Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

phoenix

Subscribe to phoenix's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

Saturday, November 29, 2008

After a year in the wild, a lion remembers the people who raised him.


Saturday, November 22, 2008

President-elect Barack Obama promoted an economic plan Saturday he said would create 2.5 million jobs by rebuilding roads and bridges and modernizing schools while developing alternative energy sources and more efficient cars.

"These aren't just steps to pull ourselves out of this immediate crisis. These are the long-term investments in our economic future that have been ignored for far too long."


Monday, October 27, 2008

The government will begin doling out $125 billion to nine major banks this week as part of its effort to contain a growing financial crisis, a top Treasury official said Monday. Assistant Treasury Secretary David Nason said the deals with the nine banks were signed Sunday night and the government will make the stock purchases this week. The deals are designed to bolster the banks' balance sheets so they will begin more normal lending. The action will mark the first deployment of resources from the government's $700 billion financial rescue package passed by Congress on Oct. 3.


In point of fact, the dirty little secret of the banking industry is that it has no intention of using the money to make new loans.

read more


Sunday, October 26, 2008

First, the $700 billion rescue for the economy was about buying devalued mortgage-backed securities from tottering banks to unclog frozen credit markets. Then it was about using $250 billion of it to buy stakes in banks. But reports surfaced that bankers might instead use the money to buy other banks, pay dividends, give employees a raise and executives a bonus, or just sit on it. Insurance companies now want a piece; maybe automakers, too, even though Congress has approved $25 billion in low-interest loans for them.

read more


Comments

Wot makes you think America supporting a two sided solution to tjhe Isarael/Palestine conflict would involve American occupation? -- Spud

I don't. Samantha Power advocated an American occupation, and doesn't pretend to favor a two-sided solution:

What we don't need is some kind of early warning mechanism there, what we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import; it may more crucially mean sacrificing or investing, I think, more than sacrificing billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel's military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you're serious, you have to put something on the line.

Unfortunately, imposition of a solution on unwilling parties is dreadful. It's a terrible thing to do, it's fundamentally undemocratic. But, sadly, we don't just have a democracy here either, we have a liberal democracy. There are certain sets of principles that guide our policy, or that are meant to, anyway. It's essential that some set of principles becomes the benchmark, rather than a deference to [leaders] who are fundamentally politically destined to destroy the lives of their own people. And by that I mean what Tom Freidman has called "Sharafat." [Sharon-Arafat; this is actually an Amos Oz construction NP] I do think in that sense, both political leaders have been dreadfully irresponsible. And, unfortunately, it does require external intervention. http://
www.commentarymagazine.com/
blogs/index.php/pollak/2093


Uh, Spud, find me a quote from a Clinton advisor that stoops to the level of "She's a monster... You just look at her and think, Ergh'," michellemalkin.com

James Carville calling Richardson a "Judas" for supporting Obama over Hillary doesn't cut it fer you?

This is the worst of the examples you cite, and no, it does not reach the level of "just look at her... erghh." And I promise Carville will NEVER be considered for any position for which diplomacy is a requirement.

Also, Malkin? Yer fucking kidding with that, right?

It hurt me, too, but most of the "complient [sic] lapdog American press," as you called it, tends to airbrush anything unflattering about Obama out of its coverage.

Here's a transcript of the interview in which Power advocated a U.S. occupation of Israel: www.commentarymagazine.com

In another notable moment, she criticized the New York Times for its headline retracting previous coverage of an alleged Israeli massacre that, upon investigation by Human Rights Watch, never occurred:corner.nationalreview.com

Look. She's smart. She's also a fruitcake. I thought we were voting them out of office.

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2008 World Readable