It's a stupid series of questions to ask.
In other words, you're not willing to answer them because it would make your "argument" weak, so you just say the questions are stupid.
They're very relevant questions - those are some of the worst things Trump has done so far as President, so in an argument over who would have been a better president, it's highly pertinent whether the other candidate with a chance of winning would have also done those things. Your avoidance of this point doesn't stop it from being relevant.
If your only point is that she's not the same exact person as Trump, that's pretty lame. I
Nice strawman. You don't have to round up "would she have done these bad things" to "are they the same person" unless you have no argument left to make.