#49 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

You had no standards for the President and he has lived up to them. And now he is selling us out so he can have golf courses in China and a tower in Moscow. Thanks.

WRONG! Hospitals get paid according the DRG (diagnosis). The DRG (diagnosis) has a correlating length of stay. Most patients exceed the term of the length of stay allowed. Any period exceeding the predetermined DRG length of stay is eaten by the hospital.
Homeless dumping or patient dumping is the practice of hospitals and emergency services inappropriately releasing homeless or indigent patients on the streets instead of placing them with a homeless shelter or retaining them, especially when they may require expensive medical care with minimal government reimbursement from Medicaid or Medicare.
Like I said... Hospitals do ANYTHING to dump the poor and the homeless while spending Millions on lobbyists to keep the Rich from flying away,,,
Hate to break it to you, bunkies... but no one gives a --- about you. Except for how long you stay in a hospital before you finally croak.... or if you can pay...
#23 | POSTED BY PEGASUS

Actually, you are wrong.

That's only true for some insurance companies and Medicare. It's not true for all. It's not true for Physician charges. And it's not true for many treatment costs.

But yes, I agree that insurance companies don't care and will do what they can to not pay.

#29 | Posted by snoofy I don't know about that a 40X80 lot is selling for about 15,000 in my hood. the same lot in North Park, Dallas goes for 100K. The big difference is you can build in the same month, try that in LA. The permits and inspections will take months if not years.

#30 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

And you know this because you read it on a comments section on Breitbart, right?

It's not true in the slightest. It takes almost as long in the Dallas area. It all comes down to the plot, plans, and if there is a backlog. One of my co-workers found this out the hard way in Frisco.

Here's the issue. Terminal cancer patient comes in suffering pain and is nearing the end. There is an expensive, painful, intensive, long term treatment with a 10-20% chance of saving the patient. On the other hand, there is another "treatment" at 1/4 the cost, nearly painless and, while it has a 0% chance of working, the practitioners swear its effective and works on those who try it.

As a patient, what do you think many people will opt for?

How come the first black president didn't do this? Was he too busy stopping the oceans from rising?

#17 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

The irony here is incredible. You've just praised Trump for doing something that changes nothing while chided Obama for allegedly focusing on something serious with earth changing consequences...

Libs will all say "ban all the guns". That is because they want all men to be effimenate. Ban everything that could potentially hurt you. Gender fluid? Give me a break. You are one or the other. When I was in middle school I received a heavy bag and a set of weights. I didn't need a gun to deal with bullies I used my fists. Today's society won't allow it but I'll trade some missing teeth and black eyes for some lives any day. Quit trying to make boys be girls otherwise you will keep having these shootings.

#44 | POSTED BY BYRDMAN

Oh ----. Someone replaced Sniper as Dumbest Poster on the DR!!! Sorry, Sniper.

#115 once again proving to be the dumbest person on the planet. Kim just said he wants the meeting. Go hide under a rock hack.

#117 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

And? Kim never said he didn't want the meeting.

But he also said they aren't giving up their Nukes. So...do tell us what there is to negotiate. What does Kim have to lose?

Um....The meeting is on again correct? Kim blinked.....

#125 | POSTED BY SCOOTER28054

Nope. Not as of right now it isn't. MAYBE POSSIBLY POTENTIALLY at some point it could be rescheduled.

The price you pay for spying on the opposition political party. Damn dumb, o'bummer.

#4 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Except the whole "It didn't happen" thing... Literally NO ONE besides Trump has said it happened. And Trump has his own people in control of the DOJ and FBI. How would he only now know about it and why would the DOJ and FBI people on his team deny it happened?

Any other idiotic lies you want to trot out?

This wouldn't be nearly as much of an issue if the FDA streamlined approval processes and politics stayed out of the FDA approval process. How many years did it take to get birth control and the morning after pill approved for purchase without prescription?

Thanks Donald.

Bombs are apparently not as effective as assault weapons.
#12 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY
No.
#15 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

That's adorable. Whats the body count on guns versus bombs each year? And how many of those mass bomb attacks have we had?

I'm not eliminating public education. I'm recommending kids learn at home, in the safety of their home, and teachers teach in the safety of their homes. It's still the public school teachers.
It also means education doesn't have to be given at 8am-3pm. It could vary, if needed.
Bottom line, the schools can't keep the trouble out. So, close the schools. Let the kids learn at home. The parents have to deal with their children learning there.

Maybe, if the parents are there, they'll learn something to - by being involved.

#25 | POSTED BY PETROUS

You mean leave the kid home alone all day? Its not like most families have a parent at home during the day. So where would the kid go during the day?

Mike Tyson

#4 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

Oh come on. We can't include Mike Tyson on there. That's like including Chris Brown for beating Rihanna.

He paid $1M bail and was released.

#10 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE

We literally just had a thread on this Bail stuff. It was a good thread.

Good Job Donald. Finally something okay.

11
I've looked up the claim and the admin changed how deported were calculated. It's not like he was the pushover people say, but it's disingenuous of them to claim the "most" without an asterisk.
It's typical political BS.
www.snopes.com
#14 | POSTED BY 101CHAIRBORNE
Ok, I can give you that one. That change did account for how he beat Bush by so much. Without it, he would be slightly behind Bush.
#28 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

I'm giving you a Newsworthy flag for correcting me. I don't like being wrong but when I am, I'm intend to admit it and make sure I have the facts correct in the future.

I wonder if his buddies Schumer, Hillary and Michelle O will bail him out?

#5 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Because he was such good friends with them? Is it hard being the laughing stock of the DR?

Just who actually is 'winning' at this point :)
www.sondrakistan.com

#112 | POSTED BY MSGT

Well that's the height of stupidity. What nuke site did they destroy? OH! Did you confuse their Nuke Test Site which they don't need anymore with their Nuke Development and Launch Sites?

This is the problem with posting Memes instead of knowing whats going on. You end up looking like a dumbass.

#106 | Posted by eberly, Better question would be why are black young men involved in activities that get them confronted by the police? Maybe if young black men had a father in the home, they might have a better model of behavior than some gang banger on their street. 73% do not. Women can get assistance for their children, families with a man in the home can not qualify. That takes a special sort of stupidity. In confrontations with the police, white men are more likely to get shot. If you want to kill someone, kill a black man in a black neighborhood, no one will say a word to the police. Apparently telling the truth in a black neighborhood is snitching. That is crap, a snitch is a individual involved in a crime that rats out his accomplices for his own benefit. Telling the police what you saw is not snitching, it is getting the trash off the street.

#121 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

Well that was racist and pretty stupid.

Let's unpack the stupidity, shall we?

1. "Better question would be why are black young men involved in activities that get them confronted by the police?"
Like walking down the street or driving a car? They get stopped simply for being black.

2. "Maybe if young black men had a father in the home, they might have a better model of behavior than some gang banger on their street. 73% do not."
Actually, it's closer to 50% live in a single parent household. It doesn't mean the father isn't around. It's actually about 20% for white children. Doesn't explain the disparity.

3. "Women can get assistance for their children, families with a man in the home can not qualify."
That's actually another lie. Assistance is based upon household income.

4. "In confrontations with the police, white men are more likely to get shot."
That's not accurate in any context. Not a single reputable study ever found that.

5. "If you want to kill someone, kill a black man in a black neighborhood, no one will say a word to the police."
Actually just another stereotype. It's only true to a degree years ago in areas with the absolute worst citizen-police relations.

6. "Apparently telling the truth in a black neighborhood is snitching. That is crap, a snitch is a individual involved in a crime that rats out his accomplices for his own benefit. Telling the police what you saw is not snitching, it is getting the trash off the street."
I doubt you've ever been a in black neighborhood or talked to the people who live there.

I don't think you are American. Your posts are either directly from Trump's Tweets or mimic the worst stereotypes from 90's movies about the inner city. Your last post sounds like someone quoting the Stormfront website. If I'm wrong, you need to get mental help because damn you got issues.

Kim has driven his people to eat grass and the bark off trees. And let 10 million die of starvation.
He's eating well and isn't concerned with the peasants.

#17 | POSTED BY 88120ROB

Yes, that's the way its been for decades.... Your point?

-Did you have a point?
Yes, I made it.
If it stings...then that's your fault.

#21 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I don't think it stings so much as it doesn't make sense. Disliking Pompeo means we should never trust anything he says even when it fits the evidence and is against what he wants us to believe?

Would you like to try again?

#17 | Posted by SpeakSoftly As I remember JFK put in a brand new lawyer, also his brother in as AG. So a Democrat with a long list of mob connections can put his brother in as AG but a Republican can't have his son-in-law as an advisor?

#18 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

Did you just go back 60 years to get an example?

And John Kennedy was approved by Congress. Were Jared's credentials approved by Congress?

No one said Jared can't be an adviser to the President. They just said he shouldn't have security clearance.

funny. rather than admit you are fine with Pompeo telling you what you want to hear and forgetting you were soiling your panties over him just a couple weeks ago.......accuse me of something like that.
It's okay. we expect nothing less from you

#16 | POSTED BY EBERLY

When someone admits something against their best interests or that they don't want to, I tend to trust them more on it.

Did you have a point?

The School can ban items of clothes because they cause a disruption to school activities OR if the ban is content-neutral (i.e. all political shirts are banned).

It doesn't seem like that is the case here though.

Unfortunately, the school can't really defend itself to the media. So we'll see when it goes to Court.