Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

RightisTrite

Subscribe to RightisTrite's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Comments

Later, under Nixon, it even went as far as poisoning livestock and so on. Big affair. And then came Vietnam; he invaded Vietnam. He invaded South Vietnam in 1962. He sent the U.S. Air Force to start bombing. Okay. We took care of Kennedy.
Johnson is trivial. The Indochina war alone, forget the invasion of the Dominican Republic, was a major war crime.

#20 | POSTED BY SHAWN AT 2014-07-11 02:51 PM | REPLY | FLAG:CLOSE BUT NO CUBAN CIGAR

Nixon had a bigger hand in Vietnam than Kennedy because he started mixing it up with Vietnam when he was VP. It was bi partisan but Nixon had more leverage and it was never declared a war until it was over. A lot of military were angry with Kennedy because he showed a lack of commitment by not declaring it a war. The thing is no one wanted to call it a war. They is how they got away with throwing draftees at it rather than the reserves. The facts are Nixon presided over it longer than anyone.We know how well that went. Nixon started it and ended it... and according to new information did what he

ould to drag it out trying to squeeze a victory dance out of it.

Cuba is another tragedy of the Eisenhower and so is Iran. Ike propped up Bautista in Cuba and helped stage a coup in Iran to oust their democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and replace him with Mohammad Pahlavi.

Kennedy was on record for hating the Bautista regime and critical of the US part that played in it.

Nevertheless the US did have a run of Presidents who has served in WW2 where our nations was able to celebrate a "victory". Fascinating that the rabbit holes those vets have led us down finally ending with Bush the elder haven't garnered the glory they wanted.

As far as Cuba is concerned I don't think there has been a president in my life time that has handled Cuba well.They were a Soviet State for so long and Reagan was all about killing the Cubans in Grenada when he started that diversionary war on trumped up charges to cover his tracks for dropping the ball in Beirut. The ghosts of Reagan/Bush drug cartel are what is haunting us in the border detention centers today. Which explains why the pigs are squealing so loudly. They hate paying for what they do.

Perhaps if the other Arab nations had first put their capital into developing the Gaza Strip and relocating those people instead of getting their asses handed to them time and again, things would be better for those people.
After all, the conflict was and always will be about the rights of the Palestinians, right?

#5 | POSTED BY AMERICANPLY AT 2014-07-10 08:02 PM | REPLY | FLAG:RIGHTWING BRILLIANCE AT WORK

Yes why not just send them to "reloaction" camps set up a reservation system or ghettos, or even gulags to make them useful instead of this nagging little thorn in the side of humanity. After all standing on the roof of a house to defend it against unjustified bombing is criminal.

Ya know the majority of the Jewish populations live in two places in the world. Israel and the U.S.A.. I know you like to believe that our military involvement in Arab nations is not a continuum of 7000 year old conflict.
One of the reasons the clown brigade like to keep creationism concept popular is so the US Talibaptist belief that the world began with the creation of Jews and that God is on our side demanding we sacrifice our family to keep the dream of a Judaic empire alive. The reward is who ever does the best job will be called a messiah.

Meanwhile the U.S. spends copious amounts of money propping up the best military in the world who regularly get their asses handed to them by tattered Arab and third world nations.

Seriously we have spent more military money battling Arab Muslims and preparing to go to battle with a than communists.Look how fast we got out of Korea and Vietnam relative to how long we stayed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The lgtfot pivotal point began when the first insurgents came to fore within six months of "Mission Accomplished" pulling what ever we created out and throwing it back at us. And what was that all about? To keep them Ay-ya-tollah fellers in Iran from going after Israel.

If Israel is so capable why don't cut off their funding and relocate the U.S. Israelis supporting the ouster of the Palestinians while living here to their homeland to solve the problem for themselves. Let those who know the world did not begin with the creation of the first Jews called Adam and Eve spend those tax dollars on something productive.

Give them a choice. You can be a US citizen or and Israeli citizen. You know like they did with the Iroquois nations of the Cherokee and Choctaw.

Read much? That list was provided by....wait for it.... CNN... DUH!!!

#38 | POSTED BY SAMES1 AT 2014-07-07 04:42 AM | FLAG: STILL STUPID

So CNN publishes a shopping list of tax defectors and that is supposed to give it credibility? And you think my head has exploded? I don't care who said it. Treating as a "dire warning" is lame hyperbole typical of the rightwingnuts. For two decades those companies with all the capital have managed to lower the income of most Americans and now they are heading for "greener pastures" and you think everyone should be upset. Why?

You losers are like battered spouses who plug in to something that beats you on a regular basis because you think we cannot live without it. As if the are the only show in town and nothing can replace them and therefore should be tolerated at all costs.

If you had any balls as an American you would know that there isn;t a business out there that cannot be replaced with something better.

Most of them are like Walgreens in the article. One year they are fined by the government for pumping oxycontin onto the streets and the next year they are leaving for "tax reasons" and you think the "tax reasons" are due to socialistic problems in the US. Meanwhile they dodge the "tax problems" by relocating to Switzerland where one of the oldest socialist parties in the world exists.

NO they are leaving because they can't maintain the profit margins without dealing in the illicit markets. All those companies "burdened" by something in the US? Grow up. Companies and corporations come and go like johns to hookers.

You brand of stupid is right up there with blaming the exodus of manufacturing jobs on unions by moving production to communist countries as a way of escaping the creeping socialist menace.

You mean they'll pay off the big screen TV and the cruise they put on their credit cards. That's why we allow the rich to live, to fund the creature comforts we are not able to fund on our own.
This is definitely Kardashianland...

#4 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER AT 2014-07-06 09:17 PM | REPLY | FLAG PFFFTT

You're the kind that is the first one to go down so just keep singing stupid things at he top of your voice. You belong to the same class those stupid quasi militia men who were going stand behind their wives so the world could see the government slaughter women... before they were carved in to small chunks.

Believe me when it gets to that the morality you are counting on to save your stupid @$$ will be just a footnote that people laugh about.

The acquisition of those big screen TV's which sell on craigslist for $200 or $300 are not the problem. It is your sanctimony that somehow you have more right to own one than someone else who worked just as hard in a profession that is paid far less. Someone fed you the idea that what it is you do is so much more valuable. The truth is without the people you denigrate the product you pitch... I don't care what it is...is worthless because there is no one else to buy it.

Throughout history it has always comes down to that and the pigs on your side of the court always lose. Every time. No exceptions.What is so stupid is you will insist on losing and you don't care who you take with you as long as you think what you did was so much more important. Most of you work for the day where you can live off your bloated sense of self and live of the proceeds of defunct services you performed in the past that serve no one in the present... and then you will bitch about the takers. Let someone intimate they are going to take that from you and your destiny is to join the rest who have to stand in the lines. You will squeal all the way home.

self righteous idiots

All of a sudden the left care about [their version of] 'patriotism'. Just too funny.:

#3 | POSTED BY MSGT AT 2014-07-05 03:25 PM | REPLY | FLAG:FULLU OF IT

You must be snarfing down Boazos stupid. Typical right wing slug defending very the ones telling him to bend over.

What was Walgreens up to a year ago?... oh yeah riiiiight.
www.usatoday.com

Must upset you to lose your source fun pills.

Leaving for tax reasons ... uh huh suuuureeeee. I have a feeling that was just the tip of the iceberg.
Walgreens leaving for "tax" reasons.... nonsense... Yeah they got their hands slapped for bilking the tax payers and they are forced to cool their jets. As far as I am concerned good riddance losers.

Go ahead keep defending {your version} of patriotism.

I'm not Christian or Jewish or Muslim but I have read the Bible. Granted it is full of some nasty stuff but you have obviously read a different Bible than I did.

If you are going to argue against it at least point to some reference to back up your claim. Otherwise... your spew is no different than the religious whack jobs that come in and blather generalities about "libruls" and atheists.

But really even if one of the common translations try reading some of the newer ones and lighten up a bit. I highly recommend
www.lolcatbible.com

Here's a little excerpt

Pslams 23

1 Ceiling Cat iz mai sheprd (which is funni if u knowz teh joek about herdin catz LOL.)
He givz me evrithin I need.
2 He letz me sleeps in teh sunni spot
an haz liek nice waterz r ovar thar.
3 He makez mai soul happi
an maeks sure I go teh riet wai for him. Liek thru teh cat flap insted of out teh opin windo LOL.
4 I iz in teh valli of dogz, fearin no pooch,
bcz Ceiling Cat iz besied me rubbin' mah ears, an it maek me so kumfy.
5 He letz me sit at teh taebl evn when peepl who duzint liek me iz watchn.
He givz me a flea baff an so much gooshy fud it runz out of mai bowl LOL.
6 Niec things an luck wil chase me evrydai
an I wil liv in teh Ceiling Cats houz forevr.

In the mean time lighten up it's Sunday

How do you libs square this while supporting OWS? How do you celebrate the rise of the Dow with your supposed support for the common man?
I'd rather see a rising stock market but this is no way indicative of a well functioning economy.

#5 | POSTED BY JUSTANOVERSIGHT AT 2014-07-03 11:28 AM | FLAG: PFFFFTTTT!!!

The right has been asked this question for years... so what is your answer?

There is a rather bizarre perception out there fueled by ------------ misinformation that democrats are socialist and anti-business. If that were the case then Clinton would no have had the longest period of sustained economic growth in US history. Your perceptions are not unlike what happens when the clown brigade is running around saying democrats are soft on terrorism. When is fact that is not the case. Democrats have been doing plenty of terrorists ass kicking... but that is the ------------ way of worming out of their stupid... I mean the nation is attacked on its own soil for the first time in its history the son of business associates of a sitting president and you pig brains tried to blame it on Clinton. That same president doing business with terrorists funding organization put economic policies in place that drove the economy into the ditch... something the clowns have been blaming on Obama.

[...] The difference is the ------------- vilify the poor and lower working class insisting that that any benefit afforded them by the US government is wrong and creating a state of dependancy. As if the facts that the corporations who screw up and demand government protection to keep from failing aren't dependent on government? Fine let them take their business and move to the nations whose labor they exploit and see how well they do with their governments.

Democrats says the poor should be paid a living wage and have affordable medical care. The ------------- throw a fit. We know big business is what drives the economy. That is not the problem. The problem is what is done with the money.

The pig brains of the clown making machinery go on and on about how it's whom ever the CEO of what ever company's money because he or she earned it. The problem with the clownies is that they do not take into consideration that the CEO's job is to devalue the worth of human labor in order to drive up profit. If they have done their job well they get paid the big bucks. So people become unemployed and when they do return to work are paid less. The person(s) responsible for the devaluation gets a yacht.

The democrats say this is not good for the country and say the were created by the big business practices and should have their basics needs met. Since you won't pay them a living wage it is not right to let them languish. What is taken away from the 1% to meet the needs of their creation won't be missed. You can only fly so many planes or sail so many yachts.

But to her the clowns yammer on about it you would think that all "those people" have ever done was take take take. That is the big lie.

[...] The recipients of the benefits are not going to get rich from them. They just aren't going to languish. You go on and on about how the democrats want to turn this nation into a third world nation. Wake up stupid. Third world nations are where the people are where people languish while those at the top cry victimhood.

If anyone is aiming for that status it is the clown brigade because they are out of touch with the realities on the ground.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2014 World Readable