Yeah you're avoiding the question.
You're also acting like a republican.
Make do everything you can to make sure a program fails and then hold up it's not working well as proof it's a bad idea.
#21 | POSTED BY TOR A
?? Your solution seems to be summary execution with a bullet to the head.
Given the number of innocent people killed, feeble minded people killed, people killed who were subjected to corrupt prosecution, I think the current system is working as designed. You know attempting to ensure that only the guilty are killed.
I, of course, go way beyond that and think every person has value and should be afforded the chance at redemption.
Example Karla Faye Tucker-killed 2 people in a gruesome attack. She was on drugs at the time.
No doubt she was guilty of the crime and deserved to be held accountable.
After being in jail she cleaned herself up, found religion, was a model prisoner and most importantly was counseling other inmates on improving their lives to change their lives, stop committing crimes and avoid prison.
Everyone agreed and acknowledged that.
She was put to death.
Was that for the betterment of society?
The captain of the "Death House Team," Fred Allen, was interviewed by Werner Herzog for the 2011 documentary Into the Abyss. Within days after Tucker's execution, one of over 120 he managed, he suffered an emotional breakdown. He resigned his job, giving up his pension, and changed his position on the death penalty. "I was pro capital punishment. After Karla Faye and after all this, until this day, eleven years later, no sir. Nobody has the right to take another life. I don't care if it's the law. And it's so easy to change the law."[39]
