Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

jeffj

Subscribe to jeffj's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

According to Gallup, Barack Obama entered the presidency with a net approval rating (i.e. percent approve minus percent disapprove) of 56%. This past weekend, he was at just +1%. No newly elected President has fallen so far so fast since polling began.

Some pundits that the drop is entirely due to the stagnant economy. They like to draw a comparison to Ronald Reagan, whose numbers fell quickly as he dealt with a recession early in his term. No doubt some of Obama's decline is related to the recession, but the 44th President - unlike the 40th - was elected when the economy was already contracting. This gives Obama political cover that Reagan did not have. Just 7% of Americans, according to a recent CBS News/New York Times poll, blame Obama for the recession.


Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Mitch Daniels: When I was elected governor of Indiana five years ago, I asked that a consumer-directed health insurance option, or Health Savings Account (HSA), be added to the conventional plans then available to state employees. I thought this additional choice might work well for at least a few of my co-workers, and in the first year some 4% of us signed up for it. In Indiana's HSA, the state deposits $2,750 per year into an account controlled by the employee, out of which he pays all his health bills. Indiana covers the premium for the plan. The intent is that participants will become more cost-conscious and careful about overpayment or overutilization.


Sunday, February 28, 2010

While Barack Obama was making his latest pitch for a brand-new, even-more-unsustainable entitlement at the health-care "summit," thousands of Greeks took to the streets to riot. An enterprising cable network might have shown the two scenes on a continuous split-screen because they're part of the same story. It's just that Greece is a little further along in the plot: They're at the point where the canoe is about to plunge over the falls. America is farther upstream and can still pull for shore, but has decided instead that what it needs to do is catch up with the Greek canoe. Chapter One (the introduction of unsustainable entitlements) leads eventually to Chapter Twenty (total societal collapse): The Greeks are at Chapter Seventeen or Eighteen


The news from sunny Bali that there is to be an international investigation into the conduct of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its chairman Dr Rajendra Pachauri would have made front-page headlines a few weeks back. But while Scotland and North America are still swept by blizzards, in their worst winter for decades, there has been something of a lull in the global warming storm after three months when the IPCC and Dr Pachauri were themselves battered by almost daily blizzards of new scandals and revelations. And one reason for this lull is that the real message of all the scandals has been lost.


Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Tiger Woods doesn't owe me an apology. Nothing that he has ever done has cost me a dime nor an hour of sleep.

This is not a plea to be "non-judgmental." I am very judgmental about all sorts of things, including Tiger Woods' bad behavior. But that is very different from saying that he somehow owes me an apology.

For all I know, my neighbors may be judgmental when I drive out of my driveway in a 15-year-old car. But they have never said anything to me about it, and I have never offered them an apology. This is not equating driving a 15-year-old car with what Tiger Woods did. But the point is that any apology he might make should be made to his family, who were hurt, not to the public, who might be disappointed in him, but not really hurt.

read more


Comments

The argument is disingenuous. The GOP wants two votes so they can hang the vote "for" all the crap listed in Jeff's post #30 on the Dems, knowing none of it will be part of the final bill.


There is no such guaruntee. All of that "shit" passed for a variety of reasons. Once the House either votes in favor of the senate bill or deems it passed, it can go straight to Obama for a signature. The only criminal bribe that is likely to be scrubbed is Nelson's deal - and that is only becuase his constituents were embarassed by it. The final bill will likely contain most of that unsavory shit. The house is forced to vote on this toxic senate bill and then HOPE that the senate will scrub the bill of teh bill of its corruption. Let's keep-in-mind that ONLY budgetary measures can be ammended in reconciliation. The abortion language stands as is.

My God! The Dems have painted themselves into one helluva corner. If they were to abandon this and IMMEDIATELY push for agreed-upon measures they would STILL have the ability to brag about being transformative. They are fighting a losing battle and they are squandering EVERY advantage they currently enjoy in order to try and pass a turd.

Give it up and either:

1. Go back to the Universal system

-or-
2. Proceed incrementally; adopt the HSA-model and keep it private.


IMO - these are the only 2 vialbe options. Everything else in the middle only makes matters worse.

Obviously, I favor #2 (I like taking dumps). But #1 is better than anything else other than status-quo.

Yeah, let's please avoid all the good points about the actual legislation, because the GOP will lose on that.

And what would those be?

The acceleration of Medicare's bankruptcy?

How about the exploding deficits?

Doctors fleeing their profession if this is passed just when we are adding 30 million, or so, to the doles?


My favorite part of this "interview" is when Obama made his point, and Brett would immediately say "ok" then change the subject and go back to "process."

OK. We need Ben Nelson's vote - here's $100 million for him. Landrieu? $300 million. What, we have a lot of seniors in Fla. who don't like our Medicare Advantage cuts - well, you guys are exempt. Hmmm....Cadillac taxes ruffling some union feathers, well we can delay YOUR increase by 5-years - the rest of you can pony-up. What, Scott Brown fucked up our filibuster-proof majority? No worries, we can just invoke an obscure senate rule that was never intended to be invoked for a bill of this nature. Uh-oh, this bill is HUGELY unpopular? Let's propose some trivial ammendmens and in the process let's "deem" this shit passed without technically voting on it (the public isn't buying that shit and it'll actually prove worse than a somewhat more honest straight-up vote). Sweeping legislation and zero bi-partisanship? Fuck 'em. 75% of the public wants to scrap this shit and start over? Fuck them too.

Quite honestly, fuck YOU for trivializing all of this shit as it it's inconsequential, Yav. You point to similar GOP attrocities, which were FAR less-sweeping in terms of degree as justification for this criminal power-grab???

Fuck all of this. If this bill is SO great, drop the shenanigans and at least have a modicum of honor and let it pass or fail sans criminal dishonesty and trickery.

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | Copyright 2010 World Readable