antibiotics ever" promise. Citing diminishing chicken supply, Chick-fil-A will back off its pledge never to serve chicken that was fed antibiotics, and instead it will embrace a looser industry standard: "no antibiotics important to human medicine." Chick-fil-A first announced that it would abandon antibiotics in 2014.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Antibiotic use in food production has come under intense scrutiny in recent years as some bacterial infections in humans have become increasingly resistant to treatment as a result of more frequent exposure to the drugs.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Not great - antibiotic resistance is rapidly hitting the point where diseases we thought eradicated are coming back strong - and I'm not even referring to the (hopefully) obvious difference with vaccine hesitancy we're also dealing with.

That said, where do I find milk that still has added growth hormone? Do you know how expensive that stuff is on the black market?!?

#1 | Posted by zeropointnrg at 2024-03-25 10:11 AM | Reply | Funny: 4

"Now with extra poison in it so our executives can be richer!"

#2 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-25 12:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Aren't antibiotics sometimes needed to treat sick animals? This seems much ado about nothing

#3 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-03-25 08:19 PM | Reply

This is about giving antibiotics to healthy animals.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-25 08:44 PM | Reply

"In addition to chickens' health, antibiotics are particularly important to promote poultry growth " particularly for items like large broiler chickens."

This is the practice that trades short-term profits for long-term antibiotics resistance.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-25 09:39 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

__________
Aren't antibiotics sometimes needed to treat sick animals? This seems much ado about nothing

- - - #4 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-25 08:44 PM
- - - This is about giving antibiotics to healthy animals.

This is about antibiotics that have been given to sick animals. Supply chains are sometimes disrupted, as we should all know by now, and recently there has been an outbreak of bird flu, which is why the prices of chicken eggs rose again sharply, after steady decline from the post-COVID peak.

www.cbsnews.com - Chick-fil-A will allow some antibiotics in its chicken, ditching its "No Antibiotics Ever" standard - CBS, Mar 25, 2024

|------- In 2014, Chick-fil-A said it would shift to a "No Antibiotics Ever," or NAE standard, meaning the company would not use any antibiotics-raised chickens. But now it is switching to a "No Antibiotics Important To Human Medicine," or NAIHM standard. Under this label, antibiotics are used to treat animals if they are sick, but use of antibiotics that are important to human medicine and are commonly used to treat people is restricted.

The company blamed supply chain ... concerns about the company's ability to acquire antibiotic-free chicken.

Chick-fil-A promised to continue to only serve "real, white breast meat with no added fillers, artificial preservatives or steroids" and source chickens from farms that follow its Animal Wellbeing Standards, which includes US-hatched and raised animals that are provided nutritional food and live in temperature controlled barns. -------|
__________

#6 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-26 03:14 AM | Reply

From the article: "In many chicken farms, animals are raised in crowded and unsanitary conditions and can be prone to disease."

Is it possible to raise animals in more sanitary conditions? It would affect food supply and prices. Another reason why I'm in favor of lab-grown meat (as long as it can be produced in an environmentally sustainable way).

#7 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-03-26 08:16 AM | Reply

__________
#7 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-03-26 08:16 AM
Is it possible to raise animals in more sanitary conditions? It would affect food supply and prices.

Obviously - which is what California pols denied when they pushed Propositions 2 and 12 for "cage-free" chickens.

asmith.ucdavis.edu - Egg Prices are Still High, Especially in California - March 15, 2023

|------- That is what happens when a product most people buy quintuples in price.

The proximate cause of the price spike was avian flu, which caused millions of chickens to be killed, thereby reducing the supply of eggs. In the background, however, a massive transition is underway as the egg industry moves from caged to cage-free operation. What role did this play in the egg price spike?

Prior to 2015, California prices averaged about 60c per dozen higher than the Midwest, likely because most California eggs are produced in the Midwest and need to be shipped from there to here.

This requirement stemmed from Proposition 2, which California voters passed in 2008. Under the PFACA, California prices have been 85c above Midwest prices. It seems clear the PFACA raised the cost of producing eggs for California. ... In 2022 after Proposition 12 took effect, California wholesale egg prices averaged $1 higher than Midwest, up from a 85c gap in 2015-2021. ... Cage-free egg production is more expensive because hens that move more eat more and because disease spreads more easily. The price spread was more volatile in 2022 than before, perhaps indicating that the cage-free market is thin, i.e., more easily disrupted. ...

Proposition 12 also applies to hogs (which I wrote about here), but litigation has held up its implementation for pork products.
-------|

Check out the charts in the document.
__________

#8 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-03-26 02:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort