Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, May 23, 2019

Shortly after Donald Trump's 2016 election, his onetime campaign chief Paul Manafort wrote to Jared Kushner to ask the incoming administration to consider giving a "major appointment'' to Manafort's banker. "On it!" Kushner replied to Manafort on Nov. 30, 2016.

Advertisement

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

But Hillary and her emails!

-resident dips---s

#1 | Posted by jpw at 2019-05-23 02:49 PM | Reply

"But Hillary and her emails!"

Boy we sure dodged a bullet there!

Whew!

#2 | Posted by donnerboy at 2019-05-23 04:26 PM | Reply

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

#3 | Posted by aborted_monson at 2019-05-23 04:50 PM | Reply

Did he get the job?

"He ultimately didn't get an administration post."

"Awww. so close. so close and yet so far." -Frankie Valli

#4 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2019-05-23 09:27 PM | Reply

so this is the cat that forked over 16 million to manafort for a seat at tRump's table..J-kush is frontin' the deal and we're supposed to believe tRump is unaware of this? where's that 16 mill show up on declared individual contributions? who paid the taxes, if owed, on the swag?

#5 | Posted by 1947steamer at 2019-05-23 09:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Jerry's only question at this point is do they serve kosher food in prison?

#6 | Posted by Tor at 2019-05-23 09:43 PM | Reply

#4 A bribe doesn't have to be successful to be illegal, dummy.

#7 | Posted by Nixon at 2019-05-24 06:56 AM | Reply

#7 | Posted by Nixon, To prove it was a bribe, you have to prove intent. Beyond that it was a loan, not a payment. Why not pull the loan application.

#8 | Posted by docnjo at 2019-05-24 08:38 AM | Reply

"Posted by Nixon, To prove it was a bribe, you have to prove intent. Beyond that it was a loan, not a payment. Why not pull the loan application."

In a court of law you may be right but we aren't in a court of law, in the court of public opinion is was a bribe and you know it as well as I do. As all Americans who hear about it do.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2019-05-24 08:52 AM | Reply

And the banker is facing charges so a prosecutor apparently agrees with me not you.

#10 | Posted by danni at 2019-05-24 08:53 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#10 | Posted by danni Let's see the result of the trial. Maybe a prosecutor had a political motive, which is not unheard of.

#11 | Posted by docnjo at 2019-05-24 09:23 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

#10 | Posted by danni Let's see the result of the trial. Maybe a prosecutor had a political motive, which is not unheard of.

#11 | POSTED BY DOCNJO

Wait for the results of the trial?

I don't remember you saying that about Hillary or anyone else who wasn't a Trump associate...

#12 | Posted by Sycophant at 2019-05-24 05:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Awww. so close. so close and yet so far." -Frankie Valli

#4 | POSTED BY SHEEPLESCHISM

Quick. Someone noticed another crime (so many!) by the trump crime family.

We need a humpy defender!

"I'm on it!!"

-SHEP

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2019-05-25 12:18 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort