Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, July 17, 2019

A federal judge Wednesday ordered prosecutors to release the unredacted search warrants and other documents related to Michael Cohen's campaign finance case now that the investigation has concluded.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Rich man pays expensive hookers: News at link; Hysteria Crisis Vortex Now Forming

Sitting US President gets BeeJay in Oval Office: "Leave him alone! Consenting adults! Nunya Beeswax!!"

#1 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-07-17 03:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

How much orange ball snot does ------------------ ingest in a single shift?

#2 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2019-07-17 03:54 PM | Reply

^damaged goods

#3 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2019-07-17 04:00 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Clinton deflection:

*Drink*

Flagged as "Newsworthy" by another serial deflector:

*Drink*
*Drink*

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-07-17 04:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3


@#1 ... Rich man pays expensive hookers: News at link; Hysteria Crisis Vortex Now Forming

Sitting US President gets BeeJay in Oval Office: "Leave him alone! Consenting adults! Nunya Beeswax!!" ...

You got the first part wrong.

Lemme fix it for you...

Rich man violates campaign finance laws by paying hush money to expensive hookers, then lies about it.

It's not about using the, ummm, services of the expensive hookers, nor paying for those services. The problem arises when payment is made in order to quiet the story when the rich man is running for President. Then it can run afoul of the campaign finance laws.

I suspect you knew that, which is why you took the deflection approach you did.

But do I give you, as a "thanks for playing" prize, a Nice Try at your lame deflection attempt. :)

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-17 05:01 PM | Reply

#5 Oh, BS

Rich man extorted by expensive hooker who threatened to blabber about Shark Week.

Expensive hooker represented by professional extortionist, Micheal Avenatti. The whole thing was a shakedown.

"Campaign Finance" is just fancy lawyer excuses for tearing into Trump with hysterical hate. This was a political hit from the get-go.

#6 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-07-17 05:38 PM | Reply

#4

I thought WFW was beneath you, I guess I was wrong.

This is actually a lot more significant than Cohen paying hush money to hookers, the fact that the SDNY concluded its investigation without any further indictments, as we saw from the Mueller investigation, shows that the rest of the Trump Campaign (but not Trump per se) is in the clear as it relates to alleged Campaign Finance violations:

Pauley also said the government must publicly release a status report it filed earlier this week under seal that acknowledges the end of the wider Trump Organization campaign finance probe.

"The campaign finance violations discussed in the Materials are a matter of national importance," Pauley added. "Now that the Government's investigation into those violations has concluded, it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the Materials. Indeed, the common law right of access -- a right so enshrined in our identity that it ‘predate[s] even the Constitution itself' -- derives from the public's right to "learn of, monitor, and respond to the actions of their representatives and representative institutions."

#7 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-07-17 06:15 PM | Reply

#7 In other words, Trump is exonerated again!

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-07-17 06:17 PM | Reply


@#7 ... Oh BS ... "Campaign Finance" is just fancy lawyer excuses for tearing into Trump with hysterical hate. ...

"Because it is not what you want to hear" does not make it BS.

Violations of the campaign finance laws are exactly that. The breaking of a law.

You may not want to head that, but there it is.

Maybe you should tune into Hannity this evening, I'm sure he'll tell you only the spin you are interested in hearing.

#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-17 06:44 PM | Reply


@#7 ... WFW ...

What is WFW?

Search engines come up blank, unless you meant Windows for Workgroups.

{shrug}

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-17 10:05 PM | Reply

Lamp,

I don't know what WFW is either.

#11 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-07-17 10:13 PM | Reply

Should I tell them what it means, RightOCenter?

If I do, please flag it as "Newsworthy."

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-07-17 10:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

we'll see if campaign finance is done...or if it morphs into a facet of the inauguration funds investigation. where's Weisselberg?

#13 | Posted by 1947steamer at 2019-07-17 10:17 PM | Reply

WHO FLAGS WHO

#14 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2019-07-17 10:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


@#14

Wow, really?

I wasted my time in duckduckgo.com for *that*?

{big sigh}


(thx, btw)

#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-17 10:39 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Anytime dear.

#16 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2019-07-17 10:48 PM | Reply

Rich man pays expensive hookers: News at link; Hysteria Crisis Vortex Now Forming

#1 | Posted by SheepleSchism

Just ANY rich man right sheep4stupid? Not someone with great power who could be blackmailed or anything right? Not someone entrusted with our future who exhibits severe lack of morality and ethics or anything.

Just some rich guy.

#17 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-07-18 12:14 AM | Reply

WFW....
Water Feels Wet
Women Feel Wonderful
Women Feel Wet (if you do it right )

#18 | Posted by 1947steamer at 2019-07-18 12:18 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Just ANY rich man right sheep4stupid? Not someone with great power who could be blackmailed or anything right? Not someone entrusted with our future who exhibits severe lack of morality and ethics or anything.

Just some rich guy.

#17 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

You're all over the map. "could be blackmailed", "entrusted with our future ", "severe lack of morality and ethics".

You're a soap opera tabloid consumer. Nobody cares if he banged hookers 15 years ago. The morality concern ended with Bill Clinton in the 90's. You're hyperventilating over adults having sex. Take your pills, put on your relaxation tape, and take deep breathes.

#19 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-07-18 12:29 AM | Reply

Both Snoofy and Laura get flags...go ahead and look up which ones that I gave.

#20 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-07-18 12:30 AM | Reply

The morality concern ended with Bill Clinton in the 90's.

BS hack.

#21 | Posted by jpw at 2019-07-18 12:37 AM | Reply

BS hack.
#21 | POSTED BY JPW

You have a bedroom morality concern, JPW?

Go ahead, where's the line to be drawn?

#22 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-07-18 12:42 AM | Reply


@#22

Is the changing personalities I see in the comments from your alias different people tag-teaming?

(just curious)


#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-18 12:50 AM | Reply

Tag teaming? You're in conspiracy-paranoia land.

Rcade has the time stamps and IP's. You should email him.

I'm probably the only person posting fro SLC, Utah.

#24 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-07-18 12:53 AM | Reply


@#24 ... Tag teaming? You're in conspiracy-paranoia land. ...

Not really.

I'm just saying what I see.

A single origin point (e.g, SLC, Utah) does not necessarily mean a single person.

I could, if I wanted to, appear only from Los Angeles, quite easily.

But don't mind me on this point. It is just that I find the multiple personalities quite entertaining.

#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-07-18 01:27 AM | Reply

where's the line to be drawn?

#22 | POSTED BY SHEEPLESCHISM AT 2019-07-18 12:42 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

Impeachment for lying to congress was the line.

#26 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2019-07-18 07:10 AM | Reply

Not really.

I'm just saying what I see.

I thought I was crazy.

I also noticed that he and Nulli always seem to show up at the same time, flag each other's posts very soon after they're posted and have become waaaaay to similar in personality.

#27 | Posted by jpw at 2019-07-18 07:55 AM | Reply

Sorry guys but sex between consenting adults is not illegal. Neither is a nondisclosure agreement,(hush money). Both are unseemly, but not illegal. Hell, if we are going to look into a trest that happened long before the Damn Yankee ran, maybe we should look into all the sitting members of congress that had their settlements for sexual harassment paid by tax revenues. At least the Damn Yankee used his own money.

#28 | Posted by docnjo at 2019-07-18 08:44 AM | Reply

#28 there are many reasons good actions were wrong. Using legal definitions as a substitute for morality is wrong. The left is America's moral anchor and we are more important now than ever.

#29 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2019-07-18 09:32 AM | Reply

Good actions = his actions

#30 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2019-07-18 09:32 AM | Reply

#29 | Posted by BruceBanner

I don't disagree with you on that. Morality really does feel like it almost completely belongs to the left at this time. Not to mention ethics.

Let's face it both sides can be ethically and morally challenged - especially individuals within the demographics - but the bottom line is when you look at each side as a whole Morals and Ethics belong to the left overall today.

#31 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2019-07-18 10:38 AM | Reply

You're hyperventilating over adults having sex. Take your pills, put on your relaxation tape, and take deep breathes.

#19 | Posted by SheepleSchism

President committing campaign fraud = just adults having sex to sheep4trump

What pills do I take to make me as dumb and conservative as you?

#32 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-07-18 11:14 AM | Reply

Sorry guys but sex between consenting adults is not illegal. Neither is a nondisclosure agreement,(hush money). Both are unseemly, but not illegal. Hell, if we are going to look into a trest that happened long before the Damn Yankee ran, maybe we should look into all the sitting members of congress that had their settlements for sexual harassment paid by tax revenues. At least the Damn Yankee used his own money.

#28 | Posted by docnjo

Wait he did? But he said he never paid stormy daniels.

Are you saying he's a liar?

#33 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2019-07-18 11:15 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort