#37 | POSTED BY SULLY
"I previously explained the flaw in your thinking."
No, Sully, you explained the flaw in someone's thinking. Just not mine.
"Eveyrone is responsible for their own vote". I said nothing to the contrary, and nothing about responsibility at all.
"And a Green Party presidency certainly would be a change." Hence the "tens of millions" mentioned, as that's what would be required.
"If you have to take shots at others..." Which wasn't what I was doing.
"...in order to justify your own vote..." Which wasn't what I was doing.
"People are not voting for Stein to appease their own egos just because THETOM declares it to be so." Which isn't what I said.
Stein voters aren't voting for her to be president, as that's NOT going to happen. So, why are they voting for her?
Because they don't want to vote for either major party candidate, but they still want to vote. But without tens of millions of others doing likewise, it's hardly a vote for change.
"You have no point because there is no logic to your claim." Because Sully declares it to be so?
"You are not denying that Stein represents a change." I am denying that merely voting for her represents a change.
"And you seem to be hung on numbers as if that matters." Just the numbers that DO matter, like electoral votes. Crazy, I know.
Perhaps if you hadn't gone for the adolescent approach, assigning motive and attacking a position that wasn't mine to being with, you'd have fared better.