Friday, January 11, 2019
Fact-checkers wandered into false equivalency territory Tuesday night after President Trump's Oval Office address on immigration and Democrats' response to it. The Associated Press was clobbered on Twitter after it anointed the Democratic claim that Trump was at fault for the shutdown "false," saying that the Democrats are at fault too. As the AP put it on Twitter: it takes "two to tango." The New York Times, meanwhile, attempted to fact-check a "should" claim made by Democrat Chuck Schumer -- the kind of statement that doesn't really lend itself to a fact check at all.
Fact-checking has evolved during Trump's time in office -- mainstream news outlets are far more likely to call a lie a lie than they used to. Even on Tuesday night, big outlets relied on policy expertise to clearly dispute Trump's false claims.
But the night also revealed that outlets still feel the urge to find fault on both sides or assign neutral blame for political problems. The political press has long wanted to cover politics like a sport, to cover the plays of each party as if they are morally and ethically the same. On a night when the president looked the public in the eye and lied about why the government has been shut down for weeks, the press needs to not fall into the false equivalency trap.
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.