Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, March 13, 2024

President Vladimir Putin told the West on Wednesday that Russia was technically ready for nuclear war and that if the U.S. sent troops to Ukraine, it would be considered a significant escalation of the conflict.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... Putin, speaking ahead of a March 15-17 election which is certain to give him another six years in power, added that the nuclear war scenario was not "rushing" up and he saw no need for the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

"From a military-technical point of view, we are, of course, ready," Putin, 71, told Rossiya-1 television and news agency RIA when asked whether Russia was really ready for a nuclear war. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 04:28 PM | Reply

So, Pres Putin seems to think it is quite OK for him to send in Russian troops to invade a sovereign country.

But he says it is not OK for the West to send in troops to help that sovereign country defend itself from Pres Putin's unprovoked invasion?

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 04:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What would have happened if Russia had helped Iraq when we invaded?

If they had armed,trained,and financed them against our forces? Or if they had helped Cuba break our Embargo? With military assistance.

Askin' for a Friend.

#3 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 05:55 PM | Reply

@#3 ... What would have happened if Russia had helped Iraq when we invaded? ...

I dunno, what?

But for starters, the US did not invade Iraq to annex and eliminate it, as Pres Putin has stated his intention for Ukraine. I had thought your current alias had given up on those false equivalencies the multiple times in the past they were shown to be wrong.


#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 06:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

the US did not invade Iraq to annex and eliminate it,
- gaslighter

It did too

It was our to destroy the government and take the oil.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:03 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

It was our to destroy the government and take the oil.

What?

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-13 06:05 PM | Reply

Putin warns the West: Russia is ready for nuclear war

About as ready as it was to take on the poorest nation in Europe? Three days to Kyiv, amirite?

Russians should change their "China's Final Warning" expression to "Russia's Final Warning."

#7 | Posted by censored at 2024-03-13 06:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#5 ... It did too ...

Your current alias said that at the beginning of its comment, but then goes on to gainsay it in the rest of the comment.


#8 | Posted by lamplighter at 2024-03-13 06:13 PM | Reply

What?
#6 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

Out! =)

#9 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:27 PM | Reply

Your current alias said that at the beginning of its comment, but then goes on to gainsay it in the rest of the comment.
#8 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTE

What?
#6 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:27 PM | Reply

Why the war in Iraq was fought for Big Oil

Yes, the Iraq War was a war for oil, and it was a war with winners: Big Oil.
It has been 10 years since Operation Iraqi Freedom's bombs first landed in Baghdad. And while most of the U.S.-led coalition forces have long since gone, Western oil companies are only getting started.
Before the 2003 invasion, Iraq's domestic oil industry was fully nationalized and closed to Western oil companies. A decade of war later, it is largely privatized and utterly dominated by foreign firms.
www.cnn.com

#11 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:29 PM | Reply

@#11 ... Why the war in Iraq was fought for Big Oil ...

... and your current alias continues to show its prior comment was wrong.

#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 06:33 PM | Reply

and your current alias continues to show its prior comment was wrong.
#12 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

English is my second language, but I know annex means to make a subordinate part of.

Iraq was made a subordinate part of the US to extract its oil via BIG oil

You seriously couldn't have been a software manager with such poor logic skills.

#13 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:39 PM | Reply

Iraq was defacto annexed.

#14 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 06:40 PM | Reply

Iraq was invaded because there was nothing worth blowing up in Afghanistan.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-13 06:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#14 ... Iraq was defacto annexed. ...

Sometimes your current alias says the funniest things.

:)

But to its point, that's the best it can come up with?



#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 06:49 PM | Reply

Iraq was invaded because there was nothing worth blowing up in Afghanistan.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL

And as Bush reportedly said, "he tried to kill my daddy!"

#17 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-03-13 06:52 PM | Reply

"So, Pres Putin seems to think it is quite OK for him to send in Russian troops to invade a sovereign country."

They've gone to great lengths to rationalize that somehow that isn't what they've done, including comparing the ethnic Russian regions of Ukraine to Kosovo. They also believe the 2014 protests and riots were a CIA backed coup, which somehow justifies their actions, in their minds. It seems Putin and his followers never saw Ukraine as a sovereign nation in its own right, but merely a puppet state of either Russia or 'the West'.

#18 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 06:53 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#18 ... They've gone to great lengths to rationalize that somehow that isn't what they've done ...

The great lengths they have gone to is to try to rationalize, after the fact, their unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country.

Everything else just seems to be deflective noise.


#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 06:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Iraq was invaded because there was nothing worth blowing up in Afghanistan."

More likely because they couldn't catch bin Laden, so they had to catch a smaller criminal to show Bush had done something in time for reelection.

#20 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 06:58 PM | Reply

"The great lengths they have gone to is to try to rationalize, after the fact, their unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country."

They were rationalizing it well in advance, too.

#21 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 07:01 PM | Reply

18

Correct, sir. Whatever Vlad says is Truth! to some people around here.

Here's what he's doing while he points and says, "Hey, look over there at my Nukes!".

www.youtube.com

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 07:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

If Russia is nukes are anything like the rest of their military, the Russians should be worried about those things exploding in their silos.

#23 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-13 07:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

So they're ready to die. Good. Make sure none live.

#24 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-03-13 07:07 PM | Reply

Russia is

Should be "Russian"

As in, "I shouldn't be Russian to hit publish before I've had a chance to read my posts."

#25 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-13 07:08 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"ELECT MY PUPPET OR DIE."

#26 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-13 07:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

It's the last chance Russia has to claim the Ukraine and it's Trumps last chance to stay out of prison.

November is going to be quite an important election.

Democrats will screw it up.

#27 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-13 07:09 PM | Reply

Why the war in Iraq was fought for Big Oil

#11 | Posted by oneironaut

answer - because the supreme court made a republican oil man president despite him getting fewer votes than his opponent, and then rightwing media brainwashed morons into supporting his war of lies.

#28 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-13 07:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So. They learned all of that from Dubya.

When they do something it's "war crimes".

When we do something,or Israel commits obvious war crimes the whole world recognizes as such, it's somehow "rules based".

It's too obvious and too idiotic.

There is no meaningful international law.

If there was why would anyone need Nukes?

The only morality is what can be gotten away with.

Russia has Nukes. They can get away with this,just like the US got away with Iraq, for the same reasons.

#29 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 07:10 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

answer - because the supreme court made a republican oil man president despite him getting fewer votes than his opponent, and then rightwing media brainwashed morons into supporting his war of lies.

#28 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2024-03-13 07:09 PM

Here we go with stolen elections ... .

#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-03-13 07:26 PM | Reply

Yeah, the war in Iraq was about Iraq's oil fields. Dick Cheney wanted that oil (vis-a-vis) Halliburton so bad he could taste the money in his deferred stock options he had in Halliburton when he retired.

Thus the fake WMD and fake yellowcake receipt. And the prison sentence for poor, unwitting Scooter Libby.

Cheney was behind the whole plan.

Plus dumb ol' George W. wanted to be a "war president."

Cheney played W. like a cheap fiddle.

#31 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-13 07:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Here we go with stolen elections ... .

#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Did democrats didn't attempt a coup after a legit stolen election.

Repubs attempted a coup after an election that wasn't even stolen.

#32 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-13 07:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- Dubya.

Why is it that people who have no argument to make about the facts of the question at hand "think" that pointing at something someone else did some other time in some other place for some other reasons.... is anything other than calling people hypocrites, and not addressing what is happening now?

OK, just kidding. I know why, and so do you.

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 07:52 PM | Reply

Poland is the country that is talking about sending troops to help Ukraine ~ in a pre-empted move to protect their own borers.

As far as I know, President Biden hasn't even floated the idea.

So why is Russia's president warning the United States?

#34 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-13 08:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Selective morality is contagious.

That's just how it is. How is living the same corrupt and criminal life making others More law abiding?

Putin saw Dubya get away with it.

You think that didn't influence or encourage him to try it too?

Nukes change everything. Pakistan didn't get invaded when they actually had bin Laden.

Iraq, with no Nukes got pulverized for trumped up lies.

#35 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 08:09 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#34 ... Poland is the country that is talking about sending troops to help Ukraine ...

Poland won't rule out NATO force in Ukraine
www.dw.com
... Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski responded positively to French President Emmanuel Macron's recent comments about the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine.

"The presence of NATO forces in Ukraine is not unthinkable," Sikorski wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

On the contrary, British Foreign Minister David Cameron has stated that he opposes the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine, even for training purposes.

Members of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (UDCG) will meet again on March 19 at Ramstein Air Base in Germany to discuss support for Kyiv. ...

#36 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 08:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Poland knows a thing or two about getting preemptively invaded.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-03-13 08:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

- So why is Russia's president warning the United States?

To build up the fear in his own people and remind him that he is all that stands between them and the Evil West.

Well, also because if the ever stopped listening to his propaganda and thought about it... he would likely end up on the sharp side of a French razor, aka guillotine.

.
- Putin saw Dubya get away with it.

If you aren't getting paid to make up stupid, irrelevant excuses for Vlad, you really need to get job.

#38 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 08:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

if they ever

#39 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 08:15 PM | Reply

Putin saw Dubya get away with it.

It's not about Dubya getting away with it.

It's counter to the idea that America is without sin.

Without understanding that, you can't understand how the rest of the world precieves the US.

Which leads to blunders like Syria today.

#40 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 08:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

The whole point of immigration is to have a diversity of our looks.

But CorkyTheBigot would have you believe there's only one PoV that is correct.

That's how Lumpers operate.

#41 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 08:22 PM | Reply

How is that incorrect? The US led by example. They saw us invade and change the leadership of a country for spurious reasons. Steal resources and dominate their policies. Kill their elites and completely remake their country.

Why was it okay when we did it? Why isn't Dubya locked up at The Hague?

Why hasn't the US been forced to pay reparations and demilitarized for being an Outlaw nation?

I think we all know the answer to that.

Russia does too.

#42 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 08:24 PM | Reply

"YAY!! ARMAGEDDON CAN COME AT LAST!! Forget that Christ dude! We're all about his father's wrath!"

- Christian Nationalists

#43 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-03-13 08:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

So, Pres Putin seems to think it is quite OK for him to send in Russian troops to invade a sovereign country.
But he says it is not OK for the West to send in troops to help that sovereign country defend itself from Pres Putin's unprovoked invasion?
#2 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-03-13 04:30 PM | FLAG:

Just for fun, replace Russia with United States, and Pres Putin with Pres Bush.

#44 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-13 08:29 PM | Reply

@#44 ... Just for fun, replace Russia with United States, and Pres Putin with Pres Bush. ...

Did fmr Pres GW Bush say his aim was to annex and eliminate Iraq? I didn't think so.

That aside...

And, for the record, I was against the Iraq invasion of fmr Pres GW Bush.

Unlike his father's invasion of Iraq, fmr Pres GHW Bush's invasion had neither an end goal or an exit plan. His father, at least, knew that there was no goal beside freeing Kuwait. So for fmr Pres GHW Bush it was go in, liberate Kuwait, then leave.

Fmr Pres GW Bush blew it big time, and I was saying as much back in the day.


#45 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 08:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So maybe we can get back to the thread's topic and away from the lame deflection attempts?

Putin resumes sabre-rattling' with warning Russia ready for nuclear war
www.aljazeera.com

... Ahead of weekend elections, Russian president boasts his country's nuclear capabilities are superior to the West's. ...

#46 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 08:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Putin saw Dubya get away with it.

You think that didn't influence or encourage him to try it too?

#35 | Posted by Effeteposer

And the lesson you learned is - LET PUTIN DO IT TOO.

Insted of - DONT ELECT REPUBLICANS

#47 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-13 08:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

So was I.

The difference here is Russia has vital national interests in a non NATO Ukraine. Ukraine is also virtually Russia in many ways.

The US had no compelling national interests in Iraq. No cultural ties to Iraq. The war against Saddam was pure whim.

The Iraq war was far more immoral than the Ukraine war.

It was senseless violence that killed almost a million people. It created ISIS.

#48 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 08:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Russia Ready for Nuclear War"

Well that's double plus good!

So Russia is ready to end it all in a blaze of glory?

Well ok then! We have been ready for that since the 50s.

We would rather not. It's kinda MAD if ya know what I mean.

But hey, Slim Pickens is ready to ride that nuke all the way down to Moscow town if need be.

#49 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 08:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I hope this isn't just bluster.

It's the only thing that can fix this place.

#50 | Posted by tres_flechas at 2024-03-13 09:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

We live in A Stupid World. It's like we haven't stopped being stone age tribes.

War is the most defining characteristic of humanity...Not Reason.

Tribalism and Massacre are in our DNA.

It will be the cause of our Extinction.

#51 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 09:04 PM | Reply

@#48 ... in a non NATO Ukraine. ... The difference here is Russia has vital national interests in a non NATO Ukraine. Ukraine is also virtually Russia in many ways. ...

There's that Russian, "Ukraine should not exist" thing again.

Countries ask to join NATO (typically to help defend against unprovoked Russian aggression).

Countries are invaded, annexed and eliminated by Russia.


Of course Pres Putin had an interest in a non-NATO Ukraine. A non-NATO Ukraine makes it far easier for him to invade, annex and eliminate Ukraine.

Wow, so your current alias seems to be agreeing with me on that aspect.

Maybe ask your handlers... why did Sweden after centuries of non-alignment ask to join NATO?





#52 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Ukraine is also virtually Russia in many ways."

I think that the Ukrainians who speak Ukrainian not Russian would vehemently disagree. Many Ukrainians will but even speak Russian to Russians. Even if they know it they will speak English instead.

Kyiv is one among the oldest cities in Europe and was founded in 482, while Moscow was founded in 1147 by Yuriy Dolgoruky, the son of Volodymyr Monomakh.

So, Kyiv is older than Moscow by 665 years.

So if anything Russia is virtually and essentially Ukrainian.

#53 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 09:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"The US had no compelling national interests in Iraq."

That's not true of course. I don't agree with the Iraq war but there is no sense lying about it.

We went for the oil.

"We live in A Stupid World. It's like we haven't stopped being stone age tribes."

Welcome to Earth.

You live in a world full of humans. Humans are the most dangerous creatures in the known universe. Yes. There is a high probably will not make it. There is a high probability that we will destroy ourselves before we become a level 1 civilization on the Kardashev scale.

#54 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 09:12 PM | Reply

Well ok then! We have been ready for that since the 50s.

Might as well find out! Burning up those nukes would cut down on the overhead... expensive toys to maintain.

#55 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-13 09:18 PM | Reply

A distinction without a difference. This is a tragic, almost civil war being inflamed by outsiders meddling in things they barely understand.

Russia, Ukraine, it's an almost identical culture. The language difference is more like a dialect.

This is literally brother against brother.

All for the benefit of outside interests feeding and encouraging the slaughter.

It's sickening to watch. It's worse to know the whole thing could have been avoided if reason and diplomacy had been allowed a place in policy decisions in both Russia and Ukraine.

Killing their own people wasn't a good idea,for Ukraine, and encouraging them wasn't a good idea for the US and NATO.

Russia had a Duty to Protect.

It wasn't like NATO was stopping the Ukrainians in the Donbass,they were arming and encouraging the killing.

#56 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 09:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#56 ... This is a tragic, almost civil war being inflamed by outsiders meddling in things they barely understand. ...

Yup.

So your current alias finally admits that Pres Putin should not have done his unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country.


Good to see it finally admit that.

#57 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"So why is Russia's president warning the United States?"

Why do you think? They see this as a proxy war, and always have.

#58 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 09:26 PM | Reply

A distinction without a difference. This is a tragic, almost civil war being inflamed by outsiders meddling in things they barely understand.

Russia, Ukraine, it's an almost identical culture. The language difference is more like a dialect.

This is literally brother against brother.

All for the benefit of outside interests feeding and encouraging the slaughter.

...

You are obviously not well versed in Slavic history.

So why is Putin "encouraging slaughter" and turning brother against brother? The fact is that is not brother against brother and it's not a civil war. It is one sovereign country invading another sovereign country.

Ukrainians do not belong to Russia. So quit lying about it (or repeating Russian propaganda)

A distinctive difference. Kyiv is 600 years older than Moscow.

And Kyiv does not belong to Moscow.

And the biggest difference?

THEY DONT WANT TO.

#59 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 09:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

So your current alias finally admits that Pres Putin should not have done his unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country.

Same with Dubya.


Good to see it finally admit that.
#57 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER A

Glad to see you finally admit it too.

#60 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 09:34 PM | Reply

So why is Putin "encouraging slaughter" and turning brother against brother?

Because they believe the West will eventually attack them.

France
Germany

and eventually NATO.

Its not compliated.

#61 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-13 09:35 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Ukraine should have known better than to keep killing civilians. They did know better but the US pumped them up and sent them forward to continue their illegal killings and war on their own eastern oblasts.

This was intolerable to the Russian leadership. They were massively provoked by the senseless killing of Russians in eastern Ukraine.

They should not have invaded Ukraine proper.

Helping the breakaway oblasts in Ukraine fight off the Kiev attacks was justified by events.

Invading the whole country wasn't.

Getting the UN involved against the Ukrainian paramilitaries and regular troops attacking the Donbass would have been a better response.

War should always be the Last Option.

NATO made that more difficult and Putin was stupid to rise to the bait.

He got suckered and now you repeat "unprovoked invasion" in every context like a propaganda ------.

It's not true you know,and repeating it endlessly doesn't make it so.

It just makes you look like a mindless shill.

It's also The Rhetorical style of Nazis.

#62 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 09:40 PM | Reply

@#56 ... This is a tragic, almost civil war ...

It is an unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country by Pres Putin for the purpose of annexing and eliminating Ukraine.

And, yes, it is tragic.



#63 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:42 PM | Reply

"Russia, Ukraine, it's an almost identical culture. The language difference is more like a dialect. "

Wrong again. No it's not just a dialect.

While one language has influenced the other a Russian may not understand a Ukrainian at all.

There are people who say that Ukrainian is a dialect of Russian, or that the two languages are very similar. When traveling in Poland or Slovakia, Ukrainian speakers have no problem understanding the locals and they in turn tend to understand spoken Ukrainian. On the other hand, in Russia if you speak Ukrainian, you will not be understood. So the question is: are the two languages really similar?

ukrainianinstitutenyc.wordpress.com

#64 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 09:43 PM | Reply

One word: Hogwash...

Two words: Saber rattling

A whole sentence (utilizing the words above):

Impotent saber rattling from despotic ruler
whose antiquated notions of true power are hogwash.

#65 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-13 09:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#60 ... Glad to see you finally admit it too. ...

Admit what?

Exactly, what did I admit?


#66 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:46 PM | Reply

"Because they believe the West will eventually attack them."

It's against the NATO charter to attack anyone ...

And the west believes that Russia will eventually attack them. And Putin has now proved them to be correct by attacking it's neighbor.

Proved it so much that two more countries have now joined NATO.

#67 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 09:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

59 is spot on.

The rest of this Excuse Making for Vlad Fest is a production of the Theatre of the Absurd.

Vlad invading his neighbor and now threatening Ukraine, the rest of Europe, and the US with nukes?

Well, obviously that is anyone but Vlad's Fault.

NATO, for existing when Russia would already have invaded Europe after WWII if they didn't?

The 2 percent of the last vote in Ukraine that were Nazis?

The US for standing against territory taking (unlike Iraq, not that it matters) by killing civilians?

Maybe It's All Balcones Fault.

www.youtube.com

#68 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 09:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#62 ... Helping the breakaway oblasts in Ukraine fight off the Kiev attacks was justified by events. ...

What events?

Please be specific.

And as a follow-up question...

"oblasts" seems to be a distinctively Russian thing.

Oblast
en.wikipedia.org

... Historically, it was used in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. The term oblast is often translated into English as region or province.[2][3] In some countries, oblasts are also known by cognates of the Russian term. ...

Wow.

Going full-on Russia here are ye?


#69 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:51 PM | Reply

@#67 ... Proved it so much that two more countries have now joined NATO. ...

Worth repeating.

In bold.

Proved it so much that two more countries have now joined NATO.


And, if I may add, apprx doubling the NATO border of NATO with Russia.

Did Pres Putin see that coming as a result of his unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country?


#70 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 09:54 PM | Reply

On second thought, it's really the fault of people who make excuses for Putin.

If he didn't know they would, he wouldn't be doing this.

I mean, he already has Mafia Don, now he also has self-hating supposed liberals, for whom "Hate America First!" has become their go-to Knee Jerk Reaction.

#71 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 09:54 PM | Reply

So now the Big One is even more likely.

I sure feel safe knowing NATO is protecting Lithuania.

It's just another Tripwire for Nuclear War.

The Russians have their version of the Monroe Doctrine.

NATO just makes it more likely to be have a major war,not less.

Without NATO this would not have even be a regional war, it would have been a Russian internal affair, like the Chechen wars.

I don't see anyone saying the Chechen wars were a vital Western issue.

Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much.

They know about boundaries and common sense policy concerning Spheres of influence.

Too bad NATO doesn't,we may all pay for that stupidity.

#72 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 09:58 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

"He got suckered and now you repeat "unprovoked invasion" in every context like a propaganda ------."

YOU are the one spreading Russian propaganda like candy around here. And you don't even have your historical facts right. And the things you say are eerily similar to what Putin preaches in his six hour "history lessons". Proving to me you are getting your propaganda from Russia.

Ukraine does not belong to Russia. It's older than Russia. Vlad invaded Ukraine. Ukraine did not invade Russia (yet). Just because Ukrainians were considering joining NATO does not give him the historical right to invade to prevent it. He just did it because he thought no one would stop him. He misjudged us. He may have judged Republicans correctly but he definitely did not judge the Democrats response correctly.

#73 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 10:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

And, if I may note...

From my understanding, there is only one time when Article 5 of NATO (~an attack on one is an attack on all~) has ever been invoked.

Do you know when that event was?

It was an attack upon the US, the World Trade Center attack.



Invoking Article 5
shape.nato.int

... Article 5 is the cornerstone of the Alliance. It means that an attack on one is an attack on all. This article has been invoked only once in the 70-year history of the Alliance: in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States. In this episode we discuss how NATO came to the aid of the US and why article 5 was invoked. ...

#74 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 10:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So now the Big One is even more likely.

Lol

You are either stupid or gullible or both.

Nuclear war is not any more likely today than it was years ago when the war started. It's pretty much the same probability. And only slightly more probable than it was in 1960.

Just because Putin mouths off and saber rattles to try and influence our upcoming elections changes nothing.

#75 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 10:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#72 .. Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much. ...

Then please explain the unprovoked invasion of a sovereign Ukraine.


Yer up.

#76 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 10:04 PM | Reply

Putin had Moneywar a'scairt' enough to pootin' his pants, rofl!

Not to mention defend Putin's massacres of civilians as targets of war.

#77 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 10:07 PM | Reply

Just because Putin mouths off and saber rattles to try and influence our upcoming elections changes nothing.

He does have one thing going for him... the US Minuteman ICBM fleet is made by Boeing. :-)

#78 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-13 10:09 PM | Reply

RUSSIAN BORDER COLLAPSES, PUTIN THREATENS!

Breaking Ukraine War News With The Enforcer (Day 749)

going Live now

www.youtube.com

#79 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 10:12 PM | Reply

Sounds scary.

How long have we been ready for nuclear war?

#80 | Posted by horstngraben at 2024-03-13 10:12 PM | Reply

I defend none of that. Putin acted stupidly and rashly. I was never in favor of invading Ukraine itself.

Backstopping the breakaway oblasts was the right thing to do.

Getting the UN into the Donbass to stop the civil war would have been the more effective thing.

The SMO was not well thought out.

The hypocrisy of the Western allies could have been used against them if Putin had been subtle rather than stupid.

But he wasn't. So here we are.

I can't defend this war. But it's obvious that Russia will most likely keep the Donbass and Crimea as Russian.

The Ukraine will become a rump state and basket case liability to Europe.

All so a few Idiots in the US could feel self important.

It is Tragic.

#81 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 10:17 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much."

LOL!

Again your international knowledge is a bit lacking or you are still clinging to Russian propaganda as if it were the facts.

So how about that whole Cuban missile crisis thingy. (When we were closer to nuclear war than ever) ... yes it was long ago but Russia continues to meddle there.

And then there is Russian attempts to influence or should I say meddle in Venezuela, that gave them a foothold.

Then there is Nicaragua Argentina Brazil and Mexico.

I believe those countries are all in the Western Hemisphere and Russia has expanded its influence there.

But mostly they are in Cuba Venezuela.

I guess we will just have to to attack Cuba now because Russia is just too damn close!

#82 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 10:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"So now the Big One is even more likely."

This is almost entirely sabre rattling for his fake election coming up. What Putin wants is a return to the Cold War.

#83 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 10:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You said it,not Me.

We were ready to go toe to toe over Cuba.

Good thing Kennedy wasn't Stupid.

With Biden in, in 1962?

Who knows.

#84 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 10:23 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

- This is almost entirely sabre rattling for his fake election coming up.

Bingo! We have a Winner.

MW is apparently registered to vote there.

.

wow... I haven't watched The Enforcer for a while. They've gotten better video sources.

#85 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-13 10:26 PM | Reply

Putin needs to remember that he is mouthing off to a man who was in the "situation room" and second in command when bin Laden was rendered into fish food.

Republicl0wns can't lay claim to that... bin Laden Bush business ties...

Republicl0wns like to keep scary men in power. They come in handy when you are desperate to fluff a voter base with wusses.

#86 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2024-03-13 10:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How long have we been ready for nuclear war?

#80 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN

The Soviet Union detonated its first atomic bomb, known in the West as Joe-1, on Aug. 29, 1949, at Semipalatinsk Test Site, in Kazakhstan.

So since the 1950s.

#87 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 10:33 PM | Reply

With Biden in, in 1962?

Who knows.

#84 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

Yes Biden was alive in 1962.

So he definitely knows. Much better than you obviously.

What's your point? Today is the same as yesterday?

Gratz!

Here's your sign.

#88 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 10:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#81 ... I defend none of that. Putin acted stupidly and rashly. I was never in favor of invading Ukraine itself. ...

What, exactly, does your current alias mean by "Ukraine itself?"



thx.

#89 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 10:37 PM | Reply

America has the strength but it no longer has the soul.

#90 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2024-03-13 10:38 PM | Reply

@#83 ... This is almost entirely sabre rattling for his fake election coming up. ...

That was my first thought, and why I posted #46.

OK, that aside...

For Pres Putin to say such a thing is unnerving, and reckless. Or, maybe, he means it.

I mean, he has also said he would not invade Ukraine.

But here were are. ...

#91 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 10:43 PM | Reply

#89 The four breakaway oblasts are Russia. Ukraine is what's left.

Before the war it was all Ukraine but they were fighting a civil war that Russia intervened in. Mostly because it was ethnic violence against Russian speakers.

The Minsk Accords, properly administered could have prevented war.

NATO has openly admitted not encouraging Ukraine to implement the Minsk Accords.

They acted in bad faith. Not a rare thing where NATO and the US are concerned.

Now Russia will just keep the eastern quarter of Ukraine.

It didn't have to be this way.

I'm sure many in Ukraine regret the decision to continue the war on Donbass rather than give them autonomy within Ukraine.

Tough.

#92 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 10:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"What, exactly, does your current alias mean by "Ukraine itself?""

It seems pretty obvious he believes any region that declared itself independent of Ukraine is no longer a part of it.

#93 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 10:59 PM | Reply

"Mostly because it was ethnic violence against Russian speakers."

Because they would not learn Ukrainian? And obey Ukrainian law?

Russia supplied them with Russian arms.

Then Russia attacked into Ukrainian territory to defend them.

How would you feel if Mexicans came here and they spoke only Mexican and then Mexico provided arms and supplies to the Mexicans in Texas. Then Mexico attacked Texas saying that Texas was mistreating the Mexicans and they were only there to defend their culture.

( I am assuming you are an American and would respond as an American which is a big assume here)

#94 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 11:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much.

#72 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

And yet here you are.

#95 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2024-03-13 11:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Putin is going insane with frustration that his "Special Military Operation" is not unfolding to plan.

He knows no one is planning to use nuclear weapons against Russia. But to make his constantly lied to public believe his lies, he's stoking his jingoist war bloggers fo keep up their extreme rhetoric.

KGB Putin knows using any nulcear weapon would mean assured destruction of the Mafia-like fascist system he's designed and thrives under.

There are some who say the war is stalemated. Not so. Russia's military is getting weaker every day. For a series of updates on Ukraine's military's progress at decimating Russia's military, see the Ukraine-Russo War Map series: www.youtube.com

As Ukraine brings the war closer to the homes of Russia's voters, pressure might force Putin to fire even more senior military officers. And the turmoil would make Russia vulnerable to hearing real news about Putin's klepto-fascist government, and EU pressure on Kalingrad might lead to this isolated Russian city's 1/2 million rssidents angry at Moscow.

#96 | Posted by Augustine at 2024-03-13 11:06 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Now Russia will just keep the eastern quarter of Ukraine."

In your Russian dreams. Then they will be fighting Ukrainians forever.

And now they may even lose it all. And more. They are now getting attacked inside Russia. And now they may even drag the whole world into their nightmare. You think the world will let them keep theirill gotten gains after? If any of us survive the nightmare that is..

Nope. It didn't have to be this way. Putin did not need to invade. He miscalculated Ukrainians resistance and the support that the free world would give them. He miscalculated badly.

Pooty Pants may have accurately calculated the Republicans response.

But he did not accurately predict the response of the rest of the free world.

#97 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-13 11:10 PM | Reply

Meant to edit that last sentence before posting:

"While Putin remains distracted by reelection politics and his errant Special Operation war plan, EU pressure on Kalingrad could lead to that isolated Russian city's 1/2 million residents getting angry enough at Moscow to seriously rattle them into thinking about joining the rest of Europe and to sever their subjugation under Putin's corrupt fascism."

The more widespread concurrent the distractions, the better. Maybe a lack of sleep will be Putin's undoing?

#98 | Posted by Augustine at 2024-03-13 11:15 PM | Reply

Here we go with stolen elections ... .

#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds

That was more "stolen" than 2020 was.

#99 | Posted by jpw at 2024-03-13 11:21 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#92 ... but they were fighting a civil war that Russia intervened in. ...

So, your current alias admits that Pres Putin did an unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country for the purpose of annexing and eliminating Ukraine?

#100 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 11:25 PM | Reply

@#93 ... It seems pretty obvious he believes any region that declared itself independent of Ukraine is no longer a part of it. ...

Quite simply, that is Ukraine's problem to resolve, not Pres Putin's.

If the South declares itself to no longer be a part of the United States, should Mexico then come in and claim territory?


#101 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 11:28 PM | Reply

Only pathetic, partisan, sore losers say that either the 2000 or 2020 elections were stolen.

#102 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 11:28 PM | Reply

@#92 ... Now Russia will just keep the eastern quarter of Ukraine. ...

On what basis?

#103 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-13 11:30 PM | Reply

Putin did Not Need to Invade. True.

NATO did not Need to Incite War.

Also True.

This war has many causes. Russian Paranoia, Western Hubris.

We all pay for expansionist policies,in Russia, in the US, in Israel.

But Russia is an Amateur compared to the US.

We always end up fighting the Wars we try to Avoid.

I just hope Reason prevails over Stubborn Stupidity.

I'm not Optimistic.

#104 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-13 11:33 PM | Reply

Electoral College exists to steal elections from liberals and give them to conservatives.

And the only people who can't acknowledge it are Sore Winners.

#105 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-03-13 11:34 PM | Reply

"If the South declares itself to no longer be a part of the United States, should Mexico then come in and claim territory?"

Regardless of whether we agree with it or not, we should be surprised if some of them wanted to try. I've seen billboards in Mexico which claim all the territory that used to belong to New Spain should belong to it.

#106 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 11:35 PM | Reply

*not be surprised

#107 | Posted by sentinel at 2024-03-13 11:35 PM | Reply

"This war has many causes. Russian Paranoia, Western Hubris."

You are over complicating the situation and twisting the truth and trying to shift the blame. As propagandists (and teenagers) like to do.

There is really only one reason there is a war. Putin could not resolve the situation peacefully so he violently invaded a sovereign country, his neighbor. And he made up all kinds of reasons why he did. None of which were true. And that country defended itself and did not submit to Russian aggression. And that country had Allies. And that country did not fall in 3 days as planned.

Putin has painted himself into a corner. Just like republicans like to do. It's eerie how similar and sympathetic to each other they have become.

#108 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-14 12:10 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Not three days, three years.

The end will likely be the same.

Many more deaths than if it was three days.

NATO humiliation at not defeating Russia will be immense.

Russia will outlast NATO. I don't like it, but that's how I see it happening.

And none of it had to happen.

#109 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-14 12:22 AM | Reply

@#104 ... NATO did not Need to Incite War. ...

Wait... what????

Pres Putin does an unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country for the purpose of annexing and eliminating that country.

And now your current alias is saying that NATO made him do it?


Wow.


Your current alias really needs to demand more rationale talking points from its handlers.

Jus' sayin'.

#110 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-14 12:44 AM | Reply

@#109 ... Russia will outlast NATO ...

And your current alias says that... why?

Because that was a talking point issued to it?

Or is there some substantiation behind it?


#111 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-03-14 12:46 AM | Reply

Because that was a talking point issued to it?

He's been using the same talking points for 2 years.

#112 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-03-14 12:51 AM | Reply

Putin didn't Have to do it. Like everyone else he has free will.

That being said. NATO didn't have to increase tensions and push the envelope leading up to war. Ukraine didn't have to slaughter their own people.

You're too propagandized to get the subtleties about the build up to war.

Maybe just too simple. I don't know.

Try to think outside the tiny box you've created for yourself.

I know it's scary.

#113 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-14 12:54 AM | Reply

He's starting to look more and more like Emperor Palpatine.

#114 | Posted by madscientist at 2024-03-14 01:21 AM | Reply

"Doctor Strangelove or... How I learned to stop worrying and love the Bomb".
We Humans just do not learn as we age, we kind of turn to fine...vinegar.

#115 | Posted by Hughmass at 2024-03-14 07:54 AM | Reply

Let me remind everybody that Mr. Putin doesn't have to start a nuclear war with NATO to accomplish his goal. He only has to launch a small missile attack on Ukraine's Nuclear Power Plant which would disable the entire country.

#116 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-03-14 08:08 AM | Reply

Did fmr Pres GW Bush say his aim was to annex and eliminate Iraq? I didn't think so.

#45 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-03-13 08:41 PM | REPLY

The goal in Iraq was "regime change".

Russia goal in Ukr, "regime change".

Many Russians don't agree with the invasion, but like mine and your opinion on Iraq, that part is irrelevant.

#117 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-14 08:44 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Russia will outlast NATO. I don't like it, but that's how I see it happening.

#109 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER AT 2024-03-14 12:22 AM | REPLY

Yeah but your account is loaded with propaganda posts that don't hold up to reality. A quick review says:

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics didn't outlast NATO.

It's successor, the real Russian Federation as a Democracy, lasted 3 years.

Putin's dictatorship called a Federation is only 21 years old and there is no established successor, and if there was he'd have to kill them.

Putin will die of cancer and Russia will be anarchic for awhile. NATO will still exist.

#118 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-14 09:26 AM | Reply

Putin is 71 and has already been treated for cancer multiple times. His clock is ticking faster than Joe and Donald's, and they're quite a bit older.

#119 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-14 09:27 AM | Reply

You know this,how? Medical records aren't open information.

82 is not the new 71.. Trump is stupid and unstable. He also doesn't want to help NATO.

Putin is a Turd. Russia wouldn't need him to keep fighting anyway.

As long as NATO is pressing this the Russians will continue the war even if Putin died.

#120 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-14 10:08 AM | Reply

You know this,how?

#120 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER AT 2024-03-14 10:08 AM | FLAG:

How do you not?

#121 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-14 10:14 AM | Reply

I don't believe propaganda.

I need factual information.

If comfortable lies make it easier for you, that's just fine.

But don't pretend there's any real evidence.

A lot of people "know" things that Ain't so.

#122 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-14 10:30 AM | Reply | Funny: 3

Putin didn't invade "because Nazis!"... he invaded for the same reason he told the President of Georgia that he would "hang him up by his balls".

His intentions are to recreate the Soviet Union states, and anyone who has followed what scholars of Russian history say about him knows that.

#123 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-14 11:26 AM | Reply

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
- often attributed to Samuel Clemons (Mark -----)

#124 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2024-03-14 11:28 AM | Reply

Apparently "-----" is a moderated word here.

Sorry Shania ...

LOL

#125 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2024-03-14 11:50 AM | Reply

I need factual information.

#122 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER AT 2024-03-14 10:30 AM | FLAG:

The irony. It's too much.

#126 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-03-14 11:56 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

I am so happy that Rigt wingers such as Tucker Carlson believe Putin should be our role model.

#127 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-03-14 01:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I don't believe propaganda.

#122 | Posted by Effeteposer

You dont just believe it. You spread it.

Like russia "being forced to invade because of nazis"

#128 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-03-14 01:24 PM | Reply

"Russia wouldn't need him to keep fighting anyway."

You know this how?

Well. Regardless. We'll see. No one lives forever.

#129 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-03-14 01:27 PM | Reply

"Putin is a Turd. Russia wouldn't need him to keep fighting anyway."

Putin has done away with any hint of competition. When he dies, Russia will be in chaos as all his former lackies try and take his place. Even if there is not an outright civil war, Russia will be too busy with internal conflicts to bother with Ukraine.

It will be similar to when Stalin died, but without the stabilizing force of the communist party to shield the population from the conflict.

#130 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-14 01:54 PM | Reply

#130 This is true.

Seems like even within the military there are great fractions.

#131 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-03-14 02:41 PM | Reply

It sure is fun to bankrupt Russia and Pooty Pants
while Effete rails and rails and whines and cries...
I feel like Eric Cartman drinking Scott Tennerman's tears. ;D ;D ;D

Pooty Pants won't do -----...
Not unless he wants to make Moscow into a glass bowl.

#132 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-14 02:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Seems like even within the military there are great fractions."

I suspect that the military may represent the largest opposition group in the country. Sorta like the German military in WWII.

#133 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-14 03:06 PM | Reply

It still took the Red army to defeat Germany.

I guess they weren't too strident about their "resistance".

Hitler killing himself and all.

No Putin, means aimless nukes pointing everywhere from submarines and silos at the world.

Chaos with six thousand nuclear weapons.

Sounds almost worse than having Putin around.

Be careful what you wish for...you may get it.

#134 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-14 04:58 PM | Reply

It still took the Red army to defeat Germany.

It still took the Germany to defeat Red army.

Even then they ended up with half of Europe.

#135 | Posted by libs_of_dr at 2024-03-14 05:17 PM | Reply

It still took the Germany to defeat Red army.

Daddysfist, are you having a stroke?

#136 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-03-14 05:19 PM | Reply

The Free Russian fighters and the Serbia Brigade are doing a lot of the damage on the ground inside Russia recently, as per the video in #79 where they appear to be going after a nuclear storage plant.

#137 | Posted by Corky at 2024-03-14 06:27 PM | Reply

Lol. Germany was defeated by the Russian winter,
certainly not the 'Red Army'. But hey, believe whatever fables you need to.

Heck! There are people who think that angels talk to them, or that Trump is actually sane...

#138 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-14 08:26 PM | Reply

#134

Internet "tough guy" should change his diaper.

#139 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-03-14 10:48 PM | Reply

Got any baby wipes? I'm fresh out.

#140 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2024-03-15 12:13 AM | Reply

It became increasingly clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation of the build-up of Soviet military power in the East during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military build-up of world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather to attack that which seemed incapable of defense ... I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost.

#141 | Posted by libs_of_dr at 2024-03-15 12:37 AM | Reply

Stalin apologists might think he was a good boy.
Surely he was going to stop with the Balkans and Latvia Lithuania Estonia Finland and Romania and Hungary and Poland and Czechoslovakia and most of Germany. Don't forget North Africa and Japan+ possessions and Korea.

But he was going to stop there for sure. He was an ally, for god's sake.

#142 | Posted by libs_of_dr at 2024-03-15 12:51 AM | Reply

Russia is experiencing internal conflict by an increasing number of anti-Putin militias. How they are communicating with each other is a mystery but as Putin is about to be "elected" again to yet another term as Russia's Fuehrer, more and more Russians are becoming with Putin & Russia's government. Could this frustration spill over to Kalingrad? Maybe. Check out this: "Why Russia Will Lose Kaliningrad":
www.youtube.com

#143 | Posted by Augustine at 2024-03-15 01:27 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"It still took the Red army to defeat Germany."

A red Army kept alive by US equipment transfers. Kinda like Ukraine.

#144 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-15 02:26 AM | Reply

"I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost."

Is that a quote from somebody?

Because a quote from Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German Abwehr (think Reich CIA) to Friedrich Fromm indicates that honest leaders even then saw Germany losing the war. Likely because the US has joined the effort three months earlier.

Additionally, while the Russians operated on one front, the western allies operated on two. YOu seem to be suggesting that without the eastern front, the other two would have failed.

Finally, it's incredibly important to remember that much of Europe was lost-and the rest of it under threat-once Germany was defeated.

#145 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-15 02:33 AM | Reply

to rouse votes for orange putin.

#146 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 04:17 AM | Reply

don't worry, voters won't.

#147 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 04:20 AM | Reply

Just for fun, replace Russia with United States, and Pres Putin with Pres Bush.
#44 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

ok, Bush came and went via DEMOCRACY.
Putin didn't and never will.

#148 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 04:42 AM | Reply

Putin saw Dubya get away with it.

You think that didn't influence or encourage him to try it too?

#35 | Posted by Effeteposer

And the lesson you learned is - LET PUTIN DO IT TOO.

Insted of - DONT ELECT REPUBLICANS
#47 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

best retort. as i sit discouraged in a japanese starbucks.

#149 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 04:50 AM | Reply

We live in A Stupid World. It's like we haven't stopped being stone age tribes.

War is the most defining characteristic of humanity...Not Reason.

Tribalism and Massacre are in our DNA.

It will be the cause of our Extinction.
#51 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

stone age tribes advanced to "tax" citizens to buy defenses from more stupid and brutal ones; we call criminals today.

" some/many of you guys need to play the whole tape.

#150 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 04:54 AM | Reply

Well ok then! We have been ready for that since the 50s.

Might as well find out! Burning up those nukes would cut down on the overhead... expensive toys to maintain.

#55 | POSTED BY REDIAL

if so. then first just take out Putin.

#151 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 05:24 AM | Reply

#62

NATO is not "bait."

#152 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 05:31 AM | Reply

Putin warns the West: Russia Ready for Nuclear War

Again? He plays that card regularly. If you always bluff, bluffing loses it's effectiveness.

I am so happy that Rigt wingers such as Tucker Carlson believe Putin should be our role model.

#127 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-03-14 01:20 PM | Reply | Flag

Fishsticks will say anything for a paycheck. He has only a smidgen more integrity than Donny Dementia.

#153 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-03-15 07:14 AM | Reply

I don't see anyone saying the Chechen wars were a vital Western issue.

Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much.

They know about boundaries and common sense policy concerning Spheres of influence.

Too bad NATO doesn't,we may all pay for that stupidity.

#72 | POSTED BY EFFETEPOSER

Self-determination, Democracy, and Freedom are not only virtuous, but vital to human interest of Peace, not war.

"wtf is with you and your backwards irrational "woke virtue signaling".

#154 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 07:37 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#84 proves you're just a troll.

#155 | Posted by ichiro at 2024-03-15 07:47 AM | Reply

Effette is a tankie dip$#!+

#156 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-03-15 08:03 AM | Reply

Russia doesn't Meddle in The Western Hemisphere too much.

What a stupid ass statement.

Russia is meddling in EVERY WESTERN DEMOCRACY for decades.

#157 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-03-15 10:30 AM | Reply

Hey Effete!

Russian losses in Ukraine...(to date)

Tanks " 6758 (+1)
Armored fighting vehicle " 12949 (+11)
Artillery systems " 10580 (+15)
MLRS " 1017
Anti-aircraft warfare " 717
Planes " 347
Helicopters " 325
UAV " 8254 (+34)
Cruise missiles " 1920
Ships (boats) " 26
Submarines " 1
Cars and cisterns " 13993 (+34)
Special equipment " 1711 (+3)
Military personnel " aprx. 428,420 people

source: index.minfin.com.ua

So much winning!!!
Stick that in your Russian Pooty Pipe and smoke it...

#158 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-15 10:56 AM | Reply

Russia started the War as an almost 3rd World country
pretending to be a Developed First World country,
and they will end up a full 50-70 years behind the
West and a Borderline Undeveloped Country when Putin
finally realizes he cannot win this war...

#159 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-15 10:58 AM | Reply

Putin and other Russians are inexplicably obsessed
with the notion that the West wants Russia or wants
to occupy it. Maybe all those years of Putin working
at the KGB and the FSB cooked his neurons a bit too much.
It certainly seems to have hopelessly colored his worldview.

The West wants NO PART in occupying Russia and babysitting
it's populace. China, is the one that wants to cede control
of large swaths of Siberia and (the Stans: Uzbekistan, Tajikistan,
etc...) from Russian control.

I'd worry more about China if I was Pooty.

Besides (thanks in large part to Pooty) NATO doesn't have that
much further to expand, other than eventually adding Ukraine to the fold.
(ie. that Goose is already mostly cooked!)

#160 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-03-15 11:33 AM | Reply

"when Putin
finally realizes he cannot win this war..."

He's psychotic he'll sacrifice the enrire Russian military before he let's Ukraine to announce victory and begin exterminating the Russian invaders. We are fools in this country to let traitors like Mike Johnson and Trump prevent us from giving then the weapons they need to win this war withouy any U.S. troops on the ground. We should have learned the lesson about appeasement in the 1030's.

#161 | Posted by danni at 2024-03-15 11:38 AM | Reply

"A lot of people "know" things that Ain't so."

Tell us again how Vlad was FORCED to invade a sovereign nation.

#162 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-03-15 12:12 PM | Reply

Vlad the bully Nazi wannabe and his supports of murder and rape like that--------- known on here as Effetposer are just really cowards.

#163 | Posted by Wildman62 at 2024-03-15 01:58 PM | Reply

source: index.minfin.com.ua

lol. We need 500,000 to replace our 31,000 casualty.

#164 | Posted by libs_of_dr at 2024-03-15 02:06 PM | Reply

#160

Might I recommend you watch the 1420 channel on YouTube?

It gives a decent perspective on who supports the SMO, and why.

Most of the people reek of Snoofy. Not terribly smart, but somehow, they've convinced themselves they're worthy of a professorship.

And dude, I hate video as much as anyone over age 25...but maybe give it a shot?

#165 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-03-15 06:48 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort