Absent a major Obama scandal, Clinton will trail in the delegate count in early June--and Obama will be the nominee.
Hillary Clinton can change her message, change her campaign manager, even change her hairstyle--but she can't change the delegate math that makes it almost impossible for her to win the Democratic presidential nomination.
Christopher Hitchens: So, a fresh and sly political subtext in a very bizarre campaign season. The two Democratic nominees remain icily calm when in each other's vicinity -- plain as it is that they cordially loathe and despise one another--while huge shudders of molten rage continue to shake the ample and empurpled yet graying frame of Bill Clinton as he broods on the many injustices to which life has subjected him. What a good time to shift the subject to the temperament (or temper) of Sen. John McCain and to hint, as did Michael Leahy in a major piece in the April 20 Washington Post, that we should wonder whether the Republican nominee has his tray table in the fully locked and upright position, whether he lives happily or unhappily in his own ZIP code, whether there are kittens in his granary or bats in his belfry, and whether his elevator goes all the way to the top.
Instead, he had to face an opponent who -- get this -- really wanted to win it for herself.
Got that right.
Hillary Clinton is all about Hillary Clinton.
Despite her machine-polled, sad-assed, obviously disingenuous attempts to try and be all things to all people this election is merely an exercise in egotism on a massive scale fer "Slash and Burn" Hillary.
In the story of Solomon and the two women claiming the same child she's the biatch who told Solomon to "go ahead and cut the li'l fucker in two"
If you mean like Obama saying that Indiana was the ti-breaker, then reneging on that statement?
Indiana was a tie or an Obama victory if you disclude the Operation Chaos R-tards who voted fer Hill cos Rush ordered their little dittoheaded cheatin' asses to do so.
Michelle Obama is quite correct to call shenanigans on the shit being pulled on the Obama campaign by racist fucks on the right, the vagina-visioned shills on the left and a pussyfooting DNC, who's leader, Howard Dean, makes a public anouncement telling the SDs to make up their minds w/o having actually cast HIS SD vote.
Hillary is, quite simply, the most destructive, divisive, ego-centric, blinkered politician EVAR.
Spud to Hillary:
Time to make yer O-face!
Obama's coming.
G08ama.
Be Well.
First Black Secretary of State, First Black Woman Secretary of State,
~Wobbles
Neo-Condi?
Not only is she effective window dressing disguising the GOPhers racist and sexist ways but she's is also underly competent, overly loyal BushCo lackey only instead of being a graduate of Regent College she comes to BushCo from ten years on the board of Chevron.
Bush's work in Africa which most people agree has saved a ton of lives.
BushCo so-called good work in Africa has enriched his fundie cronies and taken money away from more legitimate agencies that were doing real work as regards sexual education and AIDS prevention.
The money he's tossed in that direction has also been a goodwill getting distraction prior to the onslaught of the Iraq invasion as well as a sop to the Continent to try and take some of the sting out of the newly formed and highly agendised Afri-Com working to squeeze wotever limited respources (especially oil) wot are left to be exploited there.
Rob FAILs.
Again.
"Nobody vould have imagined" THAT! ^_^
/obligatory
Be Well.
I am trying to decipher what your point is.
Tiny Johnson's point?
You mean other than the one at the top of his head?
The entire point to Tiny, as far as Spud can figure, is that he obviously swallowed a thesaraus one day while at a Klan meeting.
/Call it a hunch.
Be Well.
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal's 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.
**************
I don't make this shit up.
No, but the National Journal does.
And yer quite correct to call it "shit".
On Thursday afternoon, political reporters across the country received a gushing email from the Republican National Committee, with a big picture of Barack Obama next to the words "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007." It was a reference to the National Journal, Washington's big-deal political trade magazine, which released its annual bipolar rankings of the Senate. The results: Hillary Clinton was the 16th most liberal member of the Senate. Barack Obama was #1.
For those Democrats who still have nightmares from the 2004 election, the importance of this fact is unmistakable. Back then, Republicans repeatedly tarred nominee John Kerry with the fact that he had been ranked as the #1 most liberal member of Senate in 2003. Could it all be happening again? If Obama is the nominee, you can bet on it. In point of fact, both Obama and Clinton are relatively liberal members of the Senate. But "most liberal"? That sounds a bit like being the drunkest guy at a Superbowl party--not something to be proud of in a general election.
The more interesting question, though, is, Does this "most liberal" ranking actually mean anything? And the answer, once you look at the National Journal's methodology, is not really. I say this only because I got an email from Dave Meyer, a researcher here in DC, who is one of the many usually-unnamed people who toil behind the scenes in Washington brokering in information. Here is what Meyer wrote:
I actually browsed through the scorecard National Journal used to determine the ranking. There are precisely two scored votes where Obama took the liberal position and Clinton took the conservative. The first was Joe Lieberman's S.Amdt. 30 to S.Amdt. 3 to S.1 The Amendment was "To establish a Senate Office of Public Integrity." Here's the roll call of the 27-71 vote. Joining Obama on the "liberal" side -- meaning the side in support of Joe Lieberman's amendment -- were Republicans Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe Chuck Grassley, and John McCain.
The second was Jeff Bingaman's S.Amdt. 1267 to S.Amdt.1150 to S.1348, the Immigration Reform bill. The Amendment was "To remove the requirement that Y-1 nonimmigrant visa holders leave the United States before they are able to renew their visa." Here's the roll call of the 41-57 vote (60 votes needed to pass, so it failed by 19). Joining Obama on the "liberal' side were Richard Shelby, Chuck Hagel, and Tom Coburn.
So there you have it. Obama is more liberal than Clinton because he voted with John McCain, the most likely Republican nominee, and Tom Coburn, one of the Senate's most conservative members. Ain't political rankings a wonderful thing?
Spud aint making any of the above up.
www.time-blog.com
Be Well.
/Do you actually believe this propaganda you quote or do you just think other folks are stupid enuff to do so?


Let me be the first to say it...
Ignorance is Bliss
Posted by TFDNihilist
Just came to say THIS, really.
Total Fuckin' D got there first me-sees.
Good eye there, TFDN!
Actually, that, combined with a tendency towards being wealthy elitist asswipes with less empathy than the average serial killer ensures the Right a huge advantage in the "Happy Happy Joy Joy" singalong competition.
Change frightens them.
The Status Quo is their friend.
Spud would rather be an aware and empathetic humane being rather than one of these slack-jawed, imbecilic ass-clowns anyday.
Be Well.
/Outta here fer a bit, as a tater do,
stage left.