#2, you can't fully prevent murders.
We also cant fully prevent drunk driving deaths or drinking water poisonings but we have passed laws to try to limit or reduce the occurrence. Are you saying that since we cant "fully prevent" murders at schools, we shouldnt do anything? If something should have been done, why wasnt it? Sounds like negligence to me.
I'm not a gun nut and think there needs to be stricter gun laws but this lawsuit is ridiculous in my opinion.
Anytime somebody starts a statement with "Im not a gun nut, But...." or "Im not a racist, But..." you can believe that they ARE a gun nut or a racist or whatever they so loudly proclaim not to be.
So I propose that if somebody came in and shot up the NRA headquarters, gun nuts would be screaming "its the governments fault, their soul reason for existence is the protection of the American people. But then they say that any type of gun laws which seek to protect Americans is "Nanny Police State" They tried to blame this school shooting on the failure of the FBI and local law enforcement for "not stopping the guy" but then scream that any proposed legislation to "stop the guys" from having weapons of mass murder are "Nanny Police State" You cant have it both ways(unless your a republican hypocrite)
There are no mass killings without weapons of mass killing.