Glad I'm a Christian with a whole book of the Bible dedicated to the (descriptive) joys of married sex!

Waaaah
Blame the commercials
What kind of a TV-driven victim-minded society do we live in?

You're the freakin' parents--if you don't have more say than a TV commercial you may just wanna give up now...

BBob and Zatiochi,

Have either of you personally read original sources/promary documents on the Founding Fathers?

Do you get ALL your info and quotes from atheist/free-thinker/
antichrist websites?

There is soooo much in those early documents that contradicts your posts.

I'm sure we'll revisit this sometime...

Most of America too?

Got anybody other than Thomas Paine? He has quite a following here at DR...

Zatiochi,

I'd love for you to school use and tell us what most early Americans were...

My quote flatly contradicts the ones you posted.

I read mine in context, YOUR view is clearly OUT of proper historical context.

Nobody's saying President Jefferson was a modern-day Baptist, but personally putting together an abbreviated Bible to witness to "Indians" is hardly something someone who thought little to nothing of the Bible and Jesus would do.

"My views..are the result of a life of inquiry and reflection, and very different from the anti-christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing of my opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am, indeed, opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian in the only sense in which he wished any one to be; sincerely attached to his doctrines in preference to all others"
-in a letter to Benjamin Rush from April 21, 1803

Hey BBob, explain to me again why Thomas Jefferson personally compilled together an abbreviated Bible and gave it to Native Americans if Christianity wasn't important to him.

I have a copy right here if you need to see it.

Happy Thanksgiving Day as we give thanks to our Almighty God as Washington did...or, for you atheist types, be thankful for evolution's favorable progress that led to you!

"change" "maverick" and the drudge retort classic "fucktard" were on MY list.

Can't get enough!

what's next, Fucking indulgences?#6 | Posted by badgerwest at 2008-11-25 05:32 PM | Reply

Depends.
Is that an adjective describing the indulgences or a verb?

Who freakin' cares?

It is a partially PAGAN holiday that we Christians celebrate.

I'd think we all could COME TOGETHER over Christmas!

Right, Mista Kurtz, Jesus was NOT born in Florida.

He also survived a wave of infanticide in his time, much like myself and everyone else under 36 years of age.

You DID make-a me raugh!

Explain HOW children are conceived in nature OTHER than a man doing it with a woman, Danforth.

Can't wait to hear this queer explanation.

(That is "strange" explanation, classical definition)

Honestly, I am FAR more concerned that there are WAY fewer adoptions occurring because of the prevalence of abortion (legal or illegal). It has cut adoptions drastically.

I commend all who seek to care for children in a society where we suck out and burn up 3,000 children every fucking day. We'll have to pay for that someday, I'm sure.

Kirk was making the reverse arguement-that because gays can't procreate, they can't be good parents.
#34 | Posted by northguy3 at 2008-11-25 04:48 PM | Reply

NO, I was stating that gays can't be parents NATURALLY.

Children are not the fruit of a homosexual relationship in nature--ever.

Children require a man getting it on with a woman in nature--a different concept.

A basic point, not really delving into the law NOR saying gays can't be good parents--CERTAINLY not saying that heteros are always or even usually good parents.

But feel free to spin this into "hate speech," "bigotry" and "homophobia."

And go get Danforth so he can throw some good name-calling in here too!

"Rational"
Explain the rationality of homosexuals and child rearing.

Two homosexuals CANNOT naturally have children as the fruit of their relationship, so they must do so artificially either through science or through adopting children born through the fruit of a heterosexual relationship.

Explain the rationality to me.

I'm sure many of us just don't "get it" so please explain it to us.

Might queer thing to do...

I saw this guy like 6 years ago and he was the real deal.

I saw the guy on Jesus Camp and said, "What is WRONG with that guy?"

BTW, his sexual activity only involved the male prostitutes hand.

I am NOT justifying anything, but you can imagine him trying to justify what happened like Bill Clinton--"Brethren, I didn't even have sex!"

He threw it all away...
And he's having a hard time just going away...

Pastors involved in his failed "restoration" have said he's been less than cooperative.

I heard Miss Ghilarducci on the radio asked about it--NOBODY's proposing this.

The natioanl finance guy's radio show played it, along with several House and Senate Democrats who said NOBODY's even CONSIDERING that.

I don't think Democrats have enough respect for private property, but this story-dog won't hunt.

Thank you, Jesus, that our Founding Fathers created a *constitutional republic* so it's HARD to limit man's GOD-GIVEN rights....certainly not impossible, but pretty damn hard.

Righties whining about this are like Germans wanting Geobels to control the entire German media.
#191 | Posted by danni at 2008-11-21 04:29 PM | Reply

You seriously need to switch your medication.

Your rhetoric is waaaay over the top.

The Danni who Cried Nazi

"The problem is a FREEDOM issue."

Bull shit it's an American issue.

We should drastically *LIMIT OWNERSHIP* of the media and *FORCE* diversity of opinion through diversity in ownership. #181 | Posted by danni at 2008-11-21 10:55 AM | Reply

Holy shit--do you HEAR yourself!

That IS a freedom issue, but apparently you're a TYRANT!

You do know that there is a 1st Amendment of freedom of speech and freedom of the press--but you wipe your tyrannical booty with the Constitution in FORCING diversity of opinion.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

I am none of those three btw, cynic.

What a sad lil poster you are.