6. She's tough to campaign against.

How so?

An unprepared chimp could beat her in a debate.

Once she's back into a campaign setting where her answers will actually mean something, I think she'll sink just like she did in 2008.

I read the the scientific research on nutritional medicine fairly regularly

What literature is that Ray and where do you find it?

Dare I ask whether you mean "literature" to be double-blinded studies that present actual data? Or are you referring to Mercola "articles" that spout BS while misquoting, cherry picking or miss citing real literature?

Does that mean Dick Cheney will rip hearts out of people like that guy in the Temple of Doom?

Fuck yeah.

Most people make the mistake of thinking he's running on a bionic heart.

Nope. He just steals a fresh one when his current one kicks it.

She looks better than Oprah.

I dunno man, she looked like shit in that interview.

If half a term as governor and an unsuccessful VP run made her age that much, what's going to happen if she DOES win the Pres spot?

She'd probably end up like this guy.

580 posts.

Sounds impressive until you realize 300 of them are bobby rambling nonsensically about the same inane points.

The Point is that NEW SPECIES can evolve from old species and is proven by the existence of Ligers and Tiglons.

I wouldn't say Ligers are a good example of speciation by evolution.

They actually constitute a great example of the challenges present when defining species.

You would consider lions and tigers to be seperate species, no? And yet they are capable of reproducing together.

With the advent of whole genome sequencing, we're finding that genetically life is much more similar than would be guessed.

That's right. New scientific fetal discoveries are about the shock the fucking world.

Really?

Please enlighten us.

Talk about pretentious and boring.....
Perhaps you'll have better luck getting thru Wilson's article on arrogant atheists.

Why? Because I made a statement of fact about the few cases of anecdotal evidence I'm familiar with?

As there are no intellectual theists, one presumes.

There are. I personally know several.

They are, however, intellectual about their beliefs, not about science or the world around them.

As Flew said about Dawkins, if a "lucky chance" is all the argument you've got, then the game is over.

That's a bit oversimplified.

And I only got through about 1/3 of the God Delusion.

It was too boring for me and I found Dawkins too pretentious.

He is a scientist first, not the other way around like many in academia who must do everything they can to keep the grant money, all of which has political strings attached to it, coming in.

Oh I love it when people say these sorts of things.

I take it you were well acquainted with academic science and grants?

The scientific probabilities simply favor the existence of a Creator.

Only when one throws in he intellectual towel.

God and Religion are entirely separate things.

The best statement you made.

God doesn't " prove" Himself through science, JPW.

How do you know?

Wouldn't it stand to reason that each individual has their own connection with God and that for some science is it?

#443 Ah so, you've studied his work and come up with different conclusions?

No, but I will based on your description of him.

I was referring to my being immersed in science every day.

Nothing I've done or seen has led me to God yet.

Or, you could follow the science as he did.

I am following the science.

No God yet.

prokaryotes have dextro proteins (germs)
how did everything reverse into eukaryotes?

They didn't dumb shit.

There are examples of prokaryotes using D-amino acids in certain instances, but the majority of proteins produced are still using L-amino acids.

There are also examples of mammals producing and utilizing D-amino acids as well.

BTW, are you still drinking?

arguing with God is like arguing with the truth, you ahve to be wrong.

Ahhhh the wonderful construct of religion.

So beautifully circular and simple.

some islanders in the south pacific might think it is magic cause they are ignorant

It is the holy spirit.

LOL oh the irony.

I am an organic chemist advanced and I know more about mathematical production of chemical reqactions than those fakers will ever learn or want to learn

As you have so eloquently demonstrated so far...

#367 | Posted by hopebobby

Full of the same lame ass misconceptions the IDers constantly make.

Clearly you have a little bit of information in your head (you know what a mole is in the context of chemistry), and yet you have so much other shit in there too.

You seem quite able to find the ID sites, use the same methods to find the sites that blow ID to pieces.

I gotta run.

I like to make pussys cry....

LOL

After your little lamentation above, you don't really have room to call anyone a pussy.

Whether oxygen or not you CANNOT make a 100 Dalton protein of all left amino acids using any technology in the universe.

No one can make a 100 dalton protein. The average molecular weight of amino acids is 135 daltons.

Also, I just realized you're dead wrong.

We can make peptides in the lab quite easily and it's done regularly for the production of antibodies for use in labs. I've done it a few times.

We know the peptides are correct not only because of the analysis done by the protein chemists who make them, but also because the accurately mimic the corresponding peptide found in the actual protein.

Now I'm sure you'll want us to make functional proteins.

Hopebobby's definitely there, mentally. He's just not here, mentally.

Well I hope there never becomes here for me.

many Bush administration officials believed that soldiers who supported the war would not face psychological problems, and if they did, they would find comfort in faith.

What else would you expect from a bunch of draft dodgers?

Hopebobby,

You're not all there mentally, are you?

Science is all about reproducing a chemical reactiono.
If it cannot be reproduced it is not scientific that is the definition

Ok, so ignorant of evolution? Check. Ignorant of science in general? Check.

You know there's a saying about when you're in a hole...

dont call evolution sccience unless you can reproduce ALL of its parts in the lab you cant even make ONE PROTEIN in the lab.

The idiocy. It burns.

So nothing is considered "science" until our knowledge of the topic was complete?

By that definition there is no true science in existence.

evolution is UNSCIENTIFIC until you can make a complete left isomeric protein either randomly or in the lab, and if you cannot do it under ideal conditions, it certainly is never going to happen in a mudpuddle.

Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, so the formation of proteins is irrelevant.

How old are you anyway?

Go make a protein in the lab, it cannot be done.

Again, what exactly is your point?

it certainly cannot ever happen randomly in an oxygen atmosphere.

It wouldn't happen in the atmosphere.

if you are NOT from la or ny or chicago or a large city you wont be taken seriously

if you are a successfull woman but not a liberal, you will be attacked

if you are pro life, not only will you not be taken seriously but you will be viciously assisination at every turn.

libs are incensed not at anything she says or does but because a sucessfull woman like this is suppposed to ba a baby killing liberal

You almost made me cry with that whiny ass sob story.

Evolution takes third law of thermodynamics that says complexity always decreases and agrees with that, then states all the animals in the world created themselves.

Actually, it's the second law of thermodynamics and even Answers in Genesis says it's a bad argument.

Who are you taking your talking points from, Richard?

Prove me wrong
Go make a protein in the lab
cannot be done

What sort of twisted, convoluted logic are you using whereby evolution is disproved because we can't synthesize proteins in a lab?