Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, May 02, 2019

"Nick Sandmann's legal team has filed another lawsuit, this time against NBCUniversal and MSNBC, according to a lawyer representing him. The lawsuit against the network asks for $275 million in damages. This will be the third defamation lawsuit filed against a media company by Nick's team."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Leftcoastlawyer and Rightofcenter (and everybody else, but especially interested in what real lawyers think about this), what do you think the odds are that NBC will settle, and if they do, what do you think the payout will be?

#1 | Posted by Karabekian at 2019-05-02 11:55 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"but especially interested in what real lawyers think about this"

You should call one then

the DR is nothing but a gathering of the ambulatory challenged and anonymous internet know-it-alls

you would be better off querying a bum for an honest opinion

#2 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2019-05-02 12:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#2 - There is at least one other lawyer here, but I forget his handle. Anyway, this is Sandmann's third lawsuit. I think they're all in the same price range. I wonder if any of these entities will simply settle to make this all go away, and if so, what they're willing to shell out.

#3 | Posted by Karabekian at 2019-05-02 12:09 PM | Reply

Tarl Warwick predicts $10M settlement, but he ain't no lawyer. He also says the other kids could each be looking at six figure settlements, but I haven't heard of any of them filing lawsuits.

#4 | Posted by Karabekian at 2019-05-02 12:13 PM | Reply

I feel like suing Sandmann for just being an a*****e. I hope his cases are thrown out of court and he has to pay for court costs and attorney's fees for the media.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2019-05-02 12:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#5 What did he do, Danni?

Nothing.

That's why he's suing for defamation, and why he'll either win or get a quiet settlement. The media jumped the gun in a race to be the first to slander the kid, and the piper is coming for payment.

#6 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2019-05-02 12:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

There is at least one other lawyer here, but I forget his handle.

It's Et_Al, the rest are only lawyers on the DR.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 12:42 PM | Reply

What did he do, Danni?
Nothing.
#6 | POSTED BY MUSTANG

Yea, it was all the Native American and Black people who were at fault.

I love how you deplorables are so quick to circle your wagons around one of your own.

Smug face chose his fate. He's gonna have to deal with it. And all of mommy and daddy's money can't change reality.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 12:44 PM | Reply

what do you think the payout will be?

The same as the first two times they attempted this lawsuit.

Zero.

The kid made his bed. Now he's gotta sleep in it.

All the screaming deplorables and mommy and daddy's wealth can't change what this kid did, it won't change who this kid is.

Fact is. Every time they're in the news. They remind everyone of the incident. They should learn from Trump, do something outrageous, then wait till the next news cycle for everyone to forget about it.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 12:51 PM | Reply

he'll either win or get a quiet settlement.

He'll get neither.

You must have missed where this is their third attempt at the lawsuit.

#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 12:54 PM | Reply

#8 I think NBC's money might.

Let me ask you...honest question...when in recorded history has someone else been treated they way he was in the media simply for standing there and smiling? No altercation...no exchange of words..

#11 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2019-05-02 12:55 PM | Reply

#10 This is their third separate lawsuit - three lawsuits against three separate entities. I believe one is against CNN, one against the Washington Post, and now this one. As far as I know, none have been dismissed.

#12 | Posted by Karabekian at 2019-05-02 12:57 PM | Reply

when in recorded history has someone else been treated they way he was

Recorded history has changed since 2007 and the advent of the smartphone. Welcome to 2019.

People react to what the see. It's why video evidence is so damning.

simply for standing there and smiling? No altercation...no exchange of words..

Is this what you remember? Your memory must be fading in your old age.

#13 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 01:05 PM | Reply

#12

He's not winning any lawsuit for having his actions reported by the media.

The only reason why Trumpublicans are so desperate to protect this kid is he's one of them. A white kid wearing a MAGA hat.

#14 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 01:07 PM | Reply

when in recorded history has someone else been treated they way he was in the media

Also. Trayvon Martin was treated as a thug and criminal by Republicans because he had some pics on Facebook.

You just happen to care about Smug Boy because he is a white Trumper. He could be your son!

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 01:11 PM | Reply

#15 Not mine. Haven't I told you before that identify as a black man, and you damn well better respect my chosen racial identity!

See how stupid that sounds?

#16 | Posted by MUSTANG at 2019-05-02 01:41 PM | Reply

There is at least one other lawyer here

Et Al was already named. Moder8 is a lawyer as is Montecore. I don't know if Joe still practices law but he certainly was a lawyer and he does a damn fine job of analyzing legal issues and cases.

#17 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 02:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Is this what you remember?

That's what happened. 'Stang's summation of what happened is entirely accurate.

#18 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 02:23 PM | Reply

Haven't I told you before that identify as a black man, and you damn well better respect my chosen racial identity!

This is an anonymous site. If you want to be black, have at it!

See how stupid that sounds?
#16 | POSTED BY MUSTANG

Did we venture into a new topic?

#19 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 02:32 PM | Reply

"The lawsuit against the network asks for $275 million in damages."

This kid must be going places.

The typical actuarial value of a human life lost in a plane crash is around 2 million dollars.

He's claiming to have suffered injury equivalent to a plane with 100 people going down.

The word for this is: Snowflake.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 02:35 PM | Reply

Honestly.

This case is 100% about white privileged.

Hearing Trumpublicans blame everything from scary black people to the location of the sun in the sky was mind boggling.

They did everything they could to excuse SmugBoy's abhorrent behavior. Because he's white and wore a MAGA hat.

It really teaches smug boy a lesson, that he's not responsible for his own actions. That if you have enough money, you can not only get away with anything, but you can then try to force others to pay for your abysmal decisions.

#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 02:41 PM | Reply

#12

That is correct, all three actions are still viable. As to what type of recovery he might get, that is a tough question since in defamation cases you have to show a quantifiable harm and truth is a defense.

I haven't bothered to look at the allegations, but the damages won't spring from showing the video (that is the truth part of it) but from statements made by anchors and opinion by commentators regarding the plaintiff himself and what provable reputation damages can come from it.

This is completely different from a wrongful death action in that he is still alive, very young and quantifying damages will be really speculative.

These are insured claims so the media companies carriers will ultimately be footing the bill, at some point the insurers will look at cost of defense and offer some or all of that for this to go away if the cases survive summary judgment.

#22 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 02:49 PM | Reply

I like how a 16-year old standing motionless and smiling is "abhorrent behavior".

#23 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 03:10 PM | Reply

#23

That is one of the things that will be analyzed, but more relevant will be the talking heads statements regarding his actions (or lack thereof) and whether their opinions could be construed as "false statements" made about Sandmann.

#24 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 03:16 PM | Reply

#24 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

A lot of outlets, including some conservative outlets, rushed to judgement based upon the first, selectively edited video.

#25 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 03:24 PM | Reply

-Yea, it was all the Native American and Black people who were at fault.

I don't think he's suing them, is he?

#26 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:31 PM | Reply

"SmugBoy's abhorrent behavior."

people are probably sending comments like that to Sandmann's legal team as proof that he is still being attacked wrongly.

and blaming the media outlets he's suing.

#27 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:33 PM | Reply

more relevant will be the talking heads statements regarding his actions (or lack thereof) and whether their opinions could be construed as "false statements"

Again. Welcome to privilege only afforded to the rich.

Smug boy has learned quite a lot about not being responsible for his actions thanks to Trump's deplorables.

#28 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:33 PM | Reply

The media's fault in this is apparent but they reversed their mistakes pretty quick, IIRC.

Those amounts being demanded are absurd.

#29 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:35 PM | Reply

I don't think
#26 | POSTED BY EBERLY

See. That's your problem.

You should try to think more.

#30 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:35 PM | Reply

-You should try to think more.

yeah...like you do. LOL

#31 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:38 PM | Reply

"I like how a 16-year old standing motionless and smiling is "abhorrent behavior"."

I like how suing for $275,000,000 isn't.

#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 03:38 PM | Reply

I'm not sure how you'd even hold the media accountable for anything.

First place I saw the video was on Facebook.

People had recorded the incident and posted it and it went viral.

The media picked it up from there.

SmugBoy might as well sue America for his abhorrent behavior.

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:39 PM | Reply

Welcome to privilege only afforded to the rich.

The lawyers suing the networks are contingency plaintiffs firms only out for a quick buck, they can and will take anyone's case if they think there is money in it.

Smug boy has learned quite a lot about not being responsible for his actions thanks to Trump's deplorables.

Very serious question: What, in your opinon, were Sandmann's personal actions (and not the kids around him) other than standing there with a very punchable smirk on his face?

#34 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 03:39 PM | Reply

yeah...like you do.
#31 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Exactly. Now you're catching on.

#35 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:39 PM | Reply

I like how suing for $275,000,000 isn't.

The amount demanded in a complaint is meaningless, those kinds of numbers are put in by Plaintiffs' lawyers to get press, nothing more.

#36 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 03:40 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

It's obvious why Snoofy and shartsmeller are so pissed.

They believe this kid will be awarded serious money.

#37 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:43 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

What, in your opinon, were Sandmann's personal actions (and not the kids around him) other than standing there with a very punchable smirk on his face?

Dude. We went over this in countless threads when the video first went viral.

I saw a kid who saw an elderly man walking towards him and his classmates, classmates who engulfed the old man, and who proceeded to scream and holler at him. His only path was blocked by a jackhole who decided, instead of stepping aside, he would stare the old man down and smirk at him. Holding him captive.

SmugBoy clearly felt superior to Nathan. You can see it in his demeanor.

It reminded me of when black people were expected to cross the street when there were white people approaching.

Then. The entire story changed. Now there were scary black guys and two hours of footage provided so you could somehow sympathize with the class full of jackholes.

Facts are facts.

But. SmugBoy has learned he's not responsible for his actions. It's always someone else's fault and money will fix any situation.

Karma is vengeful. He got what he deserved.

#38 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:50 PM | Reply

-What, in your opinon, were Sandmann's personal actions (and not the kids around him) other than standing there with a very punchable smirk on his face?

according to shart, he "felt superior". That's the only "action" he can point towards.

#39 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:53 PM | Reply

They believe this kid will be awarded serious money.
#37 | POSTED BY EBERLY

If you read my first post on this thread. I stated I don't believe he'll win any money.

But. That would require you to actually read the thread and comprehend what you read.

Not a good day for you eberly, perhaps head my first post to you and try thinking.

#40 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:53 PM | Reply

#38 The problem with your revisionist history is that Philips wasn't trying to get by SmugBoy.

He got what he deserved.

#38 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

He deserved death threats for standing motionless and smiling/smirking?

SmugBoy clearly felt superior to Nathan. You can see it in his demeanor.

You got all of that from a video? Wow, you make Bill Frist look like a piker.

#41 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 03:53 PM | Reply

-I stated I don't believe he'll win any money.

Yes, I can read. I saw it.

I don't care...it's not what you believe. You believe he will win money....regardless of what tripe you type.

#42 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:54 PM | Reply

according to shart, he "felt superior". That's the only "action" he can point towards.
#39 | POSTED BY EBERLY

That was your summary of my post?

If Barr ever needs to be replaced, Trump could always use you to summarize things for him.

#43 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:54 PM | Reply

-That was your summary of my post?

It was the only action you referenced....and by "action" I mean he "felt" something, according to you.

what other action did you reference?

#44 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:57 PM | Reply

Yes, I can read.

Doubtful.

I saw it.

Not based on your earlier post.

I don't care...it's not what you believe. You believe he will win money....regardless of what tripe you type.
#42 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Sad, every time we play this game, you end up being wrong.

#45 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 03:57 PM | Reply

Let me rephrase...Shart, you're certain this kid will be awarded something.

#46 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 03:59 PM | Reply

It was the only action you referenced....and by "action" I mean he "felt" something, according to you.
what other action did you reference?
#44 | POSTED BY EBERLY

I get it. Trump has made behavior we would, in the past, consider disrespectful and hateful, perfectly acceptable to engage in.

Just as republicans have made school shootings perfectly acceptable to engage in.

Sad how far our nation has fallen.

#47 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 04:02 PM | Reply

I don't know, Ebs.

I am not certain this kid will get anything.

I don't think slander is going to be easy to prove.

I'd say it's 50-50 these cases get tossed before even going to trial.

Like ROC said up-thread, if these cases survive summary judgement the defendants will likely settle before going to trial. The amount they offer will then depend on how they perceive the strength of the prosecution's case to be.

#48 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 04:03 PM | Reply

Let me rephrase...Shart, you're certain this kid will be awarded something.
#46 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Your telepathy is something we all envy.

#49 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 04:03 PM | Reply

#38

His only path was blocked by a jackhole who decided, instead of stepping aside, he would stare the old man down and smirk at him. Holding him captive.

I get the smirk and that you don't like the white privilege implications underlying it, but isn't saying that he held Philips "captive" overstating things a bit?

SmugBoy clearly felt superior to Nathan. You can see it in his demeanor.

I can see how you can come to this conclusion, but the question becomes, does that justify the comments made about him, i.e. are those his only actions in your mind (not moving, smirking and feeling superior) that justified "what he got?"

The reason I ask is that since truth is a defense to a defamation action, then the allegedly defamatory statements will be measured against his personal actions (and not the actions of the people around him) and whether those statements were justified.

#50 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 04:04 PM | Reply

So, standing motionless and smiling is disrespectful and hateful now?

I get that some of the kids who were jumping around were doing so in a mocking manner. Some of the others seemed to just be jumping to the beat of the drums.

But we are talking about the kid who literally did nothing.

#51 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 04:05 PM | Reply

-Sad how far our nation has fallen.

I'm reading comments like that here a lot. The sky really is falling in your world, isn't it?

Jeff, I predict a settlement with a non-disclosure agreement.

#52 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 04:05 PM | Reply

Ebs,

I admit I haven't actually followed this very closely. So, I don't know how strong of a case the prosecution has put together. I guess I should do that before making predictions.

#53 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 04:07 PM | Reply

I'd say it's 50-50 these cases get tossed before even going to trial.

It's probably higher odds that these cases don't survive either a MSJ or a Daubert Motion on the grounds that expert evidence of damages are too speculative to get to a jury.

Like ROC said up-thread, if these cases survive summary judgement the defendants will likely settle before going to trial. The amount they offer will then depend on how they perceive the strength of the prosecution's case to be.

#48 | POSTED BY JEFFJ AT 2019-05-02 04:03 PM

That is true, and in these types of actions the amounts tend to go up once the plaintiffs survive MSJ or a Daubert motion.

#54 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 04:09 PM | Reply

The linked article is very short and lacks detail.

This is the best I could come up with:

The lawsuit claims that NBCUniversal put out 15 defamatory newscasts and six defamatory articles, as well as inaccurate tweets about the incident.

It would seem to me that if the defamatory newscasts and defamatory articles were opinion or pundits giving their opinion, the prosecution's case will likely fall through. Unfortunately, without being able to know which articles and newscasts they are referencing, it's impossible to judge the strength of their case.

#55 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 04:11 PM | Reply

Again, I think defamation is very difficult to prove, especially if these outlets offered retractions to any inaccuracies, which is fairly common in the news business.

#56 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 04:13 PM | Reply

Notice how nobody on the riiiight is touting the need for tort reform.

I wonder why that is?

Eberly knows.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 04:22 PM | Reply

isn't saying that he held Philips "captive" overstating things a bit?

Not at all. He literally had no where to go without physically pushing his way through the kids. Look at the video again if it helps. He literally had no free space to move in any direction.

does that justify the comments made about him

By the public? Because. The video went viral before any media outlet started reporting on it. His fate was decided the minute he decided his right to stand his ground superseded Nathan's right to pass by.

are those his only actions in your mind (not moving, smirking and feeling superior) that justified "what he got?"

Welcome to reality. Many millions of people saw what we saw and saw it the way I'm explaining it to you.

Public opinion only started to change when hours of footage were released showing the boys getting heckled by some black folks.

Public opinion shifted more when a PR firm went fully on the attack against Nathan. Questioning his entire existence because somehow something in Nathan's past excused SumgBoy's behavior.

whether those statements were justified.

I guess it depends who you ask. The people who saw the incident.

Or the people who felt SmugBoy was the victim of scary black people.

Because in every version of this scenario, Nathan did nothing wrong. He's guilty of walking towards a group of students. Who rushed him as he approached.

#58 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 04:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I invite all of you to go up to strangers, stand in their way, say nothing, and just stare at them smiling.

Report back to us on how many new friends you make.

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 04:40 PM | Reply

Notice how nobody on the riiiight is touting the need for tort reform.
I wonder why that is?

That is nonsense, I won't speak for anyone else but I am and have always been an advocate of tort reform, probably because I am a defense lawyer.

There have been numerous threads over the years here on the DR where it is the Left that is vehemently opposed to it because it deprives people who can't afford lawyers free representation when they are injured.

#60 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 05:00 PM | Reply

#58

Thanks for taking the time to honestly answer my questions.

#61 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 05:01 PM | Reply

Tort reform wasn't part of this discussion until I reminded you that you support it.

Care to fold that ideological belief into your narrative here?

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 05:06 PM | Reply

I like how a 16-year old standing motionless and smiling is "abhorrent behavior". - #23 | Posted by JeffJ at 2019-05-02 03:10 PM
The sooner that you learn that some people believe that Trump supporters mere existence is "abhorrent behavior" the better.

#63 | Posted by Avigdore at 2019-05-02 05:33 PM | Reply

Hell, my favorite part is when people ignore the Indians own words and pretend that the kids surrounded him as opposed to him approaching the kids.

Hey, you mean to tell me if I confront a group of people by walking into the middle of them that I'd be surrounded?
-supporters of chief attention seeker

#64 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2019-05-02 05:55 PM | Reply

"Tort reform wasn't part of this discussion until I pulled it out my ass."

ft

#65 | Posted by eberly at 2019-05-02 06:06 PM | Reply

"Tort reform wasn't part of this discussion until I pulled it out my ass."
POSTED BY EBERLY

"Those amounts being demanded are absurd."
ALSO POSTED BY EBERLY

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 06:16 PM | Reply

The sooner that you learn that some people believe that Trump supporters mere existence is "abhorrent behavior" the better.
#63 | POSTED BY AVIGDORE

Apparently it's easier for conservatives to blame liberals than accept responsibility for their actions.

#67 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 07:23 PM | Reply

#62

Nice 180 Snoofy, anything else you want to flip on?

#68 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 07:30 PM | Reply

my favorite part is when people ignore the Indians own words and pretend that the kids surrounded him as opposed to him approaching the kids.

Come on dumb dumb. In every single one of my posts I acknowledge Nathan approaches the kids.

When he got close enough to then. They surrounded him.

I understand, there's two different actions being described and it's short circuiting you ability to comprehend what you're reading.

But please, if you can't add anything meaningful to the discussion, at least try to be funny. It's literally the only thing you're good at.

Hey, you mean to tell me if I confront a group of people by walking into the middle of them that I'd be surrounded?

How do you walk into the middle of a group of people?

Again.

You have nothing. You obviously want attention.

Next time. Go with funny rather than stupid.

#69 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 07:30 PM | Reply

"Nice 180 Snoofy, anything else you want to flip on?"

So that's a "No" on applying your long-standing belief about the need for tort reform to Sandmann's tort claim.

Got it.

#70 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 07:37 PM | Reply

#70

You are getting rusty on assigning positions to people, that was lamer than your usual attempts.

#71 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-02 07:54 PM | Reply

Thanks, Rightocenter. I have an excellent tax attorney in San Diego. He is the Columbo of lawyers. Seriously. You should meet him.

#72 | Posted by Karabekian at 2019-05-02 07:57 PM | Reply

Are you really asking how you walk into a group of people?
You poor thing.

He's a white kid that goes to a private school. Of course you hate him.
He has parents. He has money. He has you playing dumber than normal.

You on the other hand a middle eastern outcast. Hated at home, and looked down upon here.

#73 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2019-05-02 08:36 PM | Reply

"But please, if you can't add anything meaningful to the discussion, at least try to be funny. It's literally the only thing you're good at."

And the self-retorting retort of the year award goes to Clowns'Hack.

#74 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-02 09:40 PM | Reply

#74 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

How do my ankles taste?

#75 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 10:39 PM | Reply

Are you really asking how you walk into a group of people?
You poor thing.

You don't walk into a group of people without pushing your way in.

He's a white kid that goes to a private school. Of course you hate him.

I don't hate him for either reason, nor did I know which school he went to when I first saw the video.

He has parents. He has money. He has you playing dumber than normal.

Are you sure he has parents? He looks like a lab monkey.

You on the other hand a middle eastern outcast. Hated at home, and looked down upon here.
#73 | POSTED BY 101CHAIRBORNE

Wow. You know a lot about me.

This sudden burst of clairvoyance is remarkable.

#76 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 10:44 PM | Reply

"You are getting rusty on assigning positions to people, that was lamer than your usual attempts.
#71 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER"

Rusty?
I accurately characterized your conduct in the thread:
Not a peep decrying this lawsuit as frivolous, excessive, or indicative of the need for tort reform.

Now why could that be?

#77 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-02 10:45 PM | Reply

"How do my ankles taste?"

A bit gamy.

#78 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-02 11:03 PM | Reply

"How do my ankles taste?"

A bit gamy.

That's cause I'm a wild man!

#79 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-02 11:15 PM | Reply

"That's cause I'm a wild man!"

Like a cross between Dan Savage and Michael Savage.

#80 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-02 11:21 PM | Reply

Righto, the "noble savage" who was the one who approached a bunch of highschool students so he could bang his drum in their face is the real victim, and a white boy who had the temerity to stand his ground and smile awkwardly is really the one who deserves to have the full breadth and wrath of the twitteratti come down on him. It would really make a lot of things a whole less complicated if some of you just came out and said that you want us all dead, raped, and gone. The unsalvageable anti-white whites are some of the most despicable creatures around. Where else is there such an example of traitorous out-group preference?

#81 | Posted by berserkone at 2019-05-03 01:06 AM | Reply

"Where else is there such an example of traitorous out-group preference?"

Whenever had I read such a stupid sentence? Laughable.

#82 | Posted by danni at 2019-05-03 09:14 AM | Reply

Whenever had I read such a stupid sentence?

You obviously don't proofread your own posts.

#83 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2019-05-03 11:36 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

It would really make a lot of things a whole less complicated if some of you just came out and said that you want us all dead, raped, and gone.

You must have missed my posts...

#84 | Posted by ClownShack at 2019-05-03 11:40 AM | Reply

"The unsalvageable anti-white whites are some of the most despicable creatures around."

It's not whites that people don't like.

It's you.

#85 | Posted by snoofy at 2019-05-03 12:09 PM | Reply

#17 Hey thanks Jeff. I try.

As to whether "standing and remaining motionless" is objectionable behavior, can you at least acknowledge that the circumstances matter? For example, if i am blocking the only means of egress to a burning day care center, you could lazily characterize my behavior as "standing and remaining motionless," but wouldn't that be a biased and iinaccurate description of what actually happened?

So let's look at what actually happened. An elderly man from another culture was marching, singing and playing an instrument. A group of teen boys loudly mocked the man with exaggerated movements and sounds, and then one boy in particular stood in the man's face and smirked at him for an inordinate amount of time.

In my eyes, most (if not all) respectful people would have gotten the F out of the man's way. And if my child acted this way toward an old man he would be spending the next year of his life volunteering somewhere.

#86 | Posted by JOE at 2019-05-03 08:05 PM | Reply

"So let's look at what actually happened.

A group of underaged kids were being molested by street preachers, and then a creepy old guy comes over with his cadre and starts beating off in one kid's face for an inordinate amount of time.

"In my eyes, most (if not all) respectful people would have gotten the F out of the man's way.

How are kids in a Catholic School supposed to know that? They're usually told to remain docile until the old man is finished.

#87 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-04 12:44 AM | Reply

Anyone else wonder why a school that is ran by a tax exempt organization is sending human shields to DC to protest against women's rights?

#88 | Posted by MrSilenceDogood at 2019-05-04 02:44 AM | Reply

"I feel like suing Sandmann for just being an a*****e. I hope his cases are thrown out of court and he has to pay for court costs and attorney's fees for the media."
#5 | POSTED BY DANNI AT 2019-05-02 12:24 PM

You're lucky his lawyers don't come after you and your life savings for inciting violence against him on a public forum.

#89 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-04 11:57 AM | Reply

inciting violence against him

When did she do that?

#90 | Posted by JOE at 2019-05-04 08:15 PM | Reply

"When did she do that?"

2019-01-21 09:36 AM
2019-01-29 08:58 AM

#91 | Posted by sentinel at 2019-05-04 09:23 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2019 World Readable

Drudge Retort