Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, February 16, 2024

The Georgia election subversion case against Donald Trump and 14 of his allies took a stunning turn Thursday when two top prosecutors testified under oath about their romantic relationship at a hearing triggered by allegations of self-dealing that have the potential to derail the indictment.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

POSTED BY CLAUDIO

Haven't you got another freedom fighter in Russia you need to torture and murder?

The world's tolerance for you shallow maniacs is drawing to a close.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 07:28 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

"Haven't you got another freedom fighter in Russia you need to torture and murder?
#1 | POSTED BY ZED"

You mean NATO/NEOCON Jihadists?

#2 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 07:36 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

You mean NATO/NEOCON Jihadists?

#2 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

No, son. I mean you.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 07:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

#2 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

On a day like today, there's no exaggerating how sick you and your people are.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 07:47 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

#2 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

And, by the way, I hope that Endrogon BLEEDS Trump today.

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 07:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

"And, by the way, I hope that Endrogon BLEEDS Trump today.
#5 | POSTED BY ZED"

Of course you do - you have not respect for the rule of law. Just as your Dirty Fani demonstrated today, the Democrats are corrupt POS....and their day of reckoning is fast approaching.

#6 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 08:29 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

the Democrats are corrupt POS....and their day of reckoning is fast approaching.

#6 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

If you come to my door I will shoot you.

I report; you decide.

#7 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 08:46 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"If you come to my door I will shoot you.
#7 | POSTED BY ZED"

LOL...sure thing tough guy...

#8 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 08:47 AM | Reply

LOL...sure thing tough guy...

#8 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

That's the thing....I am not especially tough. But I am able to protect my family from the scum of the earth if you make yourself available to me.

#9 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 08:52 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#8 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

You fascists love to threaten. It's one of your fundamental traits. However, not everyone can be pushed around, or pushed around forever. You don't get too far outside that snowflake fascist bubble or you would know that.

#10 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 08:55 AM | Reply

Clod-ia is factors of 10 stupider than the Russian or Chi-com bots on here.

Really thought that was impossible.

#11 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-02-16 11:14 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Of course you do - you have not respect for the rule of law. Just as your Dirty Fani demonstrated today, the Democrats are corrupt POS....and their day of reckoning is fast approaching.

#6 | Posted by Claudio

This is trump's day of reckoning for attempted a coup against democracy.

And your fascist cult thinks an unrelated extramarital affair is the key to him getting away with his crimes.

Tell us - how would fani's affair change what trump did in any way?

#12 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 12:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Tell us - how would fani's affair change what trump did in any way?

#12 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2024-02-16 12:51 PM | FLAG:
(CHOOSE)

She is attempting to remove him from running by charging him with racketeering which is in itself a joke. She is also totally incompetent as she showed yesterday. She thought since she was working for Biden she was bullet proof and could get away with lining her pockets. She got exposed yesterday for the idiot she is, even MSNBC said she was incompetent.

#13 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-02-16 01:11 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

Hey, if a Prosecutor has a love life, you must Acquit Trump.

Pretty sure thats in the Constitution, eh?

Her sins wash away all Trump's crimes. You cant hold Trump responsible for his Crime, A crime he is on tape committing, if a prosecutor has a boyfriend.

#14 | Posted by Wardog at 2024-02-16 01:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Hey, Gov Fishpaw!

Just find me 11,780 votes, m'k?

If you don't you'll be in bigly trouble!

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 01:21 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Another thing her testimony has demonstrated is how pro Trump the judge here is. Stands to reason that a judge would be pro Trump considering the promotion Judge Kavanaugh got after he wrote that article about how the president can't be prosecuted.
These people notice such things even if your media lets things like this pass.

#16 | Posted by prius04 at 2024-02-16 01:23 PM | Reply

#15 "Trump didn't win in 2016, he colluded with Russia." The entire Democratic party for 4 years

#17 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-02-16 01:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#16 He was pro Trump because he let her blabber on? Oh I get it, by letting her blabber on it showed us what a total idiot she is and that she isn't fit to be a DA. I don't think she needed to Judge to help her out with that.

#18 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-02-16 01:27 PM | Reply

Trump colluded with Russia?

#17 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Trump IS a Russian, who today is running interference for Putin over the murder of Navalny.

#19 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 01:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Under oath she testified she committed campaign fraud.

#20 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-16 01:29 PM | Reply

how would fani's affair change what trump did in any way?
#12 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

What did he do exactly, that was against the law.

can you prove it in a court of law?

The "proving part" is where fanis affair comes into play. Contact with the white house, etc etc.

#21 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-16 01:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

She is attempting to remove him from running by charging him with racketeering which is in itself a joke. She is also totally incompetent as she showed yesterday. She thought since she was working for Biden she was bullet proof and could get away with lining her pockets. She got exposed yesterday for the idiot she is, even MSNBC said she was incompetent.

#13 | Posted by fishpaw

He attempted to overthrow democracy in georgia. Tell me why only a prosecutor who hasn't had an affair can prosecute those crimes.

If affairs disqualify you from doing your job, I have some bad news for you about your cult leader...

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 01:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

#15 "Trump didn't win in 2016, he colluded with Russia." The entire Democratic party for 4 years

#17 | Posted by fishpaw

Trump DID win WITH russia's help.

And the democrats still didn't attempt a coup over it.

#23 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 01:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

He (trump) attempted to overthrow democracy in georgia.

#22 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

You've known FISHPAW long enough to understand that he wants democracy to be over-thrown. It's just that he does not feel brave enough to say that in so many words.

#24 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 01:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"Just as your Dirty Fani demonstrated today, the Democrats are corrupt POS....and their day of reckoning is fast approaching."

Do you know who Fani Willis reminds me of? You guessed it. Trump. She can do whatever she wants...because she's Fani Willis. Laws, policies, behaving in a manner consistent with the office....that's for everyone else.

She's a lot more entertaining person than Trump is though.

#25 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-16 01:56 PM | Reply

Trump DID win WITH russia's help.
And the democrats still didn't attempt a coup over it.
#23 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY AT 2024-02-16 01:50 PM | FLAG:

Putin just endorsed Biden. And just because a couple of Russian bot facebook pages could sway Democrats doesn't mean it changed the election.

#26 | Posted by fishpaw at 2024-02-16 02:10 PM | Reply

Putin just endorsed Biden. And just because a couple of Russian bot facebook pages could sway Democrats doesn't mean it changed the election.

#26 | Posted by fishpaw

No wonder that someone dumb enough to believe trump is also dumb enough to believe putin.

Do you believe putin when he says there are no homosexuals in russia?

#27 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 02:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

He attempted to overthrow democracy in georgia.
- speaks

Prove it. I appreciate Americas system of justice.

You seem to prefer Russians.

#28 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-16 02:20 PM | Reply

Putin just endorsed Biden.

#26 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Putin lies even more than you do. Let's hope that you've killed fewer people.

#29 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-16 02:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Under oath she testified she committed campaign fraud.

#20 | Posted by oneironaut

she sure did but you see here's the thing.

these people here have to keep the heat on about trump and putin so they have to take every thread and remind
everyone just how stupid they really are with their idiotic comparisons and rabid ignorant charges of collusion.

and then there is the incontrovertible fact that is the democrat leftist-dogma KLAN's creed.

"it's not fascism....when we do it."

sieg heil / comrade

#30 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2024-02-16 02:37 PM | Reply

"it's not fascism....when we do it."

Tell us: which of the 91 indicted actions could you or I do without fear of legal repercussions?

Similarly, if you or I took classified documents, lied about having them, enlisted others to hide them, and lied under oath that we'd returned them...would we be walking around free, or rotting in jail until our trial date?

My guess is it's YOU who wants a two-tiered justice system.

#31 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-02-16 02:43 PM | Reply

Lumpers here have to keep the heat on about trump and putin so they have to take every thread and remind
everyone just how stupid they really are with their idiotic comparisons and rabid ignorant charges of collusion.
#30

FTFY

It certainly seems like much of this is a distraction.

Like Biden complaining about shrinkflation on a Superbowl ad.

I am a little distraught over all this as there are serious issues at play.

#32 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-16 02:47 PM | Reply

It's not a good look for Willis. If the judge finds that the relationship presents a conflict of interest - which is a stretch - she could be disqualified. But having an affair is nothing compared to what Trump has done and continues to do every day.

#33 | Posted by cbob at 2024-02-16 02:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Prove it. I appreciate Americas system of justice.

You seem to prefer Russians.

#28 | Posted by oneironaut

Russia's system is one where corrupt oligarchs never face justice. If trump gets away with his crimes that's what we'll have too.

#34 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 03:16 PM | Reply

Lumpers here have to keep the heat on about trump and putin so they have to take every thread and remind
everyone just how stupid they really are with their idiotic comparisons and rabid ignorant charges of collusion.
#30

#32 | Posted by oneironaut

Mr. "Dont lump me in with trumpers" still wants to pretend that it was no big deal when trump hired a russian asset as his campaign manager.

#35 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 03:18 PM | Reply

He attempted to overthrow democracy in georgia.
- speaks

Prove it.
#28 | POSTED BY 1LUMPER2

You can't prove anything to a Trumper. They have no use for facts. Or reality.

"Donald Trump's infamous call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is now a key piece of evidence in the criminal investigations into the former president's attempts to overturn the 2020 election. During the January 2, 2021, call, Trump invoked several false claims of widespread voter fraud to pressure Raffensperger to reverse the state's election results, ranging from lies about out-of-state and dead voters to conspiracy theories about drop box stuffing and compromised election equipment. These false claims drove the January 6 attack on the Capitol and continue to damage our democracy."

www.brennancenter.org

www.atlantanewsfirst.com

#36 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-16 03:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Apropos of nothing:
[A Blonde] walks into a bank with a large bag of money and wants to open an account. The teller says, "My, did you horde all that money yourself?" [The Blonde] replied, "No, my sister whored half of it."

#37 | Posted by censored at 2024-02-16 04:04 PM | Reply

37 posts on this thread and not a single one of them is on topic.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-16 04:16 PM | Reply

37 posts on this thread and not a single one of them is on topic.
#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

But, but, but ... derailing threads is your job ...

Time to find a new line of work.

#39 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-16 04:19 PM | Reply

Trump is guilty as hell. But that does not change the fact that, in my opinion Fani Willis is a liar. Or, I should say, a LIAR! I believe she is lying when she says her affair did not start until 2022. I believe she is lying when she says her romantic relationship had nothing to do with her appointing Wade to head the prosecution. And she is lying about the large sums of money she kept in her house.

None of this exonerates Trump in the slightest. It may not even require her recusal from the case her office is prosecuting against him. But her ass needs to be voted out of office at the earliest available date. Everyone, leftwing and rightwing, is sick and tired of lying, politically motivated District Attorneys.

#40 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-02-16 04:20 PM | Reply

prosecutors testified under oath about their romantic relationship

How does this impact the proceedings?

Where's the conflict of interest?

Are conservatives insisting prosecutors can not be romantically involved with each other?

Wasn't this thread already recently posted?

Looks like desperation by conservatives.

To save Trump from his own criminality.

#41 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-16 04:23 PM | Reply

37 posts on this thread and not a single one of them is on topic.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger

Sorry would you like to discuss the topic, of how republicans are trying to protect their criminal cult leader from accountability by destroying the prosecutor?

#42 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 04:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"I believe she is lying when she says her affair did not start until 2022. "

When do you think it started?

Hugo Lowell
@hugolowell

Fulton County DA special prosecutor Nathan Wade says he wasn't dating anyone in 2020 bc he was battling cancer and could not go out into non-sterile environment
2:34 PM Feb 15, 2024

No one said what type of cancer he had, but I got the impression from some comments that it might have been prostate cancer or some cancer that affected his ability to have sex. I'm speculating, but the judge in the case will know the specifics. Even if he couldn't have sex, it doesn't mean they couldn't have been dating but maybe not dating in the way many people define it.

#43 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 04:38 PM | Reply

Everyone, leftwing and rightwing, is sick and tired of lying, politically motivated District Attorneys. #40 | Posted by moder8

Agreed! Next stop for for Fani should be SCOTUS, right next to Bart Boofernaugh.

#44 | Posted by censored at 2024-02-16 04:39 PM | Reply

"And she is lying about the large sums of money she kept in her house."

It sounds like her father was old school in that way and raised her to be the same. My grandparents were like that. They kept a lock box hidden in a cubby hole up in the attic filled with cash in envelopes marked Groceries, Gas, Gifts, etc. It isn't a practice I embraced, but I can believe it's a practice other people may have followed and advocated.

#45 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 04:45 PM | Reply

#45 That's the rule for old-timers.
Banks couldn't be trusted back then.
I know a guy when his grandmother died the family was digging up mason jars filled with cash that has been buried in the backyard.

#46 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-16 04:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You can't prove anything to a Trumper. They have no use for facts. Or reality.

Trumper? LOL You're a tool of the Political elites in Washington!

In the beginning of my political education, I swallowed lie after lie after lie the political MSM told me.

Russia Collusion
Trump called NeoNazi's "Fine People"
Trump overfed fish in Japan
Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot.
Trump stored nuclear secrets at MArLargo
Border Agents whipped illegal border crossers
Hunter Bidens laptop was disinformation.

The list is almost endless.

But I learned it was an ongoing rush of accusations with no proof that withstands scrutiny.

Seriously all these "accusations" are just hyperbolic propaganda statements.

No, Speaks, and ClownHut regurgitate it like its gospel, what complete and total tools.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-16 04:57 PM | Reply

No, Speaks, and ClownHut regurgitate it like its gospel, what complete and total tools.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut

You must be young if your politics started with trump. That explains your ignorance.

I just keep asking you why trump picked a russian asset as his campaign manager out of everyone in the world he could have picked, and why that's not something that should be investigated. And you keep not answering.

#48 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 05:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"In the beginning of my political education, I swallowed lie after lie after lie the political MSM told me."

And now...what? Trump is the honest broker? Trump supporters are honesty brokers?

If you want some advice, don't follow US news. Listen to DW, and Al Jazeera, and the BBC. None of them are perfect, but between the different non-US outlets you'll get a better picture of what the facts really are.

#49 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-16 05:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"In the beginning of my political education, I swallowed lie after lie after lie the political MSM told me."

Let's test that theory:
What happened in Tienanmen Square?

#50 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-16 05:08 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

"Russia Collusion"

How is it no Republican ever read The Rubio Report.

REPUBLICANS admitted Team Trump had over 100 contacts with Russians, all while telling the American people they'd had ZERO contacts with Russians. REPUBLICANS called it a "grave security threat".

At this point, still pretending there was no attempted collusion between Team Trump and the Russians is A SELF-OWN.

#51 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-02-16 06:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Trumper? LOL You're a tool of the Political elites in Washington!

You're a tool of China.

In the beginning of my political education,

What are you? 20? No wonder you're so gullible and ignorant.

I learned it was an ongoing rush of accusations with no proof that withstands scrutiny.

You summed up the messaging of the Republican Party quite succinctly.

Well done.

Seriously all these "accusations" are just hyperbolic propaganda statements.

Accusations? I posted the transcript of the conversation Trump had with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in #36.

You can literally read Trump telling Raffensperger how to change the election results.

Also. Raffensperger is a Republican. Possibly one of the last with any integrity.

No, Speaks, and ClownHut regurgitate it like its gospel, what complete and total tools.
#47 | POSTED BY 1LUMPER2

You're a joke, a loser and a liar.

#52 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-16 06:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

She was brilliant. Hands down. She handed Trump and his attorney's their asses and it was BEAUTIFUL.

#53 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-16 06:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

When she took the stand, I nicknamed her Feisty Fani.

#54 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 06:58 PM | Reply

Oh yes! Wore her dress backwards, spoke like a 5th grade dropout and admitted to withdrawing a lot of money from her campaign account and kept at home in the form of cash. Cause when the BF dropped a G on her, she paid him back, no proof needed! All the while swearing to tell the truth. Brilliant. Hand down. BEAUTIFUL.

#55 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-16 07:00 PM | Reply

She also said she used $50,000 of her own money toward her campaign. Are you allowed to take out money you yourself put into your campaign? BTW, who in the hell keeps records/receipts of the money they give their bf/gf to reimburse them for a plane ticket or hotel bills or meals and entertainment when they are on vacation?

#56 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:10 PM | Reply

She also said she made $200,000 a year as DA. If that is true, I find it laughable that she hired her bf so that she could financially benefit to the tune of a few trips that cost so little. If that's what she did, she is a grifter neophyte for sure and needs to study up on Clarence Thomas trips paid for by billionaires to see how the art of the grift is really done.

#57 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:15 PM | Reply

Oh yes! Wore her dress backwards

#55 | Posted by gracieamazed

^expert on the proper way to wear a dress

#58 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-02-16 07:26 PM | Reply

"Wore her dress backwards"

I hadn't heard that particular diss, so I checked out Twitter and that seems to be the rightwing spin. However, this poster refutes the claim and posts a catalog photo of the front zipper dress Fani was wearing:

Bella August
@BellaAugust4

You're a ------ dumbass if you think DA Fani Willis is wearing her dress backward. Maga repeating this BS from End Wokeness shows how gullible they are. The charges are BS so they can't do anything but make something up.

twitter.com

#59 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#58 Yep. Benefit of Home Ed where girls took sewing and boys took shop back in the day. Hook and eyes go on the back of the dress. So do darts, that was even funnier. She should have dropped a G on a stylist.

#60 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-16 07:34 PM | Reply

^expert on the proper way to wear a dress
#58 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

She's an expert on posting rightwing memes.

#61 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:34 PM | Reply

Here it is on Amazon for the Twitter challenged:

VFSHOW Womens Front Zipper Tie Waist Slim Work Business Office Bodycon Pencil Dress

www.amazon.com

#62 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:38 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

LOL Twitter. I never saw a zipper, only the hook, eye and back darts. They are not fashion trends. Hook & Eyes are ugly and, in the back, at the neckline for a reason. She wore the dress backwards.

#63 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-16 07:40 PM | Reply

No, she wore it properly. The Amazon link shows the dress she was wearing.

#64 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Who said zipper, why do you keep referring to the zipper? Keep handing that poster their as on an Amazon platter. Have a great night.

#65 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-16 07:43 PM | Reply

Front zipper?

Now that's what I call fashion innovation!

Wish we had had those back when.... oh, never mind!

Prolly best we didn't. Though it would have made burning bras so much easier.

#66 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 07:43 PM | Reply

For ----- and giggles, I just Googled the picture of her on the stand. That most certainly was NOT the dress she wore with the chunky white pearls. LOL. Now, have a great night.

#67 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-16 07:47 PM | Reply

- ----- and giggles

Wasn't that FishP and your's Vaudeville Act?

#68 | Posted by Corky at 2024-02-16 07:50 PM | Reply

Well, this is the picture folks are saying she had on backwards, but this is not the dress she was wearing:

twitter.com

twitter.com

#69 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-16 07:58 PM | Reply

You -------- are desperate - this is not even about the affair now - it is about the fact that she and her lead prosecutor LIED to the court. And yes, $600k for Nathan Wade, a dude coming out of a divorce and seems dull-normal intelligence (at best) which is then kicked back to his girlfriend WAS THE INCENTIVE to put him in this position. Also, it demonstrates why this ------- carries on this charade when there is no case there - she is doing it for personal enrichment.

Sorry, if you are a DA - YOU DON'T GET TO LIE TO THE COURT! Liberals used to understand this simple concept but it seems their TDS is to the point where the ends justify the means regardless of what norms get trampled.

#70 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 08:35 PM | Reply

"which is then kicked back to his girlfriend"

Which should be easy to prove with the paper trail. Where is the paper trail?

#71 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-02-16 08:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Which should be easy to prove with the paper trail. Where is the paper trail?
#71 | POSTED BY DANFORTH"

Do you live under a rock? It was already proven by Wade being so damn dumb that he booked all their trips on his business credit card and they are now forced to concoct this ridiculous story about Fani paying him back in cash - which she cannot explain where is came from - BECAUSE THERE IS NOT PAPER TRAIL on her paying back ----. Fani, because she is low intelligence, is basically broke so the thought of 3 all expenses paid international trips with her boyfriend is a powerful incentive - and everyone with above a dull-normal IQ can see it.

#72 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 09:01 PM | Reply

Another day, another republican super witness caught lying under oath.

#73 | Posted by northguy3 at 2024-02-16 09:05 PM | Reply

" Fani, because she is low intelligence, is basically broke"

ANOTHER claim without proof.

Keep digging.

#74 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-02-16 09:13 PM | Reply

"ANOTHER claim without proof.
Keep digging.
#74 | POSTED BY DANFORTH"

LOL, if this is the hill you want to die on, be my guest. Her testimony was so horrible that she decided not to show up today to continue. This is what happens when you ally with these corrupt morons - you didn't learn your lesson from Avenatti cheerleading yet?

#75 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 09:22 PM | Reply

"Sorry, if you are a DA - YOU DON'T GET TO LIE TO THE COURT!"

DA's lie to the court all the time.
It's rarely even grounds for a mistrial or a new trial post-conviction.

You "Law and Order" types ought to know that, and like it!

#76 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-16 09:42 PM | Reply

"DA's lie to the court all the time.
#76 | POSTED BY SNOOFY"

And -------- like you cheer it on - does the stupid hurt?

#77 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 09:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Cops lie and DA's know it. Works great in jury duty.

#78 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-02-16 09:49 PM | Reply

Cops are trained to lie. It's part of the job, which completely undermines the credibility of the profession as a whole. These folks are setup for failure while in boot camp.

#79 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-02-16 10:03 PM | Reply

"Cops are trained to lie.
#79 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11"

And -------- like you cheer it on - does the stupid hurt?

#80 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-02-16 10:08 PM | Reply

#80

You lazy ----. Put up or shutup, be specific when laying accusations. Me thinks you're full of chit.

Swallow it.

#81 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-02-16 10:49 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"She was brilliant. Hands down. She handed Trump and his attorney's their asses and it was BEAUTIFUL."

All of the evidence suggests she is corrupt. Her demeanor in the courtroom is the only reason I think she might not be.

#82 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-17 04:12 AM | Reply

All I've heard about this case is her testimony of her regaling the court of her father telling her to keep cash stored in the house for emergencies as an emergency fund - which is old school but I respect it.

To be honest, that's all I care to learn about of this case taking place in a state far away from my own.

#83 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2024-02-17 06:57 AM | Reply

GONOLES

Your choice. But the rest of us knew that she wasn't the one on trial. The plaintiff in the case was a co-defendant in Trump's effort to change the outcome of the 2020 Georgia state election ~ (a case that hasn't gone to trial yet). Fani Willis is the D.A. in Fulton County. Trump's team is trying to have her removed from the case by asserting a bunch of lies to destroy her credibility, thereby creating one of Trump's famous delay, delay, delay tactics to run out the clock to he can avoid prosecution.

What you saw was Ms Willis throwing their accusations back in their face.

I don't know what state you live in but no state is too far away to be affected by Trump's dirty tricks. Trump, et al is being brought to justice in both civil and federal cases on 91 bona fide charges in total. Should he win the election in 2024, your state and 49 others will be very much affected in the most negative ways possible.

You should care about that!

#84 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-02-17 07:57 AM | Reply

All of the evidence suggests she is corrupt.

#82 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

If it is "all" the evidence then you should be able to cite some easily.

So far I see nothing but the usual MAGA cynical hysteria.

#85 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 08:36 AM | Reply

#75 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

It's hilarious to hear a Trump supporter such as yourself wail about "corrupt morons".

How many square feet do YOU believe is in Donald's penthouse?

#86 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 08:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You should care about that! #84 | POSTED BY TWINPAC

You make good points but following the play by play of the case rather than occasional recaps seems exhausting on something that is completely out of my control - if that makes sense?

#87 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2024-02-17 09:00 AM | Reply

"You -------- are desperate - this is not even about the affair now - it is about the fact that she and her lead prosecutor LIED to the court. "

This is not a court. It's a retort. Get gate will be decided by the judge. It should have been decided by the HR dept.

You Maga maroons are So funny. You claim to be concerned about the rule of law while you support and cheer for a criminal doing his best to avoid being held accountable by rule of law.

This was never about Fani and her alleged affairs. It's trumpian financed distraction and an attempt to keep trumpy's case from ever going to trial.

It's about delaying Trumpy's court dates and delaying or better yet preventing him from ever being held accountable for his crimes against America.

Having said all that she should have known better than even allow an appearance of a conflict of interest if she was going to take on the king of digging up dirt on others.

#88 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 11:12 AM | Reply

"Get gate" should have been "her fate".

#89 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 11:14 AM | Reply

#59 Maybe you should unfollow Bella, she watched as much of the trial and stills as you did, which was zero based on that Twit(X). Got caught, so you post #69 after looking it up. It took longer than others, but Trump finally broke you. TooTles.

#90 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-17 11:23 AM | Reply

All of the evidence suggests she is corrupt.

#82 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

If it is "all" the evidence then you should be able to cite some easily.

So far I see nothing but the usual MAGA cynical hysteria.

#85 | POSTED BY ZED

Yeah but she apparently wore her dress "bass ackwards" so that proves something something!

#91 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 11:37 AM | Reply

"If it is "all" the evidence then you should be able to cite some easily. So far I see nothing but the usual MAGA cynical hysteria."

You don't see anything unusual about her minimally qualified boyfriend getting the job he gave her? Or getting $600k while the two others got ~$90k?

Or that he paid for her vacations, and she reimbursed him with cash?

Maybe it's just me, but I would venmo the person. Or if I wanted to go old school, write a check.

#92 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-17 11:42 AM | Reply

This sounds like something Trump wouuld do.

#93 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-17 11:43 AM | Reply

" None of this exonerates Trump in the slightest. It may not even require her recusal from the case her office is prosecuting against him. But her ass needs to be voted out of office at the earliest available date. Everyone, leftwing and rightwing, is sick and tired of lying, politically motivated District Attorneys.

#40 | POSTED BY MODER8 AT 2024-02-16 04:20 PM | FLAG: "

Her conduct doesn't change the facts of the case but I don't see how she can be retained. She really does have to go if the judge rules against her.

#94 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 11:52 AM | Reply

Her conduct doesn't change the facts of the case but I don't see how she can be retained.

#94 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Think about what you just said.

No changes in the case but you will allow Trump to skate?

#95 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 11:58 AM | Reply

If this woman is "too corrupt" to be a judge then I guarangodamntee Trumpy is way too corrupt to be a President.

#96 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 12:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" No changes in the case but you will allow Trump to skate?

#95 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2024-02-17 11:58 AM | FLAG:

She needs to be replaced with another prosecutor.

#97 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 12:16 PM | Reply

She needs to be replaced with another prosecutor.

#97 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Why? Be specific.

This does not appear to be a conflict of interest that actually prejudices the defendants in any way.

#98 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-02-17 12:35 PM | Reply

If it's determined she perjured herself SHE needs to be prosecuted.

Nobody is above the law. Right?

#99 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 12:42 PM | Reply

Couldn't all this have been avoided if someone recused themselves from the case? (I'm a low info commenter on this current event, but the messy personal drama is a bit popcorn worthy.)

#100 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2024-02-17 01:13 PM | Reply

#59 Maybe you should unfollow Bella, she watched as much of the trial and stills as you did, which was zero based on that Twit(X). Got caught, so you post #69 after looking it up. It took longer than others, but Trump finally broke you. TooTles.
#90 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

I don't follow Bella. I had never read a tweet of hers until last night when I typed "fani willis dress backwards" into the twitter search box and her tweet was one of the ones that came up. The twitter links I posted in #69 came up in the same twitter search. FWIW, I saw the tail end of Wade's testimony, a good chunk of Fani's and a snippet of her father's. I'm not the one who is broken. I do, however, think a lot of people who were already broken are attracted to Trump.

#101 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 03:02 PM | Reply

To me anyone who sees Trump as being ordained by God to save this country is broken.

So is anyone who needs Trump to be their retribution is broken.

Likewise anyone who thinks Trump is a good, honest person is broken.

So, too, anyone who says "Trump is a narcissistic, misogynistic bastard, but he's our narcissistic, misogynistic bastard" is broken but in another way.

#102 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 03:12 PM | Reply

#102 this applies to both candidates.

#103 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 03:37 PM | Reply

Do better Gal. running to Twitter because you don't know the answer (no one was talking about the zipper here) and quoting that person as FACT when she was just an angry little lady with TDS and wrong, is not a good look. Do a better job researching. TooTles.

#104 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-17 03:39 PM | Reply

Can someone explain to me the relevance that a DA banging her deputy has on the criminal allegations against Trump?

Maybe it's unseemly or whatever, but i fail to see how it negates the claims against him.

Anyone?

#105 | Posted by JOE at 2024-02-17 03:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Do better Gal.
#104 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

Gracie, you're the least informed, possibly most obnoxious person on the DR.

Do better. At life.

#106 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 03:43 PM | Reply

...but i fail to see how it negates the claims against him.

It doesn't. It's just a deflection, distraction, or delaying tactic.

#107 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-02-17 03:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Can someone explain to me the relevance that a DA banging her deputy has on the criminal allegations against Trump?
Maybe it's unseemly or whatever, but i fail to see how it negates the claims against him.
Anyone?
#105 | POSTED BY JOE

I've asked this question a few times.

Where's the conflict of interest. What's the issue?

It all boils down to people who have no issue with Trump grabbing p****, suddenly becoming aghast at the thought of two consenting adults having a relationship.

It all boils down to republicans doing anything they can to protect Trump.

Manufactured outrage is all they have.

#108 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 03:46 PM | Reply

Joe,

On its own the affair isn't really a problem. That she may have perjured herself is the problem. As you well know, perjury is a big deal as a legal matter.

#109 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 03:59 PM | Reply

"Likewise anyone who thinks Trump is a good, honest person is broken."

But you don't think he deserves a fair trial by a competent court?

I despise Trump, but this whole thing with Fani Willis just plays into his hands. Maybe she's not corrupt, but she sure appears to be.

And as much as I dislike Trump, he still deserves a fair trial by a competent court. If FW feels the same, she will step aside and let someone else take the case. Someone with less self-induced baggage.

#110 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-02-17 04:01 PM | Reply

#110. It's ridiculous that even has to be said.

#111 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 04:03 PM | Reply

Okay Joe and CS, here is my take on it: Fani banging Wade does not necessarily have anything to do with Trump's crimes. The issue, from a judicial point of view, is a bigger one than the guilt or innocence of anything single defendant. Our system is based on both propriety and the appearance of propriety. Fani ------- Wade is sordid and vulgar. It makes it appear they are in cahoots, which in itself is fine. But it appears (to me) as if she has lied about the relationship, the length of the relationship, and financial aspects of the relationship. Let me emphasize, in the eyes of many, many people, myself included, she is a LIAR. Now you can reasonably argue that she has the right to lie about her personal relationships. But it becomes really problematic when the person she is ------- she then appoints as chief prosecutor in what is arguably one of the most important criminal cases in the last twenty years. Who knows what promises and understandings she and Wade have reached? Who know what else, if anything, she has lied about. If my client were being prosecuted by this duo, especially in a high profile case, I would be screaming to high heaven. The defendant, be it Donald Trump or John Doe, can be prosecuted with equal force for the alleged crimes by almost any prosecutor without this glaring appearance of impropriety. The only reason you, me, and the vast majority of the nation want the judge to keep her on the case is we are rightfully worried that this will delay the jury trial until after the Election, and we the voters will never know for certain whether or not Trump is guilty before casting our votes. But from a jurisprudential point of view, there is a serious problem here.

#112 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-02-17 04:03 PM | Reply

But it becomes really problematic when the person she is ------- she then appoints as chief prosecutor in what is arguably one of the most important criminal cases in the last twenty years.

Why?

You think he's not capable of prosecuting Trump?

Is he or isn't he capable of presenting facts to a jury?

#113 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:09 PM | Reply

Are we capable of having an absolute faith that there is not some underlying agenda behind the prosecution beyond the guilt or innocence of the defendant when the Prosecutor specially hires her lover and appoints him to oversee this specific case? I know you are smart Clownshack. You have to be able to see at least the problematic appearance of impropriety here.

#114 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-02-17 04:14 PM | Reply

It makes it appear they are in cahoots,

The prosecutor and the DA are in cahoots??

Aren't they always?

Where's the conflict of interest?

If it was the DA and the defense attorney I could see your issue.

Otherwise. Sounds like you just have a personal issue with the DA and the prosecution having a relationship.

#115 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:15 PM | Reply

There was no perjury, or at least there has been absolutely no evidence of any perjury by her that has been presented. None.
There is only one "witness" that had the option to quit or be canned that never spoke with Willis again after she "quit" - and who likely lied when she said they were "friends." In fact, she herself demoted that "best friends" the MAGA attorney tried to paint her with because it was so inaccurate.

I watched the entire hearing and there was absolutely no evidence introduced that would even come close to meeting the requirements for dismissal of Willis under Georgia law. There is no conflict. Wade wasn't even her first choice, and that was proven with testimony by the first choice that turned Willis down because the job didn't pay enough.

Reading people's comments here that are arguing that this is unfair to trump, biased, etc. proves to me that not a single one of those critics has a clue what transpired in the hearing, nor what GA law says about it.

This was, 100%, a -------- and failure of Trump's attorneys. An utter embarrassment for them for anyone that did pay attention.

And Gracie, how ------- stupid are you? You think a woman can put dress on backwards? Are you actually that completely stupid?
I don't have ----- and I can't put a t-shirt on backwards. Do you have -----? F--k me, you truly stun me with how utterly dumb you can be.

#116 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:16 PM | Reply

there is not some underlying agenda behind the prosecution beyond the guilt or innocence of the defendant when the Prosecutor specially hires her lover and appoints him to oversee this specific case?

Sleeping your way up the ladder is the American Dream.

Heels Up Harris?

I don't know if I'm smarter than this. Because I don't see the problem.

Is it anymore concerning that Jared Kushner representing America in deals with the Saudi government?

Talk about sleeping your way to the top.

#117 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:19 PM | Reply

You think he's not capable of prosecuting Trump?

He's an ambulance chaser, accepts cash from clients, so no.

Where's the conflict of interest?

Well Willis is paying Wades firm millions of dollars, it looks like a get rich quick scheme.

Make the case as big as possible makes a much money on it as they can and travel the world.

That's what it looks like.

#118 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:19 PM | Reply

Is it anymore concerning that Jared Kushner representing America in deals with the Saudi government?

He is registered as a foreign agent, was it a problem when Hunter was not?

#119 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:22 PM | Reply

Are we capable of having an absolute faith that there is not some underlying agenda behind the prosecution beyond the guilt or innocence of the defendant when the Prosecutor specially hires her lover and appoints him to oversee this specific case?

Wow. I expected WAY better from you. Your premise is based on a lie that depends on unproven assumption that hasn't even begun to be validated with any proof. Pull your head out of your a** and look around you. Do you think an attorney can't be married to an investigator, another attorney, can't work together on a case? That isn't even the issue nor what the speculative issue is about.

#120 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:22 PM | Reply

Wade wasn't even her first choice, and that was proven with testimony by the first choice that turned Willis down because the job didn't pay enough.
- yav

Irrelevant.

#121 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:23 PM | Reply

#120 sure they can, it's above board.

This was not.

#122 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:24 PM | Reply

Well Willis is paying Wades firm millions of dollars, it looks like a get rich quick scheme.

Idiot. You don't even know how much was paid or who did the paying. Your statement makes that clear. Even that lying SoS Merchant hasn't alleged "millions" or even a single "million".

#123 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:26 PM | Reply

Irrelevant

Wade's going to get rich on an hourly rate that is so low that no one else would take the job and that's irrelevant. Brilliant.

#124 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:28 PM | Reply

He's an ambulance chaser, accepts cash from clients, so no.

Accepts cash from clients? He really is making America Great Again.

An Ambulance chaser may be just who we need to keep up with Trump's antics.

Well Willis is paying Wades firm millions of dollars, it looks like a get rich quick scheme.

Get rich quick? He's a lawyer with a firm. Getting paid to do their job isn't the definition of a rich quick scheme.

Make the case as big as possible makes a much money on it as they can and travel the world.

You imagine it's the DA and the prosecutor who are making this case big? Not Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the election and the years of media coverage that lead us here?

You really have fully embraced QAnonsense.

#125 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:28 PM | Reply

This was not.

You can type whatever you want, but guess what?
No evidence.
No proof.
No case.

#126 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:29 PM | Reply

Yav, I disagree with you. Observing her and her combativeness, she did not seem like a witness simply taking the stand and saying what happened. She did NOT seem credible to me. Like cornered prey. As for her being in cahoots, as I mentioned in my initial statement above, there is nothing ipso facto surprising about a DA and a prosecutor being in cahoots about a criminal case. It is when sex, money and lies is added to the mix within the context of one of the most important prosecutions of the last few decades that the "cahoots" seems way more than the normal type you would expect to see between prosecuting team. And the statement that 'other people' are known to have slept (------) their way up the ladder is not a great defense either for the practice or the type of people who engage in it. It too does not instill confidence. Calling it "The American Dream" is a way of avoiding the entire point of whether there is an appearance of impropriety.

If you were arrested by a cop who you believed was dirty and dishonest and out to get, and then you learned the prosecutor that cop was able to choose to go after you in Court was the cop's lover about whom he had told lies about in the past in order to promote and help, you too would screaming that another prosecutor must be appointed. It stinks.

#127 | Posted by moder8 at 2024-02-17 04:31 PM | Reply

Observing her and her combativeness,

Black woman should know her place and not be so opinionated and uppity?

Yikes.

#128 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:39 PM | Reply

Sounds like you're brining some personal "experience" (trauma) along with your perspective, Moder8.
I know how I react when people lie about me or accuse me of lying. I'm WAY more combative than Willis.
I won't stand for it for one minute.

Your perspective lacks any evidence, by the way. Only one witness who I found not credible and offered only interpretations of what she may have seen, and that was all colored through the lens of her being forced out.

Did I miss another witness other than everyone else that testified they didn't even know she was involved with Wade? Even her father?

#129 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:42 PM | Reply

Yikes.

Indeed.

#130 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 04:44 PM | Reply

you too would screaming that another prosecutor must be appointed. It stinks.

I agree. But only because that's a different scenario.

The DA and the prosecutor are the same. They both represent the prosecution. They both have the same goal. They're both lawyers. They're literally the same but the DA is the DA.

If it was the Judge and the prosecutor I'd agree.

If it was the defense attorney and the DA I'd agree.

If it was the judge and the defense attorney I'd agree.

If there was anything that made me think the relationship between these two people would affect the outcome of the proceedings, I would agree.

But they're already on the same team trying to achieve the same results.

#131 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:45 PM | Reply

#131 - Exactly.
There is no conflict of interest.
There is no evidence that Wade was hired so Willis would improperly benefit personally from his hiring.
There is no evidence that hiring Wade created a conflict of interest that Willis improperly benefited from.
There's no evidence that Wade was hired only because of "personal relationship."

The utter insanity of the definition of "personal relationship" and it's relevance was stunning to me during this hearing. What does that have to do with anything?

Is it OK to hire someone you don't have any "personal" relationship but you will improperly benefit as a result?
Is it OK to hire a friend, but you will improperly benefit as a result?
How about a crush?
Is it only "bad" if you're having intercourse?
What about a "business relationship" where you improperly benefit? Is that OK?

Strip all that out and look at the evidence: Was Wade hired so that Willis could improperly benefit?
So far ZERO evidence supports that.
All the "personal", "romantic" and "intercourse" is meant to prejudice the public such that it will make it difficult for a judge to follow the GA law clearly and accurately, or will allow tRump and his lying "attorneys" to further lie about the judgement.

#132 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 05:04 PM | Reply

Do better Gal. running to Twitter because you don't know the answer (no one was talking about the zipper here) and quoting that person as FACT when she was just an angry little lady with TDS and wrong, is not a good look. Do a better job researching. TooTles.

#104 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED A

Says the woman who gets her info from who knows where. Where is your link to a picture of the dress she had on backwards? The links I saw were not the dress she was wearing. The darts in the back of the dress did not match. I wouldn't have to research your talking points if you offered up links to the research you did, but I know, providing links isn't your thing. You have proven that ad infinitum on the nooner. Do better, Gracie.

Yes, Fani was angry. In another thread I compared her reaction to Kavanaugh's minus the tears.

#133 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#102 this applies to both candidates.
#103 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

I told you you are a lumper. LOL

#134 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Her conduct doesn't change the facts of the case but I don't see how she can be retained. She really does have to go if the judge rules against her.
#94 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

If the judge rules against her, not only will she be removed from the case, but the case will be taken from the Fulton County DAs office and given to another DAs office in the state, which may or may not pursue the case. That's what I have heard anyway.

#135 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:41 PM | Reply

Bears repeating:

And Gracie, how ------- stupid are you? You think a woman can put dress on backwards? Are you actually that completely stupid?
I don't have ----- and I can't put a t-shirt on backwards. Do you have -----? F--k me, you truly stun me with how utterly dumb you can be.
#116 | POSTED BY YAV

#136 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:59 PM | Reply

Sorry about that Gal, but when you all lie constantly, and get caught, you are interexchangeable with the other liars. Now post Bella again with Amazon links.

#137 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-17 06:05 PM | Reply

Sorry about that Gal, but when you all lie constantly, and get caught, you are interexchangeable with the other liars. Now post Bella again with Amazon links.
#137 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

I haven't lied, Gracie. Not once. You saying otherwise is meaningless.

#138 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 06:11 PM | Reply

Everything Gracie says is meaningless. Especially if you consider how many posters have that username plonked.

#139 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 06:20 PM | Reply

Damn Gracie, you fnkcin' dumb.

#140 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-02-17 06:22 PM | Reply

Remember when kavanaugh lost his shht at the proceedings when he was called out for being a rapist?

That was funny.

Trump's contribution to the Supreme Court is a rapist frat boy who grew up being a fat bully rapist.

#141 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 06:22 PM | Reply

"You think a woman can put dress on backwards?"

Also, so what if she does?
It's as ad hominem as it gets.
"I don't like Fani because she put her dress on backwards" isn't a meaningful political statement. It sounds like something a kid would repeat on the playground after hearing it at home from their bottom 80% Republican father.

#142 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-17 06:26 PM | Reply

Well Willis is paying Wades firm millions of dollars, it looks like a get rich quick scheme.
Make the case as big as possible makes a much money on it as they can and travel the world.
That's what it looks like.
#118 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT

He testified that his salary is capped. Once he reaches that cap, he works for free. He has put in many more hours than he was able to bill for as a result. When he was questioned about all that he said, Are you trying to depress me?

#143 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 06:32 PM | Reply

"I don't like Fani because she put her dress on backwards" isn't a meaningful political statement. It sounds like something a kid would repeat on the playground after hearing it at home from their bottom 80% Republican father."

The backwards dress is being characterized as a sign that Fani is so dumb and/or so flustered by what's going on that she put her dress on wrong. You're right, it does sound like a playground insult.

#144 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 07:30 PM | Reply

Gracie didn't shoot herself in her foot by saying something that utterly stupid, she shot her face off.

#145 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-17 07:33 PM | Reply

I've read some complaints about Fani having her American flag pin on upside down, but it looks right-side up to me:

Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman are American Heroes!
@Sandra137198021

This Georgia Girl is PISSED!

My whole family in Atlanta talking about getting more voting drives together.

The fury of Black women will be felt at the ballot box.

Hannah Drake
@HannahDrake628

How many of my sistas saved this picture of #FaniWillis?

twitter.com

#146 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 08:06 PM | Reply

That she may have perjured herself is the problem. As you well know, perjury is a big deal as a legal matter.
#109 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

If the perjury is irrelevant to the Trump indictment then let some other DA oversee the prosecution. Doesn't have anything to do with his blatant crime spree.

#147 | Posted by JOE at 2024-02-17 08:31 PM | Reply

@#147 ... If the perjury is irrelevant to the Trump indictment then let some other DA oversee the prosecution. ...

Whether or not it is relevant will be decided in Court.

Until that happens, the court of public opinion will run wild.


#148 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-17 08:33 PM | Reply

" If the perjury is irrelevant to the Trump indictment then let some other DA oversee the prosecution. Doesn't have anything to do with his blatant crime spree.

#147 | POSTED BY JOE AT 2024-02-17 08:31 PM | FLAG: "

Yes. I've been saying exactly that.

#149 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 08:49 PM | Reply

@#149 ... Yes. I've been saying exactly that. ...

Exactly that? Exactly?

I've not seen that in your comments.

Got a link?

(should be easy to cite a prior comment on this thread...)

thx.

#150 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-17 09:00 PM | Reply

@#147 ... If the perjury is irrelevant to the Trump indictment then let some other DA oversee the prosecution. Doesn't have anything to do with his blatant crime spree. ...

Yup.

But what it does do is delay. A possible rather significant delay.

And delay seems to be fmr Pres Trump's legal strategy.

#151 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-02-17 09:02 PM | Reply

delay seems to be fmr Pres Trump's legal strategy.

You know what the absurdity of this notion is.

It's that if Trump manages to win the presidency.

Then his criminality doesn't matter.

Just fkkking ridiculous.

The fact he's the presidential candidate for the Republican Party should be used to condemn and disqualify the entire party.

Why didn't the confederacy simply vote Robert E Lee into the presidency once they lost the civil war?

The Democratic Party is weak and completely out maneuvered by the GOP.

#152 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 09:23 PM | Reply

Whether or not it is relevant will be decided in Court.

Can you conjure a scenario in which it would be relevant?

Has anyone even alleged that it's relevant?

#153 | Posted by JOE at 2024-02-17 09:48 PM | Reply

I've read some complaints about Fani having her American flag pin on upside down, but it looks right-side up to me:

I watched the hearing and I saw the flag. It was not upside down. You can clearly see it in the posted video at 0:27 seconds in.
This is about as intelligent as the "she wore her dress backwards!" idiocy.

#154 | Posted by YAV at 2024-02-18 07:42 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort