Keep in mind that she is green and doesn't have that blowhard mentality of the Democrat reporters and politicians. What you call 'lightweight' is actually a fresh face uncorrupted by politics and the media. As she deals with her critics she will grow those callouses and eventually push back. Then they will be in for a big surprise.

#16 | Posted by KBM

Good lord what a tool. But Obama is too inexperienced? lol f-ing lol

That has got to be the dumbest fucking response I have ever heard. Cindy McCain should be shot for ever starting that.

Palin, if she had one iota of intelligence would have backed away from it, but instead she grasped on to it like a life preserver at sea.

The US confronts Russia in Europe, not Alaska.

I guess it makes McCain a foreign policy expert because Mexico is next to Arizona.

#10 | Posted by 726

NY is only about 300 miles farther from Moscow than Juneau is.

Dems got us into this, it will take the Repulicans to get us out

#4 | Posted by Maverick

Ignorance in its purest form. Why don't you check on the 1999 bill which deregulated the banking industry? And maybe take a peek at the repubs' record of deregulation.

I bet you think Sarah is really smart, huh?

Sigh.

Another poll.

Let's not count our chickens just yet, but it's certainly better to be ahead than behind.

He'd be laughed out of town here in NY.

Any dress which causes disruption or interferes with instruction does not have to be tolerated in schools.

His parents are using him as a pawn. Nice.

They should mail the hand to Sarah Palin - she can get $150 for it.

The notion that some prick thinks he knows when certain babies should be aborted and when others should not is sickening. It is a personal choice and should be left to a family and their doctor. It seems awfully un-libertarian to criticize others for exercising their reproductive rights, one way or the other.

#3 | Posted by JOE

Well said.

Of the four candidates, I guess she is the poorest and perhaps is a bit embarassed to let it out.

#8 | Posted by takitez

Would you wipe her ass for her, if she asked you to?

welcome to the world the left has always desired.

#1 | Posted by nanc

lol

Tell me, nanc, is ignorance really bliss?

All would have been well but then the leading Democrat put his foot in his mouth by promising an October surprise. Apparently he doesn't need the investigation. He is on a witch hunt.

#16 | Posted by KBM

uuhhhh ... wouldn't that be a reason to CONTINUE with the investigation ... to uncover the facts?

Good grief.

Please, give me back my money so I can get a real return on investment...In the current state of the economy, I would be better off burying that money in a hole in the ground.

#12 | Posted by IraqiBukkake

Wrong.

Social Security COLAs have increased benefits some 12% over the Bush years. That same money invested in a fund tracking the SP 500 would have lost 14%.

How about injecting some facts into your arguments?

two of the dumbest things i have ever heard in my life

#7 | Posted by klifferd

Stick around

Are they really claiming that Sarah!'s tanning bed was necessary to combat depression?

#197 | Posted by nullifidian

Seasonal Affective Disorder. It's f-ing dark in Alaska in the winter. Makes you want to get in helicopters and shoot things on the ground.

Why did the Republicans feel the need to lie

The same reason roaches flee from the light - it's their first instinctive response.

Come one guys, give her a break. Remember, according to recent reports, she needed the bed to treat her depression.

I mean, we want her depression to be cured before she goes to the White House, right?

What a bunch of pathetic liars. The only ones who can believe their BS are the rightards who will believe anything that comes out of their mouths.

In the meantime CONSERVATIVE commentators are calling McCain a "farce" and a "liar", a "tragedy" and "desperate".

And Carly Fiorina says McCain couldn't even run the company she was fired from.

This shit is ACTUALLY happening, folks.

And what a lying sack of shit Palin has turned out to be. Go look up the teleprompter story - it's f-ing hilarious.

Americans can't be this stupid to elect this 72 year old floundering piece of senile shit !!

#14 | Posted by USATrueandBlue7

Sadly, it will likely be the triumph of "white over right".

Does any rightard SERIOUSLY believe that Obama wouldn't be 10 or more points ahead if her were white?

Barack Obama contends that a John McCain presidency would amount to little more than President Bush's third term. But as it turns out, an Obama presidency might look a bit like Bush's second.

I really don't understand why more Dems aren't bothered by this.

#5 | Posted by Phoenix

why would they be? Obama went on record some time ago with proposals that were at first critcized, and are now being adopted, at least in part. If Bush is now doing the right thing, we should be happy about it. Once again, Obama's judgement has proven to be good on foreign policy issues.

why are righties such whiny bitches?

#3 | Posted by truthhurts

Especially that Fiorina Stepford Wife - she is a lying sack of shit that can't bring herself to tell the truth even about the obvious:

"I think she looked a bit like her". How anyone takes these people seriously defies rational explanation.

McCain now is as much a maverick as any other Senator that would brag he voted with the president 90% of the time.

Yes, Danni. And Obama himself has voted with Bush 40% of the time. And during his short rookie season in the Senate, he has robotically voted >99% (essentially 100%) of the time with his Dem leadership. Quite the change-master.
www.factcheck.org

So, Obama and McCain are both party-line voters in an election year. I know, this can come as a shock to anyone who is clueless as to how party politics work. Especially those who selectively reveal statistics instead of providing the whole picture.

#13 | Posted by PublicTrough at

A silly post.

Obama isn't CLAIMING to be the maverick, and OF COURSE he votes with the oppostion most of the time. It's only a good thing to break with your party when your party is wrong.

lol

This is like Satan telling Saddam Hussein to lay off the torture.

What a pathetic bunch of simple-minded dolts the repub party supporters have become.

How anyone could POSSIBLY risk putting Palin in the White House is proof that all their talk about "country" is yet another slogan that they will use when it suits them hold pow

Do the Dems have any ideas? Or are we supposed to vote for the ticket because Palin didn't actually sell the plane on e-bay and wasn't in Iraq?

#19 | Posted by Phoenix

Shameleful ignorance.

If you can still adk that question after all this time, you are truly beyond hope.

Have you ever read ANY of the proposals that have been on the obama website for MONTHS?

Good grief. Reading through these posts, I relaize that this country will always have leaders like Bush and McCain. America is becoming dominated by simple-minded yahoos who treat politics like a favorite sports team.

When was the last time any ISSUE was discussed in the media?

Hey McCain supporters: McCain will tax your health benefits, and Obama proposes LOWERING your taxes. Rememeber that?

It's a little hard to suggest doing something that had been being done for at least a year or two prior. Wouldn't you agree?

But of course somebody like you wouldn't admit that Hussein clumsily used the debates to sound tough to the american people.

I'm interested in how you sycophants believe that Barry some how came up with that "foreign policy" tid bit though. I often see you fools suggesting that W somehow took Barry's advice.

#97 | Posted by 101Chairborne

You do know that McCain called Obama "naive" for proposing these raids, right?

My comment about W was not a serious one, chair, and you know it. Nice try, though.

BTW : Do you know that factcheck.org is criticizing the McCain campaign for distorting one of ITS stories? You HAVE to love that.

I'm sure you feel that way about Barry's answer in regards to his answer at the debates about attacking inside of Pakistan...

b...b....bbbbb....but that's different.

#83 | Posted by 101Chairborne

Nope - not even close. Obama was correct, and little W is doing exactly as Obama suggested.

Across the border raids into Pakistan in the pursuit of known terrorists vs a European-theater all-out war with Russia?

Gee ... hard to decide.