Mexico ag: ""Everything that was negotiated was in the joint statement," said a Mexican official familiar with the discussions who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity."
It's quite funny how many anonymous sources sprang up once Liberals started amping up their attacks on Trump. Sorry, but an anonymous source is not a fact check.
Drugs: "Trump is inflating the death toll from drug overdoses"
So far it's 0 for fact checking and 1 for objectivity and logic.
He never said overdoses. He said from drugs. Which, anyone who has an ounce of objectivity knows when politicians talk about drugs, they are talking about the entire environment such as violent deaths related to drugs, shooting, etc.
That's 0 for fact checking and 2 for objectivity and logic.
PR aid: ""Puerto Rico should love President Trump. Without me, they would have been shut out!" "
This isn't something you can fact check, but I'll give it to fact checking because it's such an absurd statement. So that means 1 for fact checking, 2 for objectivity and logic.
NATO: "It's not true that the U.S. was paying "close to 100%" of the price of protecting Europe."
Can't argue with that. They provide the numbers which disprove Trump.
That's 2 for fact checking and 2 for objectivity and logic.
Climate change: "Trump is once again conflating weather and climate, suggesting that global warming can't be happening if it gets cold outside. "
Trump never said anything about climate. He answered with an ambiguous statement made to avoid the question. He didn't make a false statement. In fact, his statement is very true...there is a change in weather and it does go both ways. It's not an answer to the question, which objective people understand extremely easy. But this is a fact checking article, so they should leave it to fact checking and not biased spin.
That's 2 for fact checking and 3 for objectivity and logic.
I could go on but, as you see, an article claiming to be fact checking is, in fact, not. They are "Partisan checking" to make sure everyone knows that they disagree with Trump and will do everything they can to make him look bad. Nothing new there. Been happening to both party's since the country was founded. The only really sad part is so many people actually believe this kind of nonsense in an article like this because they have no objectivity or logic.