Guilty of what? Conspiring, by whatever level of directness, with a foreign power to win the Presidency
That is exactly what hiltabeast did.

#11 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Show us the evidence.

Show us hacking going on to help her.
Show us foreign bot farms supporting her.
Show us her campaign staff being indicted as foreign agents.

Show us or leave, you whiny little crybaby.

So where's the accountability for starting it? We didnt start this...

#302 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Remember when the Republicans openly admitted their plan was to prevent Obama and the Dems from passing ANYTHING? Remember when they blocked hundreds of judges and officials for coming to a vote?

Yeah...You started it and have given the Democrats carte blanche to do WHATEVER they want to obstruct you.

Deal with it, Snowflake.

This new deal doesn't seem to change much....at all....

Ten Commandments is a religious significance to Jews Christians Muslims Etc. And historical significance to not only all of those people but Humanity in general.
These Satan Temple dweebs simply have no life.

#30 | POSTED BY TOR

Actually, no. Islam does not recognize the Ten Commandments but they do recognize Moses. Islam has its own set of commandments which are similar. But the Ten Commandments are wholly Jewish and Christian.

Danforth makes the good point though just above me.

JPW,
All I'm trying to say that we still have more to learn about contributing factors & their significance.
As I said, I've no issue with man-made cO2 being a contributing factor. However, the sun & the power it wields has the capability of 'wreaking havoc' on more than electrical systems. We must also consider any weakening in the earth's magnetic field, which has also been occurring.
www.livescience.com

#47 | POSTED BY 9MMHEATER

You are comparing two different things. There are no studies or research or experiments showing the sun to be a contributing factor in climate change, let alone a major contributing factor.

Syo,
"Still waiting on that list of things rammed down Conservative throats."
Pronouns and pretending people with weiners are women.
I can see calling them transgender but I can't abide this social shaming if you don't refer to them as female and call them "her".
There's one example.
#314 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Oh I didn't know we legislated that. When did that bill pass?

I think they only wanted for the U.S. to not establish a national religion. I believe they wanted us to be able to recognize a religion at a local municipality level.
But that's just me..
#8 | Posted by Boaz

You're right, it is just you. And we can thank our lucky stars for that.
#20 | POSTED BY JOE

Not only is Boaz wrong as usual. But the Arkansas Constitution has similar language barring preferential treatment of any religion. Oops. Double Whammy for Boaz.

Those people in California have gone bat-sh*1 crazy.
And you liberals say conservatives want to run your lives? Look at this!
THIS is why we have an electoral college!!! To keep these crazy folk from telling me what to do!!

#1 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Did you read the damn bill?

All it says its if you offer a "Kids' Meal" that the default beverage be water or milk on the menu or advertisement.

And if the parent requests something else, the kid gets something else. Most restaurants like McDonald's already do this in their advertising and the pictures on their menu board.

Honestly, how stupid are you?

"A little noticed detail in Santa Barbara's recent drive to criminalize plastic straws, which culminated in the Santa Barbara city council taking testimony from a nine-year-old about the planetary menace, has come to light in recent days. During that council session, councilman Jesse Dominguez said the following in response to citizens who asked "what's next?":
"Unfortunately, common sense is just not common. We have to regulate every aspect of people's lives."
Forget it, Jake. It's California.

#5 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

The reason they ban plastic straws is because plastic straws break down into micro-plastics that plastic utensils don't. So animals in those environments tend to ingest it by accident due to its size. So they are thousands of times more harmful to the ocean and fresh water life in and around California than other types of plastic items.

Plastic straws also don't make it through recycling because they are too light weight, unlike plastic utensils.

By the way, its a City Council. They do community type events like letting Cub Scouts testify about something they did a project on all of the time.

If you pulled your head out of your ass for more than a few seconds, you'd have looked it up.

So Warren Buffet wants it, Liberals say nothing. Trump comes along and asks for the same exact thing, Drudge Retort commenters get panties in wad. PLEASE keep this article up for a very long time...it's an easy way for people to know what this site is all about.

#14 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

Oh damn! I didn't know Warren Buffet was able to change SEC policy so the Dems needed to respond!
He also asked for coffee with creamer this morning. Should we respond to that?
Are the Dems to respond to every rich person who wants something? Do we need to put out a press release for Buffet's feelings on every law or regulation he wants changed?

Do let me know so I can inform everyone.

You like apples?

How do you like dem apples?

--Consensus is literally one of the hallmarks of science,
Actually it's consensus followed by a crumbling of the consensus, followed by replacement by a new paradigm. Read Thomas Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolutions."
#29 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Kuhn never said that consensus "crumbled" (using your term) absent somebody making the leap in thinking that lent itself to a greater number of scientific questions being answered. Up until that point he agreed that a current paradigm is scientifically sound.
#30 | POSTED BY HAGBARD_CELINE

Hagbard is correct.

And actually Kuhn said the opposite,Nulli. Consensus didn't crumble. He called a Gestalt Switch. Consensus would essentially shift overnight once the current Paradigm (set of theories) had enough evidence it couldn't explain and a new Paradigm (new set of theories) better answered the evidence. That isn't happening with Climate Change. In fact, evidence continues to corroborate.

I've read Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolution" and published papers on it. You should try reading it sometime followed up by Imir Lakatos. Lakatos really put it all together using Kuhn's work.

Consensus is literally one of the hallmarks of science, you dolt.
#28 | Posted by Sycophant
I can't believe you would post such a stoopid thing. Actual proof is the only hallmark of true science.
#33 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Actually Science doesn't believe in "actual proof". "Actual proof" doesn't exist in Science. They believe only in evidence corroborating theory. And every single bit of evidence in this case points the same way.

I can believe you would post such a stoopid thing.

This entire thread is completely ridiculous.

It's about how you measure height.

For example, I met a beautiful young woman the other night who was clearly only 4 inches shorter than me. She was about 5'10.

But then she took off her heels and lost six inches.

I learned two things that night:
1. Strippers don't take credit cards.
2. Height is a relative term.

We have black rappers constantly calling women ---- and bitches, preaching violence and drug use and constantly using the "N"word. Of course, you as a liberal, would condone it.
Another example of how the liberal establishment is destroying the black community.

#9 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Ted Nugent talks about having sex with underage girls and shooting Obama...and you Conservatives worship him and put him on Fox News as a commentator.

I don't remember Liberals condoning those lyrics, making rappers who use them commentators, or anything close. That's a Republican thing.

Want to try again, Snowflake?

Doc, call this number: 1-888-605-5055. They can help you learn to read.

#10 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Also, I post the number to Hooked on Phonics for DocNJO and I get no FF? You guys have no sense of humor...

CLOWN
"Where is this $716 billion coming from?"
Your taxes.

#14 | POSTED BY TWINPAC

You mean China since we slashed taxes and put the deficit to a trillion.

#11 | POSTED BY CHIEFTUTMOSES

I was going to post something similar. Thank you for beating me to it. NW flag for you.

The parade it's self would be easy. Security is the problem, with all the left whang America/Military haters.
Some would "peacefully" demonstrate by throwing bricks at our GIs.

#22 | POSTED BY PHESTEROBOYLE

Security would be tough?

Let me get this straight...

Issue #1:
1. More guns make us safe.
2. A parade with thousands of soldiers and military vehicles requires a lot of extra security to be safe.

Issue #2:
1. Liberals don't believe in guns and are limp wrist snowflakes.
2. Liberals are a threat to thousands of armed soldiers and military vehicles.

Would you like to post any more -------- today or are you done?

Boaz,

Still waiting on that list of things rammed down Conservative throats.

But if Obamacare is so bad, why haven't the Republicans repealed it?

#1 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Lets take this nonsense down one item at a time because Jeff you are smarter than this...

1. Republicans believe "that traditional news outlets knowingly report false or misleading stories at least sometimes."
That's because they are told to believe that and Fox News frankly lies to them. Every single reputable Media Bias study finds Fox News consistently misleads its audiences while CNN gets high marks for being factual in its straight news reporting. Fox News doesn't do much straight news. And CNN only leans liberal in its Pundits.
Sorry Republicans are too stupid to know facts when they hear them and think they are being lied to. We aren't going to go to #AlternativeFacts so they feel better.

2.But here's the part that should give pause to these editorial boards...
The issue with the survey is referring to the "Traditional News Outlets". It has no specific meaning. Republicans think CNN and MSNBC lie (even when they don't). Democrats think Fox News and Breitbart lie (because frankly they do). So the survey doesn't tell me a whole lot.

3. Speaking of the 44th president, some may ask where the press was on the coordinated editorial front when Mr. Obama and his Department of Justice (DOJ), led by then-Attorney General Eric Holder, acted as "the greatest enemy to press freedom" since the Nixon years.
Did you not get your morning coffee? Obama and Holder didn't refer to the press as the enemy. Risen did.
FACTS: Risen was under investigation for working with Jeffrey Sterling. Sterling was accused and convicted under the Espionage Act. Sterling was sending classified information to Risen. He revealed the names of covert agents in the CIA. Risen appealed the subpoena and lost at the Supreme Court. He had been subpoenaed to testify against Sterling.
Risen's whining doesn't make the Obama administration an enemy of the Press.

4. Trump calling the media the "enemy of the people" is bad but it pales in comparison with the actions the previous administration
Don't be this dumb. Trump is literally putting reporters and journalists at fear for their lives. He is cutting news agencies out of meetings. The White House refuses to divulge loads of information that they received under Obama. Trump and the White House lie about everything. And Trump literally tell his people that the Press are the enemy of the American people. This is going to get people killed. Obama did nothing close to this. Nothing in the same ballpark.

Damn it, Jeff. Do you research before posting this garbage. I know you are smarter than this.

Trump exhibits a similar lack of professionalism. I don't think the best way to oppose him is to mimic his crassness. That just presents a choice between two bad actors.

#22 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

So treat Brennan one way but let Trump off the hook for far more serious issues?

I see how the Republican mind works...

In all seriousness, some of Brennan's tweets and statements on CNN were not professional and becoming of someone with his previous stature as head of the CIA.
He did not show the professionalism, levelheadedness and demeanor of someone that could be entrusted with state secrets.

#19 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Well since he doesn't work for the Feds, he doesn't get state secrets. His clearance only works if he goes back to work for them.

But yes, do show us the examples of what you mean.

#11 | Posted by Sycophant
consensus proves nothing. Are you a lemming? Do you know where the clif is?
#15 | POSTED BY SNIPER AT 2018-08-16 05:47 PM | FLAG:

There is no debate in science.
#9 | Posted by Sycophant
There was very little debate when they thought the earth was flat. Many scientific beliefs have been proved wrong in the past.
#16 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Consensus is literally one of the hallmarks of science, you dolt. Multiple studies and experiments confirming the same result and theory.

The Consensus you are referring to is literally study after study, experiment after experiment, arriving at the same result. These aren't opinion pieces. They aren't surveys of what scientists believe. They are studies of what the outcome of these published studies and experiments are and that they agree.

And just to show how stupid you are, no one has really thought the earth was flat since around 500 b.c. It's a myth taught in school that people actually believed that by and large around the time of Magellan.

Don't waste our time anymore.

This bull market in U.S. stocks stands just a week away from the history books
- same website
(www.marketwatch.com)

#2 | POSTED BY GONOLES92

They are talking about two different things. How can you not understand this?

A correction period occurs when stocks or bonds might be overvalued and generally either lose some value for a period of time OR simply stall in value. This is what we have been in for the past 4 months.

A bull market is when the market is increasing in value as a trend versus a bear market when the market is losing value as a trend. We are in a long term bull market since the middle of Obama's first term (Thanks Obama). However, during the last four months, we are in a long term correction period as stocks are remaining stagnant due to an overvaluation earlier in the year linked to the tax cuts and lower interest rates at the Federal Reserve.

A long term bear or bull market is measured in years. A long term correction period is measured in weeks (generally).

Please don't waste our time with your nonsense posts anymore.