Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, January 24, 2018

THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY maintains a page on its website that outlines its mission statement. But earlier this month, the agency made a discreet change: It removed "honesty" as its top priority. Since at least May 2016, the surveillance agency had featured honesty as the first of four "core values" listed on NSA.gov, alongside "respect for the law," "integrity," and "transparency." The agency vowed on the site to "be truthful with each other." On January 12, however, the NSA removed the mission statement page – which can still be viewed through the Internet Archive – and replaced it with a new version. Now, the parts about honesty and the pledge to be truthful have been deleted. The agency's new top value is "commitment to service," which it says means "excellence in the pursuit of our critical mission."




Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Those are not the only striking alterations. In its old core values, the NSA explained that it would strive to be deserving of the "great trust" placed in it by national leaders and American citizens. It said that it would "honor the public's need for openness." But those phrases are now gone; all references to "trust," "honor," and "openness" have disappeared.

The agency previously stated on its website that it embraced transparency and claimed that all of its activities were aimed at "ensuring the safety, security, and liberty of our fellow citizens." That has also been discarded. The agency still says it is committed to transparency on the updated website, but the transparency is now described as being for the benefit of "those who authorize and oversee NSA's work on behalf of the American people." The definition of "integrity" has been edited, too. The agency formerly said its commitment to integrity meant it would "behave honorably and apply good judgment." The phrase "behave honorably" has now been dropped in favor of "communicating honestly and directly, acting ethically and fairly and carrying out our mission efficiently and effectively."


Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

To be reasonable, how much openness could one expect when the operations are, in order to prevent grave danger to national security, unable to be publicly identified and announced?

#1 | Posted by GOnoles92 at 2018-01-24 06:51 PM | Reply

To be reasonable, if the NSA can't perform their mission without lying to Congress or to us, they belong in prison.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2018-01-24 07:02 PM | Reply

Welcome to Trumplandia! - the oldest surviving plantation in America, spreading infection and disease since 1604.

#3 | Posted by ichiro at 2018-01-24 10:06 PM | Reply

I have this running informal poll. In threads about nsa etc, people are too scared to comment.

#4 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2018-01-25 11:35 AM | Reply


George Orwell was right.

#5 | Posted by shane at 2018-01-26 02:58 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort