Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

kingcuke

Subscribe to kingcuke's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

#7 | Posted by sawdust at 2016-07-11 07:04 PM | Reply
"BLM based on a lie."

It may well have been hijacked & is certainly misunderstood, but to deny that there is systemic racism in the US is naive.
One must remember that its only been 52 years that legalized, institutional racism was rescinded, in law.
Our parents or grandparents lifetimes.
Given that 42% of people believe the Civil War was not about slavery & are often taught so in Southern schools, expecting the echo of the segregationist South & Jim Crow to simply disappear when the generation which both perpetuated & experienced the abuse is still living is naive.
As far as Black Lives Matter, the essence of the movement is the implied "too".
"Imagine that you're sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don't get any. So you say "I should get my fair share." And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, "everyone should get their fair share." Now, that's a wonderful sentiment -- indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad's smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn't solve the problem that you still haven't gotten any!

The problem is that the statement "I should get my fair share" had an implicit "too" at the end: "I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else." But your dad's response treated your statement as though you meant "only I should get my fair share", which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that "everyone should get their fair share," while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out."

www.reddit.com

#14 | Posted by tmaster at 2016-05-01 07:53 AM | Reply
"In sum, there is no scientific or DNA test to tell us if a person is homosexual, bisexual or even heterosexual for that matter. And since nobody is "born gay," it's clear that sexual orientation is, at its core, a matter of how one defines oneself – not a matter of biology or genes."

"Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play – we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight. But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved. The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation."
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10637532/Being-homosexual-is-only-partly-due-to-gay-gene-
research-finds.html

"The search for a single dominant gene--the "O-GOD" (one gene, one disorder) hypothesis--that would influence a behavioral variant is likely to be fruitless. Many different genes, together with many different environmental factors, will interact in unpredictable ways to guide behavioral preferences. Each component will contribute small quanta of influence. One result of such a quantum theory of behavior is that it makes irrelevant... the quest for a teleological explanation to identify a reason for the existence of a "gay gene" becomes pointless when one understands that there is not now, and never was, a single and final reason for being gay or straight, or having any other identity along the continuum of sexual preference."
pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/genetics/nyreview.html

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2016 World Readable