Yet you claim you will accept the outcome of his report. That is increasingly looking like a lie.
Or I don't think the report will show much of anything.
2 of whom were #1 and #2 in the agency at the time.
One of whom kneecapped Hillary's campaign 10 days before the election.
And neither of them have the power to grant FISA warrants or unilaterally authorize surveillance (as far as I know, I'm willing to admit if I'm wrong on that one...).
Also, are you so buried up Trump's ass you can't fathom the concept of professionalism?
Of course I can.
Every FBI agent who ever worked a case had private feelings and opinions about the case they were working.
No ----, Sherlock.
Does that make you question every outcome of every investigation the FBI has ever worked?
Then why throw the long shot to hell Faux News talking point of those guys into the mix? You're picking and choosing information for consideration when synthesizing the full idea.
I'll answer with a question: Do you think law enforcement never abuses authority and always does things the right way?
The IG has already recommended criminal charges against McCabe.
For misleading investigators regarding a leak, not investigative misconduct. Stop using that misleading line.
Strzok was removed from the investigation by Mueller for obvious conflicts of interest and Page was reassigned.
Yeah, because of, you know, professionalism.
The results of one investigation will be here within weeks, much to your chagrin.