"Reporting from the scene, Al Jazeera's Ismail al-Ghoul said that after opening fire, Israeli tanks advanced and ran over many of the dead and injured bodies. "It is a massacre, on top of the starvation threatening citizens in Gaza," he said."
"Al Jazeera's Bernard Smith said the Israeli military "initially tried to pin the blame on the crowd" saying that dozens were hurt as a consequence of being crushed and trampled when aid trucks arrived.
"And then, after some pushing the Israelis went on to say that their troops felt threatened, that hundreds of troops approached their troops in a way they posed a threat to them so they responded by opening fire," Smith added."
---
You see, the Zionist apologists will ALWAYS find a reason for blaming the Palestinians, even when numerous ground reports indicate that they are either outright lies or gross exaggerations. This has been going on for decades. Decades before October 7th. Decade before Hamas. Zionism is an evil and despicable ideology.
Maybe we don't agree on what "winning" means. But if you go by body count (and who doesn't in a war?) and destruction of property and resources Israelis sure seems to be "winning".
#182 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY
-----
Israel's main resource has always been global sympathy. Sympathy earned by the blood of historical victims in some of the most heinous crimes of modern history. Ask yourself- has that sympathy remained the same, been bolstered, or has it eroded since the events of October 7th? And, when all is said and done, is that loss negated by the deaths of 30,000 babies, children, and women and the complete destruction of a poverty-stricken area of the world not much bigger geographically than Las Vegas?
But I would agree that the true definition of "winning" is only determined after one side has actually "won".