Some of you are so transparent. It doesn't matter if they had evidence, you wouldn't believe it. Chances are, they are catching terrorists, probably not the number he claims, but if they give away who they've caught, then they have to provide a trail for that person. If they don't give any of the evidence or names away, they can torture them and ship them wherever they want, and do whatever they want with them. It is funny, though, watching so many of you be herded into believing things simply because they use partisan hate in the media. You make the corruptness so easy to hide. Trump is able to get away with so much just because it's so easy to propagate topics focusing on hating him. As long as the media ensures they get clicks and dollars, they don't have to dig any deeper.
#8 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE
That's might be the weakest defense ever posted for Trump.
Let me see if I get your logic:
1. They caught Terrorists but can't tell us they caught terrorists because it would jeopardize operations.
2. Except Trump says they caught terrorists.
3. Other agencies say no, they haven't caught terrorists because they don't want us to know what Trump already told us.
4. And somehow saying they caught terrorists after Trump told us they caught terrorists without telling us who or from what group will magically jeopardize operations.
Damn, and you accuse others of being partisan hacks?