Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, September 10, 2018

The tax law passed late last year included slews of changes that will have wide impacts across the U.S. Among them is a likely jump in the numbers of Americans who'll owe taxes when they file 2018 returns. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently issued a report warning that more than 4.5 million taxpayers will come up short next April, unless they act now to adjust their withholding amounts.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.


... The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently issued a report warning that more than 4.5 million taxpayers will come up short next April, unless they act now to adjust their withholding amounts. ...

That under-withholding is an old trick.

By releasing withholding tables that do not collect enough taxes, the Republicans made it appear that people would get more take-home pay, but the those people won't find out that the Republicans lied to them until after the midterm elections.

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2018-09-10 04:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

the calculator won't allow you to enter an amount that exceeds $10,000 as a deduction for state and local taxes

Damn, that sounds like a tax increase on the rich. In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold.

#2 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-10 04:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Our local tax expert (Danforth) said exactly this when this idiotic tax cut crap was first announced.

Trump supporters are fools.

#3 | Posted by Angrydad at 2018-09-10 09:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 4

"In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold."

Total nonsense. The two aren't connected, and it's possible to have a lot of money in the bank and not much taxable income.

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-10 10:53 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

a likely jump in the numbers of Americans who'll owe taxes when they file 2018 returns

The mid-term election will be over by then and they'll forget about it by the time the next one is up.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2018-09-10 11:29 PM | Reply

#5

The average republican voter is incredibly stupid.

So. You're right.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-09-10 11:33 PM | Reply

but the those people won't find out that the Republicans lied to them until after the midterm elections.

#1 | Posted by LampLighter

If Americans weren't so fat and stupid they would have made it a base assumption long ago that Republicans lie cheat and steal about 98% of the time.

And we wouldn't be in this mess.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 01:10 AM | Reply

Damn, that sounds like a tax increase on the rich. In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold.

Get out of your trailer park more often, snippy.

Or maybe out of whatever blue state funded, red state hellhole you live in.

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 01:19 AM | Reply

LoL, Sniper thinks 180K puts someone in the 1%.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-09-11 06:28 AM | Reply

the calculator won't allow you to enter an amount that exceeds $10,000 as a deduction for state and local taxes
Damn, that sounds like a tax increase on the rich. In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold.

#2 | POSTED BY SNIPER AT 2018-09-10 04:48 PM | FLAG:

Snoops, that includes property taxes too.

If you have property taxes of $5000, that cuts that $200K in half to $100k.

Solid middle class tax increase.

#10 | Posted by 726 at 2018-09-11 07:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Yup, the truth is out the window under Trump. All middle class tax cuts expire while 1.5 trillion for the 1% will persist and become an excuse to slash SS and Medicare. Republicans are terrible beyond words, yet honest in their determination to take everything for themselves. Democrats are two faced on these issues the Clintons and Obama were itching to help the Republicans since they both depend on Wall Street for campaign funds. Pelosi is already talking about restoring pay-go, counting her chickens before....

#12 | Posted by bayviking at 2018-09-11 10:45 AM | Reply

If you have property taxes of $5000, that cuts that $200K in half to $100k.

Solid middle class tax increase.

#10 | Posted by 726

Which is highly likely you'll have if you're pulling in $100K+ per year.

#13 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 11:10 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold."

Total nonsense. The two aren't connected, and it's possible to have a lot of money in the bank and not much taxable income.

#4 | Posted by Danforth

Are you that stoopid? Net worth is not the same as adjusted gross income.

#14 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 11:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Nike's market cap is around $130B, not the moronic $30B shown in this tool's link"

If that's the case---and it probably is---then I retract and apologize. It does NOT change the multiple warnings I've received from the IRS, nor does it change the fact the withholding rates were dropped more than the tax rates.

"4M taxpayers is what, 1.5% to 2.0% of taxpayers? Yeah, sky is falling with an impact like that."

If you're one of the 4 million, it's 100% to you. And it's based on the administration operating on bad faith. No mistake about Nike's market cap changes any of those facts.

"remember this the next time this guy holds himself up as an expert on anything."

Because I made a mistake on a market cap? Jeez, what a farkin' snowflake.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 11:23 AM | Reply

"Are you that stoopid? Net worth is not the same as adjusted gross income."

What a riot.

You're such an idiot, you don't know you just proved my point.

#16 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 11:23 AM | Reply

LoL, Sniper thinks 180K puts someone in the 1%.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Did I say that, you moron? Learn how to read, you are just about as bad as dan.

#17 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 11:24 AM | Reply

Because I made a mistake on a market cap?

#15 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

It's kind of like making a mistake on a Cadillac insurance plan tax.

#18 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 11:24 AM | Reply

"It's kind of like making a mistake on a Cadillac insurance plan tax."

Not even close. I certainly didn't rail against something for years on end that didn't even exist.

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 11:26 AM | Reply

It existed. It was written into the law. It's implementation keeps getting delayed (now delayed until 2022 and most likely permanently delayed).

#20 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 11:32 AM | Reply

My point, that flew over your head, was you were complaining about being harped on for a mistake yet continue to bring up my mistake, over and over again, even though I acknowledged it long ago.

#21 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 11:34 AM | Reply

Holy crap! Isn't this EXACTLY what the Dems wanted?

"Specifically, married taxpayers who itemize deductions, with two children under age 17, income exceeding $180,000 from one or more jobs and who have $20,000 or more in nonwage income (dividends, interest or capital gains) are highly likely to have to pay additional tax when they file next year."

So a family making a crapton of money will pay more taxes? That's what Dems have been fighting for for decades. $20k in nonwage income? Jesus Christ, it's about time they have to pay more taxes on investment earnings. I mean, this is as cookie cutter as it gets to what the Dems want so I assume you are going to have to start applauding Trump for doing something that he probably didn't even know he was doing. Congratulations, you just got your wish. More people who make a lot of money having to pay more in taxes.

#22 | Posted by humtake at 2018-09-11 12:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"It existed. It was written into the law. "

And you knew people hurt by it.

#23 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 12:30 PM | Reply

And you knew people hurt by it.

#23 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

Nope. Never said that.

#24 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 12:40 PM | Reply

"Isn't this EXACTLY what the Dems wanted?" - #22 | Posted by humtake at 2018-09-11 12:13 PM

No it isn't.

"... you just got your wish."

According to the summary of this article, the tax law passed late last year.

Not a single Democrat voted for it.

Facts are obviously not your friend.

#25 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 12:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

-- the wealthy upper middle class

Also known as the Favored Fifth, the class that screamed loudest about their beloved SALT deduction being capped.

#28 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-09-11 01:07 PM | Reply

" You expect people to believe that you are an accountant when you don't even know the basic terminology?"

No. I've never claimed to be an accountant, and clearly market vapid one area where I'm not an expert.

That said, my claims about the tax code and bad faith withholding tables are spot on. I noticed you were dead silent about those facts.

#29 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:08 PM | Reply

Also...you joined today?

What other name(s) have you posted under?

#30 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:09 PM | Reply

"Nope. Never said that"

Bull. You knew people affected by it, even though it never took effect.

#31 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:11 PM | Reply

Wow Dan. You've got your own personal stalker.


TruthOut2018

Party: Republican

Ideology: Conservative

Joined 2018/09/11
Visited 2018/09/11


Based on posting style, I'd wager it's Rex.

Have fun!

#32 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-09-11 01:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

--What other name(s) have you posted under?

Is that important?

#33 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-09-11 01:13 PM | Reply

Cowards often change their handles, especially after being humiliated.

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

In other words, you want to ignore the content of his posts, and make it about him.

#36 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-09-11 01:17 PM | Reply

"yet, you are an 'expert' relied upon here for your sage advice"

I'm a longtime tax preparer and advisor. And I've received at least a half dozen notices from the IRS to warn my clients.

And your bona fides?

#37 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:18 PM | Reply

"makes it easier for me to shear the sheep."

Well, that's certainly the difference between us; my goal is to keep clients from being sheared.

#38 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:20 PM | Reply

"That is not what the Dems have been claiming to want for the last 20 years?" - #27 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:03 PM

No Democrat voted for the bill that you claim "the wealthy upper middle class ... will pay more in taxes."

If that's what Democrats have "been claiming to want for the last 20 years," then why did no Democrat vote for the bill?

#40 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 01:21 PM | Reply

"In other words, you want to ignore the content of his posts, and make it about him."

He claims to know me. And you've got it exactly backwards.

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:22 PM | Reply

"Or because they are routinely banned"

Awww, you poor little snowflake.

#43 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:24 PM | Reply

"Or because they are routinely banned, not for violating the TOS..." - #39 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:21 PM

This site's TOS clearly states:

Creating a second account to circumvent these rules will result in a permanent loss of account privileges.
Oops.

#44 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 01:24 PM | Reply

"LOL. HR Block temp help."

Nope. 500 Clients, all from word of mouth. I also lecture regularly in the collegiate and professional circuit.

Why haven't you listed your qualifications? Don't have any?

#46 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:26 PM | Reply

Bull. You knew people affected by it, even though it never took effect.

#31 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

No. I never said that.

#47 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 01:27 PM | Reply

"If they are taking advice from you, the shearing is a foregone conclusion."

Well, yeah, if they're taking advice about Nike's market cap.

But back to the topic at hand, what's your response to the fact the withholding tables were lowered more than the tax rates?

#49 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:29 PM | Reply

I'm betting Truthout is the tool that got busted by rcade for the third time just a few weeks ago.

I don't think it's rex. Not loony enough.

#50 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 01:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Besides, the last guy who got ban hammered for the third time also stepped on his own dick over tax issues.

I think he claimed he paid 50% of his income to taxes while trying to tell everybody how to do their taxes.

#52 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 01:30 PM | Reply

"No. I never said that"

Then tell us what you did say. You certainly brought it up a half-dozen times. What, you were supportive of it???

#53 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:32 PM | Reply

the calculator won't allow you to enter an amount that exceeds $10,000 as a deduction for state and local taxes
Damn, that sounds like a tax increase on the rich. In many states you would have to have an adjusted gross of damn near $200k to hit that threshold.

#2 | POSTED BY SNIPER

I have to wonder if it hurts being that stupid...

#54 | Posted by Sycophant at 2018-09-11 01:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"I think he claimed he paid 50% of his income to taxes while trying to tell everybody how to do their taxes"

Yup. I recall taking his idiocy to task. He's probably been waiting for me to make a mistake, so he could pounce.

Glad I could accommodate!

#55 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:37 PM | Reply

"when HR Block gives you your smoke break, please tell us your degree"

Okay, but I'll have to apply first. My guess is you'll be long-banned by that time.

Be sure to hold your breath in the meantime.

#57 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 01:47 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"15 year career in Venture Capital Investing" - #51 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:30 PM

The reason why anyone would believe a self-admitted rule breaker is....?

#59 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 01:53 PM | Reply

"...but by all means continue to take financial advice from the ------- that does not know what market cap means." - #60 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:55 PM

Fair enough.

I won't take financial advice from you.

Thanks for the heads up.

#61 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 02:01 PM | Reply

"I am not surprised that "you should not take financial advice for a random guy on the internet" seems to be a new concept to you." - #62 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 02:04 PM

When all else fails, move the goalposts.

Any other well-worn tricks up your sleeve?

#63 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 02:06 PM | Reply

I will be banned again. I accept that. Just get to cast some pearls before the swine before I leave.

Trolls will be Trolls.

#64 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-09-11 02:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Okay, after 4 dodges..."

But enough about your unwillingness to address the bogus tax withholding rates.

#65 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 02:15 PM | Reply

"Now, you can continue to pretend that you have a bunch of clients that pay you for 'tax advice".

This, from the guy who had to pretend I was an HRB temp to assuage his ego.

Sometimes the comedy writes itself.

#66 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 02:18 PM | Reply

I'm a longtime tax preparer and advisor. And I've received at least a half dozen notices from the IRS to warn my clients.
And your bona fides?

#37 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

My dick is bigger than yours.

#68 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 02:26 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

My dick is bigger than yours.

The only way to figure this out is to measure them side by side.

Remember. Only fully erect penis measurements are acceptable.

And. The last person to shoot has to eat the toast.

#69 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-09-11 02:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Let's make it five times."

For you to avoid the topic? Done!

#70 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 02:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#67 lol arguing about degrees on an anonymous web site.

#71 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-11 02:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 3

#72
Like Hans says, when all you've got is lies....

#73 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 02:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Only fully erect penis measurements are acceptable." - #69 | Posted by ClownShack at 2018-09-11 02:30 PM

Is the use of ED drugs considered a disqualifying offense, like the use of steroids in the Olympics?

#74 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 02:42 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

remember when jeffyj said Kansas was going to show us how trickle down really works

he talked up the Laffer curve on a daily basis, right up to the time it became apparent it wasn't working, (again).

#75 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2018-09-11 02:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Apologizing does not restore your credibility.

#26 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:00 PMFlag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive

You're a dick.

The guy retracted his statement and went as far as apologizing for his mistake.

Its obvious that you have a personal vendetta here. And as far as credentials go, you're making claims on an anonymous site - not impressive.

#76 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-09-11 03:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

Much like your posts tonight.

#39 | Posted by truthout2018 at 2018-09-11 01:21 PMFlag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive

Interesting post. Shows up at 1:21PM

#77 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-09-11 03:19 PM | Reply

The guy retracted his statement and went as far as apologizing for his mistake.

Agreed. I pointed out to Danforth that I had made a similar mistake, retracted (several times, and counting) and even apologized for it, yet he still throws it in my face. I give him props for immediately retracting but have zero sympathy for him that someone continues harping on his mistake.

#78 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:21 PM | Reply

#78 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:21 PMFlag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive

Had I seen that I would have said something.

#79 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-09-11 03:25 PM | Reply

Had I seen that I would have said something.

#79 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

It's no big deal. It was just a good opportunity for me to rub his nose in it a little bit.

At this point, bygones...I won't be mentioning this to Danforth again.

#81 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:27 PM | Reply

#80 FYI - Subtlety is the key to effective trolling.

#82 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:28 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

If that's what Democrats have "been claiming to want for the last 20 years," then why did no Democrat vote for the bill?

#40 | Posted by Hans

Because Trump was pushing it............. wake up hands.

#83 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 03:29 PM | Reply

Awww, you poor little snowflake.

#43 | Posted by Danforth

Is he a lib dem?

#84 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 03:30 PM | Reply

Creating a second account to circumvent these rules will result in a permanent loss of account privileges.

Oops.

#44 | Posted by Hans

WTF does that have to do with changing your name? Oops.

#86 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 03:31 PM | Reply

I think he claimed he paid 50% of his income to taxes while trying to tell everybody how to do their taxes.

#52 | Posted by jpw

By the time you count ALL the taxes you pay he may be right.

#87 | Posted by Sniper at 2018-09-11 03:33 PM | Reply

"By the time you count ALL the taxes you pay he may be right."

Not if you know what you're doing.

And he claimed to live overseas, so no state income tax.

#88 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 03:36 PM | Reply

#80 FYI - Subtlety is the key to effective trolling.

#82 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:28 PMFlag: ReceivedFunnyNewsworthy

He's quail hunting with a bazooka. Subtle isn't in his vocabulary. Besides this is a personal vendetta with Danforth.

He said he made a mistake and apologized. that's good enough. If it's not then Troofout can move on to another site and behave like a WWE wrestler over there.

#89 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2018-09-11 03:37 PM | Reply

He said he made a mistake and apologized. that's good enough...

#89 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

It's more than good enough. It's not very often that people on this site admit their mistakes, much less apologize for them.

#90 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-11 03:39 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Awww, you poor little snowflake.
#43 | Posted by Danforth

Is he a lib dem?
#84 | POSTED BY SNIPER

Nope. He's a poor little snowflake like you.

#91 | Posted by Sycophant at 2018-09-11 03:43 PM | Reply

"This is Danforth showing that he does not even know basic financial terms."

So the next time I write about Nike's market cap, ignore me.

Meanwhile, Truthout has lied at least twice. My bet is no retractions or apologies will be forthcoming.

#92 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 04:12 PM | Reply

"WTF does that have to do with changing your name?" - #86 | Posted by 43 PLONKS! 43 PLONKS! at 2018-09-11 03:31 PM

WTF does changing a name have to do with creating a second (or third or fourth, etc.) account to get around having the previous account banned?

HINT: Once an account has been banned (status: visitor), there is no changing your name.

snippy: the standard by which all other imbeciles are judged

#93 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-11 04:16 PM | Reply

"He's quail hunting with a bazooka. Subtle isn't in his vocabulary."

He's likely a reincarnation as suspected.

But how does his method compare with the way Hans goes after sniper daily?

Completely unsolicited, BTW.

#94 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-11 04:42 PM | Reply

--But how does his method compare with the way Hans goes after sniper daily?

No HTML, thankfully.

#95 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-09-11 04:47 PM | Reply

"But how does his method compare with the way Hans goes after sniper daily? "

Well, he has to resort to lying about me.

#96 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 04:59 PM | Reply

#92 | Posted by Danforth

This "truthout" is nothing but a scumbag coward, anybody with half 'a brain knows it.

#97 | Posted by Angrydad at 2018-09-11 06:16 PM | Reply

"And your bona fides?
#37 | POSTED BY DANFORTH"

"LOL. HR Block temp help. What advice can you possibly give when you are so clueless about accounting and finance? What is your degree in? Can't be anything financial related given your lack of even basic understanding. Do you even have a degree?
#42 | POSTED BY TRUTHOUT2018"

Truthout is clearly a douche. Why anyone engages with him is confounding. He reminds me a little bit of the dude who claimed that watches don't work on him, and that he sets his own fractures.

#98 | Posted by mOntecOre at 2018-09-11 07:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

98

He signed up today.

But he has to be a reincarnation

#99 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-11 07:48 PM | Reply

99: no doubt. he admitted it in #39 and 48.

#100 | Posted by woe_is_W at 2018-09-11 08:43 PM | Reply

I would say it's quite possible this guy is aka whitedevil or whatever his other names have been. Why else would he say tonight when it was early afternoon. He is possibly halfway round the world, i.e. in China

"Much like your posts tonight"

#39 | POSTED BY TRUTHOUT2018 AT 2018-09-11 01:21 PM

#101 | Posted by woe_is_W at 2018-09-11 08:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

RightIsright.

#102 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2018-09-11 09:01 PM | Reply

Doesn't look like RiR's writing

#103 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-11 09:06 PM | Reply

"Doesn't look like RiR's writing"

It does to me. And he's been pissed at me for years, ever since I posted I was a tax preparer and financial advisor, since clients ask me all the time about where/how to open/invest in IRAs. He told me he was going to "turn me in" for claiming to be a financial advisor. I recall laughing at him, and telling him to go right ahead. Of course, he probably knew otherwise: my next copy of Consumer Reports stated anyone can call themselves a financial advisor; certain designations are protected (CPA, CFP, etc), but not FA.

Of course, there's a big difference: I put my clients' interests first. He believes his clients are sheep waiting to be sheared.

I returned from Chicago about 10 days ago, from the National Tax Forum put on by the IRS. At one of the booths, a gal asked me if I offered "financial products", adding "You can make A LOT of money on financial products." I responded part of my mission is to talk clients out of bad ideas, and the financial products offered were replete with high costs and fees, something I try to help my clients avoid.

#104 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-11 10:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It's not RiR's writing or style.

I'd wager it's Rex.

#105 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-12 09:03 AM | Reply

"I'd wager it's Rex."

Wrecks doesn't have half the financial acumen.

#106 | Posted by Danforth at 2018-09-12 10:06 AM | Reply

"Completely unsolicited, BTW." - #94 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-11 04:42 PM

My #93 was a retort to the unsolicited #86.

But apparently, to you my #93 is unsolicited.

Noted, BTW.

#107 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-12 10:11 AM | Reply

Oh please HANS. You follow that guy from thread to thread every day hammering him with the same ----.

I couldn't care less but don't deny it.

Compared to a new (sort of) poster who posted 10-15 times or whatever?

You hammer sniper that many times a day here.

#108 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-12 10:17 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"I couldn't care less..." - #108 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-12 10:17 AM

Imagine what it would be if you did!

#109 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-12 10:32 AM | Reply

Ebs,

Hans is not the only person who beats up on Sniper relentlessly.

#110 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-12 10:32 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

--Hans is not the only person who beats up on Sniper relentlessly.

He's No. 1 by a mile.

#111 | Posted by nullifidian at 2018-09-12 10:36 AM | Reply

"Hans is not the only person who beats up on Sniper relentlessly." - #110 | Posted by JeffJ at 2018-09-12 10:32 AM

Perhaps what Ebs is saying, "Hans is the only person beats up on 43 PLONKS! relentlessly with such HTML style and flair."

Yeah.

That's what Ebs must be saying. :-)

#112 | Posted by Hans at 2018-09-12 10:39 AM | Reply

112

It is with flair, I'll give you that.

If I did it, it would be called "abusive".

But that's okay. I've chosen to plonk anyone like that.

#113 | Posted by eberly at 2018-09-12 11:21 AM | Reply

The guy who got ban hammered a third time a few weeks ago was neither RiR or Rex iirc.

#114 | Posted by jpw at 2018-09-12 12:58 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort