Saturday, January 27, 2018
Connecticut mayors grappling with rising retirement costs and sinking economies this week issued a distress signal to lawmakers in Hartford: Save us from our public unions. The conference of municipalities implored the state to end collective-bargaining for pensions and health-care benefits as well as limit binding arbitration when unions and local politicians deadlock during contract negotiations. This usually results in a sweet deal for the unions. "We're suggesting it's very difficult in the state of Connecticut under the current labor agreements and under binding arbitration," said Waterbury mayor Neil O'Leary, a Democrat. His town's health care and pension costs make up 30% of its budget.
That's because state lawmakers have little flexibility to cut spending since Mr. Malloy extended collective-bargaining agreements through 2027 despite receiving few concessions from government unions. Meanwhile, tax revenues have been declining amid a sluggish economy and retirement costs are soaring. About 35% of state revenues go to debt service and retirement obligations. Connecticut's annual teacher pension contribution is projected to quadruple by 2032.
While mayors say they're willing to pay more for pensions, many want the ability to shift their employees to defined-contribution plans that give them control over the costs. But will Democrats in Hartford defy their labor friends and rescue Connecticut's underwater cities? Connecticut voters are only beginning to understand the damage from two terms of Mr. Malloy.
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.