"On the other hand, Obama took us from 7,000 points to 20,000 points. So excuse me if I wonder why you don't cheer that one."
Obama also increased our debt more than any other President.
"Clinton also took us from a struggling economy to incredible highs."
Clinton paid for one kind of debt with another kind of debt. He didn't do anything with the economy, he just made the numbers look different. To make it easy since so many people can't seem to grasp what he did (which is why so many people still praise him for it), imagine you perform an equation a+b+c=debt. Now, let's say there is another type of debt out there that only includes d, so it's not part of the country's debt equation. Clinton comes in and says ok, let's make c part of d now so the country's equation is a+b=debt, removing c and making things look so much better. But, the country is still responsible for all c and d debt, which is only known as d now because Clinton incorporated c into d.
There are many other things you have wrong but those are just the two that are factually wrong, the others are more opinionated so nobody is right or wrong. It just sickens me that people will see only the good someone does and completely ignore the repercussions of those actions. It's like if Clinton would have gone on a murdering spree and killed a million people, Dems would still be like "Hey, he done fixed our economy so it's ok". No, it's not. All it does is make his actions something people want to see repeated instead of learning from the big mistakes that resulted because of those actions.