Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, October 20, 2017

The National Archives within the next two weeks will release thousands of never-before-seen government documents related to President John F. Kennedy's assassination, but two national experts on the topic write in Politico Magazine the disclosure could be a fiasco. More than 3,000 never-before-seen documents from the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department are set to be released, along with 30,000 that have only been partially released in the past. The document dump "will simply fuel a new generation of conspiracy theories," write Philip Shenon and Larry J. Sabato.




Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The CIA is urging President Donald Trump to delay disclosing some of the files for another 25 years according to friend and political adviser Roger Stone but the National Archives would not say whether any agencies have appealed the release of the documents.

"They must reflect badly on the CIA even though virtually everyone involved is long dead," Stone said in a statement on his website.


Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Oswald was Hoovers top undercover FBI whom Dulles discovered had infiltrated CIA operation Alpha 44. He was trained in special operations, learned Russian, defected to marry an intelligence officer, etc, etc, how stupid are the members of the Warren Commission expecting the FBI to behave? But they are the NIST of their day, officiating the true conspiracy.

JFK was assassinated by CIA for interrupting their attempt at instigating WW III.

The missiles were live. The joint chiefs unitedly disavowed that. Their mistake would have obliterated the northern hemisphere of this planet.

The snakes are at every level. Why did NORAD step down during 9/11 and make so many systemic mistakes? No video of what hit the Pentagon.

What they did to JFK and other social luminaries of his time has set the stage for this utterly mismanaged world they have crafted.

#1 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2017-10-20 03:13 PM | Reply

"Robert F. Kennedy saw conspiracy in JFK's assassination"


"But... but... that would be the dumbest stunt the mob could ever pull, like assassinating the Pope or something!"

As if no Pope has ever been murdered, even in our own lifetimes. Like, maybe John Paul who was Pope for only 33 days?

#2 | Posted by danni at 2017-10-20 06:13 PM | Reply

--JFK was assassinated by CIA for interrupting their attempt at instigating WW III.

--"Robert F. Kennedy saw conspiracy in JFK's assassination"

Goofy conspiracy theories. Roma-esque.

#3 | Posted by nullifidian at 2017-10-20 06:21 PM | Reply

enlighten me donnie............ what were they when kennedy got shot?

#20 | Posted by Sniper

Enlighten yourself. This is 2017. Not 1963.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2017-10-20 06:44 PM | Reply

"Goofy conspiracy theories. Roma-esque."

And then Jack Ruby murdered Oswald. When you can explain that intelligently let me know. Clue, it wasn't because he loved JFK so much.

#5 | Posted by danni at 2017-10-20 06:44 PM | Reply

--And then Jack Ruby murdered Oswald.

A goofy Democrat who loved JFK.

Leave the conspiracy quackery to BuffaloTonyBobAroma.

#6 | Posted by nullifidian at 2017-10-20 06:54 PM | Reply

"In his memoir, Bound by Honor, Bill Bonanno, son of New York Mafia boss Joseph Bonanno, stated that he realized that certain Mafia families were involved in the JFK assassination when Ruby killed Oswald, since Bonanno was aware that Ruby was an associate of Chicago mobster Sam Giancana.[86]"


#7 | Posted by danni at 2017-10-20 06:56 PM | Reply

Nulli, the only thing more goofy than the theory that the mob took out JFK is the Warren Commission.

#8 | Posted by danni at 2017-10-20 06:57 PM | Reply

The CIA took out Kennedy. I wonder how many times the whereabouts and actions of one George H.W. Bush will be blacked out on those 3100 pages. I'm guessing they will go thru numerous pens.

#9 | Posted by aborted_monson at 2017-10-21 01:00 AM | Reply

The CIA gets to redact all the documents before they are released, which makes the release pointless even after 55 years.

To HeRat's point, Lawyers Bugliosi and Spencer staged a mock trial for the BBC of Lee Harvey Oswald and Bugliosi got Oswald convicted. (Bugliosi also got Manson convicted in spite of the fact that Manson never killed anyone). The most interesting fact, which Spencer uncovered and most people don't know, is that a retired FBI agent saw someone behind the grassy knoll run to his car put something long in the back seat and take off. The agent followed that car, wrote the license number down and turned it over to the FBI, where it was apparently lost. The mock trial video is available on Netflix.

Tom Hartman wrote a exhaustive book "Legacy of Secrecy" which definitively links the assassinations of RFK and MLK to the mob, which the CIA has employed historically, including planning the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, which the CIA and mob blame on JFK. But nothing definitive has ever emerged in the JFK assassination, other than Oswald was definitely involved.

#10 | Posted by bayviking at 2017-10-21 01:54 AM | Reply



I was a junior in high school when it happened. I took the governments word but it was hard to
accept jack ruby shooting oswald and then dying in his cell..i know that the zapruder film wasn't
shown for many years. i don't remember when i first seen it, but as a lifelong hunter, you'd be
hard put to convince me that he wasn't shot from the front.
all the recent analysis of the las vegas shooting..with that in mind, look at the diagrams of
Kennedys' route and the pics of the room that oswald supposedly shot from. he had a helluva'
easy oncoming unobstructed shot but supposedly waited to take a receding shot that was partially blocked by trees. when Kennedy slumps forward and grasps his throat, i might give
that one to oswald but hard to say without forensics showing entry angle..the one that capped
him was from the front. i wouldn't even venture a guess as to who did it and i'm not sure at this
point if i even want to know.

#11 | Posted by ABlock at 2017-10-21 12:05 PM | Reply

Release the documents. Let's see what there is. That's all I am going to say.

#12 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2017-10-21 01:26 PM | Reply

Expect to see the critical sections blacked out.

#13 | Posted by Ray at 2017-10-21 05:59 PM | Reply

"CIA, on the other hand, had the tools, know-how, access, means, and motive."

Yeah, I'm sure the Deep State has been pulling strings for decades.

The mafia conspiracy is stupid. Most people on here seem to think the mob is some shadowy global organization. It's not.

#14 | Posted by jamesgelliott at 2017-10-21 07:26 PM | Reply

Like the CIA, Sam Giancana (Chicago) had the means and the motive to kill JFK. There is no doubt Santo Trafficante (Cuba) and the CIA worked closely together to invade Cuba and assassinate Castro, to no avail. As Attorney General, RFK was at war with the mafia and determined to get to the bottom of his brother's murder, so he had to go too. John Roselli (LA) had two of Siran Siran's brothers peddling heroine for him. James Earl Ray was a heroine runner across the Canadian border for Carlos Marcello before he was recruited to shoot King for which Marcello was paid $300,000 and Ray $3000. The fella who raised the money, whose name escapes me now, collected it over many years every payday at an Atlanta GM plant, with the promise to use it to kill King. He also provided immediate shelter and escape assistance in Atlanta for Ray but has been erased from the assassination story. Ray escaped to England through Canada. The FBI's belligerent interference in King's campaign for equal rights was driven by J Edgar Hoover who hated communists and american protesters of any kind equally. The FBI tailed King 24/7. The FBI sent a tape they made of one of King's extramarital lovers to his wife. It is inconceivable that the FBI did not see Ray coming. Illegal FBI behavior, which continues to this day, infiltrated protest groups, incited violence to discredit those groups and actively sought to sow paranoia and discord in everyone from the black panthers to OWS.

Events around the (3) tragic assassinations are chronicled in the "Legacy of Secrecy" I mentioned above. Like "The Dark Alliance" voluminous documentation is countered by Government officials with immediate denial which gets heavy front page coverage and subsequent admissions which are never printed on the front page of any newspaper, leaving the general public with the impression that these are just stupid conspiracy theories.

#15 | Posted by bayviking at 2017-10-21 08:24 PM | Reply

Release the documents. Let's see what there is. That's all I am going to say.

#33 | POSTED BY GALAXIEPETE AT 2017-10-21 01:26 PM | REPLY

Me too. While he is releasing those documents Trump should release the aliens and show us the space ships in Area 51.

That will teach Obama.

#16 | Posted by donnerboy at 2017-10-21 08:30 PM | Reply

To be sure, no matter what, the CIA is not going to release anything which proves their historic ties to organized crime, international drug trafficking or assassination of anyone, let alone President Kennedy..

#17 | Posted by bayviking at 2017-10-21 09:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

The death certificate says 'multiple gunshot wounds'. The autopsy photos even show the BACK of his head blown off. That only happens from a shot from the front.

And of course, bullets just stop in midair and change directions all the time.

You don't wanna hear the truth, you can't handle the truth.

If nothing else, can we agree not to accept any political explanation that contradicts the laws of physics?

#18 | Posted by kudzu at 2017-10-21 10:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- You don't wanna hear the truth, you can't handle the truth.

"you're damn right I ordered the code red" - CIA

#19 | Posted by SheepleSchism at 2017-10-21 10:22 PM | Reply


"That only happens from a shot from the front".

Seems to me, only if there were an entrance wound on the front of his face, which was not the case. A side shot could and did easily take off the back of his head. There is no doubt Oswald shot at the President. That a second shooter was so perfectly timed with Oswald is unlikely, though not impossible. First hand credible FBI testimony strongly suggests that was the case.

#20 | Posted by bayviking at 2017-10-22 03:22 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2018 World Readable

Drudge Retort