#28 | Posted by RexZeitgeist at 2012-02-11 05:02 PM | Reply | Flag: Needs new brand of sniffing glue.

Team Phester

-Reagan Democrats, meet Obama Republicans.

Nice!

I was wrong. There are a few lucid conservative left.

#17 | Posted by phesterOBoyle

One born every minute......

lOve that joke... lol

Stealing a joke from Rcade....

"A conservative, a moderate, and a liberal walk into a bar.....

The bartender says, "Hi, Mitt!"

live that joke!

- If one person is receiving a benefit, another is losing something.

Win-Win is a foreign concept to sheep, one supposes.

- The "why" is all spin.

Context is irrelevant.

That's right half of him speaking.

"A conservative, a moderate and a liberal walk into a bar.

"The bartender says, 'Hi, Mitt!'"

OK now that's funny!

-along comes Monte and Corky to agree.

I only agreed with the

Your lack of trust in a condom should probably be more a function of the fact that its been crammed and undisturbed in your hermetically-sealed, wallet for the last 5 years

because it rang so true, lmao!

-Hebe wallet
Never heard that one before.
Sheltered life, I guess.
#27 | Posted by Corky

for the rest

- using the government's guns

More sheep than shepard, obviously.

-that warm and fuzzy "culture war" thing.

They keep trying to get there, don't they?

Not having wanted to talk about the economy so much recently and all.

They must of thought that it might have actually mattered to the Catholic church that 98 percent of their women members use contraception, or that many states have similar requirements already.

Though I wouldn't argue with the overall supposition, lol.

-Hebe wallet

Never heard that one before.

Sheltered life, I guess.

-Yes, he is. He is appointing judges based not on their qualifications or knowledge, but political opinions. Not that hard.

So, you expected he would appoint conservative justices?

You are obfuscating yet agian.

The result of his appointments are that we have more liberal justices, which would not be the case if his was, "Bush's 3rd term".

I understand that some people went out on a limb and voted for Obama and now are SO disappointed that the ship of state doesn't turn on Obama's dime, but the idea that the overall results of his admin so far make it, "Bush's 3rd term", is a ridiculous... and whiny... comparison.

-You mean a Democrat President appointing only Liberal justices is different than a Republican appointing only Conservatives? Really? You honestly think that?

More obfuscation.

The point is not whether "a Democrat President appointing only Liberal justices is different than a Republican appointing only Conservatives".... the point is that by appointing liberal justices, Obama is not doing something which would have happened if his was "Bush's 3rd term", as the result of having more liberal justices would not have occurred.

You are smarter than this.

-We still have out of control spending and growth. - Obama did that

Yeah, when he could have stopped it So easily!!

-We still have governmental intrusion into individual rights. - Obama is doing that.

I though King Obama unilaterally declared all such nonsense would stop?

-We still have an aggressive and hostile foreign policy. - Obama is doing that

Yes, it's the exact same as sending a half million troops to the wrong country.

-We still have torture. - Obama is doing that
-We still have Patriot Act. - Obama did that

Yes, he spends more time torturing people than on the golf course.

-We still have endless war. - they all want that

For someone who loves endless war, Obama sure went out of his way to keep our troops out of Libya.

-We have growing UE, outsourcing, debt.- Obama keeps asking for more

Yes, we should just tell China that all that borrowing GW did was in the last admin and this admin isn't responsible.

#81

It doesn't matter that it was unsuprising, K. It matter that Obama did it and GW would not have.

Another way that Obama is not, "Bush's 3rd term".

-Justices Sotomayor and Kagan would beg to differ.

As would tens of millions of the uninsured and under-insured, including people with preexisting conditions and kids on parents policies.

And as would millions of homeowners that will see at least some relief as compared to the nada they would get from the GOP.

And, as would bin Laden beg to differ.

#78

And you thought that the GOP was going to somehow magically roll over and disappear and let Obama/Dems do whatever they wanted without fighting tooth and nail and, given Senate rules, blocking or forcing modifications to Dem legislation?

Practically everything you mention was addressed by Dems in House Bills that died a slow tortuous death in the Senate due to GOP stone-walling.

IF "there is no way to know what the GOP would have done in the last 3 years with GWB in charge."

THEN how can you compare what Obama has done to what you admittedly don't know about what GW and the GOP would have done done

You aren't very good at this, are you?

You should stick to calling people cheerleaders and impersonating Special Ed.

(Of course, this ignores that it is quite easy after suffering 8 years of GW/GOP to speculate on what they would have done over the last 3 years in comparison to what Obama has done, and determine that the Obama is "Bush's 3rd term" meme is nonsense, but for the sake of argument we'll let you look as stupid as possible..... which is pretty damn stupid.)

#3 |

"Will do!" - Ris

-by his actions, of course.

-there is no way to know what the GOP would have done over the last 3 years with GWB in office.

-Then by your own admission, how can one say that that Obama is "Bush's 3rd term"?

-by his actions, of course

First you say that there are no actions of GW to compare to, then you say you can tell the difference by Obama's actions.

You're a seriously dedicated moron.

You should have stopped when you declared that I opened up the subject of GW when I obviously did not.... and then you were stupid enough to try to cover up by declaring that the mention of GW by someone else was "baiting".

You are in Special Ed territory here.

Special Eb.... yep, rings true.