She circumvented that process because she didn't like it, like the rules don't apply to her.. and she's right, they don't, she'll have protection from the top because Democrats are not going to damage their front runner.
#47 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG AT 2016-04-12 04:10 PM | REPLY | FLAG:WHINER
Oh dang, and gosh darn it....blah blah blah blah... rules don't apply to her .... waaa waaa waaa waaa... the dems always covering....boohooo boohooo.
Yeah, I know, to the righty tightys there is something about uppity women that is more irritating than uppity negroes.
In terms of party protectionism... I recall Bush the elder pardoning Casper Weinberger in order to sweep the Iran-Contra affair under the rug... not only getting himself off the hook but allowing Reagan the president presiding over one of the most corrupt administrations in US history to drift off into senility at his Western White House estate ... rather than face criminal charges.
As you recall Reagan had already been compelled to publically admit he screwed up all around the whole Iran-Contra affair because he was generally clueless about the going's on. Clowns were happy as clams at high tide to let Bonzo skate. Hell, the clowns named an airport after him.
Then there was Gerald Ford pardoning Nixon
Oh and lets not forget Governor Bush in FL and the '00 election.
Then there was the whole nation of clowns vilifying the poor in order to cover for Bush trashing the economy.
No wonder the pig brains are always looking for redemption through scandal.... your team keeps stacking it up and the best you get is the story about a --------.