2008 - exactly - welcome to Ayn Rand's version of professional licensing.

#12 -

You MAY NOT CARE but this only shows that some only react to emotion and are incapable or significantly less capable of critical thinking.

It isn't the treatment of the two that is at issue, it is the inappropriateness given the age of Obama's daughters.

If Obama's girls were 19/20 and out getting drunk, puking in the gutter after leaving a frat party at college, you bet they should be reported on, why not? However here, these two cases are not "similarly situated'.

sorry for all you hypocrites who will have to see this..
but the PRECEDENT WAS set. and things like this were perfectly okay with many of you BACK THEN..so now you're just gonna have to LIVE WITH IT...
turn about is fair play

SO YOU radical lefties..many of you..LOVED IT when it was the bush twins and now that it's the obama girls...well you'll just have to SUCK IT up and understand that you WONT GET to just do anything you want anymore without it sometimes coming back at you...

#1 | POSTED BY AFKABL2 AT 2013-03-30 04:58 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

Bush twins born - November 25, 1981. They were 19+ years old when GWB was sworn in - at the time they were consenting adults in any state in the union - FROM THE TIME THEIR FATHER TOOK OFFICE.

Obama daughter' current ages are:

Malia was born on July 4, 1998 (today she is only 14+ years) and
Natasha (Sasha) Obama was born on June 10, 2001 (today she is only 11+ years)

Is you need to have the difference between these two points explained any further, I'd be happy to oblige. Just let me know at what point you are confused about the appropriateness of the president's adult (but under aged) daughters getting creamed at a college party and being photographed, and two young girls of the current president not breaking the law on a vacation.