How did this guy get past the psych tests?

This is the issue?

Not that it was covered up by the chain of command?

Leave the cops alone, it is hard work to take a list of license plates. They might get a hand cramp.

#2 You a Catholic? Read about what the Church has to say about the death penalty.

But tomorrow Trump will once again be a Russian agent
#6 | Posted by Spork at

How many civilians have to be deliberately murdered before they become the US equivalent of Al Queda?

"A unanimous Supreme Court in 1993 concluded that impeachment by the Congress is a "political question" that is nonjusticiable -- which means not reviewable by the courts. The case involved two federal judges who had been impeached by the House and convicted in the Senate, but the ruling is seen as having wider application across government, including the presidency.

The court held that the Constitution confers on the Senate the "sole" power to try impeachments.

"A controversy is nonjusticiable where there is a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department," Chief Justice William Rhenquist wrote for the court.

He noted that Article I of the Constitution "demonstrates a textual commitment of impeachment to the Senate.""

The White House has no such legal requirement.

Congress does.

Section 6103(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) reads:

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary [of the Treasury] shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

#3 Exactly.

Disney with their price increases have priced themselves out of many middle class families vacation budget.

They love pushing their "affordable" vacation packages and once you book and get there, there is outrageous parking fees at hotels, food costs, $5 + for a bottle of water then throw in a souvenir stand every five feet.

Walt would be disgusted at what his dream has become.

Something is not lining up. I am always leery of the word "average" as it can skew actual results.

Why can't we pick from that group?

#4 | POSTED BY MONTECORE AT 2019-04-22 06:24 PM | REPLY | FLAG

Because none of them want to associate with Fat Nixon?

There is a thing called character, which is usually (and rightfully so) considered as a job qualification.

#9 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN AT 2019-04-22 09:29 PM | REPLY | FLAG

Every other pick by Fat Nixon has been a corrupt immoral piece of ----.

Why should this guy be any different?

All the people mentioned in the Mueller Report as not following Pres Trump's orders because it may be unlawful to do so... how many of those people are still working in the White House? My count says zero.

Fat Nixon tells them to break the law.

They refuse.

They "resign".

Now Fat Nixon tells them to not cooperate with Congress.

---- it. Lock them ALL UP.

This is where I support stand your ground laws.

Fat Nixon is jut playing out the clock until Nov 2020. He needs to win another term or he is effed in SDNY.

Easter Sunday, first words out of my cousins mouth "Looks like we'll have a goddamn socialist as President".

My response "Yep, about damn time. BTW Dave, how many years you been sponging social security disability and medicaid? Your Trump loving rhetoric would carry a lot more weight if you were a maker instead of a taker."

He was fuming the rest of dinner.

Best Easter ever.

After the last two years of being a whiny little bitch about Democrats blocking Fat Nixon?

Shocking.

This is assuming Cocaine Mitch is still in office.

WTF does nixon the poster have to do with gas prices?

#2 | POSTED BY SNIPER AT 2019-04-22 12:40 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

Dumber by the day.

He should, he has consistently walked the talk that Fat Nixon used to -------- them in 2016.

No no no, the right wing morons said it was the leftist atheist SJW fault.

Of course the guy who did the killings in New Zealand wasn't a Christian but a Pagan.

No one has ever claimed that ---------- who are willing to blow themselves up or shoot up a mosque as being the sharpest tools in the shed.

The world would be a better place with these skid marks. Too bad we can't precog abort both sides.

Churches Have Become The #1 Target For Hate Attacks: An Average Of 105 Every Single Month
www.zerohedge.com
Leftist atheists consider this to be a feature, not a bug.

#84 | POSTED BY BERSERKONE AT 2019-04-22 11:19 PM | REPLY

Considering the rationale for the attacks was retaliation for the NZ mosque shootings, keep blaming leftist atheists moron.

Lie #1 from Fat Nixon was that he was going to be completely self funded.

You can push a 100% "on time" arrival rate by saying a 45 minute flight takes 75 minutes.

The hell with putting in an effort to actually arrive on time, when you can fudge the numbers and still boast about how great you are.

Very Trumpian.

I find the fact that 37% of people still support a criminal who obstructed justice because his boo boo feewings were hurt interesting.

Throw in putting kids in cages, taking away health care, cutting social security, medicare and medicaid and it leads me to believe that 37% of America lives on a diet of hatred and bigotry.

I am embarrassed this is the United States.

Ronny Reagans shining city on the hill is engulfed in flames.

The Democrats could run a dead Richard Nixon and he would still be better than -----------.