--In all seriousness, crowdsourcing a person's mental health via news article and internet forum is a dangerous precedent, Zed.
"Notably, the conference appears to stand in clear violation of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) "Goldwater Rule," which prohibits those in the field from "offering opinions on someone they have not personally evaluated."
An August 2016 posting on the APA's website even explicitly warns psychologists to resist psychoanalyzing "the candidates," saying it would "unethical" and "irresponsible" to abuse their credibility for political purposes.
"Every four years, the United States goes through a protracted elections process for the highest office in the land. This year, the election seems like anything but a normal contest, that has at times devolved into outright vitriol," the APA's August assessment contends. "The unique atmosphere of this year's election cycle may lead some to want to psychoanalyze the candidates, but to do so would not only be unethical, it would be irresponsible."