If I understand the basic premise "science rule" is that if we are going to base regulations on studies, the data the study is based should be available to all.
Its odd, for supposed "pro-scientist", that having to submit your data to scrutiny is somehow bad.
Seems pretty reasonable to me.
#3 | Posted by AndreaMackris
This is a common retort used by deniers. Mackris is arguing that the private information of individual subjects in a given study should be made public if the results are going to be used.
And just think of what Trump's minions would do with a list of study participants. First you get sick from pollution, then you get harassed or worse because you got sick from pollution.