Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Two more accusers have joined a defamation suit against Fox News and Bill O'Reilly, alleging that he violated their confidentiality agreements and disparaged their motives. Andrea Mackris and Rebecca Gomez Diamond have joined the suit filed on Dec. 4 by Rachel Witlieb Bernstein, a former Fox News producer. Like Bernstein, both Mackris and Diamond were cited in an April 1 report in the New York Times as having obtained settlements for alleged workplace misconduct. Mackris filed a detailed sexual harassment suit against O'Reilly in 2004, and received approximately $9 million, according to the Times. The story alleged that at least five women had received $13 million in settlements. O'Reilly, who was fired in response to the story, denied that anyone had complained to Fox's human resources department. He later claimed that the allegations against him were politically and financially motivated.





Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The D-bag will never learn.

#1 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2017-12-20 08:02 PM | Reply

Mackris is suing Nulli O'Reilly?

Did he break out the falafel/loofah again?

Wasn't her new sailboat from Trump enough?

And when I say Trump I mean kid's, seniors, the poor... and every taxpayer whose credit card it is being put on.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2017-12-20 08:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


"The D-bag will never learn."

O'Reilly is waaaaay too far gone for that. He's the type who will play the victim for the rest of his life.

#3 | Posted by Twinpac at 2017-12-21 01:00 AM | Reply

I wonder if Mr O'Reilly ever called her Andrea Mattress.

#4 | Posted by madscientist at 2017-12-21 03:32 AM | Reply

Now who is going to lead the fight in the War on Christmas?

To most people like myself, O'Reilly has been an obvious perve and a flim flam artist for years and years. How he fooled so many is beyond my comprehension. Some progressive radio stations have read excerpts from his novel on the air, if you didn't know before that you definitely did after. I have looked forward to the laughable "War on Christmas" for many years, it was hilarious and the dumb asses that joined in, as if it were a real important thing, are jokes.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2017-12-21 06:54 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Melania said "Holiday".


Lock her up!

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2017-12-21 10:19 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

I guess O'Reilly enjoys losing.

#7 | Posted by cbob at 2017-12-21 11:31 AM | Reply

Is this our Andrea Mackris?

#8 | Posted by Sycophant at 2017-12-21 11:39 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So I take it your independent research shows that O'Reilly is innocent, Humtake? Will you have to testify?

#10 | Posted by cbob at 2017-12-21 12:15 PM | Reply

Just because a headline says something you agree with doesn't mean you can ignore your intellectual responsibility by understanding what you are talking about before spouting ignorance.

Are you new here? Most of the comments made by the Usual Suspects on both the DR Left and Right have nothing to do with the article, since they can't be bothered to read more than a paragraph or so (if that) before their confirmation bias kicks in and the inanity spews forth.

Which actually makes it fun IMO.

#11 | Posted by Rightocenter at 2017-12-21 12:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1




So since she made a big deal about it, she must be lying? What about the other 20 or so?

#12 | Posted by Sycophant at 2017-12-21 12:46 PM | Reply

This is too meta for me.

#13 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2017-12-21 01:40 PM | Reply

#9 | Posted by humtake

Nothing to do with the Headline. Headline just says more people are joining a lawsuit against him - what's to agree with? It's a FACT. So what if one of the people suing him was "one who made a big public deal"? I don't know the terms of her agreement and I don't know EXACTLY what she did that is so terrible. I am however pretty sure that she and/or her console isn't stupid. She got the word out on what an ----- he is? Great. So what does it have to do with suing him now?

The fact that Bill O'Toolly publicly said nobody every went to HR about him and then claimed that the allegations against him were politically and financially motivated broke the terms of his own mutual mute contracts with people. He made defaming statements about his accusers in general. Since his statements are recorded and widely distributed and it is pretty easy to prove they did go to HR they have a great case.

#14 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2017-12-21 02:19 PM | Reply


OK Kellyanne.

Thanks for those Alternate Facts.

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2017-12-21 02:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

Hey Hummertake, are you really that much of a half-wit????

Innocent people don't "settle" false cases against them with HUGE cash payouts. Especially extremely wealthy people like your hero Bill O'Liely!

#16 | Posted by aborted_monson at 2017-12-21 07:32 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort