Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

Jpw

Subscribe to Jpw's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Saturday, January 20, 2018

The federal government shut down at midnight Friday as senators continued to scramble to reach a deal to fund the government. This is the first modern government shutdown with Congress and the White House controlled by the same party, and it comes on the one-year anniversary of President Donald Trump's inauguration. Trump's White House however immediately blamed Democrats for the shutdown. ... "It's almost as if you were rooting for a shutdown," [Democratic Sen. Chuck] Schumer said from the Senate floor. "And now we will have one. And the blame should crash entirely on President Trump's shoulders. This will be called the Trump shutdown. This will be called the Trump shutdown because there is no one, no one, who deserves the blame for the position we find ourselves in than President Trump."


Monday, December 18, 2017

Fox News is facing fierce backlash on social media after host Jesse Watters suggested that a "coup" might be underway in the U.S. Watters on his show Saturday night stepped up his attacks against special counsel Robert Mueller, claiming that now that there's proof at least some agents on Mueller's investigative team were biased against President Trump, there may be evidence of a "coup." read more


Thursday, November 30, 2017

Texas Rep. Joe Barton has announced he will retire, after a nude photo of him circulated online and it was revealed he had exchanged sexually charged messages with a supporter. The announcement Thursday by the veteran Republican came after a Texas newspaper revealed the Facebook conversations Barton had with tea party activist Kelly Canon in which Barton sometimes steered the chats to inappropriate topics, such as asking if she was wearing panties. read more


Monday, November 27, 2017

President Donald Trump revived his derogatory nickname for Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., on Monday, referring to her as "Pocahontas" during an event honoring Native American veterans at the White House.

Trump told the veterans: "You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her Pocahontas." read more


Comments

An overwhelming majority of those executive actions have undone over-reaching actions from the prior administration. They've undone executive over-reach.

--------. This is why you're not taken seriously.

he EPA wasn't created to regulate - without new laws expanding its powers - CO2 emissions. Smog, rivers like the Rouge in Michigan, catching fire due to pollution, etc.

Do you have something, anything, to back this up beyond gross political BS ideology?

BTW do you really not see how that post adds to your mystique of -------- support of everything wrong with the GOP? Wahhhhh the Constitution doesn't specifically state that the Federal government has the power to stop rivers from being lit on fire, UNCONSTITUTIONAL OVER REACH!!!

---- me. Stick you head in a plastic bag if you love inhospitable, polluted conditions so much.

Of course they are. And I would guess that you view ALL of Obama's nominees as unicorns.

Nope. But the Dems didn't block a candidate's Senate hearing/vote nor the appointment of multiple judiciary positions in order to fill them with their own shills.

Don't let your own biased mongoloid views taint your perception of me. Please?

Straw man alert!!!

That was a description of how I perceive your views. Learn the definition of a strawman before claiming it.

I don't recall you making the case that Hillary Clinton is an exemplary person. But had she won and enacted policies you favored surely you'd have been able to applaud the policy in spite of the person enacting it. No?

Sure. But what I'm saying is you've yet to clearly dissociate yourself from Trump. You pay lip service to it but spend most of your character count deflecting criticisms of him or nitpicking them in order to minimize them.

You're a shill dude. Just own it.

The looming 2018 shutdown is over expecting a POTUS to sign onto violating a vociferous campaign promise.

After violating or discarding dozens you're a fool to play this card.

Unless you're a racist with a good facade. In which case, congrats on keeping that curtain so tight for so long.

But naturally, in your political outlook, the Dems are ALWAYS right and the GOP is ALWAYS wrong.

What part of mentioning compromise supports this?

There's a significant number of topics on the table that are playing into this. But no, the absurd wall is a must.

And no, I will not yield on the wall being a horrible waste of money for multiple reasons.

You are hilarious. Like I said, the ONLY thing you will accept is 100% total opposition to anything and everything related to the blah blah blah

Nope. You're just too intellectually dishonest or sold to see it.

You're a ------- stooge. Period. Look at the responses to your posts (objectively) and you'll get dick punched by the realization really quickly.

I never claimed neutrality, -------. If you weren't so invested in being a ------- dick, we could have a constructive conversation.

I'm not interested in being a dick. I just don't shy away from it when necessary.

Having said that, you're not quite the closed book you think you are. And if you receive feedback different than what you expect maybe you should consider that as a significant finding.

Having said that, I'm happy to trade insults if that is your sole interest.

Game on! Dude, it's the DR. ------' bring it! ------! LOL

You have so grossly mischaracterized my posts that clarification seems pointless. No matter what I say, you seem to have your narrative and nothing will change that.

I'm just reading between the lines (who do you think hacked my account? out of curiosity...)

You'll spend a paragraph or two deflecting or defending or nitpicking something with a few words "rebutting" your devotion to the obvious point of your post.

Seriously. Using a hyperbolic example, if I said "Child molesters are scum" but followed it up with as much or more text describing how child molesters really just love children and want to express their love and how the view point is seriously misunderstood blah blah blah...

what would you read between those lines?

No, I'm not comparing the political right to child molesters, I'm just using an extreme example hoping it's clear.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable