Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, October 29, 2017

Lawfare: Let's start with what we know about the indictment in the Mueller investigation. Late last night, CNN broke the bombshell story that Friday afternoon, the first charges in the Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation were filed ... Reuters and the Wall Street Journal confirmed the report shortly thereafter. In short, someone under investigation in the Mueller investigation appears to have been indicted for something and may be arrested at some point. End of list. And while that alone is a genuine bombshell, the much more important point at this stage here is how little we do know and, thus, how few conclusions we can reasonably draw at this point. Below is effort to walk through the many unanswered questions that are kicking around today. Our intention here to emphasize how little we can responsibly say about it and guide people away from getting too far ahead of the story. Toward that end, here are seven frequently asked questions we don't know the answer to.





Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

I'm going with a charge of witchcraft against Manafort. But, as the article states, "we don't know".

#1 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2017-10-29 12:20 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Question #1: Who leaked grand jury info to CNN?

#2 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2017-10-29 11:45 AM | Reply

Confusing headline. The indictment is questioning a FAQ?

#3 | Posted by sentinel at 2017-10-29 12:13 PM | Reply

Question #2: Is hanging good enough or should we bring back the guillotine?

#4 | Posted by bored at 2017-10-29 12:29 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Wow...that "article" gets a big, fat, "pointless" flag.

#5 | Posted by Angrydad at 2017-10-29 12:35 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Question #3: Who did the actual leaking? Was it the president onto the hookers or the hookers onto the president?

#6 | Posted by IndianaJones at 2017-10-29 01:44 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#6 it coulda been a quid pro quo.

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2017-10-29 02:08 PM | Reply

Or --- for scat...

#8 | Posted by madscientist at 2017-10-29 02:31 PM | Reply

That article is like an episode of Seinfeld. It's about nothing. We don't have any answers.

#9 | Posted by danni at 2017-10-29 02:36 PM | Reply

Two will get you ten that Mueller is just cutting bait.

#10 | Posted by Twinpac at 2017-10-29 03:22 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort