Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

jpw

Subscribe to jpw's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Saturday, March 02, 2024

Interesting video with a (subjective) placement of each POTUS on the political compass spectrum.


Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Ronna McDaniel said Monday that she will step down next month as chairwoman of the Republican National Committee following former President Donald Trump's endorsement of a new slate of leaders to direct the party. read more


Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Amid a failed vote to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and the striking down of a bipartisan U.S.-Mexico border security bill, Mike Johnson is still House speaker because "nobody else wants his job," former Republican Representative David Jolly said on Saturday. read more


Monday, February 12, 2024

As the prospect of a Joe Biden-Donald Trump rematch in this year's presidential election rises, a poll indicates that more Americans are looking back at Trump's term in office with nostalgia.

Forty percent said Trump's presidency was better than expected, according to the NBC News poll. About one-third of those surveyed (31 percent) said Trump's time in office was about as expected, while 29 percent said it was worse than expected.


Sunday, February 11, 2024

Is this really who we want in charge?


Comments

Of course they are. You basically just called anyone who doesn't agree with the proposition that the assault victim brought it on himself "righties". It's not the first time you've politicized either, as I recall.

No, I called blueballs stupid, you idiot. Blueballs is a righty.

God damn you're f*&^ing stupid.

Here's a hint: especially when it comes women and minors, arguing that an assault victim is entirely to blame for his or her own assault requires very compelling evidence to sway a jury. No matter how much you want to believe otherwise, the evidence didn't come anywhere close to meeting that bar, even if you include the stuff you alluded to that was excluded.

Oh look, an idiot trying to condescendingly give advice on a topic they're abjectly ignorant about.

Hey idiot, if you're in a crowd and suddenly you see a dumbass with a gun shoot an unarmed guy four times, it's a reasonable assumption that most would make that the person with the gun is a problem. That's the premise that Kyle was attacked under.

It's not the "well why'd he dress like that in a dark alley" you're trying to equate it with.

Just STFU you f*&^ing idiot. You haven't said a single useful thing this entire thread.

You just acknowledged that your views on this case are based "entirely" on emotion.

Except we were talking about them being partisan. In case this hasn't sunk in yet, you. Are. Stupid.

Your views are clearly not based on logic and facts.

Because you have the same level of understanding of the concept of facts and lies as STD.

but that does not make him responsible for Rosenbaum's violent actions against him nor the circumstances such as the shot Josh Ziminski fired, which for all he knew at the time could have been coming from his attacker.

I've never defended Rosenbaum's actions.

The second line is irrelevant. You are responsible for every round you send down range. Period.

It does seem like you really sympathize with Rosenbaum and were all for the violence he perpetuated against Kyle Rittenhouse.

#168 | Posted by sentinel

Nope, but that's a cool intellectually lazy false dichotomy you've got there.

#147 everything I've said was undisputed in the court proceedings.

amp.cnn.com

Your post 148 is just the usual drivel that leads to you being viewed as an absolute idiot.

You clearly don't know a thing about self defense use of force so just shut your idiot mouth and go try to learn something before speaking again.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable