Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, October 15, 2018

Yale Philosophy Professor Jason Stanley does a video history of fascism throughout the world titled: When fascism starts to feel normal, we're all in trouble.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Another useless idiot who might as well be on the Kremlin payroll. If Clinton was President, they'd be calling her Hitlery, and getting lots and lots of clicks from suckers because of it, but in the end it would help her chances of getting reelected more than hurt it.

I honestly don't believe those who put out and propagate crap like this actually want to defeat Trump.

#1 | Posted by sentinel at 2018-10-15 11:50 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

He is right............ you should be afraid of them.

Antifa burns American flag amid melee on Portland street

THE AMERICAN MIRROR:

Hillary Clinton and Maxine Waters have called for incivility and confrontation, and Antifa is happy to oblige.

Members of Antifa clashed with "Patriot Prayer" in Portland, Oregon on Saturday, in the latest ugly incident in the progressive, "tolerant" city.

Video shows agitators burning an American flag in the street, before it gets snatched away and extinguished.

#2 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-10-15 11:51 AM | Reply

michaelsavage.com

#3 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-10-15 11:52 AM | Reply

Trump has been less of a fascist than Obama was, at least in his actions.

You snowflakes need to get a life.

#4 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 11:54 AM | Reply | Funny: 3

Fascism is the child of rwing populism and corporate interests: the money base and the voter base... in other words, Trump's bases. When the Pres lies daily, demeans the free press, and coddles the corps, the wealthy elites, white supremacists and Nazis, it's time enough for concern.

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2018-10-15 12:00 PM | Reply

You know what worries me?

The fact that government has the right to spy on us at any moment they choose to, and the fact that it is being normalized.

Not one clown from either party is willing to go up against that. But do carry on and point fingers at each other while your government continues to strip away your basic rights to privacy.

#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-10-15 12:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

Circlecirclecircle

Flapflapflap

#7 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2018-10-15 12:37 PM | Reply

#6

Agreed, but those kinds of sentiments don't drive election year fundraising like fearmongering...

#8 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2018-10-15 12:38 PM | Reply

- Flap

Still can't spell what he's doing here daily.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2018-10-15 01:07 PM | Reply

I'm sure he doesn't want to admit to slapping you around.

#10 | Posted by Avigdore at 2018-10-15 01:39 PM | Reply

#2 | Posted by Sniper

Antifa! Squawk!!

Right on cue.

Shut up moron, the adults are speaking.

#11 | Posted by jpw at 2018-10-15 01:57 PM | Reply

Agreed, but those kinds of sentiments don't drive election year fundraising like fearmongering...

#8 | POSTED BY RIGHTOCENTER

Only His Humpiness and the Deplorables are allowed to express their fears?

Kinda like deficits only matter when Dems are in charge.

Got it.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2018-10-15 01:57 PM | Reply

#4 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

At least Jeffylube no longer tries hides his blatant rightwing delusions.

#13 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 01:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

--Shut up moron, the adults are speaking.

#11 | Posted by jpw

Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult."

#14 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-10-15 01:59 PM | Reply

Antifa burns American flag amid melee on Portland street

Vietnam War protestors burnt the American flag amid protests, too.

What's your point?

Vietnam protestors were fascists?

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-10-15 02:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

He is right............ you should be afraid of them.
Antifa burns American flag amid melee on Portland street
THE AMERICAN MIRROR:
Hillary Clinton and Maxine Waters have called for incivility and confrontation, and Antifa is happy to oblige.
Members of Antifa clashed with "Patriot Prayer" in Portland, Oregon on Saturday, in the latest ugly incident in the progressive, "tolerant" city.
Video shows agitators burning an American flag in the street, before it gets snatched away and extinguished.

#2 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Flag burning is fascism?

Isn't that the OPPOSITE of fascism?

#16 | Posted by Sycophant at 2018-10-15 02:04 PM | Reply

At least Jeffylube no longer tries hides his blatant rightwing delusions.

#13 | POSTED BY INDIANAJONES

Why should he? He's one of the more rightwing posters we have.

He just happens to tell a good tale about bbq.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-10-15 02:04 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

michaelsavage.com

#3 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Ah, our good ol' crazy friend Michael Savage:

"Now, you come to a point where the spiritual vacuum has emerged in the United States of America. Enter the vacuum are very religious Muslims. They don't like the stuff that I don't like, frankly."

"God abhors a spiritual vacuum. That is why he has permitted, in fact probably not only permitted, but in a way orchestrated the rise of radical Islam."

"And God, who is the center of this monotheistic religion, has said, "Oh, you don't worship me anymore? I'm going to show you I exist in a way that you can't believe. Down came the World Trade Center towers. That was God speaking."

#18 | Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2018-10-15 02:05 PM | Reply

"It is, regrettably, no exaggeration to say that we are living in an era of irrationality, deception, confusion, anger, and unfocused fear -- an ominous combination, with few precedents. There has never been a time when it was so important to have a voice of sanity, insight, understanding of what is happening in the world. CounterPunch has performed that essential service with unusual success. It is a matter of paramount importance to ensure that it will continue to do so, with even greater resources than before." – Noam Chomsky

#19 | Posted by bayviking at 2018-10-15 02:06 PM | Reply

At least Jeffylube no longer tries hides his blatant rightwing delusions.

#13 | POSTED BY INDIANAJONES

What I said was both factual and provable.

Granted, we are only two years into Trump's term and he has plenty of time left to really start taking fascist actions.

#20 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 02:11 PM | Reply

Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult."

#14 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Of course a child would be dumb enough to think snippy has more substantive posts that JPW. JPW's posts are too difficult for an illiterate like nulli.

#21 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 02:12 PM | Reply

Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult."

#14 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN AT 2018-10-15 01:59 PM

Sad but true, it would be nice to get the old JPW back.

#22 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2018-10-15 02:13 PM | Reply

#20 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

It was explicitly nonfactual and provably so. You've just fallen victim to trump's fascist tactics.

#23 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 02:13 PM | Reply

You've just fallen victim to trump's fascist tactics. - #23 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 02:13 PM |

Your dishonesty is part of trump's fascist tactics? To be honest, I'm not that surprised.

#24 | Posted by Avigdore at 2018-10-15 02:19 PM | Reply

#24 If you were able to pull that red herring out of your ass, why did you leave your head lodged up there?

#25 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 02:25 PM | Reply

Jones,

Your incessant trolling has become unimaginative and boring.

Getting read to be called inbred/confederate/Klan/Nazi in 5..4..3..2......

#26 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 02:33 PM | Reply

#26 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Try not being a GOP-koolaid drinking moron for once and perhaps your deserved treatment will improve. Honestly I prefer this real you over the fence-sitting -------- you claimed to be for the last two years. At least now I can resort straight to calling you out as the inbred confederate you are instead of wasting my time trying to convince a person I once thought was capable of rationality to see something objectively. But no, turns out you're an average Joe Redneck hell-bent on advancing the destruction of the United States so you can "win" some game that only exists in your FOX poisoned mind.

#27 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 02:41 PM | Reply

I don't care how you treat me.

I let you know how lame your trolling has become. What you do with that information is completely up to you.

#28 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 02:52 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult."

#14 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Probably because you don't know what substantive means.

#29 | Posted by jpw at 2018-10-15 02:54 PM | Reply

"Trump has been less of a fascist than Obama was, at least in his actions."

Had to scroll up to find that gem from JeffJ.

That's because you think Obamacare is fascist. You think Dear Colleague letters are fascist. And you think loaning money to Solyndra is fascist.

Oh you're still fairly sure Obama fascistically took Lois Lerner aside and ordered her to delay and deny tax-exempt status for right-wing dark money groups.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 02:55 PM | Reply

Granted, we are only two years into Trump's term and he has plenty of time left to really start taking fascist actions.

#20 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

Like firing an AG to squelch an investigation into himself?

#31 | Posted by jpw at 2018-10-15 02:55 PM | Reply

"I let you know how lame your trolling has become. What you do with that information is completely up to you."
#28 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

My trolling is the same as ever. The difference you're experiencing is because you've stopped pretending to be an independent thinker that actually cares about policy, so I've stopped giving you anything but what you deserve. Ask one of your fellow inbreds if I've ever been kind to them.

"I don't care how you treat me."

Your whining suggests otherwise.

#32 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 03:02 PM | Reply

Fascists to the left,
Fascists to the right,
Here I am,
Stuck in the middle with you.

#33 | Posted by bogey1355 at 2018-10-15 03:17 PM | Reply

Like firing an AG to squelch an investigation into himself?

#31 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2018-10-15 02:55 PM

So far, that hasn't happened. Also, he could potentially fire Sessions and instruct his successor to let the investigation run its course.

If I were advising Trump and he genuinely wanted to fire Sessions I would tell him to do so after Mueller ends his investigation (it's beginning to feel like the investigation may never end).

#34 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 03:19 PM | Reply

-I let you know how lame your trolling has become.

He's too clueless to know otherwise, Jeff.

This thread is a great example. He personally attacks you and doesn't address the subject matter in any way.....and he can only do that when it's already 3 or 4 others here who are already addressing you.

So, basically -------------- can only take credit for showing up when it's already 4 to 1 and only then can he hurl insults at you from a safe distance.

#35 | Posted by eberly at 2018-10-15 03:19 PM | Reply

Correct, Ebs.

In his non-ending quest to be combative he doesn't realize I was actually trying to help him.

#36 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-15 03:21 PM | Reply

Alternate headline: "The Price Of Freedom Is Eternal Vigilance."

A whole lot of you who were on that wall eagle-eyed during the Obama years have been AWOL on full stand-down since November 2016.

Because you're lazy partisan half-wits.

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 03:32 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult."

#14 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Probably because you don't know what substantive means.

#29 | Posted by jpw

Wow, you really told me. Teaches me a lesson to not lock horns with such a mighty wit.

lol

#38 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-10-15 03:33 PM | Reply

Wow, you really told me. Teaches me a lesson to not lock horns with such a mighty wit.

lol

#38 | Posted by nullifidian

Because Even Sniper has more substantive posts than you, "adult." was such a zinger...

#39 | Posted by jpw at 2018-10-15 03:38 PM | Reply

#35 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Actually its just that I know you inbreds won't listen to objective reality. Anything that doesn't agree with Jefflube's preconceived position is dismissed an invalid source. You're just as pathetically detached.

What the hell can I say to a statement as delusional as "Trump has been less of a fascist than Obama was"? If jeffylube is dumb enough to make that statement, he can't be convinced. If you morons truly want us to show you sources, stop using logical fallacies, stop ignoring empiricism, and stop making fools of yourselves by parroting trump and fox news. Until then, you get the trolling you deserve because no one wants to waste their time trying to convince you idiots of the obvious.

#40 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 04:48 PM | Reply

In his non-ending quest to be combative he doesn't realize I was actually trying to help him.
#36 | POSTED BY JEFFJ

You're far detached from reality, getting any policy help from you is like getting literacy tutoring from Mike Tyson.

#41 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 04:49 PM | Reply

-you inbreds

we all shudder to think who touched your naughty parts when you were younger.

#42 | Posted by eberly at 2018-10-15 04:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

---getting any policy help from you is like getting literacy tutoring from Mike Tyson.

#41 | Posted by IndianaJones

Figures you would use a black man as an example.

#43 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-10-15 04:53 PM | Reply

Figures you would use a black man as an example.

He's got to go with what he knows...those "tutoring" sessions with Mike Tyson cost him a fortune, but at least he never needs to worry about being constipated ever again.

#44 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2018-10-15 05:15 PM | Reply

#42 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Just because trump grabbed you by the ----- doesn't mean I was ever assaulted. I call you inbreds because that's a common trait of southern rednecks from which your political opinions are derived.

Figures you would use a black man as an example.
#43 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN

Figures a racist like you would have an issue with that.

#45 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 05:15 PM | Reply

#42; And it helps explain your objective mental retardation.

#46 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 05:16 PM | Reply

"Figures you would use a black man as an example.
#43 | POSTED BY NULLIFIDIAN"

Hey Vern!

Yer pal Ernest P. Worrell here.

If he used Samuel L. Jackson it would change the meaning entirely.

And if he used Obama you could recite your favorite quote from Joe Biden about how Obama sounds so articulate for one of the negroes.

Obama is a lot like Sprite. Got the great taste of Lymon in it. That's two different colors of fruit, Vern!

#47 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 05:28 PM | Reply

Fascism - a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts [1] nation and often [2] race above the individual and that stands for a [3] centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, [4] severe economic and social regimentation, and [5] forcible suppression of opposition

www.merriam-webster.com

Trump has pushed the US toward 1-5, some more than others.

#48 | Posted by hamburglar at 2018-10-15 05:59 PM | Reply

#48 | POSTED BY HAMBURGLAR

"Merriam Webster? Ha! Come back with a real source not this left-wing hack." --- Jeffylube

#49 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-15 07:41 PM | Reply

Wow.

After watching that, my only question is why the BernieBros aren't included along with the Trumpsters. Maybe it's because the presenter is not so much against authoritarianism, he's just against authoritarianism when the other team as the ball. But virtually every other tactic the presenter points out as having been used by Trump are also used by the Bernie-supporting progressives.

#50 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-15 11:26 PM | Reply

"But virtually every other tactic the presenter points out as having been used by Trump are also used by the Bernie-supporting progressives."

Go on.

#51 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 11:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

We should all be glad that Trump is such a terrible orator. Can you imagine how much more effective he would be if he had the speaking skills of any other president?

#52 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-15 11:35 PM | Reply

What's Bernie's mythic past, what divisions has he sought to create?

Oooh I see.

You're not talking about Bernie. You're comparing Trump, the person actually in position to be a fascist, with "Bernie-supporting progressives" who I presume you think might someday aspire to be in a position as a barista.

Nice bait and switch there! Do you even realize you did it?

#53 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 11:36 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"What's Bernie's mythic past, what divisions has he sought to create?"

The post-war 1950s, when incredibly high taxes were levied against the richest Americans and "working families" enjoyed unparalleled prosperity. Of course that's not really true, and it wasn't exactly the most ideal time if you were a woman, a minority, or someone living in Europe or Asia.

The larger point being that higher taxes on the rich is what would "make America great again."

And divisions? How about the attacks on the rich? Or have you poked your head in the sand when a progressive starts to argue that the rich don't actually make money, they just take it from the workers who earned it. Pretty much identical to the argument given by the presenter that was used by the Nazis, when they claimed that the jews didn't make their money from working.

#54 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-15 11:43 PM | Reply

"You're not talking about Bernie. You're comparing Trump, the person actually in position to be a fascist, with "Bernie-supporting progressives" who I presume you think might someday aspire to be in a position as a barista."

I don't recall every referencing Bernie as being in a position of leadership, beecause he's not. He's only the most visibile symbol of a larger movement. And honestly, he's old, and not likely to be around much longer. That doesn't mean his Bros won't change their stripes or be less authoritarian once he's no longer in the picture.

#55 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-15 11:46 PM | Reply

Maybe it's because the presenter is not so much against authoritarianism, he's just against authoritarianism when the other team as the ball.
#50 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-15 11:26 PM | Reply

It's not surprising. The professor is an ultra-leftist at Yale.

#56 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-10-15 11:47 PM | Reply

"I don't recall every referencing Bernie as being in a position of leadership, beecause he's not."

He's in more of a position of leadership than the "Bernie-supporing progressives" you compared Trump to.

"And divisions? How about the attacks on the rich? "

Those divisions already exist. He's not creating them. Compare this to Trump's comment about Mexico sending rapists here, which is beyond the pale. Maybe ISIS would send rapists here, not our NAFTA buddies in Mexico.

But this really gets to how you perceive language. For example, I guess you think I'm attacking the rich when I say "Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households." I guess you think the CIA analysts who wrote that, who almost certainly belong to the top 20% of households, were attacking the rich when they wrote that too. Well, they weren't. Facts aren't an attack.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 11:53 PM | Reply

"The post-war 1950s, when incredibly high taxes were levied against the richest Americans and "working families" enjoyed unparalleled prosperity. Of course that's not really true,"

What's not true about it?

When did "working families" enjoy greater prosperity?

You understand a lot of that prosperity was because GIs took advantage of the GI bill and helped build America's high tech economy, right? Sort of the way you suppose you are doing the same thing with your own life, right? I only bring this up because "Free College" is a way to pursue that same success toady.

#58 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-15 11:57 PM | Reply

"The post-war 1950s, when incredibly high taxes were levied against the richest Americans"

Of course, if you were to ask you, you'd say "incredibly high taxes" are currently being leveled against the richest Americans...

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 12:00 AM | Reply

"Those divisions already exist."

And you don't think the divisions Trump is exploiting did as well?

"Well, they weren't. Facts aren't an attack."

They're facts with no context. Your intent is to suggest that some unfair shift has occurred in the economic landscape which drove this change. That's not the case. If you included that the gains have occurred naturally as a result of changing demands within the labor market, as well as the failure of low skilled workers to adapt to a changing landscape, you would be providing the context necessary to really understand what that statement means. But if you did that, it would lose it's progressive pull.

When you say it, you're not really any different than Trump.

#60 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-16 12:04 AM | Reply

"They're facts with no context."

There's plenty of context.

"Your intent is to suggest that some unfair shift has occurred in the economic landscape which drove this change."

Unfair?

If you don't think it's unfair that since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households, does that make it unfair back in the 50s, when gains in household income were more evenly distributed across economic quintiles?

Or is "fairness" just not a part of the economic lexicon? For example, slavery might be unfair from some other vantage point, like liberalism or human rights, but from the point of view of an economist, it's just another commodity?

You're just mincing words, right?

#61 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 12:12 AM | Reply

#61 Snoofy

The problem with your household income gains statistic (a citation would be nice, BTW) is that it ignores the fluidity of movement between the various income groups. The US does not have a caste system. Yes, it has flaws and is tilted toward the richest. Having said that, look at the modern Carnegies - Jobs, Gates, Bezos, et al. That's incredible first-generation wealth with very humble beginnings.

#62 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-10-16 12:21 AM | Reply

"The problem with your household income gains statistic (a citation would be nice, BTW) is that it ignores the fluidity of movement between the various income groups."

That's not a thing that matters.

The top 20% is the top 20%, doesn't matter what place they were in before they pulled a Jeffersons and did that whole Movin' On Up thing.

Of course, since practically all the gains in household income go to the top 20%, when the Jeffersons moved on up, it meant someone else was movin' on down.

#63 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 01:27 AM | Reply

"That's incredible first-generation wealth with very humble beginnings."

Nobody said they weren't. You're just navel gazing.

Also, Gates beginnings aren't so humble. You've never heard of Preston Gates Ellis? en.wikipedia.org

#64 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 01:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"There's plenty of context."
There is zero context. None.
"If you don't think it's unfair that since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households, does that make it unfair back in the 50s, when gains in household income were more evenly distributed across economic quintiles?"
There was nothing unfair about either eras, as the incomes in both were the (predictable) outcome of a free market operating in a manner that satisfied the best interests of all the stakeholders.
"Or is "fairness" just not a part of the economic lexicon? For example, slavery might be unfair from some other vantage point, like liberalism or human rights, but from the point of view of an economist, it's just another commodity?"
If the economic outcome is representative of each participant willingly choosing an outcome that they deem to be most beneficial, then it is a "fair" transaction. One does not willingly accept an outcome that is not unfair, even if it's less than what they would have wanted.

#65 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-16 05:41 AM | Reply

"Also, Gates beginnings aren't so humble. You've never heard of Preston Gates Ellis?"

Have you ever heard of Larry Ellison?

#66 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-16 05:42 AM | Reply

"There was nothing unfair about either eras"

So there's nothing unfair about slavery prior to 1865 either.

#67 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 11:44 AM | Reply

But regardless of all that, if it's not unfair to return to 1950s tax rate, why do you so staunchly oppose it?

You must have some reason not born of a sense of fairness.

What is that reason?

#68 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-10-16 11:46 AM | Reply

The fact that government has the right to spy on us at any moment they choose to, and the fact that it is being normalized.
Not one clown from either party is willing to go up against that. But do carry on and point fingers at each other while your government continues to strip away your basic rights to privacy.
#6 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

WIns thread.

#69 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2018-10-16 11:59 AM | Reply

I've seen that same headline with the word "fascism", and the word replaced with "socialism", more times in the last 10 years than it has probably ever been said in the whole 1900s.

#70 | Posted by humtake at 2018-10-16 01:11 PM | Reply

#55 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Wow the russian bernie-bro propaganda hit you hard. Mission success for sheepleschism and his comrades I guess.

#71 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2018-10-16 01:22 PM | Reply

Re: Humtake

Fascism - a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts [1] nation and often [2] race above the individual and that stands for a [3] centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, [4] severe economic and social regimentation, and [5] forcible suppression of opposition
www.merriam-webster.com

Trump has pushed the US toward 1-5, some more than others.

#72 | Posted by hamburglar at 2018-10-16 08:46 PM | Reply

"But regardless of all that, if it's not unfair to return to 1950s tax rate, why do you so staunchly oppose it? You must have some reason not born of a sense of fairness."

Who said I was against it?

I'm all about taxing society in order to buy bombers and battleships in order to fight off the Russian hordes. And actually, Trump does want to expand the Air Force's bomber fleet from nine to 14 squadrons.

#73 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-17 05:32 AM | Reply

"Wow the russian bernie-bro propaganda hit you hard. Mission success for sheepleschism and his comrades I guess."

There's really no way you could watch that short, objectively, and not accuse accuse contemporary progressives of using the same methods. Progressive just seem to feel justified in their usage.

#74 | Posted by madbomber at 2018-10-17 05:35 AM | Reply

"I've seen that same headline with the word "fascism", and the word replaced with "socialism", more times in the last 10 years than it has probably ever been said in the whole 1900s."

Probably true because you only read right wing propaganda.

#75 | Posted by danni at 2018-10-17 12:16 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort