Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, January 27, 2018

GOP Missouri Senate candidate Courtland Sykes dished up some enlightening comments about women's rights this week, saying he expects "a home-cooked dinner every night at 6" and opposes "nail-biting manophobic hell-bent feminist she-devils." Sykes, 37, who bills himself as a Trump-style populist and "constitutional conservative," aims to face off against Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill in November. Sykes said he doesn't "buy into radical feminism's crazed definition of modern womanhood" and claimed feminists "made it up to suit their own nasty, snake-filled heads." As for those home-cooked dinners, Sykes said he expects to have daughters one day who will serve these meals as they "become traditional homemakers and family wives -- think Norman Rockwell here and Gloria Steinem be damned."





Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

This guy seems to be looking to become the Alpha dog for conservative men.

Boaz may have a new hero.

#1 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour at 2018-01-26 06:07 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

No wonder this guy isn't married.

#2 | Posted by Crassus at 2018-01-27 12:02 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

isn't that a late 50's film?

#3 | Posted by ichiro at 2018-01-27 05:56 AM | Reply

"think Norman Rockwell"

Am I imagining it, or did Rockwell appear on Hannity's show once and rip him a new one? I think it was around the time of the Iraq war.

#4 | Posted by sentinel at 2018-01-27 08:29 AM | Reply

"the Alpha dog for conservative men"

and like all typical alpha conservative men, he lives off the money his wife makes off her cartoons.. jock boy in the streets, emasculated in the sheets.

#5 | Posted by klifferd at 2018-01-27 08:19 PM | Reply

You can call the guy a parody all day but the mental midgets of Missouri will vote for him and be happier for it.

#6 | Posted by qcp at 2018-01-27 09:09 PM | Reply

Sounds like that that nut from Georgia, Jody Hice.

#7 | Posted by Angrydad at 2018-01-28 02:02 AM | Reply

Hilarious, he's another "Legitimate Rape" type Rethug. How does McCaskill draw these losers? Just like with old Todd Akin, Claire will mop the floor with this moron. He can crawl back under his rock, as can the rest of the alt-Reich after the blue wave sweeps the Grand Oligarchs and Pedophiles out of power and impeaches their God and poster boy Combover Caligula.

#8 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2018-01-28 05:21 PM | Reply

This guy is such a clown, it's hilarious! I feel sorry for his Mother. I'd be ashamed to have brought that piece of garbage into this world too.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2018-01-29 08:19 AM | Reply

Depending on your financial situation or pregnancy women have more career choices today than ever. In Government jobs and Family Law they have large advantages over men, which they never complain about. But, women are biologically vulnerable to sexual abuse and the trend to correct the problem is an example of our slow social progress as a species.

Are we all really better off when it takes two incomes to raise a family when it used to take one, as it does for the majority of families?

#10 | Posted by bayviking at 2018-01-29 09:42 AM | Reply

"In Government jobs and Family Law they have large advantages over men, which they never complain about."

Stated as if it is a fact, when it is really baloney, sexist baloney.

#11 | Posted by danni at 2018-01-29 09:47 AM | Reply

Women's work in the home becomes an asset in divorce, entitling her to up to a 18 years of child support and a lifetime of alimony, at the standard of living she enjoyed during the marriage. These awards are often so large they leave a male living out of the trunk of his car, which can become an argument for denying visitation. If that eventually costs him his job he can find himself jailed. This has happened to activated Reserve troops, when they return from overseas duty, having been activated faster than they can get a support agreement modified. There is no such thing as retroactive modification in a notoriously slow overloaded system. That never happens to a women, whether they are required to pay support or not. There are endless weird examples. Marrying an irrational selfish women is a very dangerous move for a man.

Worst I ever heard comes from Australia. Mother runs off with another man for two years, leaving father to work and care for their three children. That doesn't work out for her either, so she returns two years later and demands the kids back. Court says no. So the mother accuses the father of rape and gets him sentenced to 30 years in prison. Yes, under Australian law a man can be convicted of rape based solely on the women's testimony alone, even her husband.

Occasionally, family law is twisted against a women, but the general rule is the man is guilty until proven innocent, a very expensive process. For the women, guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

#12 | Posted by bayviking at 2018-01-29 10:12 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort