Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

Avigdore

Subscribe to Avigdore's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Thursday, August 22, 2019

BEAUFORT, S.C."Andrew Yang was sitting here in a rented silver Suburban outside a black chamber of commerce surrounded by five members of his rapidly growing campaign staff when he saw a new Fox News poll in which he was tied for fifth in the sprawling Democratic presidential primary. read more


Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Universal Background Checks: For ten bucks, any seller could phone in a buyer's driver's license number to find out whether the buyer's prohibited from buying a gun (appallingly, the current check system is off limits to responsible private sellers wishing to conduct a check). The new system could even be used by anyone to check out a babysitter or contractor. This system would record only that the ID was checked and issued a confirmation number. The seller can keep the confirmation as a defense to a false charge of selling to an unqualified buyer. The system knows only that someone was checked but has no idea if they even bought a gun, let alone what model or serial number. read more


Wednesday, August 07, 2019

[T]he overwhelming majority of gun sales already require a background check. Anyone who buys a gun from a licensed dealer -- whether in person or online, in a store or at a gun show -- must be cleared by the FBI before the weapon is delivered. Every year the federal government conducts more than 25 million such background checks. The only time the requirement doesn't apply is when someone acquires a gun locally from a private individual, such as a friend or relative. That's the so-called "gun show loophole," which has nothing to do with gun shows and isn't a loophole, since it doesn't apply to anyone in the business of selling guns. read more


Tuesday, August 06, 2019

The front-runner -- the front-runner! -- is septuagenarian gaffe machine Joe Biden, who started running for president in the Eighties and never finished higher than "candidacy withdrawn," with a career delegate total matching John Blutarsky's grade-point average, i.e., zero point zero. The summer's "momentum" challenger is California Sen. Kamala Harris, who spent all year sinking in polls but surged when she hit Biden with "I don't think you're a racist ... but ..." on national TV. read more


Tuesday, July 30, 2019

A mass shooting has devastated a New York City community, after a gunman opened fire during a park party, killing one person and injuring up to a dozen more. read more


Comments

We'll all make sure not to vote for him in 2020.
But you? You're voting Trump! The man who stepped up incarcerations and family separations.
#300 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-08-23 12:18 PM |

No, I didn't vote Trump in 2016. I don't expect I'll vote for him in 2020.
Of course, I also won't vote for the party which started the Nazi-style concentration camps.
We are merely by discussing the de facto head of the Democratic party, the most recent Democrat President, starting Nazi-style concentration camps. When a political party has been tainted by a Nazi president (in 2014 to today), as you've all proven in this discussion, there is no way that I would consider voting for one of them.
Are you going to vote for one of the 2 Nazi parties, Clownshack?

As some person once said:

Do you honestly feel these detention centers are even remotely comparable to the Holocaust?
"Even remotely"? Absolute. Perhaps you should educate yourself on them. #32 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-08-22 08:58 PM

Much the same way as people currently don't care what's happening to the people being separated and incarcerated at our borders since back in 2014. #37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-08-22 09:15 PM

Just because you add the word "Nazi" to "concentration camp", it doesn't change the meaning of the word "concentration camp". - #68 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-08-22 09:46 PM

Yes, we get it. Democrats started concentration camps and shall forevermore be tainted by that indelible stain.

What say you, Clownshack. Are you going to vote for the party that brought concentration camps back to America? Or the party that continues the tradition?
Or perhaps you'll join me and vote for a candidate who hasn't brought the Nazi-concentration camp stain to life in America?

Mueller said he never considered the question because he knew he wasn't ALLOWED to indict trump no matter what the evidence was. So he just gathered the evidence and handed it to congress so THEY could hold trump accountable in other ways.
#26 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-08-22 02:29 PM

That is false.
Mueller did not give the information to Congress.
Congress only got that information because Barr -chose- to release it.
"the special counsel must deliver a confidential report to the U.S. attorney general at the conclusion of the work"
www.pbs.org
You are welcome to review the statute on what the special counsel's duties entail. Informing yourself on the subject seems like something you'd have done rather than spout off falsehoods for so long.
You still ignored my question by pretending that Mueller, and not his boss, represents the DoJ. Shall we continue to pretend that we don't know that its devastating effect on your theory is the reason why you are dodging such a simple question?

It was the part where the idea was called absurd.
www.cnn.com
The Danish Prime Minister called Donald Trump's interest in buying Greenland "absurd"

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable