Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, February 16, 2024

As a Black woman and working professional, I've never been a huge fan of affirmative action and the recent rise of critical theory, and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives has only bolstered my resistance. While it may seem necessary to some in order to right the wrongs of the past, I can sum up why these measures are an unmitigated disaster for hard-working Black Americans in two words: Fani Willis

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Trotting out the racism now too, huh Jeff?

Anything a black person accomplishes MUST be from DEI/Affirmative Action apparently.

#1 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-02-16 03:53 PM | Reply

Fani Willis is proof that DEI hurts black people
All because she went after a man of color (orange).

#2 | Posted by censored at 2024-02-16 04:10 PM | Reply

"Willis is the prosecutor in one of the nation's major cities and most high profile cases against former President Donald Trump. Her position and the historic nature of the case she is prosecuting put her in an elite class most Black people will never even dream of reaching."

Um, what?
Fani Willis
Base/Regular Pay 2022
$62,793.66

Saying $62k is beyond imagination for most black people is some of the most racist ---- I've heard. It's the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Anyone here with a job making LESS than Fani Willis?

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-16 04:14 PM | Reply

#1. The author of the linked op ed is a black woman. Take it up with her.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-16 04:19 PM | Reply

Does the black lady explain where DEI comes into the picture?

Because DA's get elected in Georgia. They don't get DEI diversity hired.

Might as well blame George Santos on DEI.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-16 04:31 PM | Reply

Jeffyjbell doesn't trust journalists, but he sure believes every word of a favorable opinion piece

#6 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-02-16 07:46 PM | Reply

Racist much Jeffry?

#7 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-02-16 10:38 PM | Reply

On Friday, prosecutors sought to bolster Willis' testimony that Nathan Wade was not Willis' first choice to lead the case against Trump.

Former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes testified that Willis approached him in 2021 about serving as special prosecutor, but that he turned it down in part because he had "mouths to feed" at his law practice and because he was concerned about potential threats of violence that could come with the job, the Associated Press reported.

Barnes said he does not know why Willis approached him about becoming a special prosecutor in her Trump investigation. He said Willis is a very qualified prosecutor and attorney. He said special prosecutor Wade is a very good organizer.

www.wafb.com

#8 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 12:18 AM | Reply

The author of the linked op ed is a black woman. Take it up with her.

#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Why'd you post it?

#9 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 08:46 AM | Reply

This article is nothing but old fashioned sexism. It's the tone policing that women constantly face.

#10 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-02-17 09:07 AM | Reply

No one knows how they would react after receiving death threats and what they claim are lies about them in court papers and newspapers across the land. At least she didn't tear up the way Kavanaugh did. Imagine the uproar if she had.

#11 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 09:48 AM | Reply

She acted like a petulant child on the stand.

Here's how NYT framed it:

" The hearing resumes on Friday at 9 a.m. Ms. Willis is expected to take the stand for more grilling. The defense lawyers will likely crowd, again, onto one side of the packed courtroom. They are, in
aggregate, a sea of boxy wool suits and white male faces (with Ms.
Merchant, a white woman, a stark exception). The contrast with Ms. Willis, in glowing magenta, could not be
more glaring"

Setting aside the fact she put her "glowing magenta" dress on backwards, this is just another example of why trust in the press is at historic lows. They couldn't possibly be more sycophantic.

" This article is nothing but old fashioned sexism. It's the tone policing that women constantly face.

#10 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE AT 2024-02-17 09:07 AM | FLAG: "

This article was written by a black woman.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 10:37 AM | Reply

This article was written by a black woman.

#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

If you've ever talked to a woman, which I assume you have not other than you mom, you'd know women are some of the worst about tone policing. She doesn't say a single thing about what Willis actually said. All she said was about how she said it and her appearance.

By the way, why are so quiet on the GOP's let witness against Hunter Biden being exposed as a fraud. You've been on about Hunter for a while and now you are going to be silent?

#13 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-02-17 11:45 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

" If you've ever talked to a woman, which I assume you have not other than you mom"

I've been married to my wife for 27 years.

Fani Willis is no victim. She likely committed perjury and the appointment of her lover, who really isn't qualified for this case, is corrupt as hell.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 11:55 AM | Reply

Fani Willis is no victim.

#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Neither is Trump.

I can't find the conflict of interest.

I can find your MAGA bias.

#15 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 12:40 PM | Reply

Zed,

I posted this on the other Fani thread - if it's determined she committed perjury SHE needs to be prosecuted. Nobody is above the law. Right?

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 12:47 PM | Reply

Ballwasher is proof that monkeys ------ web-toed hillbillies.

#17 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-02-17 01:11 PM | Reply

Nobody is above the law. Right?

#16 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Plenty of time to prosecute her, if that's warranted----AFTER Trump's trial.

You want to tell us why you have a problem with that?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 01:11 PM | Reply

She likely committed perjury

#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

What specific statement did she make under oath may be perjurous?

#19 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-02-17 01:20 PM | Reply

If the judge determines she perjured herself why in th3 world would you want to keep her on this case?

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 01:21 PM | Reply

" What specific statement did she make under oath may be perjurous?"

When her romantic relationship with Wade began. That Wade's appointment had nothing to do with their romantic relationship.

#21 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 01:23 PM | Reply

If the judge determines she perjured herself why in th3 world would you want to keep her on this case?

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

To more expeditiously nail that snake, Trump.

Unless you can find a reason why any of this changes the case against Trump, then I'm not sure what your motives are.

#22 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 01:47 PM | Reply

So, it's not about the proper administering of justice but taking out a political enemy.

That's what I thought and I do appreciate your honesty.

#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 01:49 PM | Reply

"She acted like a petulant child on the stand.
Here's how NYT framed it:"

Like I said, her testimony put me in mind of Kavanaugh's. Here's how the New Yorker framed his testimony:

At fifty-three, Brett Kavanaugh is an adult now, or at least no longer young, but after Christine Blasey Ford came forward to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had pinned her to a bed, drunk, when they were ---------, covering her mouth so that she couldn't scream, he gave his own statements after a recess and blubbered like a child. His voice broke sharply up a couple semitones while his mouth curled down at the corners. He scrunched up his nose and dug his tongue into his bottom lip, as he was deposed in an embattled bid to save his Supreme Court nomination. If he would get to don his black robe, he'd do it weepily.

www.newyorker.com

PS She didn't have her dress on backwards. I don't think that dress was her best choice to wear on the stand, but I chalk that up to the fact that she wasn't intending to testify that day. Counsel for the DA's office was in the midst of trying to get the subpoena for her testimony blocked when she suddenly came into the courtroom and took the stand.

#24 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 01:52 PM | Reply

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You're not in the war and, if you are, you are on the wrong side.

Donald Trump is getting scrupulously fair treatment from the Justice system, light years beyond what I could expect.

MAGA impugning personal relationships to get off is sickeningly common. He tried to do that with Engoron.

Morality can't be a sort of ju-jitsu that only affects people with morality, letting the evil go unscathed.

#25 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 01:53 PM | Reply

So, it's not about the proper administering of justice but taking out a political enemy.

#23 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Son, it's a battle between light and darkness and you like the shade.

Donald Trump is the enemy of my country and of mankind. People have been bending over for him making sure that he is being treated fairly legally.

I've got no problem with that.

YOU have a problem with Trump being in trouble at all.

#26 | Posted by Zed at 2024-02-17 01:55 PM | Reply

When her romantic relationship with Wade began. That Wade's appointment had nothing to do with their romantic relationship.
#21 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

He wasn't her first choice. The former governor of Georgia was (post #6). Wade testified that he worked many hours that he didn't get paid for. Between all the unpaid hours and the death threats and security protection involved, it really isn't that great of a job, which is why the former governor turned it down.

#27 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 01:57 PM | Reply

She testified that she made $200,000 a year as DA. If that is true, I find it laughable that she hired her bf so that she could financially benefit to the tune of a few trips that cost what? Maybe $10,000 for both trips? If that's why she did it, she is a grifter neophyte for sure and needs to study up on Clarence Thomas trips paid for by billionaires to see how the art of the grift is really done.

#28 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 02:01 PM | Reply

The judge in this case will decide and his decision will be final. He has listened to all the testimony, plus testimony the public hasn't been privy to yet. He doesn't strike me as a pushover or a Democratic lackey. He was appointed by Kemp, who is a Republican. He may very well find Willis and the Fulton County DAs office can no longer handle the case.

#29 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 02:09 PM | Reply

So, it's not about the proper administering of justice
#23 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

That is how the adversarial justice system is supposed to work.
The DA's job is not about justice. The defense counsel's job is not about justice either.
The DA's job is to obtain a guilty verdict. The defense's job is to obtain a not guilty verdict.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-17 02:19 PM | Reply

This article was written by a black woman.
#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

FTA:

Kira Davis is the author of "Drawing Lines: Why Conservatives Must Begin to Battle Fiercely in the Arena of Ideas" and host of the Just Listen to Yourself podcast.

#31 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 02:24 PM | Reply

At the beginning of her testimony, Willis said, Mr. Wade is a southern gentleman. Me, not so much.

What does Brett Kavanaugh's angry testimony say about gender and emotion?

It was no surprise that Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh would take the stand at yesterday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with the intention of defending himself. No one, certainly, was expecting a mea culpa. But what was surprising was the way in which he delivered his statements, vacillating between tears and angry, aggressive outbursts.

By contrast, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, remained even-keeled and "pleasing," as Sen. Orrin Hatch noted, throughout her testimony. Aside from some quiet tears and choking up during her opening statement, she was calm, collected and "collegial."

Where Ford was self-possessed, Kavanaugh was aggressive, even bordering on belligerent, as he spoke over senators, cut them off, and in one instance, accused them of mockery.

Many noted that it was a textbook display of the double standard that allows men angry outbursts with no repercussions, while the same behaviour works to discredit women. The going argument among critics and observers was that if Ford had responded in the same way as Kavanaugh, she would have likely been deemed "hysterical."

globalnews.ca

#32 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 02:33 PM | Reply

This article was written by a black woman.
#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

I love the idea that black women can't be racist.
That's like saying white women can't not be racist.

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-17 02:37 PM | Reply

Here is a point I hadn't seen made before, followed by one I had:

Randall Eliason
@RDEliason

Even if Wade did cover some trip expenses, I don't see that as a benefit to Willis from his appointment unless his income rose substantially due to the appointment. In other words, if he could have afforded to take her anyway, then the appointment doesn't change anything. 6/

The state also demonstrated that Wade was not Willis's first choice for the job, and that taking on the special prosecutor role actually involves considerable personal sacrifice in terms of threats, security, etc. (as does the DA's job). 7/

twitter.com

#34 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 02:45 PM | Reply

When her romantic relationship with Wade began. That Wade's appointment had nothing to do with their romantic relationship.

#21 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You said "likely". What evidence is there that she likely perjured herself? And please explain if it is likely then why she has not be charged with the crime.

Here's the definiton of perjury in Georgia for you. "a person commits perjury when he knowingly and willfully makes a false statement material to the issue or point in question in a judicial proceeding."

#35 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-02-17 03:18 PM | Reply

#36. She named a timeframe when she became romantically involved with Wade. Some people who know her are claiming their affair started earlier than what she testified.

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 03:28 PM | Reply

Equal treatment under the law, Zed. It's something I expect to be applied consistently, not selectively.

You said earlier that you want to expedite the process of getting your boogeyman. That is not the moral high ground you think you hold.

#37 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 03:30 PM | Reply

It's incredible.

BellRinger is more upset the prosecutor is having a relationship with the DA than he's ever been with anything Donald Trump, who he claims he can't stand, has ever done.

Face it BellRinger. The only reason you care is because your boy Trump is a criminal conman and you're desperate to reelect him.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 03:35 PM | Reply

This article was written by a black woman.
#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Ummm ...

Okay?

#39 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 03:37 PM | Reply

why are so quiet on the GOP's [lead] witness against Hunter Biden being exposed as a fraud. You've been on about Hunter for a while and now you are going to be silent?
#13 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE

Because he's a partisan hack.

He's a party line Republican voter.

You have to ignore the facts that differ from what the cult tells you to believe.

#40 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 03:40 PM | Reply

" why are so quiet on the GOP's [lead] witness against Hunter Biden being exposed as a fraud. You've been on about Hunter for a while and now you are going to be silent?
#13 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE"

First off, Hunter Biden has nothing to do with this thread.

Secondly, it's for the same reason I haven't brought up Bobulins,it's testimony this week. I just don't care any more.

#41 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 04:05 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

appointment unless his income rose substantially due to the appointment
- gals tweet quote..

It did that's why the divorce was filed.

That's the whole reason this relationship got dragged into the court room.

#42 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:45 PM | Reply

The state also demonstrated that Wade was not Willis's first choice for the job, and that taking on the special prosecutor role actually involves considerable personal sacrifice in terms of threats, security,
- gals tweet quote.

Irrelevant.

#43 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-02-17 04:45 PM | Reply

How is it irrelevant?

Is she trying to hook up her man?

Why wasn't he the first choice?

Quick rich schemes needed plausible deniability?

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:48 PM | Reply

I just don't care any more.
#41 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Bullshht.

110% bullshht.

You're a partisan hack.

110% partisan hack.

#45 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:49 PM | Reply

Clownshack,

You try WAY too hard at trolling. It's pathetic.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 04:51 PM | Reply

BellRinger.

Your trolling is weak sauce.

You're a partisan hack whose posts mirror exactly the republican narrative.

You're a joke.

#47 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-02-17 04:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

www.youtube.com

#48 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-17 04:56 PM | Reply

Some people who know her are claiming their affair started earlier than what she testified.
#36 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Not some people. One person and that person is a former coworker who left under acrimonious circumstances. They have just as much evidence of your "likely" perjury claim as I have evidence that you've never talked to a woman other than your mom.

#49 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-02-17 05:02 PM | Reply

#3 Gal, WTF happened to you? Her net worth is 8 MILLION dollars, which includes diverse stock and real estate assets. Her base salary (2022) was $110,000. JFC ModerHate made more than $63,000 in 2022 as a lonely public defender in CA. Did Bella on X tell you that, too?

#50 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-02-17 05:43 PM | Reply

#50 wft are you talking about? Not even you.

#51 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:46 PM | Reply

#50 yeah, that's why she needed to hire Wade so he could take her on a couple of cruises and pay her way. LOL

PS I didn't post #3, but thanks for playing.

#52 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:49 PM | Reply

#51 *Not even you know.

#53 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-02-17 05:50 PM | Reply

Sorry, I'm still stuck on #3. This has to be untrue.

#54 | Posted by fresno500 at 2024-02-18 09:27 AM | Reply

It seemed low to me too. But apparently it's in line with nationwide averages for a county DA.

I spent about 30 seconds googling it, feel free to do your own research!

#55 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-02-18 10:39 AM | Reply

#50

You have ZERO credibility, you ------- clown.

#56 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-02-18 10:35 PM | Reply

#1. The author of the linked op ed is a black woman. Take it up with her.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-02-16 04:19 PM | Reply | Flag

So you agree with the author enough to post the article but when called out about the article the answer is "who me?"

That is a solid profile in courage.

#57 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-02-19 06:49 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort