Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, June 07, 2019

"It is even harder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant would anticipate that LM would not make any reflexive noise or movements upon being awakened, which would have alerted multiple others to his criminal activity," the ruling reads. "This is particularly true when there is no evidence that appellant threatened LM or took any steps, such as covering her mouth, to prevent an outcry."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

She didn't fight him hard enough so she clearly wanted it.

I wish they would have simply said "women are not actually people."

#1 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 12:25 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Who was the GOP --------- that said "If rape is inevitable you might as well relax and enjoy it"?

Clayton Williams.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2019-06-07 01:22 PM | Reply

Yet another rape thread from Douchegood.

You and -------- need ankle monitors.

#3 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-06-07 01:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#1 They are. They are just too cowardly to use those exact words. Everything they do and say, says it.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2019-06-07 01:23 PM | Reply

I was going to post #3 for ---------------------.

Anywhere my ass is his nose is never far behind.

#5 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 01:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#5

You will notice, creeper, that I only call out your love of rape, which is beyond disturbing.

#6 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-06-07 01:35 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Let's see..

I post an article about a rapist getting away with it and how ------ that is and then you do your best to fight your way out of a wet paper bag, fail miserably, and then accuse me of "loving rape."

Seems like someone is projecting.

#7 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 01:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How many rape threads do you post a week? 5-10? Couple that with -------- using the word rapist about 20 times a day and posting threads on rape and it is clear that you both have a problem.

It takes a sick mind to actively look for those types of threads.

#8 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-06-07 02:06 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

FBI profilers regularly note that predators are often chatty about their crimes.

#9 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-07 02:15 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

How many rape threads do you post a week?

#8 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

It's a complex equation that gets you to the answer to your question.

Take the number of hours your worthless ass spends here a day multiple it by the number of concern troll posts you make, divide by the number of posts you make pretending like you're going to vote for Joe Biden and pretending you don't worship little donnie dollhands, then divide by the square root of the number of posts you make about things you make up so you can pretend to be pissed about them.

#10 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 02:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Simply add all parts of the above equation and you get the sum total of what a ------- loser you are.

That is every post you make here for 10+ hours a day here 7 days a week.

#11 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 02:17 PM | Reply

How many rape threads do you post a week?

Yea! RoC demands you stop pointing out how fkkked Republicans are in the head and how desperate they are to make rape an acceptable behavior.

Come on! I mean. It's not even about a Hollywood celebrity. Because if it were, he would have posted the thread before you had a chance!

#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-06-07 02:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#12

Boo!

#13 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-06-07 02:22 PM | Reply

#11

Looks like I struck a ----- nerve.

#14 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-06-07 02:22 PM | Reply

You struck the jugular. watch it gush.

#15 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-07 02:23 PM | Reply

Boo!

👻

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-06-07 02:24 PM | Reply

Right #12.

It's not that it happens. It's that people report it.

That's his issue.

#17 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 02:27 PM | Reply

#17

Republican logic: "If people stopped reporting they were raped, there wouldn't be any more cases of rape."

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-06-07 02:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#18 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

I've got it figured out.

He details threads about rapists because they are potential pretend clients that he hopes to pretend to represent when him and his mom play court room in those few hours that he's awake and not posting here.

#19 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 02:43 PM | Reply

The part that is missing in this story is what was their relationship beforehand?

We all know that no means no, and that today we've moved to active consent.

This case seems to hinge in the middle... She didn't say no, but she didn't say yes either.

So what leads a guy to just slip into someone else's sleeping bag, and proceed to (rape/attempt to have sex) with them?

If they've had NO previous history together the lack of a no from her is still meaningful, her freezing up makes sense. If however they have a history together, dated, mingled, been out in the same group of friends... then her lack of even attempting to say no is more troublesome especially the more to the left of the list given you go.

I guess ultimately you're an idiot if you can't at least have a version of your story have the line "I asked her if this was okay, and she said yes".

#20 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2019-06-07 03:02 PM | Reply

"According to the Army Times, the female cadet testified that she froze when she woke up to discover Whisenhunt assaulting her, and remained in the fetal position for the duration of the intercourse."

Same exact thing happened to a friend of mine.

"But the judges didn't seem to find that plausible."

First-hand experience?

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 03:08 PM | Reply

"We all know that no means no, and that today we've moved to active consent.

This case seems to hinge in the middle... She didn't say no, but she didn't say yes either."

So consent was never given.

If consent was never given, why isn't it rape?

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 03:10 PM | Reply

Thanks for turning it into an actual discussion.

The judge -- his dad -- must be,,, uh,,, sequestering the fake lawyer in his "chambers."

#23 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 03:15 PM | Reply

#22

I didn't say it wasn't. I also didn't say it was.

There is so much context missing to this story as reported. How well did they know each other? What happened afterwards? Did they continue to interact as normal... or did she report it right away.

What happened before and after really helps frame this as rape, or regretted decision.

So ultimately I'm left asking for more information. I'm at work though, and don't have the time atm to look it up.

#24 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2019-06-07 03:32 PM | Reply

"I didn't say it wasn't. I also didn't say it was."

A bold stance!

What defined you getting raped, was it when you fought back?

#25 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:02 PM | Reply

It's a called a measured stance, unlike the knee jerking going on here.

There's a clear case for rape, and there is potential for "regretted decision" ... Depending on some details, that are lacking.

That's all I said... how that causes you to react by proposing I was raped might be my new definition of retarded.

There are plenty of stories in the news of male students falsely accused of rape, the details of the story is where it became obvious that it was a false accusation. I only said I'd like to take the time to see these details before condemning this man.

Why does this cause such a visceral reaction?

#26 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2019-06-07 04:09 PM | Reply

Rapists always say their victims wanted it.

#27 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2019-06-07 04:09 PM | Reply

There's a clear case for rape, and there is potential for "regretted decision"

Decision?

You mean the decision to not fight back hard enough for you to consider it as evidence of rape?

That's why I asked what defined you getting raped. If you didn't fight back, then it wasn't rape, is that what you tell yourself?

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:18 PM | Reply

"Whisenhunt's defense that the act was consensual, based on the fact that the woman -- identified by the initials LM -- did not struggle loudly enough to alert other cadets who were sleeping nearby."

It's not rape if she doesn't put up a fight.

Correct, KWRX25?

#29 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:22 PM | Reply

Hey KWRX25.

You know the story about how the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, had sex with a little girl, and the way Muslims decide that's okay is the little girl didn't say no?

You familiar with that part of the Koran, KWRX25?

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:30 PM | Reply

Hey KWRX25.

You know the story about how the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, had sex with a little girl, and the way Muslims decide that's okay is the little girl didn't say no?

You familiar with that part of the Koran, KWRX25?

#31 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:30 PM | Reply

Repeaters busted.

#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:30 PM | Reply

Is reading comprehension not your strong suit?

from my comments above:

```So what leads a guy to just slip into someone else's sleeping bag, and proceed to (rape/attempt to have sex) with them?
If they've had NO previous history together the lack of a no from her is still meaningful, her freezing up makes sense.```

Here I clearly agree, that her not making a sound doesn't mean squat and this is rape.

I realize that my comment contains nuance, some reason, and bits of logic. So I understand if you're having trouble making sense of my point. But come on, I said it outright right there.

#33 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2019-06-07 04:32 PM | Reply

"If they've had NO previous history together the lack of a no from her is still meaningful, her freezing up makes sense."

So then tell me when her freezing up doesn't make sense.
And tell me what her freezing up means then.

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:41 PM | Reply

"If however they have a history together, dated, mingled, been out in the same group of friends... then her lack of even attempting to say no is more troublesome especially the more to the left of the list given you go."

What's troubling about her lack of granting affirmative consent then?

You're blaming the victim here, for not saying "no."

Which is the whole reason affirmative consent had to be conceived in the first place.

Because under "No means no" you can get a girl so drunk she can't say no, and then it's not rape, especially if you're Brett Kavanaugh.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 04:45 PM | Reply

No, I didn't, I didn't blame the victim. I said based on other stories that turned out to be false allegations that I wanted to read up on more of the details of the case.

Wanting to see more details before forming a full opinion and claiming "Rapist set free" is not blaming the victim. It's just not knee jerking to a conclusion.

#36 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2019-06-07 05:06 PM | Reply

"I said based on other stories that turned out to be false allegations"

You think there are false allegations here?
What are the potential false allegations?

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 05:11 PM | Reply

Oh, I get it.

You think she consented to sex.

What's your evidence to support that she consented?

#38 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 05:12 PM | Reply

This is why I brought up the girl who didn't say "No" to the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.

Did that girl consent?

#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 05:12 PM | Reply

#36 | POSTED BY KWRX25

Don't take the bait. You are being trolled. It's what Snoofy does. Don't feed it. What you said is perfectly clear and it's reasonable.

Leave it there and have a great weekend.

#40 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-06-07 05:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"What you said is perfectly clear and it's reasonable."

Here's what he said:

"If however they have a history together, dated, mingled, been out in the same group of friends... then her lack of even attempting to say no is more troublesome especially the more to the left of the list given you go."

It's clear all right.
The part I don't see is how it's reasonable.
Because it's a complete repudiation of "active consent."
For it to be reasonable, active consent has to be the wrong standard.

Hence, the nine year old girl and the Prophet.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 05:22 PM | Reply

Thanks for reading and understanding.

I also wish everyone a happy weekend, with noone raping you, and especially you not just lying there silently in fear of what a struggle might bring, until your acquaintance finishes, like my friend did, because according to some, that might not be rape.

#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 05:26 PM | Reply

"...the female cadet testified that she froze when she woke up to discover Whisenhunt assaulting her, and remained in the fetal position..."

The fetal position?

"3000 weeks" - Snoofy

#43 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-06-07 06:50 PM | Reply

"It is even harder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant would anticipate that LM would not make any reflexive noise or movements upon being awakened, which would have alerted multiple others to his criminal activity,"

This is the standard for rape? Whether the appellant thought they were raping someone?

#44 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 07:55 PM | Reply

Brock Turner, have you considered a career in the United States Armed Forces?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-06-07 07:55 PM | Reply

Rape is cool, what's your deal??

-- Frightenedpantsp1s5-r, -----------, several others here

#46 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 08:00 PM | Reply

Rape is cool, what's your deal??
-- Frightenedpantsp1s5-r, -----------, several others here
#46 | POSTED BY MRSILENCEDOGOOD

"God's plan and all."

#47 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2019-06-07 08:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#47 | POSTED BY RSTYBEACH11

Aww man.

Zzzomg!!!

Itz liek teh jugggglair!!11one!!11eleventyone111!one1!!!

#48 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-07 08:28 PM | Reply

And JeffJ comes out in support of this decision. Big surprise.

#49 | Posted by blackheartsun at 2019-06-08 09:04 AM | Reply

Looks like Comrade Dirk's obsession with Jeffj continues.

#50 | Posted by nullifidian at 2019-06-08 09:10 AM | Reply

Impeach the judge

#51 | Posted by bayviking at 2019-06-08 09:22 AM | Reply

This guy and every other rapist who gets away with it needs to rethink the minimum wage murderer gig and get into republican party politics.

They love them.

#52 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-06-08 09:50 AM | Reply

#3 they serve more of a purpose than Boaz's trans threads.

Talk about a real mental issue.

#53 | Posted by jpw at 2019-06-08 10:40 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort