"Medical procedures on a boat at sea=probably not a good idea"

Better idea than giving birth to an unwanted child!

The John Woo Torture Memo said that for physical pain to reach the threshold of torture, it must result in pain on the level of organ failure.

Now Idaho is saying they won't stop that kind of torture.

This sounds like what Russia would do in Syria.

This exemplifies why I expect Israel will pivot to Russia.

Police are trained to escalate violence.

How far off the coast would an abortion ship need to be?

"The Palestinians are just the most recent group that wants to extirpate Jews."

Setting aside that you said Palestinians instead of Hamas, and Jews instead of Israel:

Palestinians themselves got extirpated from what is now Israel.

This is what I mean about MadBomber is unable to have a discussion without bringing up WWII.

He's Basil Fawlty, we're the German tourists.

He can't stop doing it.

I just did. It was sent. You seemed to not care but that's your choice.

Also, you aren't really making analogues.

You're making hypotheticals built on bad analogues.

"Is there is a logical, objective reason you would want to disregard historical analogs?"

Yes.

From #119:
The group emerged in 1987 as an alternative to the secular-nationalist Palestinian Fatah, which had dominated the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO). Fatah's recognition of Israel, perceived corruption and the failure of their diplomatic approach[1] to secure an independent Palestinian state or cease Israeli settlements and military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza contributed to increasing popular support for Hamas, who in 2006 won legislative elections. In 2007,

The Hamas origin story is the same origin story as Likud! (from wikipedia)
Formation and leadership of Begin
The Likud was formed on 13 September 1973 as a secular party[34][35] by an alliance of several right-wing parties prior to that year's legislative election"Herut, the Liberal Party, the Free Centre, the National List, and the Movement for Greater Israel. Herut had been the nation's largest right-wing party since growing out of the Irgun in 1948. It had already been in coalition with the Liberals since 1965 as Gahal, with Herut as the senior partner. Herut remained the senior partner in the new grouping, which was given the name Likud, meaning "Consolidation", as it represented the consolidation of the Israeli right.[36] It worked as a coalition under Herut's leadership until 1988, when the member parties merged into a single party under the Likud name.[37] From its establishment in 1973, Likud enjoyed great support from blue-collar Sephardim.[38]

Herut and Movement for Greater Israel are expansionist Zionist parties.
They want the same thing Hamas wants.
Technically, they want more, because they want Israel to control both sides of the River Jordan; the restoration of Eretz Yisrael or Greater Israel.

"The Gaza campaign is very, VERY similar to the counter-ISIS campaign the west ran under the authorities of Operation Inherent Resolve. And I was balls-deep in the targeting piece of that fight up to the end."

Did you kill 30,000 civilians, or are those rookie numbers?

"The party that ruled Germany from 1933 to 1945 was called the "National Socialist German Workers' Party."

What's Hamas called, when you don't make it an acronym, and translate it to English? "Islamic Resistance Movement."

"Why can't the issue be discussed without reverting to WWII propaganda? Why is that?"
Propaganda?
Be more specific.

Discuss it without talking about WWII.
Good luck!

"Unless you can even suggest otherwise, Israel's objective is to defeat Hamas...not punish them."

I can very clearly state otherwise, because this is how Netanyahu explained it:
Israel's objective is to prevent the emergence of a legitimate Palestinian state.

Israel isn't going to defeat Hamas by killing civilians in Gaza, let me know if you don't understand why.

"Can you imagine if, in 1943, you had student encampments calling for a cease-fire against the Germans?"

Why can't the issue be discussed without reverting to WWII propaganda?
Why is that?

Really, the law can't support injustice?

That's funny.

"Who supports killing children in the name of Israel?"

About half the DR can find a way to support that.

"Colleges Have Gone Off the Deep End."
Republicans have been saying that since the Vietnam War.

"There Is a Way Out."
Let me guess: Trade School!

The retreat to absurdism is a good way to not get taken seriously.

"Yet the don't care about the fact that the employment of these weapons is in response to Israelis being slaughtered?"

They probably think bombing Palestinian civilians to punish Hamas terrorists (that Israel supported for a quarter century) is a grave injustice.

Israel does not recognize Palestine as a state.
(That's why they declared war on Hamas, not Palestine.)

"There wouldn't be a Palestine either."

There isn't a Palestine currently.

It always does come full circle.

Violence begets violence.

"He's been on tiktok "getting denied entry for being Jewish" all over the map for months."

Not at all surprising.

The Israeli psyops game is better than the Russian.

This is just one reason I keep expecting Israel to pivot to Moscow.

They mostly have the same world view, since the fall of the USSR and the assassination of Rabin.