Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, June 09, 2019

Pastor Clenard Howard Childress, Jr. coined the phrase that "the most dangerous place for an African American is in the womb" – he tells us why, as we delve into the alarming black abortion rate.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"The most dangerous place for a black person is the womb"

Ban wombs!

#1 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-09 04:29 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

Only a complete fool links to youboob for news.

#2 | Posted by Angrydad at 2019-06-09 05:19 PM | Reply

#2,

Yea, but nothing he said isnt a lie. He speaks the truth about the racist intentions of the abortion movement. I dont understand why or how any black person could be behind the abortion movement.

Almost 50% of abortions are blacks. That in itself is mind blowing.

#3 | Posted by boaz at 2019-06-09 05:32 PM | Reply

Almost 50% of abortions are blacks.

That means most are not.

#4 | Posted by REDIAL at 2019-06-09 06:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

According to the CDC, Non-Hispanic white women had the lowest abortion rate (6.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratio (111 abortions per 1,000 live births) and non-Hispanic black women had the highest abortion rate (25.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years) and ratio (390 abortions per 1,000 live births).

#5 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2019-06-09 07:02 PM | Reply

"He speaks the truth about the racist intentions of the abortion movement."

Boaz, it sure sounds like you are unaware of the misogynist intentions of the anti-abortion movement.

#6 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-09 07:11 PM | Reply

The fact that racism can be used to market abortion to whites isn't really about abortion.

It's about racism.

Now go think.

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-09 07:12 PM | Reply

Abortion. Brought to you by the same people who want to imprison you,

...for disturbing sea turtle eggs.

#8 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-09 07:42 PM | Reply

Endangered species are worth protecting.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-09 08:07 PM | Reply

The fact that racism can be used to market abortion to whites isn't really about abortion.

Whites arent having the abortions. It's the blacks who the democrats dont care about. They only care about votes and political power.

#10 | Posted by boaz at 2019-06-09 09:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

"Whites arent having the abortions."

LOL.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-09 10:09 PM | Reply

". It's the blacks who the democrats dont care about. They only care about votes and political power."

Nonsense.

If that were true, Dems would be doing everything to birth more black Democrats. You know...your worst nightmare.

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2019-06-09 10:09 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Abortions are mandatory for black people?

Danks Oberrrrrma!

#13 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-06-09 10:31 PM | Reply


@#10 ... They only care about votes and political power. ...

Why are you talking about Republicans in your rant against Democrats?

#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2019-06-09 11:20 PM | Reply

Almost 50% of abortions are blacks.
That means most are not.

#4 | Posted by REDIAL

You math sucks. Blacks make up about 13% of the population but 50% of the abortions.

#15 | Posted by Sniper at 2019-06-10 09:31 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Great headline.

The abortion movement is rooted in eugenics. Is it surprising that lefties are the biggest proponent of abortion and seek to expand it up to the point of birth and even just after birth?

#16 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 10:43 AM | Reply

If abortions were being forced on women that would be one thing, but what we're seeing is women in a group that is disproportionately more likely to be poor are choosing to have abortions for reasons common among the poor. I suppose I shouldn't expect these Janus-faced retorters pretending to care about black babies to acknowledge that fact.

#17 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2019-06-10 10:51 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

In other words, create a society in which black folks want their kids to live in and the abortion rates would go down.
Build better schools, hospitals, and social services in poor neighborhoods and those folks will want their kids to be born.

#18 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 11:25 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Wouldn't you guys rather a pregnant poor black teenager get an abortion, and therefore have a chance to get an education and become a productive, tax-paying member of society, than she have the kid and end up on welfare?

Like most Liberal positions, we see this as an investment. Freedom of abortion now means less abortions in the future.

#19 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 11:30 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#19 But the bible I've never read gives me the GOD and FREEDOM power to increase abortions and control women at the same time; and I'll exercise my Life, Liberty, and the 2nd Amendment before you take that power of flawed logic from me!

#20 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2019-06-10 12:48 PM | Reply

"The abortion movement is rooted in eugenics."

There is no abortion movement, there is a freedom of choice movement and it has nothing to do with eugenics. Oh, I know the old argument concerning Margaret Sanger but her beliefs have nothing to do with the reasons a woman chooses to have an abortion today. In most cases it about economics. Women who can barely feed themselves get pregnant and understand theat they are not equipped to care for a child.

#21 | Posted by danni at 2019-06-10 12:56 PM | Reply

Wouldn't you guys rather a pregnant poor black teenager get an abortion, and therefore have a chance to get an education and become a productive, tax-paying member of society, than she have the kid and end up on welfare?

No. I would rather the black girl have a family with traditional values like we had before the sexual and liberal revolution. I want her taught to be a nurturing wife and mother, instead of a hard to get along with, difficult social justice warrior. Before liberals made homemaker and mother and dedicated wife a dirty word.

Liberals have destroyed the black family.

#22 | Posted by boaz at 2019-06-10 02:01 PM | Reply

"The abortion movement is rooted in eugenics."

What's "the abortion movement?"
???

The anti-abortion movement is rooted in controlling women.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:09 PM | Reply

"Liberals have destroyed the black family."

Well, Boaz. You know how nature works. Only the strong survive.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:10 PM | Reply

"The abortion movement is rooted in eugenics."

So then why do you support abortion?
Is it because you support eugenics, or for some other reason(s)?

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:11 PM | Reply

The anti-abortion movement is rooted in controlling women.

Actually, it's rooted in the sanctity of life.

#26 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 02:21 PM | Reply

Actually it's not.
Unless you don't think life was not sacred during the time of the Founders, because abortion was legal in every state at the time.
Explain yourself.

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Too many negatives...
But you get my point.
My point is that you are peddling a false narrative.
I'm giving you the opportunity to prove me wrong. Go for it.

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:27 PM | Reply

"Actually, it's rooted in the sanctity of life"

Whose life?
At whose expense?

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

No. I would rather...
#22 | POSTED BY BOAZ

For someone who is a member of the so called "reality" party, you sure do espouse a ton of fairy tales.
This world you dream of never existed.

#30 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 02:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Liberals have destroyed the black family.
#22 | POSTED BY BOAZ

I imagine the selling off of the children and the lynching of the father had a bit to do with it.

#31 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 02:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The truth is, reproductive freedom is synonymous with women's freedom.
This concept is so threatening to them that no anti-abortionist will even speak on it.

#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:35 PM | Reply

Actually, it's rooted in the sanctity of life.

POSTED BY JEFFJ AT 2019-06-10 02:21 PM | REPLY

LMFAO Liar. It's about controlling women and punishing them for having sex. That's it.

#33 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2019-06-10 02:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

LMFAO Liar. It's about controlling women and punishing them for having sex. That's it.

#33 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR

Um. no. But then, you can't be bothered to even try to understand where someone with whom you disagree is coming from.

#34 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 02:41 PM | Reply

#33 Its also about killing more babies by creating more abortions and child deaths.

If you despise the sanctity of life and think the world needs more abortions, support "Pro-Life" policies!

#35 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2019-06-10 02:46 PM | Reply

"you can't be bothered to even try to understand where someone with whom you disagree is coming from."

Been trying for four posts now, JeffJ.
You are the one who lacks the capacity to explain where you are coming from.
Which is what I've been trying to explain to you: Where you say you're coming from is a false narrative you've unfortunately adopted.

#36 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Boaz, you know the more I think about, we do want the same thing, a society where people want the children they have and are capable of providing for them.
You feel the way to that goal is to force poor women to have kids they don't want and can't afford.
My way would be to allow them to delay that until they can be responsible enough, that way their kids will learn good habits and eventually we'll have the society you want. With loving, loyal, productive (tax paying) families.
Or if they never reach the point where they are responsible and productive enough themselves, they are not forced to have unwanted children they can't afford. The chain of nonproductive behavior stops with them.

#37 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 02:48 PM | Reply

Or I guess you could stop poor people from having sex, that might work.

#38 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2019-06-10 02:49 PM | Reply

"You feel the way to that goal is to force poor women to have kids they don't want and can't afford."

They care so much about "respecting the sanctity of life" that if respecting the sanctity of the fetus takes a toll on We The People, so be it! Fetuses come first.

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:50 PM | Reply

"Or I guess you could stop poor people from having sex, that might work."

Yeah, we have that now. They're called incels. It just makes them hate women even more.

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 02:51 PM | Reply

As to Laura's argument, this should be illuminating:

2018 Gallup polling

elf-Identified Position on Abortion, 2018
With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be "pro-choice" or "pro-life"?
"Pro-choice" "Pro-life" No opinion* Number of interviews

U.S. adults 48 48 5 1,024
Gender
Men 47 49 3 552
Women 48 47 4 472


news.gallup.com

So, 47% of women identify as "Pro Life" on this issue, but it's all about control over women. 'Mkay. Something doesn't jive.

#41 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 03:06 PM | Reply

"So, 47% of women identify as "Pro Life" on this issue, but it's all about control over women. 'Mkay. Something doesn't jive."

What are your feelings on female ------- mutilation?
The reason I ask is because it's the older women who mutilate the -------- of the younger ones.
Does that "jive," JeffJ?

#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 03:08 PM | Reply

In what world-view do you look at a law which says "Women, you can't do that!" and argue it isn't about controlling women?

I want to understand how you get from here to there.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 03:11 PM | Reply

You come up with the dumbest equivalencies.

You take extreme examples of something and act like they are comparable.

They aren't.

This is why I usually just ignore the questions you ask. I have no interest in being drawn into an inane discussion.

#44 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 03:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I asked if it jives to prove a point.

Does it?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 03:14 PM | Reply

"You come up with the dumbest equivalencies."

Yeah.
I equated controlling women with... controlling women.

#46 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 03:21 PM | Reply

You are talking about a cultural practice that is geographically-centered in Northern Africa and women in the US' views on abortion, specifically pro-life women.

To suggest that the pre-eminent motivation for for roughly 79 million pro-life women is a monolithic desire to control other women is absurd.

#47 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 03:30 PM | Reply

#47 That first sentence didn't come out right.

You are talking about a cultural practice that is geographically-centered in Northern Africa and are equating that with the views of pro-life women.

Take a step back for a moment and think about the absurdity of that.

#48 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 03:32 PM | Reply

"You are talking about a cultural practice that is geographically-centered in Northern Africa and are equating that with the views of pro-life women."

I'm demonstrating that 47% of women being pro-life doesn't translate to pro-life not being a tool of women's oppression.
Just like women being pro-FGM doesn't translate to pro-FGM not being a tool of women's oppression.

Why must you refuse to see?
???

#49 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 03:51 PM | Reply

Do you think it's okay to beat your wife, JeffJ?
If your wife were to believe it's okay, would that make it okay?

Because billions of women around the world think it's okay for husbands to beat their wives.
Are you really not going to connect the dots here?

#50 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 04:14 PM | Reply

What I see is you assigning motivation to millions of women you've never met.

When you do that there becomes nothing to discuss.

#51 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-10 04:20 PM | Reply

"What I see is you assigning motivation to millions of women you've never met."

And what did you do when you said:

"So, 47% of women identify as "Pro Life" on this issue, but it's all about control over women. 'Mkay. Something doesn't jive."

You assigned motivation to millions of women you've never met.

Is what you did wrong, or is it only wrong when I did it?

Sheesh.

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-10 04:29 PM | Reply

- assigning motivation

Don't take away his shiny thing, Jeff.

It's the only thing he owns.

#53 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-10 04:31 PM | Reply

Around police?

#54 | Posted by fresno500 at 2019-06-10 06:21 PM | Reply

I am just so pleased that Missouri is requiring ------- probes now.

Think about. They are gonna pay someone somewhere to probe vaginas!

I was so disappointed when the state of Virginia changed its mind on this procedure.

I have studied all my life for a job like this job and I am so ready to probe some vaginas!

Gosh, I can hardly type now because my fingers are getting so stiff just thinking about it!

Anyone know where I can apply to be an official ------- Prober?

America!

What a Country!

#55 | Posted by donnerboy at 2019-06-10 07:55 PM | Reply

The Supreme Court came up with their own definition of when life begins.

As a court, they never provided evidence of their decision for that imaginary line.

They made it up.

#56 | Posted by Petrous at 2019-06-11 03:31 PM | Reply

Viability. If you can't survive outside the womb, your life isn't worth saving.

That kind of logic should allow elimination of children and the elderly.

#57 | Posted by Petrous at 2019-06-11 03:36 PM | Reply

- Viability. If you can't survive outside the womb, your life isn't worth saving. That kind of logic should allow elimination of children and the elderly.

Cool. Now talk about the tent campers on the sidewalk.

#58 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-11 03:40 PM | Reply

How about being fired/laid off while pregnant. If it is a fetus, then you are not carrying a baby and should be releases by an employer since the issue of your health has nothing to do with a baby. Its just a fetus. Snark

#59 | Posted by Petrous at 2019-06-11 05:18 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort