I'm a mirror, bro.
Is this supposed to be a play on posts I've made in the past?
All you have to do is not come across like an eighth grader making chinky eyes at the Asian kid.
There's more than a little of interpretation going on in this assessment.
Which is the reason why you come across as a pompous -------.
No offense. Just sayin'.
Because you support a permissive gun culture
Why? Because as with everything else you conflate disagreeing with you as agreeing with the "the other side".
Guess what, there's a lot of space out there to exist in, whether your ego acknowledges it or not.
I've named multiple restrictions I think should be enacted into law, but because they're not the "ban 'em" type views you, douchestruan and corky are wedded to you act as if what I'm saying is a regurgitation of NRA talking points.
Because you're intellectually lazy and, no offense, self-absorbed to the point of stupidity.
Armed with that knowledge, you don't support, but rather oppose, measures to reduce gun prevalence.
Absolute, utter nonsense.
I disagree with your preferred idea. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thus, I portray your position as being pro gun violence, which is an awful thing to say about you, but is also supported by data we both agree on.
No, it's not supported by any sort of "data".
You know what you sound like? You sound like Dan Loesch but on the flip side of the coin.
Many in legacy media, love mass shootings
To that I say ---- you dude.
You're ignorant as ---- but quite clearly love the thought of your own intelligence. So you espouse your ignorance as stone cold fact and make anyone who disagrees out to the bad guy.
Just like Dana Loesch.
On this note, you and I are among perhaps five people here who work with data and rely on P values to elucidate knowledge, so hopefully it cuts even harder.
And herein lies the root of your fallacy.
P values don't "elucidate knowledge".
They're simply a tool to describe aggregated data that can be manipulated to "prove" a point or not achieved because an unaccounted for variable is mucking up your data. I've seen plenty of data that is "statistically significant" but make me scratch my head and think "how in the ---- is that right?".
I suggest you occasionally try doing the same.