Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Drudge Retort

User Info

dethspud

Subscribe to dethspud's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Links

Absent a major Obama scandal, Clinton will trail in the delegate count in early June--and Obama will be the nominee.

Hillary Clinton can change her message, change her campaign manager, even change her hairstyle--but she can't change the delegate math that makes it almost impossible for her to win the Democratic presidential nomination.


Christopher Hitchens: So, a fresh and sly political subtext in a very bizarre campaign season. The two Democratic nominees remain icily calm when in each other's vicinity -- plain as it is that they cordially loathe and despise one another--while huge shudders of molten rage continue to shake the ample and empurpled yet graying frame of Bill Clinton as he broods on the many injustices to which life has subjected him. What a good time to shift the subject to the temperament (or temper) of Sen. John McCain and to hint, as did Michael Leahy in a major piece in the April 20 Washington Post, that we should wonder whether the Republican nominee has his tray table in the fully locked and upright position, whether he lives happily or unhappily in his own ZIP code, whether there are kittens in his granary or bats in his belfry, and whether his elevator goes all the way to the top.


Comments

Your a fuckehad

At least Spud can spell "fuckhead".

...and "you're" (although Spud admittedly prefers spelling that "yer" fer some strange reason)

Got the "a" part right though!

Spud likes to spell stuff.

Spud can fer example spell "race baiting"

Rethug code words like "state rights" meaning resistance to black advances used by Rotten Ronnie Reagan at the urging of Trent Lott in order to wean disaffected blue collar low info Dems away from their base and into Ronnie the Butchers blood-soaked hands.

The Party of Lincoln did indeed free the slaves but that was before before it became the party of entrenched racism that it is today.

Reagan the false saint also reversed a long standing ruling denying tax exempt status to private schools that held openly racist policies such as Bob Jones University (later over-ruled by the Supreme Court).

GOPher Geoff Davis saying about Obama that "that boy's fingers doesn't need to be on the button"

George Wallace standing in front of that school door.

This years crop of GOPher candidates refusing to take part in any Black or Hispanic debates.

Trent Lott saying how if more folk had voted fer segregationist shithead Strom Thurmond "we wouldn't have the problems we have today" basically saying that American attempts at seeking racial equality led directly to an unacceptable level of "uppitiness" amongst minorities.

The Segregationist Dems who crossed the line to become racist GOPhers, the so-called "dixie-crats" who even today factor in the GOPher's "Southern Strategy".

Jeb Bush adding innocent blacks onto his phoney "felony list" of folk who couldn't vote in Florida.

Momma Bush telling folks how the blacks affected by Hurricane Katrina were "better off".

Willie Horton ads. John McCain's push polled "black love-child"

Wy Rethug Senator Barbra Cubin essentially saying in the Senate that all blacks are drug addicts and thus shouldn't own guns and then being backed up by her fellow rethugs when the Dems demanded her words be censured and stricken.

R-tards like Rush Limpbaugh playing "Barack the Magic Negro" over and over again.

Face it asswipe, the GOP, fer at least the last fifty years, has been an elite club of wealthy white folks with a few token minorities who are willing to toe the racist/elitist/corporatist line. Folks like Alan Keyes and Michelle MalKKKin and Neo-Condi.

Got it now or does Spud hafta spell it out fer you again FUCKHEAD?

Be Well.

First Black Secretary of State, First Black Woman Secretary of State,

~Wobbles

Neo-Condi?

Not only is she effective window dressing disguising the GOPhers racist and sexist ways but she's is also underly competent, overly loyal BushCo lackey only instead of being a graduate of Regent College she comes to BushCo from ten years on the board of
Chevron.

Bush's work in Africa which most people agree has saved a ton of lives.

BushCo so-called good work in Africa has enriched his fundie cronies and taken money away from more legitimate agencies that were doing real work as regards sexual education and AIDS prevention.

The money he's tossed in that direction has also been a goodwill getting distraction prior to the onslaught of the Iraq invasion as well as a sop to the Continent to try and take some of the sting out of the newly formed and highly agendised Afri-Com working to squeeze wotever limited respources (especially oil) wot are left to be exploited there.

Rob FAILs.

Again.

"Nobody vould have imagined" THAT! ^_^

/obligatory

Be Well.

Brilliant plan by the Obamites, btw, to call blue-collar Dems racists if they don't vote for The Holy One.

Actually, Spud's just calling them gullible, low-info rubes being played by Hillary's PT Barnum-esque Bullshit.

Besides ...are you seriously denying the spate of vagina-visioned (TM) Hill Shill's who accuse anyone who doesn't back their "Inevitable One" as being sexist?

That argument cuts both ways Corky.

Hill is playing to the blue collar base because they are quite simply the only people naive enuff to buy into her painfully obvious pandering and her "say anything" inauthentic bullshit.

Anyone with half a brain can see right through it and thus her only hope is too concentrate on the more numerous but less thoughtful blue collar set.

Shooting Crown Royal, changing accents, pandering with gas tax holiday proposals, all the while stealing unabashedly anything she thinks is working fer Obama and then acting like she originated it.

This election, moreso than most, is a real test of the gullibility of the American Electorate.

Regardless of whoever gets elected the country is still is serious trouble but out of the three candidates remaining only Obama has shown a resistance to the status quo mind-set that McCain and Hillary are such die-hard examples of.

If America truly wants another 4 more years of Corporate Corruption and erosion of America's moral standing in the world then America will reap wot she sows.

Between the MSM trying to lead them around by the nose as usual and Hillary and McCain bald faced lying to them by telling them wotever they think they wanna hear the low-info voter may very well chose against their own best interests once again. That sed, the idea that Obama wants to elevate the discussion to a higher level rather than play to the peanut gallery is a big plus not a negative.

Spud to Blue Collar Base:

Fuck electing someone you wanna go drinking with and try electing someone who has the brains and the guts to run the country the way it should be run.

Fer a change.

08ama '08.

Be Well.

I am trying to decipher what your point is.

Tiny Johnson's point?

You mean other than the one at the top of his
head?

The entire point to Tiny, as far as Spud can figure, is that he obviously swallowed a thesaraus one day while at a Klan meeting.

/Call it a hunch.

Be Well.

Radio Free Vietnam!

Since 1992, Viet Tan operates a daily radio broadcast to Vietnam under the name "Radio Chan Troi Moi" (New Horizon Radio). The program airs every night from 8:30pm to 9:00pm on AM 1503 [6]. Despite efforts to jam the broadcast by the government, it can be heard in most areas of the country.

Goooooood evening Viet Nam!

Spud has a hard time believing that the Viet Tan or even it's earlier incarnations the National United Front for the Freedom of Vietnam (NUFLV) are not at least in part funded by the American government. While the NUFLV tried to encourage active resistance to the government of Vietnam through revolutionary means it's subsequent incarnations as the Vietnamese Reform Party and later the Viet Tan disavow the use of violent confrontation and are now committed to using peaceful means to promote democracy and pluralism to the people of Vietnam.

They have been labelled a terrorist organisation for a while now and while not falling strictly under that category in a traditional sense it is easy to se why the Vietnamese government considers them an illegitimate nuisance.

That sed, Vietnam has a lousy human rights record and Spud supports the efforts of groups like Reporters Without Borders to try and free these folks and also to keep this entire situation, including the current imprisonments, from disapearing off of the world's media radar.

Any form of authoritarian state deserves to be challenged; regardless of whether it labels itself, communist, socialist, monarchal or democratic.

Be Well.

Waiting for him to articulate what form of change he's talking about.

~Dion Celine

Ah, the ole "Empty Suit" argument.

Wot a fucknut you are.

Obama is a policy wonk's policy wonk. He used to get criticized for being too professorial in his speeches so he changed to be more uplifting and now he supposedly an empty suit because of that.

Changes? Off the top of me head...

Getting out of Iraq.

Investing in too long ignored Infrastructure.

Promoting a real National Healthcare plan one that benefits people rather than Aetna et al and the HMO's.

Talking with America's enemies rather than giving them a free pass.

Working on increasing Governmental Ethics.

Returning to fiscally responsible policies after the years of dangerously destructive and reckless GOPher "borrow and spend" madness.

Comprehensive national enviromental and energy policies that don't undercut each other.

Talking straight with the America People rather than pandering to them or treating them like retarded children a'la McCain and ClintCo.

In a sense the empty suit argument can be turned on it's head by noting that both McCain's suit and Hillary pantsuit are not empty.

They ARE FULL ...of SHIT.

Did anyone else catch McNutso on the Daily Show last night? Not answering a single question honestly. Turning every answer he gave into a dumbed down campaign sound byte. The guy thinks he's on easy street and all he has to do to get the Presidency is to largely avoid saying anything controversial or real.

He's wrong, of course, but that's the way he's playing it.

Straight Talk Express? NOT!

If McCain swallowed a nail he'd shit out a corkscrew.

Same fer Hillary. Natch.

08ama.

Be Well.

One of the reasons that Mrs. Clinton is resolved to keep fighting is, I think, a resentment that she and many of her followers feel over sexism in the campaign. On that issue, she has a point. One of the political lessons of this year -- backed by psychological research and polling data -- is that the bar is probably higher for a woman candidate for president than for a black candidate

Sexism v. Racism?

Interesting but kinda not the real point here.

There may be a certain element of sexism inherent in the anti-Clinton voting block but in the main most Dem voters whom Spud has read in blog-world contend, as Spud does, that a woman POTUS would be a fine thing, indeed, the election of a woman President is historically overdue.

That sed, NOT THIS WOMAN.

The idea of Dynastic politics while not unknown in American politics (Think Kennedy, Bush, Roosevelt, Adams et al) is still antithetical to the very notion of a Democracy based on merit and a class free society.

GHW Bush was essentially Dick Cheney during Ronnie "The meat puppet" Reagan's reign of errors. Viewed in that light the Bush/Clinton/Bush Dynasties go back 28 years.

The development of the overly cosy, highly destructive relationship between BigGov and BigBiz (particularily the MIC) has benefitted massively from this continuity.

The more aware people are politically the more they are prone to a growing aversion to the status quo. They see that it is working out only for a very few individuals and is working against the vast majority.

What has been put (rather over-simply in Spud's judgement) as "Clinton Fatigue is in reality a fatigue over the sense that the "fix is in" in DC (for indeed that is the case).

The Powers-that-be in the US through their complient lap-dog MSM are invested in wot Spud refers to as the 51/49% solution. A permanent state of gridlock between so-called left and right elements in politics that allows their influence to have the most sway.

In a very real sense it doesn't matter who wins to them as long as the race is tight.

Hillary, by staying in the race, despite being unable to win satisfies this agenda.

What the powers-that-be fear most of all is wot they refer to in their client states as "super-nationalism" ie. a powerful political majority working to effect change that helps the vast majority of the people rather than just the people with all the money as well as the psychotic corporate personages who currently call the shots.

McCain and Hillary ar two peas in a pod in that regard. They are both thoroughly co-opted, corporately pre-approved, disingenuous, inauthentic, "say anything" pols.

Barack Obama while obviously a creature of that culture (no politician can afford not to be) is nowhere near as commited to and corrupted by the status quo.

G08ama '08.

Be Well.

/Yup, tis the Tater o' Doom, on his third coffee no less, entering the fantabulous realm of the blog-god, the Drudge Retort, as ya do
stage left.

Now... where was Spud? Ah, yes, Spud is remember...

These media manufactured bullshit "controversies" are pathetic attempts to distract from the real and all too pressing issues that a BHO candidacy would try to effect positive change in.

The days of the corporate agendised MSM leading the electorate around by the nose are going the way of the dodo as more people wake up to the continual onslaught of non-issue molehills built up to be all important mountains.

The Media continues to dumb down and distract but despite their attempts many folks are beginning to think for themselves and wise up.

To see through the smoke and beyond the mirrors.

Can you say SWIFT BOAT?

John McCain was a sub moronic Navy Royalty brat who finished near the bottom of his acadamy class.

He still got to be a jet jockey because of his familial connections.

He destroyed 5 jets in total under questionable circumstances.

He started a fire on the USS Forrestal by wet starting his engine and igniting a missle which flew ahead of his plane ignited some jet fuel which led to an even larger flame.

132 Forrestal crewmen dead, 62 more injured and two missing and presumed dead

McCain was transported off the ship by helicopter and his part in the incident was covered up.

Many survivors of the fire believe that the reason John Sidney McCain III was so quickly whiskerd away was because the crew wanted his blood.

Spud aint talking about McCain's Pastor or a volunteer in an unofficial office or a lapel pin here.

Human lives.

Ended by John McCain.

Now ya wanna talk about the disgraceful way McCain rolled over fer the Viet Cong and betrayed his fellow soldiers at the Hanoi Hilton?

But sure, go ahead with yer manufactured non issues.

Good luck with that in November.

G08ama '08.

Be Well.

/McAncient is a physically challenged, intellectually inadaquate, superannuated, whore mongering, fear-mongering, war-mongering PSTD case with rage issues who's been turned into such a disingenuous, inauthentic Pander Bear by the most loathsome elements of the fascistical reichwing of the GOPher party that Spud can honestly say he doesn't have a single good quality to reccomend him fer the most powerful office in the land.

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.
**************
I don't make this shit up.


No, but the National Journal does.

And yer quite correct to call it "shit".

On Thursday afternoon, political reporters across the country received a gushing email from the Republican National Committee, with a big picture of Barack Obama next to the words "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007." It was a reference to the National Journal, Washington's big-deal political trade magazine, which released its annual bipolar rankings of the Senate. The results: Hillary Clinton was the 16th most liberal member of the Senate. Barack Obama was #1.

For those Democrats who still have nightmares from the 2004 election, the importance of this fact is unmistakable. Back then, Republicans repeatedly tarred nominee John Kerry with the fact that he had been ranked as the #1 most liberal member of Senate in 2003. Could it all be happening again? If Obama is the nominee, you can bet on it. In point of fact, both Obama and Clinton are relatively liberal members of the Senate. But "most liberal"? That sounds a bit like being the drunkest guy at a Superbowl party--not something to be proud of in a general election.

The more interesting question, though, is, Does this "most liberal" ranking actually mean anything? And the answer, once you look at the National Journal's methodology, is not really. I say this only because I got an email from Dave Meyer, a researcher here in DC, who is one of the many usually-unnamed people who toil behind the scenes in Washington brokering in information. Here is what Meyer wrote:

I actually browsed through the scorecard National Journal used to determine the ranking. There are precisely two scored votes where Obama took the liberal position and Clinton took the conservative. The first was Joe Lieberman's S.Amdt. 30 to S.Amdt. 3 to S.1 The Amendment was "To establish a Senate Office of Public Integrity." Here's the roll call of the 27-71 vote. Joining Obama on the "liberal" side -- meaning the side in support of Joe Lieberman's amendment -- were Republicans Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe Chuck Grassley, and John McCain.
The second was Jeff Bingaman's S.Amdt. 1267 to S.Amdt.1150 to S.1348, the Immigration Reform bill. The Amendment was "To remove the requirement that Y-1 nonimmigrant visa holders leave the United States before they are able to renew their visa." Here's the roll call of the 41-57 vote (60 votes needed to pass, so it failed by 19). Joining Obama on the "liberal' side were Richard Shelby, Chuck Hagel, and Tom Coburn.

So there you have it. Obama is more liberal than Clinton because he voted with John McCain, the most likely Republican nominee, and Tom Coburn, one of the Senate's most conservative members. Ain't political rankings a wonderful thing?


Spud aint making any of the above up.

www.time-blog.com

Be Well.

/Do you actually believe this propaganda you quote or do you just think other folks are stupid enuff to do so?

I still have not seen anyone show definitive proof of this. I have not seen anyone explain how we'd have decoupled the Japanese military from the peace negotiations, nor have I seen any precedents shown, from the 20th century prior to 1945 of the Japanese surrendering willingly. I don't believe the Japanese surrendered on any Pacific island. Seems to me they were big on fighting to the death. Finally, show things from the perspective of 1945, not 2008 or 1955.

There can be no "definitive proof" here as you well know or should. This is all speculative. Just as your assertion that the bombings saved lives is unprovable speculation by any "definitive" standard.

"Precedents"? There were no precedents for WWII just as there were no antecedants. The war was unique.

Some Japanese on some Pacific Islands did fight on to the death. Some even years later. This proves nothing in terms of how the state would react.

Every quote that Spud has pulled in order to bolster his argument was from people who were there in 1945 so yer final question about "info available in 1945" is specious.

The de-coupling of the military from the governmental power structure was done during the occupational period.

America would do well to try and relearn that skill today although in truth it's the CIA, NSA and other clandestine organisations who hold the true power while the Pentagon merely uses it's insane budget as a way of perpetually "priming the pump" in terms of the US economy with increasingly smaller and smaller gains each time.

Be Well.

/Yes, yes, well and truly gone now.

In several ways, recent news has been good to Clinton. She continues to win in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania where there are large numbers of white working-class voters. Arguably, her coalition of white working-class and Hispanic voters is equal to Obama's coalition of white-collar and African-American voters. Obama has been on the defensive lately, dealing with the continuing problem of his former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and trying to explain his own comments that "bitter" blue-collar workers often "cling" to religion and guns instead of voting their economic interests. These two episodes--the Reverend Wright fiasco and "bitter-gate"--have revealed some chinks in Obama's armor.

But the problem for Clinton is that Obama has a clear lead in delegates and that, short of a sudden Obama collapse, there are not enough delegates left for her to pull even, never mind pull into the lead.

Here is the math. There are 4,048 total delegates. You need 2,025 to win the nomination. Of those delegates, about 80 percent are selected in primaries and caucuses by voters, and 20 percent are the so-called superdelegates--party leaders and elected officials who get to vote by virtue of their position. As of today, Clinton and Obama are almost tied in endorsements by superdelegates, but Obama holds a lead in the elected delegates. Using the New York Times's count, Obama has 1,735 delegates (a combined total of elected delegates and superdelegates) to Clinton's 1,601.

Looking ahead, there are eight contests in states or territories which will select about 400 delegates by June 3. There are also around 250 uncommitted superdelegates. The most likely scenario is that Clinton and Obama will split the remaining 400 elected delegates equally. North Carolina is likely to go for Obama. Indiana and West Virginia favor Clinton and, added together, they have nearly the same number of delegates as North Carolina. Later in May, you have Kentucky (51 delegates), which favors Clinton, and Oregon (52 delegates), which favors Obama. Puerto Rico is likely to go for Clinton, but Obama is likely to win the last two western states, Montana and South Dakota (so far, he has won all of the mountain and plains states).

If we assume a 50-50 split of these delegates, then Obama will be at 1,935 and Clinton at 1,801. Obama will only need the support of about one-quarter of the remaining superdelegates to get the nomination. These superdelegates are likely to move in Obama's direction as long as he maintains his lead.


Be Well.

History has obviously vindicated Truman, and proven Leahy wrong. How many American lives did dropping the bomb save? A million? A hundred thousand? How many Japanese--three million? One million? What difference does it make?

~WrongisWrong

History has not vindicated Harry Truman's decision to drop the bomb. Indeed the more we learn from those time the more obvious it has become that it was the wrong decision.

Japan would have surrendered w/o the bombs and all those lives would have been saved.

The concessions that Truman wanted to avoid ie. conditional surrender and the continuance of the Emporer were eventuially aceded to anyways so in truth the bomb only took lives and saved nothing.

BRIGADIER GENERAL CARTER CLARKE

(The military intelligence officer in charge of preparing intercepted Japanese cables - the MAGIC summaries - for Truman and his advisors)
"...when we didn't need to do it, and we knew we didn't need to do it, and they knew that we knew we didn't need to do it, we used them as an experiment for two atomic bombs."

Quoted in Gar Alperovitz, The Decision To Use the Atomic Bomb, pg. 359

GENERAL CARL "TOOEY" SPAATZ

(In charge of Air Force operations in the Pacific)
General Spaatz was the person who received the order for the Air Force to "deliver its first special bomb as soon as weather will permit visual bombing after about 3 August 1945..."(Leslie Groves, Now It Can Be Told, pg. 308). In a 1964 interview, Spaatz explained:

"The dropping of the atomic bomb was done by a military man under military orders. We're supposed to carry out orders and not question them."

In the same interview, Spaatz referred to the Japanese military's plan to get better peace terms, and he gave an alternative to the atomic bombings:

"If we were to go ahead with the plans for a conventional invasion with ground and naval forces, I believe the Japanese thought that they could inflict very heavy casualties on us and possibly as a result get better surrender terms. On the other hand if they knew or were told that no invasion would take place [and] that bombing would continue until the surrender, why I think the surrender would have taken place just about the same time." (Herbert Feis Papers, Box 103, N.B.C. Interviews, Carl Spaatz interview by Len Giovannitti, Library of Congress).

Be Well.

The maintenance of unit cohesion and comradery is one of the primary arguments for Stop-Loss. I honestly believe that w/out Stop-Loss, we'd have a lot more casualties, because we'd be forced to send send understrength and thrown together units into a combat zone.

~Katieberry.

Not going into Iraq at all and only going after the Taliban and AQ in Afganistan and in Pakistan woulda been better still.

Iraq was, and is, a bridge too far.

Yer Stop-Loss argument is belied by the grim suicide statistics this article cites. Increased time in-country with decreased time back in the world leads inevitably to increased PSTD and suicide. Thus the unit's cohesion and morale are already decreased before they return to Iraq. Add into the mix the fact that the neo-Praetorian Guard ie. the Mercenaries get better wages and accomodation plus the inherent viciousness of house to house inter-urban combat against an insurgency/resistance movement and the ultimate unwinnability against a committed local resistance (all propaganda about AQ and "foreign fighters" aside) and you have a recipe for disaster.

The fact that troops were and largely still are being rotated out of an area after making alliances with locals just underscores in Spud's mind how the plan was always controlled chaos. Which is to say that BushCo planned for Iraq to go to hell and radicalise in order to perpetuate the thin excuses used to go into the country and stay there.

The US Government has signed thirty and fourty year agreements with the multinationals and there is no way in hell that they were signed w/o assurances that America would continue to provide reasons (similar to the BS excuses Israel uses in Palestine) in order to continue the unwarranted occupation.

BTW, the VA has been failing verterans for decades!!

~Eddie.

First thing you've sed in a long while that Spud has agreed with.

Still no excuse fer not fixing the thing but it's true nonetheless.

Be Well.

Spud,

No not Japanese I just ran across that term somewhere. The joke is on me tho as I thought is was more synonymous with wageslave, but a quick search reveals that it seems to have a middle management connotation.

whada ya gonna do?


Meh, on Drudge Spud is 8 1/2 inch tall talking potato and on Fark I'm an 8 1/2 foot tall Sasquatch typa guy.

Ya make yer bed and ya lie in it one supposes.

Ta fer replying.

We need a name for those "antis," who support terrorists, the equivalent of what the term "fellow travelers" described for those who supported communism. I thought of a euphonious term, but have decided to table it for now rather than publishing it immediately

~Tiny Johnson

Coupla things here.

First, nobody in the upper levels of the US Government was ever seriously thinking that the Soviets were gonna take over the world but it did provide an excuse to continue on the profligate Militarty spending and occasional purges w/i the US (Think McCarthyism) and so the lie continued fer decades.

Second, you sir are, in fact, the supporter of terrorism not Spud.

You support the policies that lead to increased terrorism. You support Gitmo and Amerca's other torture sites which are hardening world opinion against the US and especially radicalising parts of the Islamic world towards increased acts of radical terrorism.

You support terrorism both abroad and at home.

Spud works to counter terrorism both foreign and domestic.

Spud knows you are rarely right about anything and thus shouldn't be suprised at yer blatent misunderstanding and deliberate ignorance on the topic and yet still Spud feels a need to rub yer nose in yer own stink until you begin to get the idea.

..or at least some small semblance of an idea.

/Ya work with wot ya got.

Be Well.

/Outtie
stage left.

American Military Authorities have always taken a kind of solace in the fact that Red China has never undertaken to develop a fleet of Aircraft Carriers from which they would be able to project their power in order to back up their "diplomatic" efforts in the same way the US has and does.

See: Persian Gulf.

That sed, the "Heathen Chinee are a particularily tricky people".

In the meanwhile, they have swept ahead of the US in terms of building faster and quieter attack subs than the US.

Recently, Spud recalls a story in which a Chinese Sub made it's presence known in the middle of an American sub excercise. It showed up out of nowhere and then fucked off in a way that they were not able to be caught up to.

This wasn't an accident.

It was the PRC's way of saying: Don't Fuck With Us, Round-eye!

When Nixon signed off on the "One China" policy it set the seeds for the eventual end of democratic Taiwan.

Nixon got a much needed photo op in the midst of the Vietnam War debacle and tons of media cred fer his "ping pong diplomacy" and China got exactly wot they wanted in terms of long range goals.

China obviously had closely observed the US routine of crushing existing socialistic governments who were at least somewot responsible for their peoples interests and then installing corrupt and brutal dictatorships who crushed unions and offered sweetheart deals to multinationals who were mostly US based causing a flight of capitol to the west.

China called Shenanigans on that action.

The opening up of China has not led to the masive external outflow of capitol to foreign companies as has been the case in far too many parts of the world and thus they are in a far better position to commit resources to these kinds of long term projects.

While America has used the international drug trade (under Reagan/Bush I) and, more recently, the exagerated threat of terrorism (Bush II) in order to further perpetuate the Pentagon system of massive public spending on military systems they have for the most part ignored the growing threat of an actual non third world entity that is very real and growing.

Wotta bunch of fuckin' morons sez Spud.

Neat story Zat!

Be Well.

/Not really here yet.

Drudge Retort

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

RSS Spec